💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Votos: 40 9.9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Votos: 14 3.5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Votos: 12 3.0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Votos: 192 47.5%
  • Continuance...

    Votos: 146 36.1%

  • Total de votantes
    404
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Anything else? Did I get anything wrong? I'm just a little worried that this is a lot of false hopium
"Beth - has proposed order been submitted? If not, set SEC"

This suggests an agreement / decision has been reached. If Toe had outright lost there wouldn't be a proposed order. If kicked into the future again no order. SEC doesn't stand for settlement conference, but scheduling event conference, where an order would get entered.

It's not 100%, but added together with other happening it seems likely.
 
Última edición:
Apologies in advance if I've missed something. I have reread the posts for the last 24 hours (I was distracted with irl stuff yesterday) and watched KC's rather clumsy (though amusing) coverage. They don't seem to know any more than the Farms.

QUESTION: Why is the Farms' preliminary conclusion that Toe had a victory?

Is this why?
  • Melton got rattled on stream, looked miserable, after receiving a text from Nick as the hearing was ongoing. Oh, and he got a new lawyer.
  • The case is continued indicating that the Judge is taking the HRO seriously (and knows Nick from traffic court).
  • Hacking was brought up. (Do we know that for sure?)
  • Girl_Friday has "vibes" that the Judge is going to let the HRO stand with some group agreement not to talk about each other (or something).
  • MNPR has indicated that Nick has possibly "caved" due to wording about a settlement conference scheduling.
Anything else? Did I get anything wrong? I'm just a little worried that this is a lot of false hopium.
MNPR's documents and statements have been highly accurate and trustworthy. If they state points such as this:
As of close of business there were no new documents or even a docket entry for any actual rescheduling to to Friday, and instead there was only a tickler entry that seemed notable for its conditional wording:


Ordinarily you'd only see this sort of thing if the discussions in chambers already reached an agreement in principle about the broad strokes, and the attorneys are just tasked with circulating and revising a draft proposed order that the judge would then sign as soon as it's e-filed, in which case there would be no need to set the SEC (settlement conference) at all and it would only be needed if and when the drafting gives rise to unanticipated new disagreements about the details. In other words, it sounds like there's already a deal.
They must have an inside line with someone able to access the non-public facing software that manages the HRO case, leaking that a settlement is being drafted.
Reddit user Girl___Friday has been in contact with courtroom observers in the past, though it appears her line this time is Nick directly.

The Hackening was a significant argument point for Aaron in the previous conference, which White could only give a poor attack angle when cross-examining Aaron, only asking how he knows for sure it was Nick Rekieta, and not someone else.
I can only presume that when this line of questioning is directed back at Rekieta under his own cross-examination, it would've gone terribly. I'd love to see that transcript.
 
>Passionately Making Out and Getting Fingered by Blindfolded Bull While Flipping You Off (CUCK POV)
Nick's not even pretending that he hasn't given up on being with Kayla anymore
Funny how that change happened after Nick started to interact with her.
yuck.jpg
 
What's everyone this this theoretical settlement going to be?

Mutual no contact or something more?
Mutual no contact is the funniest outcome, as we them get to watch which retard fucks up first. Toe likely fucking up indirectly, but Nick directly flouting.

Then the next big question is can Aaron find a prosecutor that cares. If not, he needs to file a contempt motion so that the Judge gets to see Nick's beautiful face again directly.

Of course, if it was granted, this means Melton's will be as well. A pity it seems this is behind closed doors and we won't get to see him explaining the child comments.
 
What's everyone this this theoretical settlement going to be?

Mutual no contact or something more?
I'm betting on mutual No-Contact with specific push from AA-Ron on the internet part.
Looks like Junkie and Pedo have to concede pretty much all ground or face a new case with a full investigation on the "hacking/breaching privacy to intimidate" specifics.
Or maybe it's just my wishful thinking, AA-Ron do-be really retarded and manages to shoot himself on the legs and hands quite often.
I'll place my bet on mutual no-contact and no internet harassment.
AA-Rons kid should automatically be granted anything her mother wishes for her against the Fattest Nonce Loser AT LEAST.
 
I can only presume that when this line of questioning is directed back at Rekieta under his own cross-examination, it would've gone terribly. I'd love to see that transcript.

Yeah. Nick answering self-incriminating questions under oath about an actual crime would be just great. That aspect of the whole process would have scared a sane man into agreeing with Aaron's HRO order. Nick's best defense in any hacking case would be to decline to testify based on self-incrimination. But if he were to testify here, anything he said could be used against him in any potential criminal case.

And Nick trying to bring 300 exhibits to a HRO proceeding shows that he is completely insane and could say anything if he was cross-examined.
 
It doesn't necessarily have to be a settlement either, sometimes the judge will ask the prevailing party to write the order - especially if it's complicated or likely to be appealed.
 
With a burgundy shirt.
I really like Burgundy as a color and want to beat rekieta with a stick for what he does with it.
Wow. What an insane homosexual. Not even a complete loser like Russell Greer got that crazy.
Say what you will about Russell Greer but he actually has consensual sex with women (paid) and is an Ethan Ralph tier courtroom operator. Meanwhile Nick pays Jamaicans to fuck Our Wife and pisses off everyone in the legal field he meets except the guy who wrote his trust and fucked over Vic Lasagna.
 
Última edición:
Has this been confirmed? I just caught up on 30 pages and am unsure. Someone mentioned there hasn't been an entry noting the change?
I think Barneswalkers associate Lewis was assigned to Pedolton.
E: And the fat nonce mentioned his lawyer is trying to give the already pissed of judge (Nick's ~300 pieces of ebidence) a 3,3gb raw stream or something to that effect.
 
They look like the shitty AI-generated Warhammer lore videos that Youtube keeps spamming to me
If it's trying to get you to listen to TerranBrah I'd recommend it. They're clearly using AI for some of the art and for the voice work but the script writing behind those tools is solid.
 
From Mama K, responding to the rumors that an agreement has been reached -

Ver archivo adjunto 8077455

If Nick isn't a BITCHMADE cuckold, he'll just correct the record and let the world know that he hasn't yet bent to the Toe.
What that sounds like is the judge is saying "this shit show is going to take two weeks to try the way you retards are acting, I'm inclined to probably rule in the following directions - please try and work this out before we schedule a huge retarded trial".
 
From Mama K, responding to the rumors that an agreement has been reached -

Ver archivo adjunto 8077455

If Nick isn't a BITCHMADE cuckold, he'll just correct the record and let the world know that he hasn't yet bent to the Toe.

I don't think anyone is saying an agreement was reached, but there seems to be a consensus that Nick is pressing for one.
 
I can only presume that when this line of questioning is directed back at Rekieta under his own cross-examination, it would've gone terribly. I'd love to see that transcript.
Nick's best defense in any hacking case would be to decline to testify based on self-incrimination. But if he were to testify here, anything he said could be used against him in any potential criminal case.

And while testifying in the HRO case could have been used against him in any later criminal case, the only sane move of pleading the Fifth would have itself fucked him in the HRO case, so he truly was boxed into an ultimate Catch-22 that may have been Aaron's attorneys' plan all along. Recall that in the first hearing, there was an interesting exchange where White's cross-examination about the then pre-sentencing RP case prompted Johnson to bring up the obvious Fifth Amendment issues involved, which then prompted White's smug retort that Aaron is free to plead the Fifth and with the catch that he'd be subjected to a negative inference assuming the worst about what his refused testimony could have been, only insofar as the civil HRO case is concerned. Thanks to White's having been thoroughly educated about this narrow issue when it came up repeatedly in the civil CHIPS case, for once he had the luxury of being 100% correct, but ironically it only served to remind Judge Ole of the very thing that could later be used to hoist White on his own petard:

Bragg.webp
Bragg v. Hudson, No. A06-2431, 2007 WL 4564130 (Minn. App. December 31, 2007)

DJE.webp
In re Welfare of D.J.E., No. A09-1020, 2009 WL 4041099 (Minn. App. November 24, 2009)

This is just speculation, but I like to think that when the time came for Nick's anticipated testimony at the second hearing to walk straight into the gaping maw of this exact same dilemma, Judge Ole saw the opportunity to get himself out of needing to hear these gay lovers bitch and moan for hours, by holding a chambers conference about anticipated evidentiary objections as a pretext to address the above elephant in the room and warn White about the negative inference that was going to be made when the time comes, in hopes that it could be used as a cudgel to beat his retarded client back to the negotiating table.

This theory could also dovetail nicely with the subtle hint in his last order that the vast majority of White's insane client's hundreds of exhibits were about to be rejected on Rule 402 (relevance) grounds or Rule 403 (probative value vs. undue prejudice balancing) grounds: if Judge Ole had already more or less made up his mind that the hacking allegation alone was already sufficient for a sustained HRO to survive appeal because White's fixation on mere reasonable doubt insinuations about April were ineffectual when the respondent was going to present no actual countervailing evidence that would be needed to satisfy a civil HRO case's preponderance standard, and especially if it came up in chambers discussions that Nick was indeed expected to plead the Fifth and provoke an adverse inference that would blow any preponderance defense out of the water, then it makes sense why Nick's hundreds of exhibits about Aaron being a big bad meanie would cease to be 402-relevant or at least cease to have sufficient 403 probative value, because they wouldn't change the outcome even if admitted.

All of this could have been artfully imparted to White in chambers in typically passive-aggressive Minnesotan fashion until it finally got Nick to kneel down and lick the boot like he always does. The only question left is whether Judge Ole was appropriately gleeful in doing so.

Daddy.gif
 
Última edición:
Where is the original Nick video where he keeps repeating "Bow down before the state... Bow down!!!" in that wimpering voice? Now might be a good time to dust that one off.
 
I don't think anyone is saying an agreement was reached, but there seems to be a consensus that Nick is pressing for one.
If the line "Beth - has proposed order been submitted? If not, set SEC", something has been finalised.

I can't think of any other order that some party would need to present that would require a follow-up SEC.

Also, Nick before today was supremely confident. Not so much now.

Id guess the Judge is inclined mutual no contact. If it happened today or not I don't know, but we should find out soon.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo