🌟 Internet Famous Linus Gabriel Sebastian & Linus Media Group / Linus Tech Tips - Narcissistic corporate shill YouTuber driving his media empire into the ground. KILL COUNT: 2

Going into a best buy nowadays is going to be a waste of time 90% of the time, every time. Even checking store stock online is dramatically incorrect compared to what they actually have in store. Might as well just be a physical website at this point.
If its jeets staffing it, its guaranteed to be fucked. They will straight up lie on inventory, either claiming its all as it should be to avoid actually doing the work, or lie about missing stock they explicitly know is missing so that they're not held accountable for it - their reasoning is genuinely "Whoever noticed the problem was the one who lost it" and everyone will avoid it as a result. The only thing you can be sure of is that if they are accidentally sent too much of something, they will end up with exactly as much as they were supposed to have logged in the system and the accidental overstock will walk off the backroom shelves within one shift, guaranteed. Its actually quite appropriate that Jeets will shit where they eat.

This is also why you should avoid buying directly from jeets on things like facebook marketplace, shits more likely to be stolen than if you'd bought it from suspiciously wealthy black slumlords.
 
The comment section is really telling. Too much member content, video titles are dogshit, overdoing the same content.

Its $15 a month to get the members only videos.

1756917190215.webp


$5 gets you some shitty chat emotes and badges

1756917266663.webp
 
Última edición:
Never ceases to amaze me when these niggers think they're worth the near equivalent to a Netflix or Disney+ subscription for their slop videos.

Doubly so for LTT whose videos are half ads designed to appear to look like content. It's like if Netflix had a tier that you subbed to that only played ads.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=5kpHaYze8kI
A good example of everything wrong with modern LTT with this video just in time for Linus to reflect on:

-The A/B from what I saw when this popped up on my TV was "I spent 700 on my kids laptop" and "we are being forced to buy Chromebooks" when
-braces are very apparent and almost like Linus is trying to show them off
-horrible small ad read skit from Riley that isn't funny
-"going into the wild" at a local Best Buy where they blur out everyone's face but you can still see the poojeets I hate your country so much Canada
-shitting on brick and mortar inventory like a fucking pod-person liberal
-Riley shows up again with a dumb character to explain what a Chromebook Plus is
-very little and boring comparison between the two laptops that is very surface level
-generic "they're still not good but they are getting better" kind of non-committal statement
-a "what do you guys think? do you have suggestions put it in the comments" that I've never seen Linus do
-the full sponsor ad read musical with Riley being even more cringe that just makes me never want to use this product

There is a MUCH bigger story here. Schools in the US and Canada are forcing Chromebooks on students. Some schools issue them for free. What Linus should be talking about is this forces the kid to have a Google account, a gmail account and starts them down the path of a permanent online presence. If you really cared about your kids, you'd fight the school district on this, and disallow any devices with that type of invasive tracking. Autistic parents should be like "I'm giving my kid a Linux laptop. They can do all their work on Libreoffice. No, they will not make a Google or Office365 account."

Also, schools that issue Chromebooks themselves can TRACK EVERY SEARCH A KID MAKES on the device. The are several different firmware products schools can and do install on these devices. They'll often give excuses like "safety" and "identifying potential school shooters." If LTT wants to be relevant again, cover these angles. (Look up "Aristotle alerts" if you feel like going down the rabbit hole).

Linux has been pretty good at exposing frauds in the tech world
Ver archivo adjunto 78661601756836807493460.webm

Also cross posting from the OSS thread that Linus is a fucking moron about all things truly technical and is beyond incompetent when it comes to understanding Linux .. like even more than Tranny-TechShrek.
 
Right, I would give my kid my old MacBook Air and if the school wants to fight me on that I’d be happy to fight back. No child of mine will ever be subjected to a Chromebook.
 
Right, I would give my kid my old MacBook Air and if the school wants to fight me on that I’d be happy to fight back. No child of mine will ever be subjected to a Chromebook.
No doubt Linus sends his kids to some expensive private school so there's probably less one is able to push back against, also makes sense why they would expect the parents to be able to supply their kids with the required technology.
 
No doubt Linus sends his kids to some expensive private school so there's probably less one is able to push back against, also makes sense why they would expect the parents to be able to supply their kids with the required technology.
If it were a private school I would expect them to be taught on something higher-end than chromebooks. Skills learned on a chromebook aren't really transferable, the chromeOS is more like a phone OS blown up to a proper monitor and keyboard than it is like a computer. MacOS and Windows aren't identical, but skills learned in either are a lot more transferable.

Maybe I'm just out of touch. I attended a private school and we pretty much exclusively used Macs, but that was two decades ago.
 
If it were a private school I would expect them to be taught on something higher-end than chromebooks. Skills learned on a chromebook aren't really transferable, the chromeOS is more like a phone OS blown up to a proper monitor and keyboard than it is like a computer. MacOS and Windows aren't identical, but skills learned in either are a lot more transferable.

Maybe I'm just out of touch. I attended a private school and we pretty much exclusively used Macs, but that was two decades ago.
I don't think its about teaching computer skills, rather having a common device that students can do their school work on.
 
What Linus should be talking about is this forces the kid to have a Google account, a gmail account and starts them down the path of a permanent online presence. If you really cared about your kids, you'd fight the school district on this, and disallow any devices with that type of invasive tracking. Autistic parents should be like "I'm giving my kid a Linux laptop. They can do all their work on Libreoffice. No, they will not make a Google or Office365 account."

Also, schools that issue Chromebooks themselves can TRACK EVERY SEARCH A KID MAKES on the device. The are several different firmware products schools can and do install on these devices. They'll often give excuses like "safety" and "identifying potential school shooters." If LTT wants to be relevant again, cover these angles. (Look up "Aristotle alerts" if you feel like going down the rabbit hole
Why do you think leftist Canadian fag Linus isn't all for that?
 
I don't think its about teaching computer skills, rather having a common device that students can do their school work on.
Most likely, yeah. But if my nephew's school is at all comparable to a private school in Canada, all they do is use Google Docs in a browser and a videochat app. All the major videochat apps are available for Windows, MacOS, iPadOS, Linux and ChromeOS, and they all have browsers that work just fine for Google Docs.
If all you've used throughout your education is a chromebook and you enter an engineering uni, you're going to be in big trouble. Those courses all either use Windows (CAD) or macOS/Linux (programming), and you won't even know what a folder is. Learning to use a computer before you're 20 gives you an enormous advantage, even if all you did was play video games you'll find learning other things much easier also. Private school is about getting the right contacts and the best foundation for further studies at uni, and requiring a chromebook makes me think Linus picked very poorly indeed. On the first point nobody who will be influential in the future will have attended a Canadian private school, and if all your computer skills are on a chromebook your career prospects turn away from STEM or liberal arts and towards professions like writing copy or running accounts. To each his own, but if I were enrolling my child in a private school this would be a red flag.
What my school did was hold a "computer introduction" course (three to five lessons depending on how quickly you got through the exercises) where we learned how to do some very basic things on OSX and Windows, and then we were allowed to use whatever we wanted. The boys brought humongous Windows laptops they couldn't use anyway because there were no outlets and mid-2000s "gaming laptops" had battery lives measured in minutes, the girls brought smaller laptops (both Apple and Windows) or more commonly nothing, and the computer labs were mostly Macs.

For what it's worth Linus does show a mail from his school board, and based on the language it looks like it would have been pretty easy for him to push back on this policy and give his kid a proper laptop instead, even without "ChromeOS Flex". I think it's pretty clear he doesn't really care that his daughter will be learning a very poor platform and that he sees buying a chromebook as a relatively cheap way to make a video for the channel rather than anything else. I wouldn't be surprised if he promptly returned the HP and grabbed any one of the dozens he'll have in storage from ads he's run over the years instead. But maybe not, 700$ is a lot of money for a Chromebook, but it isn't a lot of money to Linus.
 
All the major videochat apps are available for Windows, MacOS, iPadOS, Linux and ChromeOS, and they all have browsers that work just fine for Google Docs.
Its pretty much irrelevant, the actual angle here is corporate lobbying in the side door of education standards to functionally force spend on their devices and encourage experience lock-in. Corpo's convince the school board you absolutely gotta buy these devices (we're so happy for the opportunity to contribute to your reelection campaign), board then needs to justify the spend to schools. Easiest way to do so is when a mandate comes down that its not optional, we've already paid for them so you will absolutely use them, deliberately weaponized sunk cost. Absolutely no incentive or reason at any level to be 'flexible' about it, the bring your own device policy is a backup for the retard who keeps breaking school issued machines to be told "You have to buy one of your own then" with the same device restriction so its their problem to deal with, not the schools.

The experience lock-in part is just as straight forward, same principle microsoft uses for Windows. Get everyone used to using your OS and its activities, and it becomes a relevant element for businesses to consider. Microsoft generally doesn't worry about personal windows monetization (not that they don't monetize, just they don't have much of a revenue mandate on that side) because the real deal is in corporate licensing, and its extremely easy to sell business on using windows when the supermajority of the workforce already knows how to use it - There's a reason almost everyone outside of media production uses Windows, and never feels the need to provide any level of Windows training for new staff. Google wants to try and force the same thing to happen with ChromeOS, get people used to using googles office suite through browser-only functionality, so they can trojan horse themselves in while stepping around Microsofts near monopoly on office suite software.

The actual student experience and software availability doesn't matter, this is all being negotiated with kickbacks and campaign contributions.
 
I used to have a silly multi-monitor setup like that, then the LG C1 48" OLED TV came out and now I just use a single one of those instead.
Multi-monitor is pretty questionable now that ultrawide monitors and high-resolution TVs are so widely available. You get ugly seams in the middle of your picture, and things like "you can have one fullscreen window on one screen and one on another" is kind of moot considering how much more convenient it is to just use FancyZones or equivalent to put windows in "slots" instead.
 
I used to have a silly multi-monitor setup like that, then the LG C1 48" OLED TV came out and now I just use a single one of those instead.
Multi-monitor is pretty questionable now that ultrawide monitors and high-resolution TVs are so widely available. You get ugly seams in the middle of your picture, and things like "you can have one fullscreen window on one screen and one on another" is kind of moot considering how much more convenient it is to just use FancyZones or equivalent to put windows in "slots" instead.
I don't think I could give up multi-monitor, but more because I actively turn off the extra monitor when I want to focus on something. Its surprisingly effective at killing the temptation to just have zone out second monitor vids or whatever playing when I do so, think it might be some lizard brain thing going on.

Even then, I only run two, and at most I'd expand a third, I have no idea what drives people to have these monster 7+ display setups going. No way that's all serving as productive screen space, your just begging to plaster most of it with distractions.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo