>IMPLYING
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Dic, 2022
America was founded on *Liberalism. The Bill of Rights that preceded the Constitution, which assure people of the right to free speech, is derived from the 1689 Bill of Rights from England. That same bill was based on the ideas of John Locke. Locke said liberty and civil rights were abiding by natural law – God's law – and so were good.For the past few days, I have witnessed you fucking faggots devolve from being the champions of free speech even if it's offensive, to mindless SJW's willing to ban anyone who you don't like off the fucking internet. It's fucking groanworthy to see all these right wing MIGA faggots bitch about SJW's censoring people for jokes and offensive remarks, only to turn around and ban people for the same exact goddamn thing, and dumb faggots like you are cheering it on.
You pretend to act like this is for freedom and "protecting people's rights" when the leftists are going around trying to censor people, but when you have the power to censor people, you'd gladly partake in this. It's fucking pathetic actually.
This isn't about principals for you, is it? It's doing anything possible to "own the libs."
This is the premise on what "God given rights" are based. Nobody can subordinate another through force, command another to cause harm, and nobody ought to harm each other or their possessions. We can enforce justice if the law being enforced is to preserve life and liberty, which is also the only exception in which another life can be impaired. We're in God's image, so man is good. We are born with free will, so free will is good. Harming man is bad, because man is God's image. Very simple.The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker... sharing all in one community of nature, there cannot be supposed any such subordination among us, that may authorize us to destroy one another, as if we were made for one another’s uses, as the inferior ranks of creatures are for our’s... preserve the rest of mankind, and may not, unless it be to do justice on an offender, take away, or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of the life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.
However, Locke gave exceptions:
1) People to who disregard the bonds of society or consider them to have no hold over them ("Atheists")Lastly, those are not at all to be tolerated who deny the being of a God. Promises, covenants, and oaths, which are the bonds of human society, can have no hold upon an atheist. The taking away of God, though but even in thought, dissolves all; besides also, those that by their atheism undermine and destroy all religion, can have no pretence of religion whereupon to challenge the privilege of a toleration. As for other practical opinions, though not absolutely free from all error, if they do not tend to establish domination over others, or civil impunity to the Church in which they are taught, there can be no reason why they should not be tolerated.
2) People who try to dominate others or claiming immunity to the law through their "Church"
The people at the receiving end of the right's actions hereabout, getting fired, having their own words laid bare, etcetera are receiving a just retort for what they are doing; if their ideas have built in them the desire to dominate others, and consider the bonds of society unimportant, then they should not be tolerated. If they have violated the premise on which America has been built, disregarding the privilege of tolerance which they have been afforded yet do not afford others, they no longer have a right to its protections.
"Have you even read Locke?"
*Liberalism in 1700 is not the same as present day "Liberalism", it's morality is pretty much rooted in religion, not based on perceived popularity.
Última edición: