- Registrado
- 4 de Nov, 2023
Nigger it's not about Jimmy Faggot Kimmel, it's the fact that the right can't accomplish fucking ANYTHING. Not even the most mundane symbolic victories.
Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt
- Iniciador del tema Amelia Troonheart
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 On-and-off DDoS attacks. (July 25th: On-going connection issues.)
🧅 Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/ -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Zenos Yae Viator
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 21 de Sep, 2025
He's old and secure in his legacy (so he believes) and rich, and wrapped up in his many dealings, he was never going to flip the board.
So long as we are ruled by the old and retarded this will be the case, 80 year old men do not cross the Rubicon.
- Registrado
- 13 de Ago, 2024
He does not matter. He has been on TV talking about how much he hates Donald Trump for the entire era in which Trump entered politics and won three primary elections and at least two general elections. He has no impact on literally anything aside from giving a tiny number of liberals another repeating station for the same message every other one of them is already putting out.
>IMPLYING
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Dic, 2022
Liberal democracy doesn't have to be the shitshow it is currently, but it arguably cannot function in its current state because it's ultimately the product of a bygone era meant to operate under specific conditions. Those conditions?
IMO:
(1) Small populations.
(2) A shared moral code/foundation of ethics amongst its population.
(3) Economical flexibility.
Those 3 not being abided by lead to a lot of issues. Arguably the inability to do (3)* lead to (1) which created (2).
*China begins to take Western-grown manufacturing away. To deal with economical decline and unemployment, gov's up spending, cut taxes, and didn't reverse course when it began to fuck with things. They import masses of would-be "tax payers" (extra burden) diametrically opposed to the ethics/moral foundations of the state they immigrate to, and then they try to abide by the wants of these new additions based on "consensus" which often contradicts the native majority.
Though some might disagree, America has been a "Liberal Democracy" since its very inception (based strictly on premise of Lockean principles (moral duty not infringe on and protect the free will of others – based on Christian) + "Vote for your leader" government) but similar to the example I gave with the French, it's bad at responding to problems as they arrive because it does so under "consensus"* and acting within the confines they've been given (constitutions, explicit or otherwise**.
*The French government's solution to Napoleon's popularity in 1851 was to restrict the ability for the people to form a consensus by further restricting people's right to vote.
**The only example of a non-written constitution that was abided by for the most part is the UK, explicit infringements were made (taxation) in the mid-1800s
Most governments are a product of reaction, and so foresight (especially centuries in advance) is very rarely employed in creating them. Washington did recognise a consequence of political parties, which cause many problems in of themselves, but he likely only saw the issue after a near-decade in office.
Because foresight can only go so far this leads to issues down the line when you combine inflexibility with the self-preservation of future politicians. Many current situations/problems come from those that resist change, and the country tend to decline and die in the long-term.
The UK changed the centralisation of authority from king to legislature in the late 18th century, further cemented the legislatures power in the 19th, attempted change with devolution in the late 20th/early 21st centuries, however the reason this didn't ultimately help avert current problems is power still remained ultimately vested in the legislature, which we've seen ebb and flow over the centuries. France was seeing issues with its centralisation in the 20th century and was saved (lmao) from possible civil war due to being invaded. After the far they ratified a new constitution in '58 that saw more centralisation in the president (away from legislature), then greater regional autonomy in the early 80s (effectively to the same fruitless end as the UK).
Off the top of my head, America saw two large shifts to the status quo. Creation of the supreme court (decentralisation), then the civil war (leading to the states becoming more like federal provinces instead of nations in a confederation i.e. state centralisation), then the direct election of senators near the turn of the 20th century (decentralisation). It's possible there's been more or less but I think attempting to resist reforms of where the power ultimately resides and trying to maintain the authority of status quo is what creates a lot of problems to begin with.
In a Democracy you ought to try to be truly representative of the people, which requires decentralising authority, which of course Congress/Commons/National Assembly isn't going to go for. And even when trying to be representative of "the people", it's now been mired by the inclusion of "people" who aren't apart of "the people". Democracy was swell when the population capped out at 10 million, begins seeing problems at 30 million (US civil war, French revolution and coup d'etat, Peterloo Massacre and others – all occurred when the populations of these states, all democracies, climbed over 20 million people) and it gets gradually worse from there.
Neoliberalism and the willing symbiosis Neoconservatism has with it hasn't helped things and only hastened the decline with rapid speed. Problems being caused by external powers is one thing, problems caused by the people another, but politicians having an ideological imperative to have morality/ethics based on popularity? When said popularity fickle, and influenced by outside people (media, immigrants, etcetera)? Complete, self-destructive retardation. There's zero moral justification to preserve civil rights outside of what people supposedly want.
If you want an non-political example of how Neoliberalism works, do you remember when Sony put Morbius back in theatres because of the memes surrounding it? How they assumed discourse, both negative and ironically positive, meant people wanted it? It's that. Neoconservatism in that scenario would then be keeping the movie in theatres forever because according to Neoliberalism it's what people want.
TLDR: Liberal Democracies were a product of the 17/1800s and decline in effectiveness with the correlation of population and lack of decentralisation because after a certain point they cease to be representative of the people due to the sheer scale of numbers. The moral impetus for Liberalism (Preservation and protection of free will from God's granting of it) has been replaced by a popularity-based form of morality which gives no reason for politicians to value liberty based on any intrinsic merit.
- Registrado
- 11 de Jul, 2024
Sinclair folds like a cheap lawn chair. Kimmel will be calling for more violence against Whites on TV unopposed. Not even one concession. ICE gets shot at by some half-gook using an app specifically to track them, Apple and Google refuse to pull it, and ICE responds by firing an agent defending himself from an illegal invader with his boss going on TV and announcing the firing. Libtards are still openly celebrating murder and planning for more, even on "far right" twitter where hundreds of thousands openly plot to kill Trump. Musk does nothing.
Example:
After the Capital Peaceful Protests hundreds were arrested basically overnight. Thousands more were not just fired, but mass deplatformed and debanked. Either the FBI is too pajeeted up to do anything or Trump has no control over it. Either option is horrible. The left sees such a weak response and is encouraged. You can already see them openly calling for more murder.
People don't understand how dire this is. They will try and kill Trump again, either another assassin or him and his family following the Romanovs after he leaves office. They already shot Charlie Kirk, what do you think they're going to do to their living nightmare? Then what do you think they're going to do to you for being on "nazi transphobe" website Kiwi Farms?
- Registrado
- 13 de Ago, 2024
They control all three branches of government and 2/3rds of state governments. If you think controlling a comedy show nobody watches is more important you are retarded.
- Registrado
- 24 de Oct, 2020
More bullshit. What a joke of a "movement".
- Registrado
- 4 de Mar, 2019
Way ahead of you.
- Registrado
- 16 de Oct, 2020
He was a nobody before the cancellation with a dying show, then he was the biggest name in existence, then he was a nobody when he was uncanceled. The narrative did a 360 not just a 180.
- Registrado
- 4 de Nov, 2023
This should make their inaction even more embarrassing to you.
- Registrado
- 2 de Ene, 2025
It's how the Overton window shifts. You ever see this?
- Registrado
- 12 de Sep, 2025
The fella who runs this site is right wing? Fucking BASED.
The main event? Sounds like a THREAT to me.
Preach it, Paul.
Besides the Trump administration has these niggers so retarded that people are out here overdosing to death on Tylenol because he said use caution while taking it during pregnancy. Fucking LOL.
- Registrado
- 13 de Ago, 2024
Why would they want to alter a media landscape that rewards them with control of all three branches of government and 2/3rds of state governments? If anybody should be asking for a change in their media representation, it's the Democrats.
- Registrado
- 2 de Ene, 2025
What's he supposed to do? Violate his oath to providing a free speech platform? Him coordinating a large sway for pro-GOP shit on Twitter can' t be exposed by him banning wrongthink. He might be noting all of the people, too, so it's better to let them act like this.
Zenos Yae Viator
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 21 de Sep, 2025
more than anything, this is the most disruptive, people are willing to overlook a lot of shit if things are good economically.
a little telling on myself, but I'm a professional meat-cutter, just in my job alone, in the last 4 years, I've watched, say, Ribeye steaks, go from 9.99$ from before Covid started, to now, 26.99$.
while this is just Ribeye's, all red meat has gone up about this much in percentage price increases, chicken went up much slower, but still, almost everything in the store has gone up like this in some way or another, my wages, and I assume, basically everyone's wages, hasn't gone up by any differing speed or amount.
This cannot continue, I'm priced out of buying my own products, and not Filet or Ribeye, but really anything that isn't marked down, I assume that's how it is for all working class people, once things get like this, people start getting real shifty, really angry, and really fucking particular with who is around them.
- Registrado
- 4 de Nov, 2023
You are not a serious person.
- Registrado
- 11 de Jul, 2024
I think he can get away with banning someone for threatening to shoot the fucking president, especially since it's against twitter TOS and could get his company in trouble with the government (and would have if similar threats were made against Biden during his term.) And "free speech platform" falls apart when you get banned for shittalking his precious indians.
- Registrado
- 13 de Ago, 2024
Kimmel did not do that. If you weren't a dumb retard who is wrong you wouldn't have to exaggerate what he said.
- Registrado
- 4 de Nov, 2023
We're not talking about Kimmel retard. You brought up the whole "media landscape", of which Kimmel was complicit in stoking tension against the right.
- Registrado
- 25 de Mar, 2024
Realistically I see the current progress and general lack of response besides platitudes from the republicans to mean they are scared they are next and are unwilling to step up to the plate and uphold the duty of their office as a result of that fear. They'll take the power, but not the responsibility.
Trump has proven in many ways why we need strong men to lead the country. There are too many pussies in office and that's where the lack of real response comes from.
The one solace is even normies are noticing how crazy the left has gotten and they are really the ones who move society one way or another. If this scares more normies away from leftist causes that's a societal benefit, and after noticing it only gets more obvious the longer it goes on.
The real test will be seeing how midterms go.
Trump has proven in many ways why we need strong men to lead the country. There are too many pussies in office and that's where the lack of real response comes from.
The one solace is even normies are noticing how crazy the left has gotten and they are really the ones who move society one way or another. If this scares more normies away from leftist causes that's a societal benefit, and after noticing it only gets more obvious the longer it goes on.
The real test will be seeing how midterms go.