🦊 Furry Melanie Herring / Purplekecleon / PK / PapayaKitty / GlitchedPuppet / Ash Hazel Woods / Floraverse - Abusive, manipulative SJW artist whose ex-husband fucked a dog and teenagers and whose current husband thinks he's trans because of a TF fetish, admitted to fucking two dogs and letting her cat eat her out

So what's your deal, anyway?

  • I used to be a fan of PK's and was already a Kiwi

    Votos: 242 7.9%
  • I made an account just to post in this thread

    Votos: 266 8.7%
  • I was never a fan of PK's but this shit fascinates me

    Votos: 1,353 44.2%
  • This thread is a fucking circlejerk trainwreck and I wanna watch

    Votos: 1,200 39.2%

  • Total de votantes
    3,060
this is all i can think of when charthur speaks:
maxresdefault.jpg
 
or for when evidence is presented that can't be easily fabricated.
Direct screen caps of shit she's said from twitter aren't enough for you?

Do you honestly think we have enough time (or that we care that much) to sit around editing fake twitter screen caps to make pk look bad?

Not very many people read this thread, so what would even be the point? So we could just sit here and circlejerk about our fake screen caps? Do you know how insane and paranoid that sounds?
 
I never called it a sin to criticize glip's art.
So why the flip out? You can stop an echo chamber without losing your cool. When you show up all pissed about an edit and complaining that the thread has been kept alive for three years, the thread no one is forcing you to read, we're gonna think you're here to stand up for her because she's being criticized. It's not that serious dude, honest.
 
I'm not really debating what glip is like as a person, or their social interactions. As I've said a few times here, I try to reserve judgement for when I have first-hand experience with someone, or for when evidence is presented that can't be easily fabricated. That's not me calling alleged victims liars, or me saying glip is a perfect angel, but me being skeptical of strangers on the internet.

I'm confused as to what your goal is here.
 
Direct screen caps of shit she's said from twitter aren't enough for you?
Generally speaking, no. I almost always look for a link to a tweet to verify authenticity. That being said, I don't think anyone in this thread would bother to doctor any. glip's said stuff I don't agree with, but I personally haven't seen anything awful enough to make me believe they're innately awful instead of just having a bad day or something idk.

So why the flip out? You can stop an echo chamber without losing your cool. When you show up all pissed about an edit and complaining that the thread has been kept alive for three years, the thread no one is forcing you to read, we're gonna think you're here to stand up for her because she's being criticized. It's not that serious dude, honest.

Not sure why the whole autism special interest thing is an issue, considering the general attitude toward criticism and frankness in this thread.

I'm confused as to what your goal is here.

tl;dr kinda dumb to claim something is a skilfully superior change to glip's art when it objectively isn't. there's been plenty of valid critique here, but that page edit was not one of them.
 
Generally speaking, no. I almost always look for a link to a tweet to verify authenticity. That being said, I don't think anyone in this thread would bother to doctor any. glip's said stuff I don't agree with, but I personally haven't seen anything awful enough to make me believe they're innately awful instead of just having a bad day or something idk.



Not sure why the whole autism special interest thing is an issue, considering the general attitude toward criticism and frankness in this thread.



tl;dr kinda dumb to claim something is a skilfully superior change to glip's art when it objectively isn't. there's been plenty of valid critique here, but that page edit was not one of them.
What exactly did make her critique invalid? Was it because she was nearly half PK's age?
 
tl;dr kinda dumb to claim something is a skilfully superior change to glip's art when it objectively isn't. there's been plenty of valid critique here, but that page edit was not one of them.

How is a page edit that fixed mistakes not valid? If that isn't something you deem good, then why not show us what is a valid criticism? It would make your presence in this thread actually worthwhile instead of shitting it up with being a white knight.
 
Floraverse is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, meaning that people can add onto Floraverse through fan work or edits of existing work. but they have to list Floraverse as the source on the page where they post. This specific license does not prohibit sales. There are other CC licenses available that have similar creation and attribution clauses and also come with a non-commercial clause.

In theory, this means that someone could edit all of the bean mouths out of the Seeds book and republish it, and they'd still be within the terms of the license as long as they attribute it to the original source.

Would adding to Floraverse automatically make that work canon? Hmmmmm...

Also, @pissyshitty you might not have the energy to jerk off but I assure you it'd be a better use of your time and you'd get roughly the same result as trying to show us what for on our own turf.
 
What exactly did make her critique invalid? Was it because she was nearly half PK's age?
I wrote some stuff that got cut off because I don't have eyes and thus can't properly crop but the short version is that a lot of the edits didn't add anything that better helped convey emotions, and the shadows didn't make any sense with the light source in some panels, and were basically just a bunch of haphazard lines that didn't communicate volume or form.
 
Art is far more akin to knowing a language as opposed to riding a bike; if you don't speak the language often, your knowledge of it deteriorates and eventually you can no longer speak said language. You very clearly don't know much about art if even that basic principle is lost on you.
(Sorry for the late reply everyone, all this shit happened while I was sleeping gosh dang).
 
I love when people waste their time trying to make excuses. You can't just come in to shit up a thread all angry like and then bow out when people start questioning you. Don't be a pussy AND a dick.
 
If that isn't something you deem good, then why not show us what is a valid criticism?
Yeah, sure. Didn't mess with the weird not-Neon goat because I don't understand its mass tbh. Edits made in the spirit of trying to preserve the intention of the style while adding stronger values and visual interest.
edits.png
 
Yeah, sure. Didn't mess with the weird not-Neon goat because I don't understand its mass tbh. Edits made in the spirit of trying to preserve the intention of the style while adding stronger values and visual interest.
Ver archivo adjunto 201740
Why have you spent the past two days trying to show up a fourteen-year-old?
 
holy fuck dude someone asked me for criticism so i gave it

do the thing
don't do the thing

make up your mind
Lol dude we're not a hive mind. And I just find it really funny that you got so worked up in the first place is all. Do you even know what this forum is?
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo