Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

[Fag Alert Major Fag Alert]

Retard alert!

 

[Boney]

Big gun nerd here. I am almost certain the no exit wound thing is fake news. But, in the event it isn't, some possible explanations exist, all of them absolutely insane and unbelievable but technically possible. I won't believe any of them except....

If the shooter was using frangible ammo. Which would actually make sense for many people, 30-06 would devestate most steel targets and bullet stops after a short while. So you shoot frangible bullets.

If there is ACTUALLY no exit wound my money is on this theory.

The wound appears to me to be consistent with FMJ 30-06, and I expect an exit wound. Never seen a terminal ballistics demonstration of frangible .30cal.

 

[JohnnyG]

Charlie not only considered anal sex between Africans to be a key part of American foreign policy and soft power but also a conservative value.
You should honor his memory by overcoming your bigotry.

What a great 2016-era memory, when Charlies was like 22. Anything from the last month or year?

The sole and singular meaning of "separation of church and state" in the context of the American government was originally to prevent the government and church leadership being the same people.

It was to prevent govt from making OFFICIAL denomination

At the time, States had their own official churches, and the concern was the Federal government establishing a church that overrode their local traditions. But whatever variation in Christian practices was tolerated across the States, all could agree that no non-believer should ever hold office.

Since Kirk's wife already forgave her husband's murderer and all the justified rage on the right has had the wind taken out of its sails, I decided to make this after all, after being too lazy to be bothered before.

Instead of the Sam Hyde quote over Charlie being shot, it might be more effective to put it over Charlie with his smiling wife & children. The black/Prog twitter reactions of "his wife next" and "get them White babies" were particularly illustrative.

It's part of the reason why he said what he said about hating his enemies.

Did you miss the "I'm sorry Erika, but now maybe you can convince me that's not right...Charlie's looking down mad at me right now"? He was clearly contrasting himself and Charlie in a self-aware way. "Charlie wouldn't have wanted vengeance, but I do, maybe you guys can help me chart a path that balances the need for forgiveness & justice."

 

[MerelyAPlateOfSpaghetti]

People upset over Kirk's wife forgiving. Turning the other cheek. Etc.

It absolutely let's maniacs like Trump get on stage and say "I hate my enemy and do not want what is good for them" launder their revenge and any potential power expansion behind compassionate displays like Kirk's widow.

It's smart. It's the same thing when Liberals tell you you should be more empathetic while also sticking a knife in your back.

I think the difference is Erika is forgiving the direct loss of her husband and father of her children, but beyond that she can only continue his mission. Trump, on the other hand, has the power, authority, and duty to work as hard as he can to prevent this from happening again. His mission is different than Erika's, and while he can still "claim loss" if he was friends with Charlie, forgiveness would change nothing about his mission to root out the evil that caused Charlie's death.

 

[Zenos Yae Viator]

Although most people in this thread won't acknowledge this, this is true from an optics standpoint. I think people who don't care for Charlie Kirk are fine, and I don't really care much for the nihilistic shitposters & the opportunistic comedian making shit about it so as long as they're not lying faggots about it. However, the focus should only be punishing retards who encourage MORE violence against political opposition. And for the most part, its been specifically that. But those who're targeting people who just don't give a shit and chimping out against the layman who don't really care about a man they barely knew are retarded and should be actively discouraged as well. I can see the Left easily flipping this around to their advantage if people on the Right take it too far. But as far as I can tell, it's not really there yet.

It's easy to forget that most of the internet is designed for people to get lost in echo chambers and ragebait. And it's even easier to flip the average normie's opinion on a situation through careful manipulation and framing. The best solution to not going full retard is to be pragmatic about it. All you have to do is let the Left continue to act the way they are now (unhinged lunatics) without becoming lost in moral busy body work. And of course punishing those who are encouraging more political violence.

Nigga NO one is getting anyone fired directly, if I show your employer you making a video tied to your name (or lol your employee account) and its some WILD shit and THEY fire you, well guess what, that's your EMPLOYER firing you.
Are all firings like this good? no!
But simply put, these are your enemies, and its holding them to their own gay HR lefty standards for being let go from their jobs, they crafted a world in which this is possible.

 

[Ogre Magi]

Ver archivo adjunto 7949820
Retard alert!

How can this retard think that gun reform is magically going to make all guns disappear? Or how about the places where "reform" (bans) happened that just moved on to knives and trucks of peace for the same purpose? Praying this fool and others like him wake up.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

Heck yeah, hanging with my son. It was his birthday weekend so made sure to spoil him. Just checking in, you seem angrier than usual, hope your week gets better and that you find a few things to make you more happy. Consider some new hobbies, maybe get out doors for a bit.

lol
What the fuck are you even talking about?

 

[Lip Glossary]

This is not how it works in the real world.

Liberals are basically Kiwi-Farms shit posting but sincerely and in real life. If a co-worker of mine started spouting Kiwifarms level of conspiratorial rage when George Floyd died, I wouldn't want to work with that person. It tells me you are too online, that you're making politics your personality, and that you probably can't moderate your emotions. That's not a good person to be around professionally or socially.

It's the same with Kirk. If you can't handle this situation with a modicum of grace then I don't trust you, don't want to be around you, and can't see myself collaborating with you personally. You are compromised and offensive.

End of the day, I don't want to be around blue hairs with septum piercings for the same reason I don't want to be around dudes wearing a pepe shirt.

I hear you on that one. Fun is fun when people are online but once you actually take that offline with you and make it your personality, you're on fucking walkabout.
There's a huge difference between being autistic and out of pocket, and I'm definitely out of pocket. And out of pocket people find spectrum surfers insufferable, regardless of their political leanings.

 

[Internet-Police12]

What do we know about the roommate/tranny boyfriend? Is he being investigated?

 

[babyDunk]

If you keep threatening people will firings because they said "I don't care about Charlie Kirk",

But that's not true is it? Most calls to get people fired have been for gravedancing and encouraging more murder. Most people in the country are apolitical, and as such do not give a damn about charlie, you don't see conservitards calling their silence "violence" or claiming "erm... everything is political!"

On top of this, the Big-C Catholic Church is the one who decides sainthood, and a Protestant Christian is, by definition, not in communion with the Catholic Church and therefore not eligible to be eligible for Sainthood.

I'm not saying he was or wasn't a saint, just that the current "legal framework" means the Catholic Church will not be able to declare him a saint and it's strange that Protestants are calling for sainthood anyway, since that is considered a heretical belief by many protestants lol

Are people really taking this Sainthood talk seriously? Look charlie was a political entity, that was killed for his politics. You could argue he is some kind of martyr , but a saint?Nope in my opinion.

 

[Kalamazoo 2 Timbuktu]

Christians didn't give up when we were persecuted by Rome, I don't know what relevancy has to do with saving your soul from eternal damnation.

WBC gives zero hoots whether society “shuns” or accepts us. We have picketed every single day, by God’s mercy and strength, since the day we started—35 years ago. Telling you every day America is doomed for proud sin. Meanwhile if you paid attention as you went in to worship the dead at the Charlie Kirk Memorial today, you saw us there with these God-blessed Bible signs.

Repent or Perish!

Why peaceful Christians? Why not Pride parades, or in front of children hospitals that perform genital mutilation and dispenses puberty blockers? Where were you all when I was standing ALONE, in front of an entire school trying to warn parents and teachers about the evil of LGBTQ+ ideology in our children’s classrooms?

Regardless if anyone repents or not, to your liking and standards that is, all of us will perish, like every other living plant and animal on this earth. Your message sucks.

It’s unfortunate, maybe you people could have made a difference the last 10+ years in our spiritual and culture war, instead you chose to be mouth breathing tards at peoples funerals and memorials.

35+ years of this, and now even orthodox Christians think you’re assholes. That’s quite an impact. I suggest going back to the drawing board

 

[Lip Glossary]

What do we know about the roommate/tranny boyfriend? Is he being investigated?

He's "fully cooperating" i.e. cutting the best deal he can for throwing his gay furry lover to the wolves. I'm pretty sure that not only was the tranny involved, but even more people in their life masterminded this whole caper.

 

[FunPosting101]

"Trump will get you fired for saying something mean about some guy you didn't know existed until today" is something the left will turn to their advantage.

If you keep threatening people will firings because they said "I don't care about Charlie Kirk", they'll get tired with you pretty quickly. This can easily be a repeat of the 2000's where the left regains power by the right being a bunch of moral busybodies that annoy too many people with things they don't care about.

For fuck's sake, dude, it's not a matter of not caring, it's a matter of people ACTIVELY CELEBRATING THE GUY BEING MURDERED IN FRONT OF HIS WIFE AND KIDS.

What the fuck is so hard about this to understand? Anyone who actively celebrates something like this (not just, not caring, but actively celebrating) the murder of a man in front of his wife and kids with a social media account with their real name on it deserves to lose their job for it.

And no, there will be no significant backlash from doing this, because nobody sympathizes with someone who murders another person over something so trivial, nor do they sympathize with people who dance on the grave of a man who's worst offense was publicly disagreeing with the left/liberals on something.

 

[Alcoholism]

Big gun nerd here. I am almost certain the no exit wound thing is fake news. But, in the event it isn't, some possible explanations exist, all of them absolutely insane and unbelievable but technically possible. I won't believe any of them except....

There is no universe in existence where a man's neck takes a 30-06 and leaves the actual bullet in there.

I think the difference is Erika is forgiving the direct loss of her husband and father of her children, but beyond that she can only continue his mission. Trump, on the other hand, has the power, authority, and duty to work as hard as he can to prevent this from happening again. His mission is different than Erika's, and while he can still "claim loss" if he was friends with Charlie, forgiveness would change nothing about his mission to root out the evil that caused Charlie's death.

At the end of the day, Trump doesn't have to forgive. It's not his place to forgive. It's not his loss.

 

[Dendyy]

Ver archivo adjunto 7949820
Retard alert!

What's the shitlib obsession with "feeling safe"? I want to BE safe, and that means putting trannies inside rubber rooms.

 

[Lip Glossary]

Why peaceful Christians? Why not Pride parades, or in front of a children hospitals that perform genital mutilation and dispenses puberty blockers? Where were you all when I was standing ALONE, in front of an entire school trying to warn parents and teachers about the evil of LGBTQ+ ideology in our children’s classrooms ?

"That's when I was CARRYING you" -Jesus

35+ years of this, and now and even orthodox Christians think your assholes.

You're.

 

[Alcoholism]

What the fuck is so hard about this to understand? Anyone who actively celebrates something like this (not just, not caring, but actively celebrating) the murder of a man in front of his wife and kids with a social media account with their real name on it deserves to lose their job for it.

Active, joyfully, gleefully celebrating it.

If I solicited feedback from a coworker and their response was "I don't like him, he was out there pushing a contentious message and this is a consequence of that and I don't really feel bad for him" then I'd probably say, "yeah, this is one of the possible outcomes of exposing yourself to crazies. Sucks." and not change my mind about this hypothetical coworker.

 

[Lip Glossary]

There is no universe in existence where a man's neck takes a 30-06 and leaves the actual bullet in there.

Just curious real quick where did you receive your PhD in physics and/or degree in ballistics? I just want to make sure that the university you attended is fully accredited and reputable.

For fuck's sake, dude, it's not a matter of not caring, it's a matter of people ACTIVELY CELEBRATING THE GUY BEING MURDERED IN FRONT OF HIS WIFE AND KIDS.

What the fuck is so hard about this to understand? Anyone who actively celebrates something like this (not just, not caring, but actively celebrating) the murder of a man in front of his wife and kids with a social media account with their real name on it deserves to lose their job for it.

And no, there will be no significant backlash from doing this, because nobody sympathizes with someone who murders another person over something so trivial, nor do they sympathize with people who dance on the grave of a man who's worst offense was publicly disagreeing with the left/liberals on something.

Don't try to argue with these people. They are intentionally playing coy to wind you up.

Active, joyfully, gleefully celebrating it.

If I solicited feedback from a coworker and their response was "I don't like him, he was out there pushing a contentious message and this is a consequence of that and I don't really feel bad for him" then I'd probably say, "yeah, this is one of the possible outcomes of exposing yourself to crazies. Sucks." and not change my mind about this hypothetical coworker.

Well yeah and that's because like most people, you're level headed and don't care about politics in your day to day. And that's the sad thing about the media is they try to paint everyone like ilhar Oman or however you spell that shit skin somali name, or they try to paint the other side as Marjorie Taylor Greene levels of insane. That's always been the American problem: most people don't even care about politics but the extreme nutters on both sides receive 95% of the air time.

 

[John Shedletsky]

Damn, already 1000 pages.

 

[I mean I'm just saying]

If you keep threatening people will firings because they said "I don't care about Charlie Kirk", they'll get tired with you pretty quickly.

But that's not true is it? Most calls to get people fired have been for gravedancing and encouraging more murder.

As much as I want to see leftoids gravedancing under their government name burn, I think there's a point here that rightoids are ignoring. The prime example can be found in the first item on charliesmurderers (archive):

Obviously Rachel Gilmore here isn't pro-charlie, but this is an incredibly tepid take to be front-and-center on a site called "Charlie's Murderers", regardless of if the site owners intended a logical order or not.
I love the idea, but I think the execution of charliesmurderers.com was really sloppy and overreaching. There are so many leftoids chirping about this that you could fill a whole page with only people literally calling for more political violence with their real name, and narrowing your focus like that makes the message much harder to counter.
Yeah, the jokes and the "I don't care" messages are in bad taste, but even one instance of sperging out about those over of the plenty of examples of universally reviled messages makes for a very easy target to counter what is otherwise righteous outrage against lefties getting comfortable enough to say "yaaas kween slay more of my political opponents" and expecting no pushback because Kirk was mean to homos or whatever.

Keep in mind that I don't say this to get the firings to stop. I want to utilize strategy and restraint so they're more effective.