Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

A lot of the coping I’m seeing is the belief that the shooter could have been just *ironically* tranny and furry adjacent, that he was far right, so his furaffinity account was just to laugh at them. I’ve been talked down to for requesting people not be so quick to repeat headlines and accidentally spread misinfo…

I don’t know what I am anymore, but I’m not a leftist and I’m not a conservative. There seems to be very few places to converse left if you aren’t leaning hard into either direction. I’m angry about a lot of things nowadays. Part of why I’m unhappy Kirk was killed is not only because it was an immoral act but also because of the fact I disagreed with him on many things. If people thought he was dangerous, they should be thinking about how he’s probably more dangerous to them as a martyr.
Same bro :feels:. But its better to be here than to hang out with queers.
 
I’m just going across the board rn lurking in IG comments on posts that pertain to this shit and there’s alotta people that believe this tranny fucker is a right-winger. I mean, loads of people just ready to die on that hill. Fuckin delusional y’all.
 
To add to that, it was great misfortune that got Charlie in the end as the slowed down footage shows that the bullet struck him in his body armor and ricocheted into his neck. It wasn't a precise shot aimed at the jugular, it hit close to the center mass.
morbo.webp
SPALLING DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY
 
My career is in a creative field thats 100% dominated by these types. After the Kirk murder I don't even understand how I can continue on interacting with these people. I'm regretting my career choice. As long as I continue to operate in this field I'm going to be surrounded by gay furries who love violence.
How much could you realistically minimize your interactions with them?
Being fired because your place of employment expects higher standards than lunatics who think it’s cool to murder people is not the same as a guy being murdered for debating people. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences, and your employer can terminate you for public displays that harm their reputation, make other employees feel unsafe, etc. Freedom of speech is not “being able to say anything I want on my personal social media and not be reprimanded at work.” Murdering someone for debating his beliefs is censorship in its most evil form, and I’m sick of people acting like these two things are the same.
I agree with you on the premise that murdering someone because they differing beliefs or ideologies is way over the line. I very much despise fucking narcs that tell on people to their jobs trying to get them fired because they said/did something on social media. For sure places of employment can axe at-will employees for any or no reason. That I don't disagree with. What bothers me is that if someone was not representing their place of employment in a post and they said some something someone doesn't like, even if it's vile, fucking with their livelihood is not okay with me. Sure, some could point out how they'd gladly do it to others but it's not as if it makes it okay.
Guillotine, with Robinson facing upwards.
That's way too much work. If you want to murder political adversaries there's much faster ways.

If this was like 500 meters, THEN it would be military precision.
600 meters is the start of what's considered LR shooting these days, including in the military. That doesn't mean anything less is automatically easy, only that people who are skilled at that type of shooting often don't need to really stress until it's 600m and up.
SPALLING DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY
No it doesn't but what the other poster was talking about is not spalling.
 
Última edición:
The "rugged individualism" never goes to the same lengths that leftist individualism goes to, as there's still some semblance of responsibility towards family and respect for property rights and whatnot.
A lot of leftists, in my experience, are just suicidal people who unfortunately think social media is a replacement for therapy. It's easy for them to become radicalized because their self esteem makes it easier to be poached by groomers and cults.
4.webp
 
Última edición por un moderador:
To add to that, it was great misfortune that got Charlie in the end as the slowed down footage shows that the bullet struck him in his body armor and ricocheted into his neck. It wasn't a precise shot aimed at the jugular, it hit close to the center mass.
I don't know if the body armor theory is more retarded than the groyper theory.

If you watch the video, you can see his nipples through his shirt. Either there was no body armor, or the guy had nipples that could cut diamonds.
 
They 100% do I'd bet my house on it. I've worked in enterprise data architecture for over a decade. Discord will cooperate as its a corporate entity and their lawyers will unanimously agree it is in their best interest to do so.

End users can't delete anything for real in Discord. Not a chance.
Agreed. Storage is dirt cheap, especially for simple text messages, and the legal penalties for willful destruction of evidence (especially once under direct court order to preserve evidence) are vicious.

I have no doubt every libtard activist in the company is screaming to purge everything ASAP, but their lawyers have screamed back even louder about how employees will actually go to fucking prison (and the company will eat all sorts of penalties) if they do try to purge things.

Something a lot of the dullards in activist circles don't quite realize is the legal consequence of willfully destroying evidence. It's a well-established legal precedent in this country that if it's proven conclusively that one party deliberately destroyed evidence pertinent to a case, the judge and jury are both expected to act as though the destroyed evidence was the worst, most-damning evidence against the party who destroyed it. In other words, if you're caught at a murder scene burning a note, the justice system is expected to assume it was your full written confession.

It's funny to see the reactions of junior admins and developers the first time you explain this to them. Their eyes bug out pretty wide. "Now, you don't want to be the subject of conversation in a courtroom full of angry people who've just caught you destroying evidence, do you?"
 
I don’t know what I am anymore, but I’m not a leftist and I’m not a conservative. There seems to be very few places to converse left if you aren’t leaning hard into either direction.
Having been in this position myself, albeit back in 2012, I can tell you one thing. If you disagree with one side, they call you a nigger and a faggot and make fun of you for a little while. The other side will shoot you in the fucking neck. It's pretty clear to me now, that since I have some disagreements on both sides, that I'd much prefer being called a faggot to being shot.

It also bears noting that one side wants you to take your kids to church on Sundays, and the other wants you to chop their dicks off or make them shower in front of pedophiles and creeps. Personally I'd rather take them to church than make them shower in front of a troon, or worse yet, become a troon. That part didn't really take hold until after 2012 though, so you have a much easier choice than I had.
 
so theres already a million conservatives calling employers to get them fired. sounds boring. What sounds alot more fun is calling the fired employees. Theyll all be looking for jobs and desperate right now. The economy is dogshit and if anyone of them were in education, healthcare its more or less impossible/illegal to get new jobs in that field? Not sure how it works. Id imagine getting fired for cause/terroristic threats is something new employers would love to know
 
These gender weirdos and trannies are like Necromongers from Riddick they can't reproduce into their degenerate ideology they can only convert.
 
The globohomos intentionally normalized trannies and tranny-adjacents into reacting to criticism with violence. Charlie Kirk deserved it because he's a stochastic terrorist, don't you know? The universities hold much of the blame. Now they all shrug and pretend like it's a big mystery what happened.

PS. still rolling for tranny adjacent
Wow total shocker who could have guessed. Big fucking mystery. Watch all the media ignore reality.

This is a GamerGate-tier event right now, but at a bigger scale. Everyone is witnessing - and will continue to witness - the media, academia, NGOs and everyone else bend over backwards to contrive up a reason why this isn't obvious cause and effect regarding an ideology that they themselves astroturfed for a decade.
 
Freedom of speech isnt freedom from consequence right?
This quote is being used to justify institutional punishment of (disgusting but legal) speech (which is unconstitutional). It's not the same as getting knocked out because you used the hard R on the subway.

Your congress rep, Higgins:
"Higgins said he will go further than social media bans in targeting those who expressed happiness about Kirk’s death.

“I’m also going after their business licenses and permitting, their businesses will be blacklisted aggressively, they should be kicked from every school, and their drivers licenses should be revoked,” he added in his Thursday post."
Source

Keep using that quote to empower your government to implement a social credit score.

Ask yourself:
What is the next wrong think to get this same treatment?
Will I be on the right or wrong side?
Do I want this applied to me or my loved ones?
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo