Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

For the past few days, I have witnessed you fucking faggots devolve from being the champions of free speech even if it's offensive, to mindless SJW's willing to ban anyone who you don't like off the fucking internet. It's fucking groanworthy to see all these right wing MIGA faggots bitch about SJW's censoring people for jokes and offensive remarks, only to turn around and ban people for the same exact goddamn thing, and dumb faggots like you are cheering it on.

You pretend to act like this is for freedom and "protecting people's rights" when the leftists are going around trying to censor people, but when you have the power to censor people, you'd gladly partake in this. It's fucking pathetic actually.

This isn't about principals for you, is it? It's doing anything possible to "own the libs."
America was founded on *Liberalism. The Bill of Rights that preceded the Constitution, which assure people of the right to free speech, is derived from the 1689 Bill of Rights from England. That same bill was based on the ideas of John Locke. Locke said liberty and civil rights were abiding by natural law – God's law – and so were good.
The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker... sharing all in one community of nature, there cannot be supposed any such subordination among us, that may authorize us to destroy one another, as if we were made for one another’s uses, as the inferior ranks of creatures are for our’s... preserve the rest of mankind, and may not, unless it be to do justice on an offender, take away, or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of the life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.
This is the premise on what "God given rights" are based. Nobody can subordinate another through force, command another to cause harm, and nobody ought to harm each other or their possessions. We can enforce justice if the law being enforced is to preserve life and liberty, which is also the only exception in which another life can be impaired. We're in God's image, so man is good. We are born with free will, so free will is good. Harming man is bad, because man is God's image. Very simple.

However, Locke gave exceptions:
Lastly, those are not at all to be tolerated who deny the being of a God. Promises, covenants, and oaths, which are the bonds of human society, can have no hold upon an atheist. The taking away of God, though but even in thought, dissolves all; besides also, those that by their atheism undermine and destroy all religion, can have no pretence of religion whereupon to challenge the privilege of a toleration. As for other practical opinions, though not absolutely free from all error, if they do not tend to establish domination over others, or civil impunity to the Church in which they are taught, there can be no reason why they should not be tolerated.
1) People to who disregard the bonds of society or consider them to have no hold over them ("Atheists")
2) People who try to dominate others or claiming immunity to the law through their "Church"
The people at the receiving end of the right's actions hereabout, getting fired, having their own words laid bare, etcetera are receiving a just retort for what they are doing; if their ideas have built in them the desire to dominate others, and consider the bonds of society unimportant, then they should not be tolerated. If they have violated the premise on which America has been built, disregarding the privilege of tolerance which they have been afforded yet do not afford others, they no longer have a right to its protections.

"Have you even read Locke?"
*Liberalism in 1700 is not the same as present day "Liberalism", it's morality is pretty much rooted in religion, not based on perceived popularity.
 
Última edición:
Vance named George Soros.
SaveClip.App_506019438_18284736271270013_1886153743873429796_n.webp
 
Actually, Charlie Kirk's assassination is the death leftists claim Floyd's was. Floyd died accidentally during an arrest, Charlie was targeted and murdered by the current system that's taken over universities and a big chunk of politics.
I 1000% agree with you.


If we have any right to chimp out, this would be the moment. We should have already chimped when they tried to murder Trump.
But why should we chimp out? Why not idk do something else than become an unruly mob? and I agree we should have acted more when trump was almost killed.
 
focusing on discor (and reddit and whatever other platform) is bait.
it doesn't accomplish anything. these platforms aren't special
Discord and reddit explicitly facilitate it though. There are longstanding and well-documented issues with trannies and nihilist faggots grooming people into violence and sexual degeneracy on those platforms and said platforms doing nothing about it.

most imageboards and forums weren't facilitating it to the degree that discord and reddit do
 
Your propaganda fueled delusions tell you you are a victim because no one takes you seriously and some random nutjob killed a one note conservative talking head.

Reality shows that you're in a cult full of endlessly projecting degenerate cowards that calls everyone pedophiles and extremists when nearly all of the politicians in the US to get caught raping/trying to rape kids in recent years have been republicans and nearly all active domestic terrorist groups in the US hold far right values. Spewing hypocrisy and blaming the other guys for the fucked up shit you like to do has been the GOP's go to strategy for longer than I can even remember and THAT is why american conservatives face constant criticism around the world. Conservatives aren't victims, they're stupid obnoxious cowards who refuse to hold themselves and their spineless greedy corporate shill politicians accountable for anything. You can't call yourself a victim for shooting yourself in the foot it just makes you a dumbass who refuses to admit when you fucked up.

The only politicians worth half a shit in this country are the ones who call out their own for their bullshit and call for unity between parties so they can actually get shit done and they're few and far between and they might as well just be another third party ballot 80% of the population doesn't know exists and that's why I refuse to join either side. They're both fucking worthless and vile.
That is not an answer to the question I asked.
 
No one here supports terrorism you ghoul. The post I engaged with you on was trying to equate punishing terrorists by costing them their jobs with a heinous criminal being placed on a pedestal and people losing their livelihoods for thinking that’s wrong.
Hey retard, I wasn't saying that. I was talking in generalities. Fucking Christ, do you have zero reading comprehension?
 
Folks, we gain nothing from pigfighting. We gain more from a reasonable discussion.

Said last week you can kill the person, but can't kill the idea. But sometimes you can discredit the idea totally while never laying a hand on the person. Senator Joseph McCarthy is a perfect example. In 1950 he started raising cain, claiming Communist influence throughout the government. Caused a lot of grief. He ended up getting censured by the Senate and soon faded away, along with McCarthyism.


In my opinion, Charlie Kirk was killed because the left could not compete with him in the contest of ideas. Now they've ensured, at least in the short term and maybe longer, that those ideas and concepts will not just last, but spread. A better strategy by the left would have been to win a public debate with Charlie but the left never had the guts to do so.

The site with the listings of all those reported for their social media isn't up.


No idea what happened. Anyone hear anything? Thanks!
 
I'm not saying we don't have to confront their ideology too but for the moment I'm perfectly happy with just forcing them to shut the fuck up for a while and them stewing on the fact that it was us who shut them the fuck up for a while.
Oh that's probably it then.

Yeah it was apparently in a server with his friends, also from Utah based on the fact that they say "our governor". They claim they didn't know, etc.
Ver archivo adjunto 7920009
Ahh, murderous internet bants. When not keeping it real goes wrong. Remember though, Kiwi Farms is in a glass house. We should act like it going forward.
 
The woketards are gravedancing because after 2020 they have felt invincible.
Consequences for acting like an asshole are getting shocked reactions because they genuinely thought no one would call them out.

There are certain obituaries I would love to read, and will quietly celebrate when the time comes. Not in public though.

I will never stop praying for the deaths of those who elevated criminals and burned our cities in their names.

🕯️
 
Vance: "I read a story in The Nation magazine about my friend Charlie Kirk...George Soros' Open Society Foundation funds this magazine, as does the Ford Foundation...Well-funded institutions of the Left lied about what [Charlie Kirk] said so as to justify his murder." x
 
Atrás
Top Abajo