Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Having been in this position myself, albeit back in 2012, I can tell you one thing. If you disagree with one side, they call you a nigger and a faggot and make fun of you for a little while. The other side will shoot you in the fucking neck. It's pretty clear to me now, that since I have some disagreements on both sides, that I'd much prefer being called a faggot to being shot.

It also bears noting that one side wants you to take your kids to church on Sundays, and the other wants you to chop their dicks off or make them shower in front of pedophiles and creeps. Personally I'd rather take them to church than make them shower in front of a troon, or worse yet, become a troon. That part didn't really take hold until after 2012 though, so you have a much easier choice than I had.

I pay for private school partly to avoid some of the tranny shit and was just today told by my kid that their male teacher told them he’s not a boy or a girl. In theory, nonbinary stuff doesn’t bother me much at all but it never stays there. It always scoots right over into full on transgenderism. So now I’m on guard.
 
Also like "I dream of one day living self-sufficient off-the-grid" is a right-wing thing, while "I wish to live in a social commune where we all share everything with each other!" is 100% some lefty dream
That's just homesteading with extra steps, really, and they don't have the intelligence, or even the work ethic, to do something like that. It's weirdly luddite non-sense.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 7917628
Link
You know what's funny? This is entirely avoidable. If you don't care or you're glad he's dead, you are not required to announce it. The only reason someone would announce it is if they wanted attention. They just don't like the type of attention they received.
They’re required to announce it, how else would they get pats on the back? How else would they get attention? These people are narcissistic dirtbags
 
So imagine my complete lack of surprise, but now I wonder how much of it is bots arguing and baiting each other.
I think you also need to throw in the fact that a lot of these "bots" are also operated by 3rd Worlders.

So of course they're happy a married white man, that doesn't want them in his country, gets killed.
 
so theres already a million conservatives calling employers to get them fired. sounds boring. What sounds alot more fun is calling the fired employees. Theyll all be looking for jobs and desperate right now. The economy is dogshit and if anyone of them were in education, healthcare its more or less impossible/illegal to get new jobs in that field? Not sure how it works. Id imagine getting fired for cause/terroristic threats is something new employers would love to know
Remember not to touch the p... Instead, hire an indian call center to touch the p...
 
I keep seeing leftists encouraging each other to sue regarding their names being on this website. Anyone know if that could happen? I badly want this website to stay up and function.
If the site publicly shows home addresses or other personal information, I believe that can be legally questionable. If it is just the names and a picture or two from their social media, then it should be fine.
 
Just to wrap it up and tie it into the thread - the media is run by chronically online, leftist weirdos with daddy issues because they came from conservative households that didn't give them asspats and reaffirm everything they did, and that's one of the Reasons they hated Charlie Kirk - he called them out on their bullshit and probably reminded them of their dads.
I find this both funny and ironic that the result of this is the "internet dad" parasocial phenomenon becoming popular.
 
I would agree if we could switch to hanging. Do you think it would have the added benefit of reducing the number of suicides by hanging?
Too bad Americans are too fat. There was a famous case in Washington state in the 90's of a 400lb dude up for hanging. It was deemed cruel and he ended up dying of natural causes. There have been a number of similar situations since.
 
Última edición:
This quote is being used to justify institutional punishment of (disgusting but legal) speech (which is unconstitutional). It's not the same as getting knocked out because you used the hard R on the subway.

Your congress rep, Higgins:
"Higgins said he will go further than social media bans in targeting those who expressed happiness about Kirk’s death.

“I’m also going after their business licenses and permitting, their businesses will be blacklisted aggressively, they should be kicked from every school, and their drivers licenses should be revoked,” he added in his Thursday post."
Source

Keep using that quote to empower your government to implement a social credit score.
I find it problematic that this is happening. Taking joy for his death is disgusting and to me unethical but it's not illegal and making it illegal is problematic.

It doesn't mean people can't complain and employers can use discretion on firing but to target people to me is disturbing.

Justice is done by punishing the criminal. Move on with life. Let God deal with these people in the afterlife if you believe in that sort of stuff.

People should be smarter with their social media but they are stupid. Be joyful about his death in private. Like all perverts, keep that shit to yourself.
 
If the site publicly shows home addresses or other personal information, I believe that can be legally questionable. If it is just the names and a picture or two from their social media, then it should be fine.

It don't matter.

They did the same thing to conservatives and moderates who supported prop 8 or otherwise opposed the LGBTQ in some capacity.

Turnabout is fair play, especially when it's for behavior that is genuinely sociopathic and anti-social, rather than a sincere belief that two men playing with each other's poo-holes aren't entitled to LARP as a married couple.

I don't fucking care anymore. I love watching leftists and sodomites and other sons and daughters of perdition get hoisted on their own petard.
 
That's just homesteading with extra steps, really, and they don't have the intelligence, or even the work ethic, to do something like that. It's weirdly luddite non-sense.
When liberals try to homestead, you get the Tranch. BTW if you haven't read this thread, I highly recommend it, even if it's haunted by alpaca ghosts and chopped-off dicks.
 
so, whats the deal with all of these leftwing tweets with 100K+ likes? usually it'll be in the range of 200-300K, and obviously for the past few days they've been the typical gravedancing. im sure we've all seen them, and its part of why we're all so appalled at the sheer magnitude of the sociopathic celebrating. even with my timeline mostly consisting of rightwing tweets, i hardly EVER see one with 100K likes. maybe for every ten or twenty leftwing tweets, i'll see one rightwing tweet with 100K or more likes. the average "viral" rightwing tweet tends to have about 30-50K, with the rare 100K+, and the even rarer 200/300K+, usually only from popular accounts during a big Happening, while many of these leftwing tweets are from nobodies.

so, is it bots? or is that just a way to cope with how many of these NPC brained sickos are out here? in the case of it being bots, its a pretty big deal. with how interlaced Twitter is with the political climate, seeing so many tweets encouraging political violence with hundreds of thousands of likes makes it tempting to say fuck it and go HH and TLD mode. its enough to cause a serious political divide. however, i cant help but feel like im coping if i buy into most of the tweets being botted and giving them a pass for their demented behavior. if they're real, what happened with this big pendulum swing to the right? i thought Twitter was "based" now, yet i cant scroll for a minute without seeing some random sheboon say "YASSSSS that racist is GONE sis" and get 392K likes, absolutely overshadowing every other RW tweet.
 
Alright I'm on page 460 back filling the content gap in the OP from when I fell behind. I'm seeing a bunch of different social media, steam accounts, reddit posts allegedly from people involved.

Could someone please collect up the information and put it into one or two posts? currently there's so much stuff scattered around it's hard for me to collect it and make anything coherent out of it.

How the social media was found and verified, anything relevant that came from it, anything you want easily accessible in the future. I will link your post in the OP once we have it organized. Thanks so much for whoever can put this together because frankly with trying to catch up I just don't have time or the familiarity with the content to do it.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo