💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[AnOminous]

That Nick claims being offered drugs at a concert or club is some “high strata that normal plebs will never know,” is just so perfectly him, just absolute balldo things.

Nick is fucking retarded. Anyone who went to Dead shows back in the day has encountered not only drug dealers for every conceivable substance you would want, but even merry pranksters just giving it out for free. Like at one concert at RFK, there was a guy with a vial of liquid LSD just randomly slathering people's tongues with it.

Nick has told a story in which Judge Fischer held it against a client of Nick's that she paid for an attorney. He also claimed that his client's family were barred from the courtroom and she didn't get to see her children before being taken into custody. It turns out he was telling the truth!

Ver archivo adjunto 8251325Ver archivo adjunto 8251326

I don't know if Nick ever talked about his defendant getting shit for not pleading guilty to ALL of the charges, but that happens too.

Ver archivo adjunto 8251331

You should read Nick's speech asking for mercy for his client, it's hilarious. This woman embezzled over $400,000 over 5 years from two family businesses she worked for and bankrupted them.

Ver archivo adjunto 8251341

I've mentioned this repeatedly. Nick's representation was incompetent, but Fischer's behavior was frankly deplorable. Punishing someone for having legal representation, or even the appearance of doing that, is completely improper and even unconstitutional.

I mean this particular evil bitch really did deserve to have the book thrown at her, but the reasoning here was pure Minnesota. The state is fucked.

Also she didn't pay for an attorney. Apparently Nick was pro bono. I have no idea how this arrangement came about. But instead of properly objecting to this in court, he confronted and chimped out at the judge AFTER the hearing instead of getting it on the record for a possible appeal. Pure incompetence and malpractice.

 

[Generic Misc]

"If all of these acts were committed in the same six-month period under the sentencing guidelines and how Minnesota aggregates this type of crime, the presumptive sentence would actually be a stay of execution under the guidelines." - Nick Rekieta, talking about a case involving actions between 2014 and 2019.

Great job, Nick. If the circumstances were very different, the punishment would be very different. His online penchant for irrelevant arguments and obfuscation was also a professional one.

 

[Vibralldo]

Even Kayla thinks Kayla is a whore, pretty hard to sue someone who agrees with you.

With Nick's views of how awesome it is to use cocaine to get sex from women, I wonder if Kayla's ever done that, either on her own or at Nick's urging

 

[Schpoots]

It's CBD FFS. That's like saying 'drug addicts are arguing about delousing shampoo'.

cope druggie

 

[daffodils]

I think what Nick is getting out is that If you hang out with enough scumbags and wanna-be mobster types they will offer you both legitimately free drugs

He was specifically talking about being offered stuff at "live shows that other people did". Translation: he was being offered drugs by Juju, sekturites, and anime nerds. That's the "stratum of fame" he was on.

---
And to all creative writing majors in the audience: you don't "sin consummate to your opportunities". The phrase you're looking for is "commensurate with".

 

[TherapyMan]

This woman embezzled over $400,000 over 5 years from two family businesses she worked for and bankrupted them.

Not to make light of stealing six figures of cash, but in white collar world, that sum is nothing. People steal millions and often serve less time than Nick's client here. Guess it speaks both to Judge Fischer's particularized hatred of these sorts of defendants and Nick's inability to secure a good deal for his client.

She did not merely deny the motion; she descended into a moral sermon with a tone far beyond judicial neutrality.

This is not a motion, it's a sentencing hearing where Nick asked for downward departure (i.e. a sentence lower than what the sentencing guidelines suggest) on the time his client would be sentenced. Judges are generally not tonally neutral when delivering a sentencing. The judge is supposed to provide rationale for the imposition of the sentence and that often involves a moral condemnation of the person's character and/or why they lack mitigating factors that would justify a lesser sentence.

I don't mean to be glib, and maybe judges should be a little more even-toned, but in practice, many are not. I would go as far as to say that most are not, and many judges are far more fire and brimstone than Fischer was here. Sentencing hearings across the country will generally be similar in tone to this one.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Nick has told a story in which Judge Fischer held it against a client of Nick's that she paid for an attorney. He also claimed that his client's family were barred from the courtroom and she didn't get to see her children before being taken into custody. It turns out he was telling the truth!

No, it's his half truth bullshit. Most likely he fucked up the time when they were supposed to show up. And no one gets family time after being remanded to the sheriff. Judge doesn't determine that.

As for holding "paid for an attorney," she was pointing out that Nicks client bankrupted 2 families but she still had money. In a just world, all her money would have gone to restitution but lawyers made sure they got paid before victims. The joke was on her though because she got an absolute shit lawyer. That Nick thinks the judge took it out on his client rather than recognizing the absolute shit job he did in presenting his client to the court speaks volumes about Nick the Human and Nick the Lawyer. Absolute dogshit. Nick: "Boy that judge really hated you." Client: "How is that my fault? You don't even let me speak. The only impression about me that she gets is whatever you present. You're shit"

But the irony that Nick never mentions is the misconduct the judge got called out over and retired over. Fischer hated the KCHHS children services group. She called them out just like Nick did. If Nick is right about KCHHS, then Fischer was right.

Not to make light of stealing six figures of cash, but in white collar world, that sum is nothing. People steal millions and often serve less time than Nick's client here.

The amount always has context. Stealing a 75 y/o's life savings of $40k is a lot worse than stealing $1,000,000 from Elon Musk. The judge is rightfully indignant that the thief was still able to afford a private attorney and college when two families were going through bankruptcy. Imagine the victim watching money that was earmarked for their childrens college paying for the defense and education of the thief. We used to hang people for stealing horses and this is an example for why that was a just punishment.

edit: An Ominous pointed out that Rekieta did it pro bono but was too much of an incompetent retard to bring that up on the record when Fischer mentioned paying him. Against all odds, Skelly was demonstrably worse than the public defender which would have conveyed indigence instead of privilege to the court.

 

[AnOminous]

Not to make light of stealing six figures of cash, but in white collar world, that sum is nothing. People steal millions and often serve less time than Nick's client here. Guess it speaks both to Judge Fischer's particularized hatred of these sorts of defendants and Nick's inability to secure a good deal for his client.

Sentencing doesn't just take account of the pure money value of some scam, but also on the impact to the victims. In this case, it was literal life-ruin shit. She destroyed small family businesses and wrought havoc on the lives of the people she swindled. Hence, the sentence itself was appropriate.

As for holding "paid for an attorney," she was pointing out that Nicks client bankrupted 2 families but she still had money.

Except she didn't. He was doing it for free. And overcharging. And he failed to point that out at the only time it would have mattered.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

With Nick's views of how awesome it is to use cocaine to get sex from women, I wonder if Kayla's ever done that, either on her own or at Nick's urging

And give cocaine to 18 y/o strippers to get them to fondle you and to fondle them. Nick learned coke is the way to the backroom.

Actually doing this with 18 y/o strippers is apparently not as bad as Kurt joking about dating an 18 y/o.

 

[Folgers Can]

Also she didn't pay for an attorney. Apparently Nick was pro bono. I have no idea how this arrangement came about.

Just use your imagination:



Hey, who let Kayla speak at the hearing?

 

[Grayback]

Moral of the story? Don't do drugs

Teetotaler chads stay winning.

 

[Pentamidine]

GET OUT OF MY WORKPLACE ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE! WHAT'S YOUR PROBABLE CAUSE? YOU HAVE NO PROBABLE CAUSE!



I'm not a lawyer and I'm clearly biased against Nick, but his monologue begging for mercy for his client reminds me of "People have always told me I'm smart". I can't explain why, the arguments aren't really similar, but something about it is so clearly not going to be effective against a normal person that they seem the same to me.

The defendant is unlikely to reoffend, Your Honor. One, my client cannot afford to reoffend. There is --it is -- it is something that has devastated her. It has devasted her victims. It has devasted her family. Reoffending is out of the question. And through her healing and personal accountability from friends who now know what has been going on all these years, she has safety nets in place to prevent this from happening again.

Though my favorite one is this

Next, my client has agreed to alternative sanctions in her plea agreement, and these sanctions are primarily restitution beyond the amount of the crimes that she has pled guilty to.

Because the Judge smacks him down for it

It's also been said that you’ve taken full responsibility. Has restitution been paid? Have you served your punishment? Then, you have not taken full responsibility.

 

[RaptInPlastic]

GET OUT OF MY WORKPLACE ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE! WHAT'S YOUR PROBABLE CAUSE? YOU HAVE NO PROBABLE CAUSE!

Ver archivo adjunto 8251760

I'm not a lawyer and I'm clearly biased against Nick, but his monologue begging for mercy for his client reminds me of "People have always told me I'm smart". I can't explain why, the arguments aren't really similar, but something about it is so clearly not going to be effective against a normal person that they seem the same to me.



Though my favorite one is this



Because the Judge smacks him down for it

A clear sign of his delusional smug arrogance is even taking this case and not facing his own incompetence. Although my theory has always been he was one of the faggots the husband was fucking.

 

[LiquidKid]

Desperate to attach himself to someone with an audience
Ver archivo adjunto 8249656

Ver archivo adjunto 8249672

Nick left some major cope replies to that comment

 

[Konstantin Romanov]

At the same time, although I have no sympathy for Ms. Melanie, the judge’s conduct was overly condescending. She did not merely deny the motion; she descended into a moral sermon with a tone far beyond judicial neutrality. Her remarks about privilege, rehabilitation being a “pipe dream,” and the insistence that the defendant is absolutely defined by her crimes felt less like sentencing and more like a public flogging. Nobody enjoys an overly judgy judge, ironic as that may sound.

I think some people do like moralising in a judge's sentencing statement, but only if they agree with it in full. Surely, if a law is moral you would want it to be applied and adjudicated morally? That's what the sentencing statement is for, explaining the judge's reasoning in full. "I find this aggravating, I find this mitigating, for all those reasons etc."

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Those snippets just made me want Judge Fischer to get her own show. Perhaps there’s a local lawyer podcasting/social media expert blowhard who can show her the ropes.

 

[thebigdream]

Those snippets just made me want Judge Fischer to get her own show. Perhaps there’s a local lawyer podcasting/social media expert blowhard who can show her the ropes.

Ver archivo adjunto 8252071Ver archivo adjunto 8252072

Stop trying to make the Kurtverse happen

 

[Watching Rekieta]

According to Nick as recetly as days ago, ADHD people don't react the same to stimulants. That's the ADHD daughter. Nick was dosing her food/water as a home remedy for ADHD. I'd bet my left testicle on it.

His retarded argument was that he was constantly vaping now but not because they took away his cocaine stimulant. Nicotine doesn't affect him. That's why he needs it. In addition to D-methamphetamine and modafinil. All three are addictive stimulants like cocaine that are abused.

 

[Soapmore]

I'm not a lawyer and I'm clearly biased against Nick, but his monologue begging for mercy for his client reminds me of "People have always told me I'm smart". I can't explain why, the arguments aren't really similar, but something about it is so clearly not going to be effective against a normal person that they seem the same to me.

The defendant is unlikely to reoffend, Your Honor. One, my client cannot afford to reoffend. There is --it is -- it is something that has devastated her. It has devasted her victims. It has devasted her family. Reoffending is out of the question. And through her healing and personal accountability from friends who now know what has been going on all these years, she has safety nets in place to prevent this from happening again.

You don't like it because it's essentially a string of non sequitur taped together with Nick's unconvincing demeanor. My client can't afford to reoffend, you see, because she got caught, it was really embarrassing to some people, and the people that didn't detect it the first time are the same people who will be watching out for it again.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Im sorry, but it takes a lot of faith to believe there was some sort of accidental exposure of a high amount,

This was covered in some of the scientific papers. All the amounts and limits for the testing are based on adult weights, metabolisms, etc, and are empirical based on interviews. They don't really have a cohort of 9 y/o coke users so while it was at 10x the reportable limit, they don't really know how much cocaine a child would have done to get that level. For adults, the levels correlated to regular, long term use but it could be substantially less for children. They just didn't know.