He's got the John K problem where he needs constraints to work within to be funny and clever, and the John K problem where he's into underage girls.
Indeed it does. Sam and John K are similar in a lot of ways.
Unfortunately due to Jet Wiggertune's inability to have some professionality with the casts of fishtank I'm not hopeful for season 5. I don't think we'll see anything interesting come from Sam in a short time span. I like Charls, but I don't see him doing anything more than being schizo and occasional guest on the podcast. I believe Sam would be better off biting the bullet and addressing the situation surrounding Jet and Fishtank and getting control of the rest of the wiggers.
Not him, but the answer is yes, especially if you’re trying to pontificate on and/or make changes to society.
Bruh... I was being sarcastic because the thread was stickied and MATI listeners will believe anything. Only autistic retards would honestly think Sam, of all people, is a political grifter. He threw his career in the trash, damn near lost everything and then had to spend a decade slowly crawling his way back to relevancy because of his political views. He might be a gay pedophile and worst person on earth but clearly isn't a grifter.
I agree, that’s why I said “If he goes full-on politics”. The sudden shift towards direct political commentary with the Sam Hyde Show, plus him hanging around with Fuentes makes me suspicious.
You don't have to be completely disingenuous to be a grifter. For example there are plenty of left wing creators who truly do believe in certain ideals but would sell out their audience for a quick buck. Hasan Piker for example despite being a literal socialist since forever owns a mansion and multiple sports cars, the black lives matter org stole millions despite being trained Marxists, Kefallas stole thousands from other trans people to fund a non existent move, and Idbuzz choose to use his events money for parties instead of charity. You would be hard pressed to argure that any of these creators don't believe in what they advocate for. They just like money more. I think the same can be said for hyde. He may hold his views, but will throw them aside for teen puss, money, and fame. The long term optics for the right when working with Fuentes doesn't matter if he makes more dough from it.
Retarded take. It's not difficult at all to say that any grifter doesn't believe in what they preach. Just because they scream into the fucking void about it does not mean anything. Money and public appeal rule the lives of people you listed.
>unknowingly injecting HGH in their roid cycles
All of my examples have a long documented history of involvement with these efforts way before they were famous and have shown significant emotions while talking about the subject. The point is that these examples show that you don't need to be insincere to be a grifter. You can easily be both, as long as money is your priority.
the example most people cite is his skull and jaw getting bigger and more angular.
Joke's on you I have proof that he's a grifter right here
I think that being on Adult Swim forced Sam and crew to be more subtle with the /pol/tard humor which made it far more effective. A lot of the humor in EP like the Candy Land sketch was just regurgitating basic /pol/tard or RW Twitter talking points without any sort of punchline.
