Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Destacado
Twix Eatr dijo:
You don't develop schizophrenia from drug use like this, but yes, it can be triggered earlier than you'd normally develop it through psychedelics. That doesn't change how big of a reach people are making to blame DMT or mushrooms when we don't even know the kid is schizophrenic.

He was taking the equivalent of bathtub gin with his wrong-sex hormones. I'd say that's probably a bigger vector for deranged behavior. He was a troon, so I don't need to make much of a leap to assume he wasn't of sound mind to begin with. It sounds more like mania and stimulant abuse or something after staying up for days on end to me.

Regardless, the posts I quoted are just silly, evidenced by weed triggering psychosis, too. The brain is fragile and some of us are more likely than others to disconnect.
Presiona para expandir...
He was also fucking taking all of the above.

Weed on its own is *generally* unlikely to cause psychosis. Talking random shit to chatbots is unlikely to cause psychosis.
Weed + alcohol + psychedelics + sitting in your room talking to chatbots all day + limited social interaction + DIY HRT supplements + probably a diet of raw junkfood all pooled together into the perfect storm of insanity for our dainty little anime princess Lance.

The question now is; how much of Lance's substance abuse was Tyler partaking in and how much of his psychotic ramblings did Tyler believe/agree?
 
Rioters organizing in Albuquerque for upcoming Turning Point event. Looks mostly peaceful. "🚨 ABQ: Say NO to Neoreactionism & TPUSA 🚨"

turning-point-usa-tomorrow-v0-f873hd86ljxf1.webp Screenshot 2025-10-27 084849.png
 
Fanatical Pragmatist dijo:
He was also fucking taking all of the above.
Presiona para expandir...
Where does it specifically say he was doing anything frequently beyond HRT, alcohol, and his weed vape? HRT was specifically noted as making him erratic. He's also at the age where schizophrenia would start showing itself anyway.

I really think people are going wild with this tranny master manipulator narrative. Tyler doesn't need help to want Charlie dead in this scenario. This is exactly the kind of retard who can be influenced to murdering Charlie Kirk: weirdo who shacks up with gay furry schizoid troons and hates evil white Christian men who deny their truth.

People are deluding themselves if they think the troon having marathon gibberish sessions with AI has more influence than the left's multi-year full-court press that convinced half of our friends Charlie is a racist hatemonger.

Am I missing something specific or does Turkey Tom just insert this idea that it was the troon ranting about Charlie with zero evidence? Like out of nowhere, he has invented this backstory because it's common for schizophrenics (which we don't know the troon is) to become fixated on specific people?

"I'm sure it was just one time and he probably forgot about it, but it must've seeped into Tyler's mind."

A genuinely retarded take. If troon was an influence, he was 100% in on it. Those messages between them are still suspect as hell to me.
 
Última edición:
Law livestream about the court case


edit: some of the takeaways:

*They agreed for him to dress in civilian attire to prevent prejudicing the public/jury with images of him in prison garb. This is apparently normal for trials, but now they also do it in the pre-hearings because of the attention this case attracts.
*They denied him the right to not be restrained, but media is ordered not to photograph or film the restraints
*Defense doesn't want cameras, prosecution does
 
Última edición:
GUT-WRENCHING: Erika Kirk posts video of her daughter arriving at Turning Point USA headquarters "Charlie Kirk! I see daddy!"

She added the caption, "Her…saying your name, as she witnesses all you’ve built and continue to build, proves that love never dies, just changes form. It breathes through our children. This is
her legacy also. And as she grows up and continues to say your name, I’ll be reminding her that each time heaven leans in to listen.I love you Charlie baby, I’m so proud of you. We all are so proud of you." x
 
QwahlityKahntent dijo:
schizos are acting like it had to have been a highly trained elite super sniper to have made that shot
Presiona para expandir...
He was clearly aiming for humpty's head for the lulz and he failed miserably.
Imagine being born as a Mormon with 70 virgin female blondes promised to you here on Earth no need to go to heaven, and you piss it away to impress your fag roommate; all because an atheist YouTuber convinced you Xenu wasn't real or whatever.
 
gernig dijo:
GUT-WRENCHING: Erika Kirk posts video of her daughter arriving at Turning Point USA headquarters "Charlie Kirk! I see daddy!"

She added the caption, "Her…saying your name, as she witnesses all you’ve built and continue to build, proves that love never dies, just changes form. It breathes through our children. This is
her legacy also. And as she grows up and continues to say your name, I’ll be reminding her that each time heaven leans in to listen.I love you Charlie baby, I’m so proud of you. We all are so proud of you." x
Yv--_F6m6IrckOZO.mp4
Presiona para expandir...
I hope their daughter isn't bothered by any shitheads at these events.
 
@WelperHelper99

So... about that judge.


"Robinson was also allowed to not show his face in the Provo courthouse at a planned in-person hearing on Thursday. But, that hearing has since been canceled.

District Court Judge Tony F. Grant Jr. said he has allowed Robinson to wear civilian attire because 'the presumption of innocence remains.'

Although he will be allowed to avoid jail clothing, Robinson will have to wear handcuffs and shackles in the courtroom, the judge decided.

'The court recognizes that Mr. Robinson has no criminal history and no record of misconduct while in custody, however the charges he faces are extraordinarily serious, carrying potential penalties of life imprisonment or death,' Judge Grant Jr. added.

Cameras have also been banned from showing 'him entering, exiting or standing in the courtroom.' His restraints are not allowed to be photographed or recorded, per the judge. "
 
Doctor Professor Timon dijo:
@WelperHelper99

So... about that judge.


"Robinson was also allowed to not show his face in the Provo courthouse at a planned in-person hearing on Thursday. But, that hearing has since been canceled.

District Court Judge Tony F. Grant Jr. said he has allowed Robinson to wear civilian attire because 'the presumption of innocence remains.'

Although he will be allowed to avoid jail clothing, Robinson will have to wear handcuffs and shackles in the courtroom, the judge decided.

'The court recognizes that Mr. Robinson has no criminal history and no record of misconduct while in custody, however the charges he faces are extraordinarily serious, carrying potential penalties of life imprisonment or death,' Judge Grant Jr. added.

Cameras have also been banned from showing 'him entering, exiting or standing in the courtroom.' His restraints are not allowed to be photographed or recorded, per the judge. "
Presiona para expandir...
Oh boy. They want to handle this internally. This could be really good or really fucking bad.
 
potato in mah painus dijo:
We have no idea what level of predictive AI the government has behind closed doors. That's really the only logical thing I can think of in this scenario that doesn't involve the absurdity of time travelers.
Presiona para expandir...
...or that it was a planned op by mossad and the cia, which is what the google trend evidence ostensibly proves beyond doubt. I get the intense desire to take the fed bait and blame a tranny chaser and his tranny roommate but there is so much evidence of a broader conspiracy being ignored here in pursuit of hating trannies. You can hate trannies and also not ignore evidence of a jewish conspiracy to assassinate a mouthpiece who was no longer under their strict control
 
Doctor Professor Timon dijo:
@WelperHelper99

So... about that judge.


"Robinson was also allowed to not show his face in the Provo courthouse at a planned in-person hearing on Thursday. But, that hearing has since been canceled.

District Court Judge Tony F. Grant Jr. said he has allowed Robinson to wear civilian attire because 'the presumption of innocence remains.'

Although he will be allowed to avoid jail clothing, Robinson will have to wear handcuffs and shackles in the courtroom, the judge decided.

'The court recognizes that Mr. Robinson has no criminal history and no record of misconduct while in custody, however the charges he faces are extraordinarily serious, carrying potential penalties of life imprisonment or death,' Judge Grant Jr. added.

Cameras have also been banned from showing 'him entering, exiting or standing in the courtroom.' His restraints are not allowed to be photographed or recorded, per the judge. "
Presiona para expandir...
This situation is such a none issue and shows how the media is able to stir up any type of commotion for views. I really dont think this is a big issue or an issue at all. I think the issue is that how its being presented in the media. I highly doubt it wouldve been notice without it being stated.

Besides Kyle rittenhouse was able to wear a suit during his criminal case.


I highly doubt his attire would change how the juror would view him assassinating a political figure..

"Well he did blew a hole through charlies neck but damn it would be easier if they wouldve just have him wear inmate outfits..."
 
Achimadriel dijo:
This situation is such a none issue and shows how the media is able to stir up any type of commotion for views. I really dont think this is a big issue or an issue at all. I think the issue is that how its being presented in the media. I highly doubt it wouldve been notice without it being stated.

Besides Kyle rittenhouse was able to wear a suit during his criminal case.


I highly doubt his attire would change how the juror would view him assassinating a political figure..

"Well he did blew a hole through charlies neck but damn it would be easier if they wouldve just have him wear inmate outfits..."
Presiona para expandir...
Every little inch matters. You'd be a poor lawyer/prosecuter to not try to push the issue (at least a little) from the side that it would benefit you.

Do you really think the clothes people wear doesn't subconsciously influence how people treat you?
 
This is something I have been pondering for weeks.

For the left, who is someone they hold dear?

I mostly started asking this question because I wanted to bust on someone the left loves in order to show them others can respond in kind to their gravedancing. However: nothing.

In trying to find a counterpart to CK for the left, I have found nothing. FDR? Died way too long ago to be remembered in an emotional way. Ruth Bader Ginsburg? You might have the right idea, but I have tested this myself and have found very few liberals even remember Ol’ Ruthy. Which is odd because she died barely less than 6 years ago.

Which leads me to a conclusion: they simply hate everyone.

I would love to be proven wrong and hear of a person of who the progressives, democrats, liberals or ‘the left’ in general actually like.
 
Dagoth AMOGUS dijo:
This is something I have been pondering for weeks.

For the left, who is someone they hold dear?

I mostly started asking this question because I wanted to bust on someone the left loves in order to show them others can respond in kind to their gravedancing. However: nothing.

In trying to find a counterpart to CK for the left, I have found nothing. FDR? Died way too long ago to be remembered in an emotional way. Ruth Bader Ginsburg? You might have the right idea, but I have tested this myself and have found very few liberals even remember Ol’ Ruthy. Which is odd because she died barely less than 6 years ago.

Which leads me to a conclusion: they simply hate everyone.

I would love to be proven wrong and hear of a person of who the progressives, democrats, liberals or ‘the left’ in general actually like.
Presiona para expandir...

Okay so Charlie Kirk was someone that build a brand on having talks with people he disagreed with and even managing to get left wing commentators and such on his show and having a positive experience. You think you can rhetorically dunk on someone that cheers for a bridge builder like this being murdered?

It's like you're trying to have a conversation about property rights with someone holding you up at gunpoint asking for your wallet. What the fuck are you even trying to do?
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo