Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

I don't understand how anyone can watch and enjoy Colbert, Meyers and the others now. Surely even if you watch it just to confirm what you already think it would eventually get annoying hearing "waa tr*mp is bad and doing bad things" and the same handful of jokes about him every night. It's been over a year since this crap started, surely at some point people will get bored and switch off the tv unless some of these late night shows mix their subject matter up a bit.
What makes it more irritating is that they've been doing this shit since Trump announced he was running for president. I got so damn tired of the Trump jokes last year, and bear in mind I didn't like Trump at all around that time (I don't like him much now, but I dislike the people opposing him more) so even for me it was tiring.

To put it another way, we've been hearing the same crap about Trump since the tail end of 2015 at the earliest. And the late night hosts have been doubling down on the same jokes since he became president, just altered slightly to make them more timely.
 
Because the last thing anti-Trump people want on their minds as they go to sleep is reassurance that THEY aren't the problem, it's the idiots around them who are in power and the idiots who keep the likes of Trump in power.... they're prefect little angels, and there's absolutely NOTHING wrong with modern progressivism.... they don't have to moderate their political views, how can THEY be wrong if even the pop cultural icons of evening TV say so?
 
To answer Dobbo's tweets one by one:
Tweet 1:No. An impeachment would only elevate Pence to the White House, Paul Ryan, as speaker would become vp. Also, should Pence be impeached and Ryan become president, the new speaker, whoever that would be would become vp. To remove all republicans drom the presidency in the next 4 years would require 200+ impeachments of every republican representative in the House. Also, impeachments are individual trials so they take a while to do.

Tweet 2: Sure, if you can prove each individual cabinet member was guilty of a high crime. The burden is on the accuser though. But you won't get Hillary, you'll get Paul Ryan and some random republican representative as his vp

Tweet 3: Dobby, there has to be a specific law he can be charged with breaking. Not being Hillary isn't a crime thats impeachable. Also, an election team isn't necessarily the same people as his cabinet.

All assuming a republican house would vote to impeach, AND a republican senate votes to convict.

Edited for shitty spelling
 
Última edición:
An impeachment would only elevate Pence to the White House, Paul Ryan, as speaker would become vp

Yeah that's entirely wrong tho

25th Amendment: Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

also Dobbo is so dumb in that last tweet its PRECEDENT for removal, not President for removal
 
Última edición por un moderador:
As far as I remember, that's not entirely accurate and the new President could tap someone else to become Vice-President, couldn't he?

Like the Speaker is the next in line, but the VP is still at the discretion of the new President
You maybe right, but the only actual case we have that's close is when Agnew resigned as v.p. Ford was speaker and became vp, but I wasnt alive then and I don't lnow if Nixon asked Ford, or if Ford just ascended to v.p

Either way Dobson's fantasy seems to be that Hillary is in the line of succession somewhere, and she isn't. If your right it just sets the infinite loop of never-going-to-happen one step earlier at the vp level, and replaces the myriad of speakers with every possible member of the republican party in the line of succession ahead of Hillary
 
The speaker isn't the defacto new VP if the old one's gone, just an obvious choice and easy-to-agree on replacement. Kinda like how the board of directors don't HAVE to install the VP of a company as the CEO if he croaks, but are likely to do it just to keep things moving in the same direction. But you're right, it's all a leftist wet dream on par with the right dreaming of an armed citizen army marching on DC and deposing a democrat by popular force.
 
God I hope Trump exposes Seth Meyers in his Swamp-Draining operation. I mean we may not need him to, but it would be the most satisfying order of events.
 
They don't plan marches, the build shelters and stockpile canned goods while making plans to ride things out
 
Calm down, I'm talking about Birthers, Infowars rejects and other right-leaning nuts that go apeshit when the left is in charge.

The birther myth was started by Hillary and all of the original hardcore birthers were Democrats and Infowars style (who are not right-wing, just go look at Infowars during the 8 years of Bush)

To claim that there's a common 'right-wing dream of armed citizens taking down an elected democrat out of office' is like saying the Westboro Baptist Church represents Baptists all over America instead of being 14 assholes living on a compound

PS Nazis are not right-wing either, they are fucking nationalist SOCIALISTS

There are sensible conservatives just the combination of smug arrogant liberals and unhinged conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones culled them into obscurity.

Alex Jones is not right-wing. He hates Republicans and Conservatives he just embraced Trump because he seems him as an anti-globalist populist and the whole infowars team has been shitting hard on him since Syria

You think the Nazis were bad?

You think the Mongols were evil?

You think Communism, which killed 100m+ is wicked?

You think the Romans were awful?



Well buckle down because according to Noam Chumpsky, the GOP is THE MOST EVIL AND DANGEROUS ORGANIZATION OF ALL TIME REEEEE
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Reminder that Chomsky was shilling about how Pol Pot regime wasn't as much of an atrocity as other regimes at the time and saying that the news from Cambodia were exaggerated. While Pol Pot was killing millions with fists and having kids put plastic bags over people's heads if their hands weren't dirty enough.
 
Tim Allen's sitcom got canceled after six seasons despite being one of the network's most watched shows.

It was considered the perfect sitcom for the Trump era, hitting ratings highs in its sixth season. But that didn’t save Last Man Standing from a cancellation today.

ABC has opted not to renew the longtime Friday 8 PM anchor for Season 7 despite the fact that the blue-collar sitcom was ABC’s second most watched comedy this season with 8.1 million viewers in Live +7, only behind flagship Modern Family (8,7 million). It was the third most watched ABC scripted series overall behind Grey’s Anatomy and Modern Family.

The Tim Allen-starring multi-camera sitcom often had gone down to the wire on renewals, with ABC and producing studio 20th Century Fox TV wrangling over the series’ license fee. ABC is supposed to cover the cost of the show at this point in its run, and LMS is on the higher end for a multi-camera sitcom because of the marquee salary Allen commands, but 20th TV had agreed to license fee reductions in the past and reportedly were open to another one. This time, there was no negotiating or bargaining, with ABC simply deciding against another season.

With a central character who is a political conservative and devout Christian adhering to traditional American values, the blue-collar comedy appeals to viewers in the Heartland, a constituency that helped elect Donald Trump as president and has been energized post-election as evidenced by the ratings success of new USA drama Shooter.

That was also a swath of America ABC had been looking to reflect better, mostly on the drama side, as the network’s entertainment president Channing Dungey has noted this season.

In its sixth and final season, Last Man Standing averaged a very respectable for any night and especially Friday, 1.2 Live+same day rating in adults 18-49 and 6.4 million viewers, regularly winning its 8-8:30 PM time slot. While most returning shows were down year-to-year 20-30%, LMS was virtually flat, off just by 5% in total viewers and adults 18-49 (L+SD).

The cancelation is a financial hit to 20th TV, which had sold LMS in syndication where the sitcom has been doing very well, a rare off-network ratings success story these days.

The Blaze and Breitbart are taking it as retaliation for Allen's public support of Trump. I don't know if I believe that but it is weird to cancel a successful show.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo