US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Because you grew up in a culture so pervaded with it that you probably took it for granted as just normal history. Did you know that Nixon:
- Nearly won with a unanimous electoral college victory (FLAWLESS VICTORY)
- Created the EPA
- Pushed Affirmative Action
- Gave the Indians their reservations back after FDR stole even that
- Ended Vietnam
- Did nothing that no other President since or BEFORE (JFK) didn’t do with illegal political espionage

If you’re the average American, you know none of these things and probably had an impression of him as being purely bad, purely defined by his Watergate scandal (only big because it was the first such, small potatoes compared to Obama shenanigans), far more Right wing than he was, and widely hated instead of widely loved. Because if I turn on a movie or TV show, especially a Groening one like Simpsons or Futurama, that’s all I’ll hear is the same Nixon jokes over and over.

He was hated by the same kinds of faggots that hate Trump, and sadly, unless there’s a giant war or revolution or something, Trump will go down the same way; people that were alive and paying attention at the time will remember how he was slandered, but future generations will having nothing to go off but the spin.
The reverse of this, by the way, is Camelot (Kennedy Enslavement Syndrome). There are quite a few reasons to like JFK (he got shot by the deep state for threatening its power, he launched Apollo), but he is romanticized to hell and back for being a rich handsome Yankee that got shot. He’s a blank slate for libtards to write their utopian fantasies on. He can play Lincoln to Johnson - to his own Johnson - except unlike Lincoln he didn’t actually preside over much of note.

Never mind that JFK was not an especially popular politician when he drew breath, that his family were bootlegger crooks with mob connections (the dad was a Nazi supporter; to be fair, Nixon also had mob friends), that the election was rigged in Texas and Illinois (allegedly).

JFK isn’t a bad dude, all considered, but he’s far from the God Jesus he’s made out to be.
 
*sigh* Let's get this out of the way...

Ver archivo adjunto 7361332

Alright, so there still exists a power differential, so it's never a matter of a young boy "getting some" from their older teacher--it's a matter of the teacher ignoring and taking advantage of the position they're in to gratify themselves, regardless of the fact that the gulf between instructor and pupil exists for a reason, and crossing it risks all kinds of long-term damage to the younger and far more ignorant of the two.
We have a term for this. It's called rape.

Yes it's still rape if the hot pedophile teacher is female.

I don't know why this is controversial but it is. Probably a side effect of our society feeling an instinctive revulsion to the idea of making females take responsibility for anything, ever.
 
Saudis make sense, but qatar has me scratching my chin. They’re the Muslim brotherhood headquarters and where Hamas leadership lives. The CIA is balls deep in Qatar.

Something has to be happening under the surface.
qatar has been working on infiltrating the US and lobbying in the US, it's paid off

It means that Trump feels satisfied they are not funding terror at this point
Qatar is still pouring money into the Muslim brotherhood and their state media supports Hamas.

I think Qatari lobbying just reached its peak point
 
We have a term for this. It's called rape.

Yes it's still rape if the hot pedophile teacher is female.

I don't know why this is controversial but it is. Probably a side effect of our society feeling an instinctive revulsion to the idea of making females take responsibility for anything, ever.
I don't know about you, but when I was 14, roughly a high school freshman, if I managed to get into the pants of a hot female teacher, I would be pretty stoked, and pretty shocked to find out that she was the one in trouble. On the other hand, if a male teacher got with a female student, I would have found that to be pretty fucked up. Because the two things are not the same.

Are you going to tell me that it's the exact same thing if the sexes were swapped? Do you seriously believe that gender is just a social construct and at their core humans are sexless androgynous things like yourself who are subject to the exact same traumas and psychological and social and hormonal pressures? Do you have an actual point to make?

Or are you just an autistic legalist who can safely be dismissed?
 
Because the two things are not the same.
They're not the same, but even if the boy doesn't understand it as being wrong (less stigma) doesn't mean its not going to fuck over his psyche in the long run.

You're in the middle of the tumultuous hormone storm that being a teenager entails and nowhere close to being able to rationally consider all the consequences of a teacher using you like a dildo.
 
I'm not American but I never understood Kennedy Enslavement Syndrome.

JFK was a bull head imperialist who I fully believe would have launched a nuclear strike on the USSR if Khrushchev hadn't had the sense and foresight to back down.

He was probably one of the first examples of how powerful the media was becoming in the US as they propped him up as some kind of superman hero when in reality he was a philandering, low IQ, wealthy party boy who said the right things and look good on TV. And more let the real movers do what they wanted up until he started to believe his own PR and they killed him for it.
 
I don't know about you, but when I was 14, roughly a high school freshman, if I managed to get into the pants of a hot female teacher, I would be pretty stoked, and pretty shocked to find out that she was the one in trouble. On the other hand, if a male teacher got with a female student, I would have found that to be pretty fucked up. Because the two things are not the same.

Are you going to tell me that it's the exact same thing if the sexes were swapped? Do you seriously believe that gender is just a social construct and at their core humans are sexless androgynous things like yourself who are subject to the exact same traumas and psychological and social and hormonal pressures? Do you have an actual point to make?

Or are you just an autistic legalist who can safely be dismissed?
You are looking back and retroactively fantasizing about this as an adult coomer, completely removing your actual emotional development as a teenager. You think you wanted it, but I doubt you would feel the same if it had actually happened. That's why people are calling you retarded.

Children are protected from these things not because they don't think about it but because they don't understand it. As a child you do not have the capacity to understand the long term developmental effects of having sex with someone twice your age regardless of how much you think you're capable. That is why the adults in that scenario carry all the blame and stigma.
 
I'm not American but I never understood Kennedy Enslavement Syndrome.

JFK was a bull head imperialist who I fully believe would have launched a nuclear strike on the USSR if Khrushchev hadn't had the sense and foresight to back down.

He was probably one of the first examples of how powerful the media was becoming in the US as they propped him up as some kind of superman hero when in reality he was a philandering, low IQ, wealthy party boy who said the right things and look good on TV. And more let the real movers do what they wanted up until he started to believe his own PR and they killed him for it.
Whenever one of our Presidents swears an oath to defeat communism and then gets shot, they earn a place in our pantheon
 
It's worse than that. They can't realize other perspectives exist. They have no theory of mind of non-leftists, usually non-alt-leftists. To them, anyone who disagrees with them (even momentarily) is guilty of the worst kind of moral failing and can be dismissed outright.
Trying to even passively discuss political events with these people is a fool's errand. The things other people are concerned about are never real, they don't happen, it's just misinformation, etc. It's not a matter of ignorance, it's willful on their part to plug their ears and pretend that the world outside of what reddit tells them isn't real.
I first started noticing it in the SJW community on Tumblr, and I called it out for what it was back then, but essentially, they've replaced the conventional definition of racism with one where only one race can possibly be guilty of it - where they feel the correct solution to racism that happened ages ago is more racism, but by the right people this time.
Trying to discuss affirmative action and DEI and the like and these people seem to believe that discrimination is inevitable and it's impossible to have raceblind merit based hiring, so someone must be discriminated against and it's good that it's happening to white people. Because if white people aren't being discriminated against, discrimination is inevitable and instead it will be the non-white bloc. It's lunacy.
Lucifer mindset. I'm not that religious but this is the exact same mindset behind Lucifer's rebellion.
Correct, leftism is inherently Luciferian in that they believe that reality is subjective and subservient to humanity. A gangbanger wife beater can be a "Minnesota dad" because they believe he is. A man can be a woman because they believe it. Objective reality doesn't exist, you can just plug your ears and pretend that only your reality is real.
 
I don't know about you, but when I was 14, roughly a high school freshman, if I managed to get into the pants of a hot female teacher, I would be pretty stoked, and pretty shocked to find out that she was the one in trouble. On the other hand, if a male teacher got with a female student, I would have found that to be pretty fucked up. Because the two things are not the same.

Are you going to tell me that it's the exact same thing if the sexes were swapped? Do you seriously believe that gender is just a social construct and at their core humans are sexless androgynous things like yourself who are subject to the exact same traumas and psychological and social and hormonal pressures? Do you have an actual point to make?

Or are you just an autistic legalist who can safely be dismissed?
This has a legal, psychological, and social definition: you were molested.
 
I think you need to do a little more research there bro. Qatar is the richest country in the world by far thanks to sitting on some of the largest, highest quality and easiest to access oil in the world.

They don't need no US dollars coming in. They play nice with the US because the US protects them from other nations who see such a small but super wealthy country as easy pickings.

I think these Qataris are very impressive after looking into it.

Managing to discipline pajeets as well.

And show that it's possible to be rich and keep chimpouts to a minimum.

Screenshot_20250514-112618_Brave.webp

Screenshot_20250514-112634_Brave.webp

Screenshot_20250514-112730_Brave.webp
 
I dont get it.

Fuck off where full. They should just go to the neitherlands and call it good

Fuck that. We got plenty of land that could use the green thumb of the Dutch in the midwest. We could even take some of those Netherlands' farmers getting fucked over by their government too.
What is a white person? Do you include slavs? Argentinians?

Will they behave like other whites?
 
I don't know about you, but when I was 14, roughly a high school freshman, if I managed to get into the pants of a hot female teacher, I would be pretty stoked, and pretty shocked to find out that she was the one in trouble. On the other hand, if a male teacher got with a female student, I would have found that to be pretty fucked up. Because the two things are not the same.

Are you going to tell me that it's the exact same thing if the sexes were swapped? Do you seriously believe that gender is just a social construct and at their core humans are sexless androgynous things like yourself who are subject to the exact same traumas and psychological and social and hormonal pressures? Do you have an actual point to make?

Or are you just an autistic legalist who can safely be dismissed?

So you're ok with the idea of having sex with little boys because (checks notes) oh, just because. Got it. Thanks for letting us know.
 
Are you going to tell me that it's the exact same thing if the sexes were swapped?
yes. 14 year old girls who are preyed upon by older men also think that they're cool and mature and special because dumb young people are naive and ignorant about how the world works. that's why we have statutory rape laws because even if they "willingly" had sex with an adult they're too immature to understand what they're doing. that's also why children cannot sign contracts. it doesn't matter if the rapist is attractive or female. they're still taking advantage of an underdeveloped brain

why don't you take your dumb radfem takes to the loli/shota thread and hang out with other people that happily protect rapists that target boys while getting mad at the internet about anime
 
Atrás
Top Abajo