- Registrado
- 31 de Mayo, 2025
Edit:Ok, if this is starting to catch on, can we get some evidence of this? I don't think Solo or Destiny claimed that Solo started talking to Destiny on Rose's account, and Destiny noted that they spoke differently? @Pentamidine
The Solo speaking to Destiny on Rose's account was mentioned in the court docs and brought to the thread by @Pentamidine below.
The speaking different needs more searching.
Ver archivo adjunto 8165389
They had to abandon "Rose was in the UK" after Rose got doxed as a Chicago highschool student, but they still needed a way to explain why those screenshots from Solo were in euro date format. That's what that line is for - Solo was on Rose's account "impersonating" her when he reached out to Destiny right before all the leaks happened. So this motion is saying the screenshots were from Solo, the ex BF, who was in the UK, therefore the date is in Euro format and thus the video was shared in April 22 not October 22.
Conveniently, the PR focused law firm wrote their line to imply that Destiny was NEVER talking to Rose, and was always talking to Solo, even though that's not actually what the motion says. This has enabled Destiny to brainwash his braindead audience into believing that this somehow (???) exonerates him. AND when the deposition transcript comes out and it shows that he's lying, they'll never even see it because it'll get banned from the subreddit instantly.
Última edición:
