i just popped into the trump derangement thread. they've topped the insane redditor talking about john doe #2 in the oklahoma city bombings. now, they're trying to cite an FBI-studied letter from 'epstein' which was almost certainly a forgery that did not line up with epstein's whereabouts, and the more insane part... that a woman claims trump was present, with jeffrey epstein, when her newborn baby was murdered and tossed into lake michigan.
this guy is off his fucking rocker, and this allegation is clearly from a schizo.
for a TL;DR summary
Crazy Schizo Woman dijo:
In 1984, which is 9 years before anyone has any evidence of Trump and Epstein being involved in any way at all, she was 13 years old and pregnant. She was trafficked to Jeffrey Epstein via her uncle, and Donald Trump was involved. They murdered the baby (which has no information about at all, no gender, no info on where it was born or when, or how old, just 'infant') and tossed it into Lake Michigan. She makes the claim that she spoke with an NYPD detective, but cannot give either a name OR phone number (despite this being reported in 2020, a time when phones have in-built caller ID and histories) and this is the second time this person has asked if anything else would be done. The caller identifies that the crime happened between May and September, a full five month period. She makes the direct claim that Donald Trump was personally present, paid to force her personally to do sex acts, and alleges he was present during the murder and disposal of the infant. At no point during the entire Biden administration was any of this information deemed worthy of any kind of followup by the FBI.
Here is the claim about Donald Trump on its own.
every single website talking about this shit also has the nerve to claim that the DOJ isn't actually doing what they were demanded to do, despite as far as i can tell every single step being followed to the letter via the DOJ. they were not allowed to release the documents without ensuring that each one had been looked over, and their pace so far is consistent. the timing would be dismissed by any non-homosexual judge as being too strict, and the justice department clearly behaving in good faith as it continues to redact and release the files.
the derangement sufferers just do not read any of these documents. they ctrl + f trump, see that his name is in the same paragraph as 'standing there while my baby was murdered and thrown in a lake' and 'paid to have me do sex acts' and immediately move on. they ignore when the document was filed, the fact that for 4 years the biden DOJ had all these, and did not find it necessary to even give them a second thought. the documents here are probably as useful, if not less, than the documents from the other day. they are entirely unproveable, and all the allegations are so old (1984 was over 40 years ago now, and once again was well before any established trump-epstein acquaintanceship at all) that they will never, ever be able to find any evidence. it's obvious smear shit, and if this girl was truly molested by her uncle this way at 13, if the baby was thrown overboard at 13, she did so many other women a disservice by not saying anything when evidence could be collected.
the person accusing trump of raping them when they were a child was age 49 at the time she reported it. she is not only grown, she's a boomer, and easily identifiable as someone who would HATE trump. the fact that they truly think people will just be so stupid that they fall for the idea that this was in any way a legitimate complaint is fucking ridiculous. if this woman was molested by her uncle, jeffrey epstein, and apparently multiple other men, why are jeffrey epstein and trump the only NAMES given? why not name every single other man? because, of course, the purpose is to put the words "Donald Trump paid to rape me at age 13 on a boat in lake michigan after murdering and dumping the body of my infant baby that I was pregnant with at age 13."
