Dealing with loads of irl stuff.
So let me get this straight.
Sharing a single half-naked photo of a known slut that posed for it gets you $50 fine, 15 days in prison, and the bond was set at $100,000. The photo was shared with a private individual who never disseminated it. It was deleted after, so they couldn't even find the original. This slut's husband who enjoyed seeing her getting fucked by the man that shared the photo had to send six other ones to the sheriff, none were the original. The original is now basically lost media.
This slut also shared whorish photos of herself in public group chats.
The judge knew this was all petty vindictive faggot love squabble, she even demanded fag lover number one to behave. Whose side is this fat judge on? Why didn't the judge who sentenced fag lover number two warn him?
This crime is worse than dosing children with cocaine. It's worse than possessing over 25 grams of cocaine and an assortment of other narcotics related paraphernalia around loose firearms where children had easy access to. That got him a suspended sentence, bond at $50,000, not a single day in jail and not a cent of fines. Oh, and 80 hours of community service, with "gainful employment" which is defined as nothing. Because having a bunch of people in secret little group chats spamming emails to other people counts too, allegedly.
He has to be clean for 5 years. Sure, time to hit up drugs that won't last in the system for a few months.
Does anything make sense in this shithole of a state? Why are so many public resources being used to defend the sanctity of a slut? Nuke Minnesota now.
