Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Direct screen caps of shit she's said from twitter aren't enough for you?or for when evidence is presented that can't be easily fabricated.
So why the flip out? You can stop an echo chamber without losing your cool. When you show up all pissed about an edit and complaining that the thread has been kept alive for three years, the thread no one is forcing you to read, we're gonna think you're here to stand up for her because she's being criticized. It's not that serious dude, honest.I never called it a sin to criticize glip's art.
I'm not really debating what glip is like as a person, or their social interactions. As I've said a few times here, I try to reserve judgement for when I have first-hand experience with someone, or for when evidence is presented that can't be easily fabricated. That's not me calling alleged victims liars, or me saying glip is a perfect angel, but me being skeptical of strangers on the internet.
Generally speaking, no. I almost always look for a link to a tweet to verify authenticity. That being said, I don't think anyone in this thread would bother to doctor any. glip's said stuff I don't agree with, but I personally haven't seen anything awful enough to make me believe they're innately awful instead of just having a bad day or something idk.Direct screen caps of shit she's said from twitter aren't enough for you?
So why the flip out? You can stop an echo chamber without losing your cool. When you show up all pissed about an edit and complaining that the thread has been kept alive for three years, the thread no one is forcing you to read, we're gonna think you're here to stand up for her because she's being criticized. It's not that serious dude, honest.
I'm confused as to what your goal is here.
What exactly did make her critique invalid? Was it because she was nearly half PK's age?Generally speaking, no. I almost always look for a link to a tweet to verify authenticity. That being said, I don't think anyone in this thread would bother to doctor any. glip's said stuff I don't agree with, but I personally haven't seen anything awful enough to make me believe they're innately awful instead of just having a bad day or something idk.
Not sure why the whole autism special interest thing is an issue, considering the general attitude toward criticism and frankness in this thread.
tl;dr kinda dumb to claim something is a skilfully superior change to glip's art when it objectively isn't. there's been plenty of valid critique here, but that page edit was not one of them.
tl;dr kinda dumb to claim something is a skilfully superior change to glip's art when it objectively isn't. there's been plenty of valid critique here, but that page edit was not one of them.
Floraverse is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, meaning that people can add onto Floraverse through fan work or edits of existing work. but they have to list Floraverse as the source on the page where they post. This specific license does not prohibit sales. There are other CC licenses available that have similar creation and attribution clauses and also come with a non-commercial clause.
In theory, this means that someone could edit all of the bean mouths out of the Seeds book and republish it, and they'd still be within the terms of the license as long as they attribute it to the original source.
I wrote some stuff that got cut off because I don't have eyes and thus can't properly crop but the short version is that a lot of the edits didn't add anything that better helped convey emotions, and the shadows didn't make any sense with the light source in some panels, and were basically just a bunch of haphazard lines that didn't communicate volume or form.What exactly did make her critique invalid? Was it because she was nearly half PK's age?
idk what you want from me, people asked multiple times after i posted the image what my gripes were with the editHonestly, being an adult and bitching about how bad a 14-year-old's art is, even after said 14-year-old already accepted your critique, is such a PK-ishly petty thing to do.
but thats what PK likes, pussydicks!I love when people waste their time trying to make excuses. You can't just come in to shit up a thread all angry like and then bow out when people start questioning you. Don't be a pussy AND a dick.
Yeah, sure. Didn't mess with the weird not-Neon goat because I don't understand its mass tbh. Edits made in the spirit of trying to preserve the intention of the style while adding stronger values and visual interest.If that isn't something you deem good, then why not show us what is a valid criticism?
Why have you spent the past two days trying to show up a fourteen-year-old?Yeah, sure. Didn't mess with the weird not-Neon goat because I don't understand its mass tbh. Edits made in the spirit of trying to preserve the intention of the style while adding stronger values and visual interest.
Ver archivo adjunto 201740
holy fuck dude someone asked me for criticism so i gave itWhy have you spent the past two days trying to show up a fourteen-year-old?
Lol dude we're not a hive mind. And I just find it really funny that you got so worked up in the first place is all. Do you even know what this forum is?holy fuck dude someone asked me for criticism so i gave it
do the thing
don't do the thing
make up your mind