Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Destacado
Aussie_Autizzy dijo:
Sent to the Trump "Free Speech Brigade". Good ol KF and the triggered spergs. Dish it out.. but pot kettle.. You get the idea.
Presiona para expandir...
Your team went full national terror campaign when some nigger OD'd on fentanyl, I shudder to think what would have happen if Jon Stewart or somebody had gotten legitimately assassinated by one of ours.
 
Meat Grinder dijo:
I appreciate that Charlie Kirk was an actual Christian and didn't give off the atmosphere of "has paid for mistresses' abortions before and will again" like many Republicans in politics.
Presiona para expandir...
Because Kirk was in politics but not a politician.

AnOminous dijo:
"I'm literally the personification of empathy," says the faggot cackling like a fucking ghoul watching a dude bleed out while his kids watch it.
Presiona para expandir...
This.
I got into arguments with 'tards on Discord (yeah yeah, I know) and me condemning Charlie's murder they're like "DONT YOU HAVE EMPATHY FOR YOUR FELLOW MAN!?!?!? THE LGBTQ FOLX LITERALLY FEEL SAFER NOW THAT HE'S DEAD!!!"

But once again, fucking heatmap graphic being spot-on.
Athena Save Us! dijo:
Big news! Jimmy Kimmel is returning! Isn't this the most important thing you've ever heard?!?
Presiona para expandir...
Hot take.
Hot fucking take and rate me autistic for it.

The whole Kimmel shit is basically just internal propaganda. It makes the left the victims ("forget the guy who just got shot for his beliefs, shitty low-performing latenight comedian got taken off the air means WE are the ones having our free speech suppressed!") AND it gives them a win ("forget the millions watching his memorial, forget the conservative voices getting even louder, forget even the moderate center-lefties saying this was too far; WE got our guy back on air!!!").

It's all fucking (D)/ActBlue theater.
 
Laughing Putin dijo:
If it's possible for bones to stop bullets, just say so, don't go trying to turn Charlie into this superhero. Or if the real reason the bullet didn't exit is because it hit some body armor first, just say so. But then that wouldn't help with the myth-making.
Presiona para expandir...
The shot was angled down from above so the bullet would have had to travel through more of the Scapula than if it had been a level shot, and it might have deflected down further into Charlie's torso instead of penetrating. I agree that there are times to hype things up, like the memetic energy that erupted after his death (because of who he was, who killed him, and "what does it mean going forward?") but when it comes to things like ballistics I think it is right and good to analyze the event fully rationally.
 
Overly Serious dijo:
It is a mystery to me how it is that in America everybody seems to be a registered Republican or a registered Democrat and not merely that but somehow this information is accessible.

Growing up in my country it was considered borderline unethical to ask someone who they voted for and few and far between are people who actually have some kind of party registration short of the actual active party members with paid dues and the candidates themselves. How and why is this even a thing in the USA?
Presiona para expandir...
The primary benefit of registration is to vote in primaries that select candidates. Or of course to join the party apparatus and gain some political position.

The vote itself is by secret ballot (supposedly).
 
You guys seeing all this shit about a trap door underneath where Charlie was sitting, a hologram projector that got taken down, the flash in the windows, etc etc etc?
Why is it so hard for boomers to believe a tranny fucker got mad at a republican and shot him in cold blood?
 
behindyourightnow dijo:
The creepiest thing I've discovered is, when it comes to the real true believers, you can't even try to reach them by appealing to their self-interest. You can't say "what if it was your father with the same beliefs who was shot?" because they all hate their parents and grandparents. You can't appeal to the idea of children growing up in a world full of political violence, because none of them have or like kids. You can't ask them to think about their own friends being gunned down over politics, because their friendships are shallow and conditional and they would happily turn over their friends to a firing squad if they ever thought they were "Nazis." You can't even say "what if someone disagrees with you and kills you for your beliefs?" because they all hate themselves and want to die.
Presiona para expandir...
This reminds me of a sentiment I see from the Left a lot which goes something along the lines of "why do conservatives care about XYZ, it doesn't affect them"- usually in response to issues like abortion or trannies- as if caring about something other than yourself is some farfetched idea.
 
Rolex dijo:
You guys seeing all this shit about a trap door underneath where Charlie was sitting, a hologram projector that got taken down, the flash in the windows, etc etc etc?
Why is it so hard for boomers to believe a tranny fucker got mad at a republican and shot him in cold blood?
Presiona para expandir...
I imagine it's because they lived through periods of time when the government has given cause them ample cause to be suspicious of anything they do, say or report on (MK Ultra, Contra Affair, WACO, MLK & JFK, Watergate) or because from their perspective society is so locked down and the government so omnipresent that anything which rocks the status quo has to be permitted by them [government] first. I think that's some conflict between natural government/news scepticism and accepting something for what it is.

Alternatively: They're just bored in retirement and like crafting outlandish theories with other boomers.
 
Rolex dijo:
You guys seeing all this shit about a trap door underneath where Charlie was sitting, a hologram projector that got taken down, the flash in the windows, etc etc etc?
Why is it so hard for boomers to believe a tranny fucker got mad at a republican and shot him in cold blood?
Presiona para expandir...
Like most "conspiracy theories" it's a concerted effort to poison the well and, being the useful idiots they are, boomers happily take the bait.
 
Airless dijo:
This doesn't take away from the fact that he knowingly and willingly broadcasted false information to push a narrative so wouldn't this just open him back up to an FCC investigation?
Presiona para expandir...
Because one could argue he wasn't technically lying, much in same way investigations into the shooter revealed "he wasn't apart of any Left-wing organisations" to infer he wasn't a Leftist. Kimmel heavily inferred the shooter was MAGA, but because of how you could interpret his words, there's wiggle room for them to contrive that they had nothing wrong.

Kimmel: “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang trying to characterize this kid who killed Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them." Could be interpreted as: "The Right's was tracking down every bit of info about the shooter to confirm his political alignment."

That interpretation is probably what he'll bring up, and he probably won't allude to the shooter's actual political alignment when clarifying (not apologising, I stress) because making sure the waters are as muddied as humanly possible is a tried and true tactic of theirs. The way the Left keeps its own people out of the know is insidious, and is probably the reason for people like Robinson in the first place.
1758643354461.webp
 
At risk of autism reacts(took my Tylenol this morning) and clock reacts, the way erika was during the memorial was a bit off to me. I get that she’s widowed and it’s a memorial for her deceased husband, but she didn’t seem the most torn up about it, which leads me to suspect their marriage probably wasn’t on the best terms and/or she was having an affair on the side. Just from irl experience, women her age, especially in conservative circles, are very prone to adultery
 
A Random Orthobro dijo:
The primary benefit of registration is to vote in primaries that select candidates. Or of course to join the party apparatus and gain some political position.
Presiona para expandir...
I see. That makes sense I guess though it seems odd to me. I think in most countries and certainly in Bongland, if there are votes on party leadership (not required) it's much more a matter for the party membership to decide upon. And does anything stop people being registered for both parties in the USA? And voting in both primaries? Seems like it's fertile ground for manipulation.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo