🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[dezazlop]

This guy is under almost every single tweet about Destiny on Twitter. Do we have any information on his identity?

Just a random footsie, the name is a reference to when destiny thought he was getting gangstalked by AI after saying trump deserved to get shot at.

 

[TheList]

I have clipped most of the relevant parts of his gloating session yesterday.

1:40

This clip is particularly grotesque, he accuses Pxie of turning because of Delaguna. Motherfucker, she doesn't need anyone to talk her into being disgusted by you.

Then he moves on to say he's "glad to take the fight" with Chaeiry, and blames JSTLK for influencing her. Like with the Pxie case, he's completely dishonest about the timeline. JSTLK initially defended you retard.

He didn't turn Chaeiry, Chaeiry turned him. He only started going after Rapestiny hard when it was revealed he recorded Chaeiry fucking without her knowledge and sent those recordings to BPD teenagers.

Rapestiny is, to his core, a massive piece of shit.

 

[Universal Balance]

N

Chaeiry Lying.mp4

This clip is particularly grotesque, he accuses Pxie of turning because of Delaguna. Motherfucker, she doesn't need anyone to talk her into being disgusted by you.

Then he moves on to say he's "glad to take the fight" with Chaeiry, and blames JSTLK for influencing her. Like with the Pxie case, he's completely dishonest about the timeline. JSTLK initially defended you retard.

He didn't turn Chaeiry, Chaeiry turned him. He only started going after Rapestiny hard when it was revealed he recorded Chaeiry fucking without her knowledge and sent those recordings to BPD teenagers.

Rapestiny is, to his core, a massive piece of shit.

What fight? He recorded her without consent. There is no fucking fight. Even his “fight” with Pxie is just arguing technicalities. Even by his own admission he’s guilty on principle and in every other metric except for time. This dickhead needs to learn when to shut his cock hole.

Steven should never use the word fight, you flail bitch ass you don’t fight. You’re weak, thats why you keep those guns in shot because you think it scares people.

I like saying heinous shit about Steven because I hate him, as a person as a figure head and as something I have to share oxygen with. However I am a bit concerned that this disgusting, unmitigated fuck up might be jerking himself off every time we tell the truth about his qualities, given his humiliation fetish.

 

[Code Cave]

Destiny went on a retarded diatribe against consent in his chat, with comments like this:

I wonder how close he can get to defending rape (he's pretty much there anyway) before the footsoldiers actually think about what he's saying.

This nigga was crying so hard, claiming that stasia has been saying so many DISGUSTING things about him. The example he showed was of someone saying they wish Destiny would just die and stasia replied "yup".

I'm sure he said in the clip that he has "spies" and then brings up a Stasia tweet. Spying on one of your victims, who has a protected identity in an ongoing court case against you, doesn't sound good.

As I said, this is his great delusion and his goal. The reason why he's being so ruthless and spending so much in this case.
The delusion is that he thinks that he won't get sued by more people/the Chaeiry case won't materialize.

It makes me wonder what he told Pakman. I imagine he's telling people "I am.a victim of revenge porn and someone is bringing a frivolous civil case against me that's getting tossed soon". Which, as we know, is very very different from reality.

I know's he's tripling down on the implied consent thing with Pxie, but has he ever said anything to justify Abby or Stasia? All he's done is attack Abby for saying she seen the Pxie video, I don't think Destiny has actually addressed the fact that Abby is a victim also, and she's not in the solo leaks.

Defendant Steven K. Bonnell’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order Governing Discovery

"Your honor, witness intimidation is a key aspect of my legal strategy, I simply must be allowed to do it."

They also link a clip of JSTLK laughing that is avatar is in the filings. JSTLK doesn't care about his online username being public, he doesn't want fucking "Chad Jones of 123 Ice Lake, Vancouver" public when Destiny is telling people to kill him.

Also remember, erudite outed him:

Unbelievably based post, I forgot about this clip. It's funny/sad that the people who might actually have good information for Pxie and Chaeiry (erudite/babypeach) are people who are desperate to be Picked by Steven.

This clip is particularly grotesque, he accuses Pxie of turning because of Delaguna. Motherfucker, she doesn't need anyone to talk her into being disgusted by you.

He acts like his victims don't have any agency and are just retards being manipulated by malicious people behind the scenes. He is unironically the "It's all about me" breaking bad meme. I can't imagine being one of the women and seeing him cry about how they didn't team up with him to go after Solo, it's deranged.

He also spoke about Melina a couple of times in the stream, but I didn't clip it. He only had positive things to say about her, which indicates to me that she's either back on Team Rape or has absolutely no intention of helping the other girls (pretty obvious since she undid her retweet of Pxie's substack, but still.) Add her to the list of several people who have information that would help Pxie/Chaeriy but refuse to do anything.

 

[A. G. Peak]

They also link a clip of JSTLK laughing that his avatar is in the filings.

That explains why Destiny was asking for the link in chat.

---

Chat log updates from last night.

Spoiler: Linked NSFW Image

https://i.4cdn.org/s/1749195497687988.jpg

 

[Universal Balance]

That explains why Destiny was asking for the link in chat.

Ver archivo adjunto 7468717
Ver archivo adjunto 7468713

---

Chat log updates from last night.

Ver archivo adjunto 7468751

Spoiler: Linked NSFW Image

https://i.4cdn.org/s/1749195497687988.jpg

Ver archivo adjunto 7468753

He’s really doing his best to get them stuck in the mud. It’s filthy morally but that’s what he hired Brettler for. Par for the course for the worm along with the “jokes” about underage women.

He better hope his confidence isn’t misplaced. I’ve seen quiet evil get away with their bullshit, but I’ve never in my life seen openly smug evil not paying what’s due. Even prince Andrew had the good sense to shut the fuck up and he’s basically untouchable. Taunting people, flaunting your horrific behaviour and motivating others to destroy you is a bad strategy. Especially when you’re a weak twink with a tween body, who has a decades long history of repeating the same behaviour.

Laugh it up Steven, but don’t expect any sympathy when the consequences of your actions drive you to bite down on the barrel of one of those display guns. You’ve made it zero sum now. Either you get away with this or your life ends in tatters with only one way out. May the odds ever be in your favour.

 

[A. G. Peak]

Another docket update.

Plaintiff Jane Doe’s Reply to Opposition to Motion for Entry of Order to Compel Lolcow LLC to Remove Videos

Spoiler: Document 94

Spoiler: Document 94-1

GPT-4.1 Summary:

Main points from the filings:

• Jane Doe asks the court to order Lolcow, LLC (owner of Kiwi Farms) to remove sexually explicit videos of her, originally shared by Steven K. Bonnell II without her consent.
• Bonnell’s opposition is based on claims that:
  • The court lacks subject matter jurisdiction (arguing the conduct happened before the relevant federal law was enacted).
  • The court lacks jurisdiction over Lolcow, LLC as a nonparty.
  • The requested removal of videos is arbitrary.
  • Jane Doe isn’t entitled to attorney’s fees.
• Jane Doe argues:
  • There is sufficient evidence showing at least some video disclosures happened after the relevant law (the CARDII Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6851) took effect.
  • Even if some sharing/digital hosting began before the law, videos remained accessible via active links (Discord, Google Drive) after the law was enacted, bringing it under the court’s jurisdiction.
  • Witness declarations show Bonnell shared the video after the law was active.
  • Lolcow, LLC has agreed to submit to the court’s authority for the limited purpose of removing the videos if so ordered (see attached stipulation).
  • Removing the videos is not arbitrary—Jane Doe continues to suffer harm from their presence, and Bonnell himself has claimed he wants them removed but has only made minimal efforts.
  • Jane Doe seeks attorney’s fees because significant attorney time and effort was required to pursue the removal and try to resolve without court action.
• The attached stipulation (signed by Lolcow, LLC) confirms:
  • Lolcow, LLC consents to the court’s jurisdiction just for this removal request.
  • If the court orders removal, Lolcow, LLC will promptly take the videos down from Kiwi Farms.
  • This submission doesn’t mean Lolcow, LLC is a party for any other purpose or waives future legal defenses.

In sum:
Jane Doe is renewing her request for the court to order Kiwi Farms to take down the nonconsensual videos, arguing the court does have the authority, she continues to experience harm, Lolcow, LLC is willing to cooperate under court order, and her claim for attorney’s fees is justified given the circumstances.

 

[wood tiger]

I'm curious, when they ask for attorney fees.

She's raised part of the money on retainer. If he refused her intial attempt at damages for 15 million down to half a million eventually in bargaining attempts before filing the suit.

If one of he legal team was I thought mentioned a family member/friend doing it probono.

Obviously playing attorney fees is should he be found culpable by the courts. Do they itemize thier billable hours? Never needing an attorney myself.

While I've always said he was stupid sending videos. It's known and joked he does age play. Is rose actually underage or this whole thing is of a ethot selling herself to him attempting to blackmail him because of the content of their age play has anyone considered? As the logs solo came to give here when the blackmail wasn't given into I'd think have some tells in regard to that. Yet all that is mostly shown is a groupie luring him in with her thirst traps and his idiot gooning while he as par the course of his well established behaviour pleads to hookup from her leads in.

If he's known to sext the nude sharing ewhores with the hopes of a transactional hookup. He was speculatively sending her money for those videos/pics. Did she actually just organically appear in his discord and then their convos occur if it's said she was marketing herself under roseiscumming with bf solo "managing" her from another country? Obviously is overall bad optics. Yet what's shown or was sent is his stupidity at gooning over whores he gets attached to in their paid for lies to get better tips
*edit additional thought*
Because if that college graduation speculation post was accurate for 2024 and they were actively [still?[ talking in 2025. Would imply age play not underage.
Lack of public social media making it difficult to be found a private/secret whore now in his rotation of fuckfriends which why protecting her [?]. I've wondered if when met up when 19 to finally hook up another reason to protect her is a secret kid? Did he pay for her college too as he did the cam whore gf? Retainer fees to fuck down tuition as exchange rent for pussy visits is known to occur with him

 

[the big new poster]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=--xJP3T8RkA
Aba now appears to be supporting the pre/post-amphetamine narrative that's been disproven already. Completely cucked.

he's clickbaiting with the thumbnail.
He doesn;t talk about destiny at all, he replays the part where he scoffs at the idea of someone changing as a person after taking vyvanse and reveals that after he released the video, someone he knew reached out and told them adhd is real and they should get tested and Aba got tested for ADHD and went on vyvanse and changed a lot.
so it seemed to me like he only took back that one tiny part of his destiny video and his other criticisms, like destiny intentionally going for mentally ill women and being unsavoury still stand.
If anything the fact that was the only thing he mentioned or retreated on seems like more of a "fuck you" and he's implicitly saying that he doesn;'t take back a single word of the rest of the video.

 

[Datman]

The new addition to the footsie dialogue tree seems to be "well, Pxie admitted to sending the same video to her boyfriend without explicit consent, therefore, what Destiny did was reciprocal."

Ignoring that there are credible factual disagreements with this (Her making it clear that's what she was doing prior, him not even being recognizable in the video, etc) lets engage with this argument as if the factual understanding is 100% level and agreed upon.

There is no evidence, that anything Pxie did in regards to the video informed the actions that Destiny took with how he distributed it. This is evident by how he took responsibility for it being in Roses possession prior to any litigation being placed on him, and him showcasing having no real insight into the nature of Pxie and her boyfriend's relationship with the video based on it apparently only being revealed to him in the hearing.

If your ever arguing with a footsie, and they bring this talking point up, just ask "what evidence is there that this informed the actions that Destiny took with the video? Or, more importantly, any of the other content he distributed containing people who allege that it was done so un-wittingly?" If they move the burden of evidence, then just point back to him needlessly taking responsibility and, by his own admission, being in the dark with how the interactions between Pxie and her boyfriend went prior to sending the video, making it impossible for it to have been intentionally "reciprocal".

It's important that we are smart and precise with how we approach this argument, because it must be as autistically bulletproof as possible. DO NOT GET BAITED INTO, OR EMOTIONALLY ATTACHED TO DEFENDING THE ACTIONS OF ANY OF THE VICTIMS, YOU DO NOT KNOW OR CARE ABOUT ANY OF THESE PEOPLE, STAY FOCUSED.

 

[Noom Boom]

I feel like the catalyst for coomer shit wasn't the meds, but him getting divorced from mel, since it liberated him to do more degen shit in his apartment. If I remember correctly thats when a fuckton of women were being flown out and visible through his background on stream.

I agree with this. It was a joke in the thread at the time that Melina was the only thing keeping Destiny grounded and now that she was out, shit was going to go off the rails. This theory seems to have played out. I believe this is for two reasons.

1. Destiny probably did have "love" (or whatever the closest thing to love that he can feel) for Melina and he never learned how to process that loss. This lead him to try and drown out the feelings by keeping himself as occupied with as many people as possible and latching onto the first viable partner that he could find (Layna).
2. Melina was the closest thing to a moral code that Destiny had to abide by. It was she who demanded he not fuck truly dangerous people that might break into their home. It was she who limited his escapades to when they both had partners lined up. When Melina left, Destiny was untethered.

So I completely reject the narrative that ADHD, medication, or anything related to that had any effect on this situation.

A. G. Peak Thank you for your docket update. I have been offline for several months and am therefore behind on the court case. My thoughts had been that the Destiny sent one video of Pixie to Rose and that was prior to the enactment of the Florida law under which Pixie is suing Destiny, therefore, this case should be quickly dismissed. I was confused on why it was not. This clears a few things up.

- Pixie is suing over multiple videos, some of which she is arguing were sent after the enactment of the Florida law. Factual disagreement it seems, Pixie will either be able to prove this or not, but the judge seems to believe there is sufficient probability that this is the case that they are allowing the suit to continue.
- For the videos that were shared before the law, they should still be allowed in the case as the links to access the videos were still active and available after the law went into effect. Interesting perspective, if you send someone a video link on day 1, are you "sharing" that video link as long as the link is active and the recipient has access to it? This is probably not defined in the law and will require genuine thought by the judge on what "sharing" means. Could go either way.
- Pixie claims, via witness testimony, that Destiny sent those same videos again after the law was enacted. I guess this is where Destiny is saying that the witnesses should have to present themselves to the court, but this also seems to be a factual matter. Either Pixie can present sufficient evidence that the videos sent to Rose before the enactment of the law were also sent to someone afterward, or she cannot.
- If Pixie can prove enough of the above to have the court rule that Destiny can be held liable under the Florida law for her videos, this is where Destiny is arguing that there was "implied consent". I think Destiny loses on this one, the law seems to pretty clearly lay out what is needed for "consent" and I don't believe Destiny has enough to support that.

I can now understand why the suit is getting so messy. I also disagree with some people saying that Pixie's lawyers are dropping the ball. I don't know if their actual filings are bad or not, but their arguments seem to be solid.

 

[Bill The Fucker]

Pixie claims, via witness testimony, that Destiny sent those same videos again after the law was enacted. I guess this is where Destiny is saying that the witnesses should have to present themselves to the court, but this also seems to be a factual matter. Either Pixie can present sufficient evidence that the videos sent to Rose before the enactment of the law were also sent to someone afterward, or she cannot.

There's a very real chance that Destiny gets clapped by this law, just to be completely unable to counter sue Pixie thanks to the same technicality he's currently trying to skate by on. Please god make it so.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

I'm not particularly eager to be dragged into this so I've done it. My expectation is that if we did get dragged in she would get her court order regardless and there's literally no point fighting it. Destiny really really really wants me dragged in though.

Now, Josh, you should have funded the take it down act to the Supreme Court. It should be rolled on constitutional. It's a god awful piece of legislation.
My opinion about revenge porn is the simple fact of the matter is, if you are dumb enough to film yourself getting dicked down by some one and keep it inevitable availability to that person who would do that and you're dating someone who would do that, you kind of deserve it. Shows a lack of judgment.
I'm tired of the state hafting to fix peoples low IQ mistakes.

But I get why you did it. You know, I find funny about to take it down, act It's not going to do anything. People. are just going to have explicit. mega folders filled with that type of stuff.

 

[Code Cave]

Okay, Pxie's latest filing is pretty interesting. When responding to Destiny's claims that he sent the video before the law was applicable, they argue:

1 - The original complaint includes someone saying Destiny sent the video of Pxie months before the lawsuit dropped. This person has deleted their account, Destiny thinks it was someone from KF trolling Pxie.
(to be fair @disastercabbage did sign up and say he sent a different video of Pxie to their friend: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/steven-bonnell-ii-destiny-destiny-gg.29205/post-20356177 so it might actually be linked to them?)

2 - Sharing it via Discord and Google Drive makes the link accessible when the law was applied as they are "live links":


(Again, very familiar points they're making! )

3 - The Abby testimony. Destiny didn't meet Abby until 2023, when the statute was already law. The leaks didn't happen until November 2024, so the fact that Abby has messages saying she has a video of Pxie means she seen it before the leaks AND when the law was applied.

They also take shots at Destiny for trying to stop Null from taking the videos down:

Defendant claims that removing these videos is arbitrary relief, even though he contradictorily claims that he has tried to have them removed to no avail and continues to victimize himself

He's not going to like that line!

From Destiny's filing - Destiny is upset that Pxie can use people on the internet to help her, but he can't:

I wonder if he's annoyed because the autists he has left couldn't find Rose for him?

Also, pretty funny that Pxie's lawyers fucked up telling the time again (bottom up):

"Joan, it's 10am"

edit:
JSTLK responds:

 

[Guyspleasedontfight]

Destiny bros……..the walls are closing in……..how do we sweep this up?

 

[WebFelching]

Destiny bros……..the walls are closing in……..how do we sweep this up?

At this point all we have left is "Let him rape"

 

[darkfate_fgg]

Code Cave 1 - The original complaint includes someone saying Destiny sent the video of Pxie months before the lawsuit dropped. This person has deleted their account, Destiny thinks it was someone from KF trolling Pxie.
(to be fair @disastercabbage did sign up and say he sent a different video of Pxie to their friend: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/steven-bonnell-ii-destiny-destiny-gg.29205/post-20356177 so it might actually be linked to them?)

2 - Sharing it via Discord and Google Drive makes the link accessible when the law was applied as they are "live links":


(Again, very familiar points they're making! )

3 - The Abby testimony. Destiny didn't meet Abby until 2023, when the statute was already law. The leaks didn't happen until November 2024, so the fact that Abby has messages saying she has a video of Pxie means she seen it before the leaks AND when the law was applied.

That's what I described here as, in my eyes, strong circumstantial evidence.

The plaintiff recently filed crucial evidence corroborating the accusations stated in the complaint, establishing federal CARDII applicability. Additional witnesses are prepared to testify once the protective order is granted. Potentially three further cases are in the pipeline (four if Chaeriy files a civil suit alongside a potential criminal one).

Yet this meth fiend jerks off over insignificant testimony for a preliminary injunction. If the PI gets denied, so what? He’s distracting his lobotomized worshippers and feeding them talking points to fuel their harassment and intimidation campaigns against witnesses. Don’t fall for the low-grade magician’s bullshit.

The second fairy tale he’s spinning involves delegitimizing the abbymc evidence. The text message, alongside the affidavit, presents strong circumstantial evidence that the alleged behavior occurred within CARDII’s scope and reflects his typical conduct. Compare this to lil’ Stevie’s “totally convincing” story that Abby hallucinated receiving those videos, conflating them with the rape archive she supposedly discovered on his PC.

“[...] he just SENT me another one let’s see who he is fucking this time” [sic]. Obviously, she’d confuse the two right as she typed it. And his star witness? The pajigger Darius. Good luck putting that crack nigga on the stand, you scum fuck.

Abby might’ve snooped through his stuff and there might be texts confirming this — but who cares? There’s no nexus discrediting her evidence.

Finally, the abbymc evidence exists electronically. I doubt Pxie’s counsel is stupid enough to rely solely on screenshots (if so, they deserve to lose and get countersued!). Unlike the fudge-packing molestation victim, they will be able to establish proper evidential foundation regarding authenticity and integrity for that piece of evidence. Meanwhile, our cock-sucking junior dev juggles JSON and HTML files, busy doctoring all those incriminating message threads, while on a Vyvanse bender. Hope they object the shit out of his “evidence.”

If my wife goes missing and they find a message from me to a friend, saying "I killed her yesterday," I don't think the court would dismiss this as insignificant evidence, even in the absence of physical, direct evidence like the body or murder weapon. A jury might evaluate it as not strong enough to convict in a later trial, but it would be admissible evidence.

That's why he is always gossiping about all the other irrelevant, retarded shit, but goes surprisingly quiet and deflects when confronted with those crucial details.

What I also found interesting is that plaintiff's counsel seems to be questioning the veracity of his claim that the message was sent before Oct. '24 by stating he hasn't provided any logs so far. So my guess is they will question the foundation of his evidence in the form of his epic JSON/HTML exports. It will be interesting what they will get out of the subpoenas (Discord/Google/etc.) in discovery.

Finally, the abbymc evidence exists electronically. I doubt Pxie’s counsel is stupid enough to rely solely on screenshots (if so, they deserve to lose and get countersued!). Unlike the fudge-packing molestation victim, they will be able to establish proper evidential foundation regarding authenticity and integrity for that piece of evidence. Meanwhile, our cock-sucking junior dev juggles JSON and HTML files, busy doctoring all those incriminating message threads, while on a Vyvanse bender. Hope they object the shit out of his “evidence.”

And I thought the little Cumsquire from Whorevard was some kind of natural-born legal genius; he has read so many Supreme Court decisions on live stream. So sad!

 

[Stratos Sphere]

Is there a way they can check who accessed the google drive links and when they accessed them? If they subpoena google of course.

 

[Pippa is a spic whore]

Anyway, Pxie's lawyers should really hammer the prolonged distribution + shite editable log format angle. Esteban refuses to agree to allow his shit taken from the backend. I am no lawyer but if his consent is needed for that (also funny how it cant be "implicit") he is probably trying to get doctored shit admitted as fact. He should be forced to either allow the subpeona or conceede that the logs may be damning to him.

They actually did it

https://youtu.be/lcFMUfjj3PY?feature=shared

 

[darkfate_fgg]

Is there a way they can check who accessed the google drive links and when they accessed them? If they subpoena google of course.

They already did, but I don't know what they can retrieve.