Based on how taxes tend to work, only the income directly related to New York would be taxed. I'm not say they won't try to tax ALL your income, but if they do you're going to see companies stop selling to New York entirely.
Only if wearing masks during protests, riots and other unlawful assemblies becomes illegal and punishable by immediate arrest and prosecution under the same (or similar) law.
It would make it substantially easier to thin out the liberals' "useful idiot" reserves. I think I'm on board with this idea TBH. It keeps the cops out of the line of fire and puts the worst of America's college output in direct danger. I don't see a downside.
Those are really cute work waifus though
What is it with Democrats trying to beat each other on "destroy your state speedrun"?
Typical boomer, will fight to the death to keep his brown slaves. And do you want to see dead ICE agents?
idk, the one on the right looks like she might murder me if i say the wrong thing.
Lol! Buddy that ship sailed about two decades ago, as police departments bought up all that surplus GWOT gear. Probably earlier than that. Seen your local SWAT team recently?
I haven’t formed an opinion really, but how is being masked ‘militarization,’ is it just mask = scary and police + scary = military? I’m genuinely asking.
I can't stress this enough, we pay these food corporations to poison us. They put this shit in our food because they know most people (especially over worked and stressed out mothers) will buy this shit and feed it to their kids without taking a second glance at the ingredients.
Maybe stop throwing bricks at cops trying to deport rapists and murderers then they wouldn't have to bring out the tear gas.
I’m actually fine with city run grocery stores.
Here is a local archived clip of Mark Rutte, former Dutch prime minister and NATO secretary general calling Donald Trump "daddy" in some kind of way.
This is the craziest one to me. Once upon a time, I worked as a grocer, and margins are insanely low. What few things did have good margins subsidized the particularly bad items (some of which would even lose money). Cutting out the profit would save shoppers no appreciable amount of money, and just creates headaches (if there's inventory loss, where does the money to cover it come from?)
I get the argument for sure, although like @Fapcop said it’s not like anybody’s getting identified easily under a helmet. My issue is more with your terminology, militarization has a meaning and I’m not sure how masking is militarization other than you don’t like it and it’s is a buzzword that people react negatively to instinctively. Is it actually a military practice though? It’s a bit like ‘assault rifle,’ people have trouble defining it but it’s an easy word to use to portray something as negative.
