US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
the "public" school system is essentially industrialized rape and mental torture of children on a nationwide scale.
I remember how much the left kvetched about homeschooling during the Covid lockdowns. They realized how much control they accidentally reliquished back to parents and have been desperate to claw it back ever since. This is why they were so shaken when Trump threatened to shut down the Department of Education: that was their end run for enforcing nigger worshipping faggotry on home/private schools on the federal level.
 
That’s hilarious that they think homeschool parents would even begrudgingly include this in their curriculum and not just throw that shit in the trash immediately when it gets delivered.
would this not also be eminently challengeable due to forcing parents to teach their children how to believe, potentially in contrast with their religious beliefs at the very least? i personally believe it shouldn't even matter if it's religious. you should never be forced to teach your children non-life necessary skills just because some faggot in washington thinks you should.
 
They realized how much control they accidentally reliquished back to parents and have been desperate to claw it back ever since.
That probably also helps explain that Virginia school district's descent into tranny madness (allowing a troon to rape another student in the locker room, covering it up, transferring the student, arresting the victim's father as a "terrorist" for bringing it up, etc.) -- they're fucking punishing those parents for daring assert control over their own kids.
 
When are these dumbass former plantation owners going to realize handing the keys to the farm over to the equipment leads to famine and starvation?

Literally every time a nigger has taken over a farm from a white person, the farm has failed and anyone who depended on it for food went hungry.

Watermelon and chicken farming went so well for the freed American blacks that it had to be spun by the Democrat media into a negative stereotype in order to cope.
 
Watermelon and chicken farming went so well for the freed American blacks that it had to be spun by the Democrat media into a negative stereotype in order to cope.
Does the current generation of American blacks still have that skillset? Genetic memory or something? :story:
 
I'm fucking sick of it. Our entire society is organized around defending criminals while ordinary people suffer. You have criminals committing crimes multiple times a day and being released each time. But the second a citizen gets fed up with it and takes things into their own hands, the book is thrown at them and their life is ruined. What the fuck are we supposed to do when our institutions fail us?
Remember when Marquis de Sade wrote fetish novels about how anarcho-tyranny was based and elevating the wicked above the good was sexy because they were all a bunch of antitheist perverts?
Wonder where he got his inspiration.
 
the picture we had was from people in a multi-story apartment-style dorm. it looked over an area that WASN'T part of the school's campus. there was never any active shooting at all. it was just a guy who HAD an airsoft rifle. as for why, why not? this isn't england, we can still have toys that look scawy. up close, MOST airsoft have orange tips specifically to prevent this. if he didn't have an orange tip on it he was a retard.

another reason could be any number of places he's going to use the rifle for any other number of uses, plinking, airsoft, just larping in the woods like you're tacticool. that's the best part of america; you're free to do that. nobody should be assuming someone who HAS an assault rifle is an imminent threat to them unless they are *near* the person with the weapon. and if you're in the position the people who were in the high up window were, what kind of retarded mass shooter would just start trying to shoot into random windows hoping to kill someone?
Actually the orange tip isn't as important as you think. People aren't gonna notice it and think "oh no problem it's just airsoft" but rather they're gonna think "oh shit a gun"

Police officers have actually encountered crooks who have painted real steel firearms orange or whatnot in an attempt to fool law enforcement.

In short, it's probably best to treat anything that might resemble a firearm as the real steel and keep it unloaded and in a case when not in use or in an area where something like this is not expected.

And even if it is legal to have an airsoft gun out in the open, it's probably not a good idea in some places.
Pull an airsoft on a cop and see if you aren't shot. Same should go for anyone. Cops aren't 'above' us and if they can fire back on a threat than we can too. At least that's how any sane person should think.

If they don't point or threaten you, then maybe you can say a cop has more of a duty to defend others, but even then, it depends on who and how and other junk.

ETA And the USSC has said cops don't have a duty to defend life anyway if it's of any danger, so.. Cops and all that suck too.
I heard a story about a woman who called the cops on a burglar who raped and beat her almost to death, and sued them because they didn't show up in time to save her. (She called when she heard the break-in)

The case was dismissed because "police officers have no duty to protect individuals from private violence."

The slogan "To Protect and Serve " means to protect society as a whole against the encroachment of criminality, not to act as bodyguards for people who refuse to carry a gun.

Not that I would want to carry a cop in my pocket anyway, but you get the idea.
 
It's some faggot in washington who decides what makes something a life necessary skill though, not parents unfortunately.
i'm talking about the people who are currently posting on social media about how they homeschool their children, and at age 10, their children do not know the alphabet and days of the week, and asking how they can fix that. there are some supremely shitty, retarded, or otherwise unfit parents out there too, and those kids don't deserve to be thrown to the wolves because other kids have a good home life.

In short, it's probably best to treat anything that might resemble a firearm as the real steel and keep it unloaded and in a case when not in use or in an area where something like this is not expected.

And even if it is legal to have an airsoft gun out in the open, it's probably not a good idea in some places.
agreed. none of that would justify busting out the hunting rifle and shooting him in the head before you even heard a gunshot, however, which is what i'm talking about.

Pull an airsoft on a cop and see if you aren't shot. Same should go for anyone. Cops aren't 'above' us and if they can fire back on a threat than we can too. At least that's how any sane person should think.

If they don't point or threaten you, then maybe you can say a cop has more of a duty to defend others, but even then, it depends on who and how and other junk.

ETA And the USSC has said cops don't have a duty to defend life anyway if it's of any danger, so.. Cops and all that suck too.
he wasn't pointing it at anyone in the footage posted here. there's no evidence of any of that behavior. just people who reported an active shooter with no gunshots, and video of people from third story+ windows. if you are in a third story window, i truly do not think you can claim imminent threat to your life from a guy who visibly does not have an optic on his rifle, even. it's just a lack of common sense. if someone is in front of you with any kind of firearm, you are not in the same position as the people in the window. i agree he was a retard who should have had it slung or in a case, because you shouldn't open yourself up to any kind of mistake like that in the first place, but the desire to be the hero with the gun is a bit overwhelming when there was no evidence other than a single video of some guy milling around on a non-university street.
 
i'm talking about the people who are currently posting on social media about how they homeschool their children, and at age 10, their children do not know the alphabet and days of the week, and asking how they can fix that. there are some supremely shitty, retarded, or otherwise unfit parents out there too, and those kids don't deserve to be thrown to the wolves because other kids have a good home life.
For every homeschooler that doesn’t know their ABCs by the time they’re 10, there are tens of thousands of public school kids who don’t know them after graduating from high school.
 
agreed. none of that would justify busting out the hunting rifle and shooting him in the head before you even heard a gunshot, however, which is what i'm talking about.
So you're expected to take being shot at before responding? That's a very english way of thinking, or canadian I guess. Have to take the lethal blow before any reaction.

ETA: I'm not saying in this case taking him out was a good call, but in general, you see someone like that.. Whatever, do what you want I guess. Being 'the hero' usually does bite you in the ass irl.
 
So you're expected to take being shot at before responding? That's a very english way of thinking, or canadian I guess. Have to take the lethal blow before any reaction.
i'd prefer that people at least wait for there to be any kind of real threat at all, other than a guy who HAS a firearm. i open carry, and i don't believe i should be shot for having my pistol, and i also believe that the guy was a retard who was just asking for a mistake to be made, either by a well-meaning civilian or the cops doing their job.

for instance, this guy wasn't even in the school's area. he was just on a road away from people. the people who called it in were from the university. that was the right thing to do. it was good that people called it in and got it checked out. if someone had shot him from a window because they saw the SILHOUETTE of a gun then i don't understand how anyone is supposed to be allowed to open-carry at all. undercover police would be in serious risk, anyone who's leaving a gun show could be a serious threat under that concept. it's not a good argument imo.

another thought that crosses my mind is that if you shoot at anyone with a gun in any kind of situation where you aren't sure what's going on, you could very well hit the good guy with the gun. my argument is not now and never was that you shouldn't defend yourself. my argument is that being a half-mile away from someone, multiple stories above them, is not in imminent danger unless there has already been at least GUNFIRE reported. it's unreasonable to think that.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo