Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

[Lemmingwiser]

Legitimately I don't understand how people think the shot is even remotely hard to pull off

Nobody said it was, you're arguing with shadows of your mind.

 

[QwahlityKahntent]

Nobody said it was, you're arguing with shadows of your mind.

schizos are acting like it had to have been a highly trained elite super sniper to have made that shot

 

[Lemmingwiser]

schizos are acting like it had to have been a highly trained elite super sniper to have made that shot

Quote a post.

 

[CIS White Droid]

I feel like this needs to be reiterated yet again. WE HAVE NO PICTURES OF THE BODY. WE HAVE NO CORONER'S REPORT OR AUTOPSY. WE DO NOT KNOW THAT THERE IS NO EXIT WOUND. Some of you fuckers need to take your meds and touch grass for a while.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

I feel like this needs to be reiterated yet again. WE HAVE NO PICTURES OF THE BODY. WE HAVE NO CORONER'S REPORT OR AUTOPSY. WE DO NOT KNOW THAT THERE IS NO EXIT WOUND. Some of you fuckers need to take your meds and touch grass for a while.

Yes it's worth pointing out what we don't have. Not sure why it's not allowed to be discussed.

TPUSA claims there isn't an exit wound for example. If it's true, it's weird and unlikely. If it isn't true then why did they lie? That would be weirder.

unnamed.mp4

This is also seriously weird. Like I could get officials wanting to remove a video from social media for any number of reasons. But asking to delete the video from your device? That is an odd and suspicious request. If everything was on the up and up you'd expect them to ask you to provide a copy instead.

 

[Confederate Fag]

Bro


the tranny didn’t have a gun because the tranny was the partner/bf/gf/whatever.

If you can’t get the most basic of details right. Why are you commenting?




This post is giving me almost as much schizo vibes as the tranny bf gave me.

Like bruh.

We all get the plot but you really think the inclusion of someone that has all the same markings of every other serial killer/assassin, or whatever you want to call it, who apparently lead the way of the whole event, isn’t very convenient? Dare I say, overdone?

The beauty in this is the pattern recognition. The bf and his subsequent tool are textbook, so you’ll never know if it’s legit or if it’s bullshit.

ETA: i genuinely believed it was a brainrotted Reddit kid that did this and i understand how easy it is to brainwash the average person via media, but all the other details we have (which aren’t much) are suspicious as hell, especially when I combine it with all the research I’ve done over the last decade about the famous killers we know about/been told about and their ties to military/government/satanic cults/nefarious networking. It’s literally all of them. Also kinda weird how serial killers were a whole phase then seemed to die out. Almost like they were doing an experiment that was profitable in more ways than one, but of course the government would never do such a thing.

 

[teriyakiburns]

Quote a post.

Here's two (technically 3 but it's the same schizo for two of them, which would be cheating).

How is it possible that a tranny chaser has a precision of a military sniper? I can't get my head wrap around that fact.

Yeah some random tard pulled off a professional hit and escaped a full on manhunt totally not a trained professional, ok zogbot

Basic shot? Yeah right you kike faggot.

Random faggot just got up with his rifle which had untraceable parts and publicly (full of adrenalin, shaky hands) shot someone in the neck then escaped the heavy police presence and federal manhunt for 3 days. Totally wasnt done by a trained professional.


If you believe this you are total retarded low iq moron faggot or a kike shill, in both cases you should kys.

e: people have been arguing, since almost the start of the thread, that the shot was impossible for anyone other than a highly trained professional to make. It's an argument from ignorance, but it has traction because a lot of people - including most americans, for some reason - don't understand how guns work.

 

[CIS White Droid]

Yes it's worth pointing out what we don't have. Not sure why it's not allowed to be discussed.

I'm not saying it can't be discussed but immediately jumping to the conclusion that it must have been Mossad/Israel because there may or may not be an exit wound is absolutely retarded. Bullets do really weird things inside human bodies that defy all logic. Personally I'm going to wait until we get a coroner's report before I start to draw conclusions based on the existence/lack of an exit wound. That is assuming one ever gets released to the public.

TPUSA claims there isn't an exit wound for example. If it's true, it's weird and unlikely. If it isn't true then why did they lie? That would be weirder.

They likely weren't lying but were making that claim based off the evidence they had or what they had been told at the time. Changing their story now, in the event it turned out there was an exit wound, would hamper their attempts to deify/martyr Charlie. I will admit the actions and statements of TPUSA have been odd but I'm of the mind that it's just grifters being grifters.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

.My wife hates guns. She'd never seen a rifle/airfifle/BB gun before, and had never even fired a Nerf. First ever go, scared shitless, she hit torso sized targets a hundred metres away. She used an AR15 with a RDS. She had so much adrenaline she cried afterwards.

your wife sounds gay. I’d be looking into divorce.

 

[pikachudidnothingwrong]

I'm still really confused and a little annoyed at how quiet talk about this actually is even in conservative places. A faggot with a troon boyfriend murdered, assassinated a popular mainstream public conservative political voice, the moment he mentioned troons.. and not many people seem to care. Let alone are willing to fight against attempts to paint the murderer as of the right or other nonsense. It's like they talk about the threat for years, and something finally indisputably happens and now suddenly nobody wants to talk about it.

The most i hear people talking about it , retards on the left and right pushing tinfoil hat nonsense.

 

[Nimbat Out Of Hell]

I'm still really confused and a little annoyed at how quiet talk about this actually is even in conservative places. A faggot with a troon boyfriend murdered, assassinated a popular mainstream public conservative political voice, the moment he mentioned troons.. and not many people seem to care. Let alone are willing to fight against attempts to paint the murderer as of the right or other nonsense. It's like they talk about the threat for years, and something finally indisputably happens and now suddenly nobody wants to talk about it.

The most i hear people talking about it , retards on the left and right pushing tinfoil hat nonsense.

I guess it depends on where you go. In my groups, we don't need to talk about it because we all agree. They want us dead, and they celebrated when someone with milder views than us was murdered. There isn't a lot to talk about there, and I think it's the same for a lot of others too until we have anything more concrete to actually talk about. As far as popular commentators, I know Crowder has been very hardline on this and does bring it up often, as well as pushing against the tinfoil hat wearers.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

Normies are just now slowly coming around to openly voicing their concerns about troon insanity and yet we have people mad that they aren't blaming DA JOOZ

 

[Lemmingwiser]

Here's two (technically 3 but it's the same schizo for two of them, which would be cheating).

Thank you I appreciate it.

unnamed.mp4

I know there's more than a few here who believe the official version of events. I've got a question for you.

Here's something I'm wondering: what could be good faith non-suspicious reasons of people on the national level asking to delete evidence of the shooting?

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

I know there's more than a few here who believe the official version of events. I've got a question for you.

Here's something I'm wondering: what could be good faith non-suspicious reasons of people on the national level asking to delete evidence of the shooting?

Is there evidence of them asking this outside of a single random person who could be looking for clout

 

[Anakin Soywalker]

Is there evidence of them asking this outside of a single random person who could be looking for clout

You're the wrong nigga to reply to that question my man.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

Normies are just now slowly coming around to openly voicing their concerns about troon insanity and yet we have people mad that they aren't blaming DA JOOZ

It's almost like it's part of the plan.

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

You're the wrong nigga to reply to that question my man.

if you're resorting to ad hominem then you've lost

 

[Lemmingwiser]

Is there evidence of them asking this outside of a single random person who could be looking for clout

Considering you didn't answer my question, would you say that there can be no good faith non-suspicious reasons for it?

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

Considering you didn't answer my question, would you say that there can be no good faith non-suspicious reasons for it?

I can't think of anything offhand unless they have the footage already. Regardless, I want to see others saying this.

 

[Ben Zener]

im praying for more threadbans. lemmingwiser/catch the rainbow- you are adding NOTHING OF VALUE to this thread.