Nowhere in my post did I say that a conspiracy was impossible that would be idiotic. The point I was trying to make is Occam's razor. What is realistically more likely to be true? A radicalized leftist murdered Charlie Kirk because he was fed lies about him being a fascist out to end democracy (Note that we literally already had this same thing happen when Trump was almost murdered in Butler) or an international conspiracy by Mossad to take him out because he started to become more critical of Israel? Which sounds more plausible to you? I think to jump to "It had to be the Jews!" when we already have info on the shooter being a leftoid is nonsensical.
I didn't ask why you couldn't believe it was the jews, I asked why it couldn't be a larger conspiracy.
I think occam's razor points to a larger conspiracy. Because the explanation for the following becomes exponentionally more convoluted.
And mind you, they are not forthcoming wih clearing up these contradictions a inconsistencies which you would expect if they had nothing to hide.
1. Brian Harpole, security chief for Charlie Kirk claims to have jumped on charlie, pressed his wound, bandaged it up and started moving him to the car in 14 seconds. The video evidence supports 14 seconds, but not doing any kind of first aid.
2. He also lied that drones were not allowed in the airspace and therefor they didn't have any.
3. Frank Turek from tpusa directly contradicted it, because discussed drone footage they had of that day raising more questions.
4. There was also a first aid guy present who tried to get to charlie but they stopped him. Video evidence of it.
5. There have been 4 different versions of events from tpusa about what mikey mccoy was doing when charlie was shot. In the video you can see him calmly walking away with a phone to his head. Every other person is either running, ducking, going to charlie.
6. One of the guys who ran away immediately and saw charlie kirk being carried away at a distance immediately made a selfie video and declared him dead before he could reasonable know. Then he went back to remove the SD card of footage from behind charlie Kirk, which was never produced.
7. Tyler robinson turned himself in but the footage of it is gone.
8. Alternate lawyers tried to reach him to offer representation but they could not get to him and he is with his assigned council
9. Every test with similar ammunition, even people that went out their way to prove the official story had to admit it is highly unlikely it was 30-06 ammunition. A new test from days ago used a softer tip as some claimed this would be the difference.
10. The claim is that charlie kirk was so unnaturally healthy that his bones stopped the bullet and directed it downwards. That it's a miracle (their words).
10. Andrew Kolvet in an interview with megyn kelly said they're all dealing with their guilt differently. She corrects him and says "grief".
11. Despite being a high profile case, it goes to a new judge, who's only been one since May
12. Despite Charlie Kirk having shared privately that he thought he was going to be killed, the only person in his surrounding to come forward with it has been Candace.
13. People that look at her show and at tpusa seem to consistently start to side with her. Since september her podcast soared from top 15 to top 1 and charlie kirk show dropped from top 5 to top 95.
14. There was an egyptian military plane that stopped at the tiny utah airport. They need US clearance to do so and it's very rare for them to do so, as they typically go to big diplomatic or military hubs.
15. This same plane flew over the area where charlie kirk would be murdered on that same day and returned to the same airport without landing anywhere else. Why would a plane fly and land in the same place? Typically reconaissance I'd say.
16. When people started to look into the history of landings of this and the other egyptian plane they discovered they were in the same time and place as charlie kirk 23 times. But then it was discovered there are 68 overlaps with Erika kirk's location (since 2022).
17. If she was unaware, you'd expect gratitude, curiosity, maybe fear from Erika. But her organisation has instead chosen to blame candace for causing them harassment. 5 december is the first time someone from tpusa claimed these actions are her decisions.
It's also worth pointing out that his organisation denied that charlie kirk was wavering in his support for israel (but it was proven), claimed that candace wasn't his friend (but it was proven) and then claimed they had split less than amicably 7 years ago (but she was main guest at tpusa event in 2024, and in his last week he said he wanted to bring her on his show, while in the texts other(s) tried to talk him out of it.
There comes a point where as much as you want it to be a tranny shooter, the evidence doesn't support him as a lone wolf, but rather as a patsy.
Remember also that Joe Kent head of counterterrorism wanted to look into the case for possible foreign involvement and was blocked by kash "there is nothing in the epstein files" patel.
I can go on for a while. You can wave away a couple of these as coincidences. I would love nothing more than a cassus belli against the crazy trannies and antifa, and cancel them in the way they've been cancelling others. To unite the right against it. I may be Dutch, but your politics has more of an effect on the netherlands than dutch votes do (we're cucks to brussels unfortunately).
The crime scene was paved over in 3 days. Tell me that all of this fits with tyler robinson acting alone.
The 15th is also her husband's birthday.
Ver archivo adjunto 8252319
btw I don't think the correction was posted here yet, but her husband's birthday is in july. However wikipedia and a couple of other sites listed his birthday as december 15, until it was corrected in the aftermath of the debacle.
