Kipersonapiscesotter
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 26 de Ago, 2024
1. I've had attorneys in the US when not a resident or citizen of the US. Ideally you want a lawyer in the same state you have the action. In my case it was related to patent wars. Out of state lawyers can do it, but it requires a "pro hac vice", kinda a petition to the court for permission, plus I think a MN lawyer will need to sponsor it. If this is sounding more expensive it's because it is. Plus you'd want someone knowing the state laws and statutes, along with case history.Coupla questions here:
1. How does a MN attorney represent a NEV resident in a MN district court? Or is it a federal court?
2. Soooooo Melton could wind up paying for Rekieta legal fees due to joint n several liability with their TRULY GENIUS MOVE to co-defend a harrassment HRO, right? Actually, Melton is likely paying for rekieta representation right now even? OMFG I love this arc.
3. Just the fact Melton will need to defend his creepy CUPHOLDER comments AND Nick will need to defend HIM knowing about a. Cupholder like comments and b. Being ok with those comments and c. Still flying to hackamania AND going as a group with melton to Aaron haunts AND inviting Melton to stay the weekend in his home with 5 kids in it
4. Did I mention, GREAT idea, this joint representation
5. Move it Heidi or Wentzell court
2, 3, 4. Come to think about it, it's a good move by Aaron to do against both and loosely tie them together. The Melton content might influence the decision against Nick. Plus...picking the same fucking lawyer is a tacit admission of coordination.
One thing you learn watching Lolcows is they somehow manage to snatch losses from the jaws of victory. They consistently make the wrong choices.
Take Nick. That mofo went on stream to moan about his lawyer not challenging probable cause. His lawyer also didn't appeal correctly. The state had no fucking idea what he was even trying to claim in his initial Frank's motion because it was so poorly written. Yet....? Sure, let's use him in the HRO. Better yet, recommend him to Melton, to make sure the Judge absolutely knows we work together.
Is it the same Judge? I mean, if the same Judge sees the same lawyer representing two people and the HROs make clear they are in cahoots, it might not legally entangle them, but that has to make some connection in a Judge's head.If you wanted someone to represent you in a MN court they would have to be an MN licensed attorney, regardless of where you live. Melton and Rekieta retaining the same lawyer to deal with their respective HROs does not entangle them or their cases in any way. They are separate HROs, and thus separate cases, whomever is representing them makes no difference.