🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[Dylon Stevens]

I haven't had the time to check in the papers but according to jstlk he declared under oath that he only sent the video to Rose.
How fucked is he if this is found to be an objective lie to attempt to drop the lawsuit?

 

[StrangerMe]

The funny thing is that Destiny's molestation was "brutal" and "pretty violent" according to him, so even a cope that tries to distinguish lighter forms of rape with more aggressive forms of rape doesn't lead to the conclusion that his molestation hasn't effected him.

It's genuinely so painfully obvious.
It's a simple matter of thinking about whether if he had never been molested as a kid would he have been a better father and more present in Nathan's life? would he not suffer of porn and sex addiction? would he not be as sociopathic and manipulative?
would he not be such a compulsive liar? would he have done more with his life rather than just streaming, masturbating all day, and eating his own cum? would he have been able to have normal romantic relationships? would his relationship with his family have been better? would he have been able to form normal friendships?
The answer is obviously yes, he would be a way different person if he had never been molested, therefore whether he wants to accept it or not his molestation had ramifications that negatively affected every single aspect of his life.

If that's not trauma, then I don't know what is. However, he will never concede that, because accepting that is in his mind to accept defeat, that his life was permanently altered against his will, 26+ years ago, and he has not even once hopped off that crazy train.
He prefers to live in self delusion.

There's probably almost certainly people that manage to move past that sort of trauma, but despite what Destiny wants to believe, he's not one of them. Just because he's not publicly crying about his memories of it doesn't change that he's very obviously traumatized by it, anyone who watches his stream for just a small amount of time realizes he's not right in the head.


Footsoldiers seething because the asian girl doesn't want anything to do with them after someone, I'm guessing from the DGGsnark subreddit, messaged her about Destiny and his fans, and their behaviour of grooming girls for him, after I posted about it in the thread.

"I don't know how long of a memory KF has for these sorts of things"
Don't worry about it buddy, I have very bad memory, surely.

 

[do ut des]

dggL, another super soldier has fallen, the walls are closing in, little stephen

 

[I HATE THE ANTICHRIST!]

How fucked is he if this is found to be an objective lie to attempt to drop the lawsuit?

Well depends considering that it will be hard to prove that its a lie. He can always say "I truly believed that this was the only time I sent this video" and it will be difficult to prove that he knowingly lied.

 

[Jesus was a λῃστής]

Well depends considering that it will be hard to prove that its a lie. He can always say "I truly believed that this was the only time I sent this video" and it will be difficult to prove that he knowingly lied.

It's irrelevant if he "knowingly lied" and the onus isn't on Pxies legal team or the judge to prove it's a straight out lie. The Judge will just not give him much regard with anything else he submits/states for its truthfulness. If there's irrefutable evidence from google/discord logs that he did send it after to date and to other parties, well he's screwed in the civil case, it will just be a case of how much his lawyers can bargain down a pre-trial settlement or he can risk going to trial where has demonstrably been dishonest and being the big brain he is, commentating on the proceedings and harassing the plaintiff, making a joke out of the whole situation where everyone is INSANE AND UNHINGED because they hate him.

If it's referred and prosecuted as perjury, criminally, all the prosecution has to establish is that Steven was obligated by the legal suit to tell the truth, the onus will be on Steven, to somehow explain in a criminal court why he signed his name on a legal deposition/response/affidavit that was objectively false, which is probably the most fucked position to be in, he could have turned this into a felony. No guns and he won't be able to vote until all penalties are served and fines paid, vyvanse or kiwifarms isn't a mitigating circumstance. OMEGALULW.

 

[dezazlop]

I was willing to consider him trying to squirm by the initial claim that it is based on belief and information, but it would be pretty weird of him to misremember such critical information given that he very recently went through all of them to "nuke the logs", as he himself puts it.

Given that pixies lawyers have already subpoenaed discord, i dont think he will OMEGALULW this one. It sounds more like a SWEATSTINY of you ask me.

 

[I HATE THE ANTICHRIST!]

It's irrelevant if he "knowingly lied"

It is really not. The act of perjury is willfully lying under oath with "willfully" being the key word here, it requires an intent to lie. If you genuinely believe that what you said is true then you have not willfully lied.
You can argue that its not reasonable for him to have forgotten it considering he said that he went on a "deleting spree" recently but it would be up to the judge to decide whenever or not it was reasonable for him to forget about it.

 

[SchizoNerd420]

It's actually really funny to me to see Destiny and his fans refer to these women as "last-minute" witnesses given the stage of the proceedings. Remember, the discovery deadline isn't for another 7 months, and trial is scheduled more than a year from now. But, yeah, totally, these women coming out more than a year before trial is scheduled are "last-minute" witnesses. Give me a fucking break lol.

 

[Jesus was a λῃστής]

It is really not. The act of perjury is willfully lying under oath with "willfully" being the key word here, it requires an intent to lie. If you genuinely believe that what you said is true then you have not willfully lied.
You can argue that its not reasonable for him to have forgotten it considering he said that he went on a "deleting spree" recently but it would be up to the judge to decide whenever or not it was reasonable for him to forget about it.

A mistaken belief is not a defence. Especially when the statement is material to the case.

You are correct that the judge will decide the circumstances, but this isn't getting some date or location mixed up.

If there's 4 years of logs and he was sharing it as late as last year just before the leak and he's been deleting evidence, claiming he dun forgot about the thousands of other instances he shared the links, when his lawyer advised him that his statement was made under oath under penalty of perjury, that will not cut the mustard.

 

[cloudy1]

wouldn't the act of him """preserving""" (note: deleting) the very logs in which he shares said videos with other women be evidence that he was 100% aware of other instances of sharing the videos?

 

[do ut des]

A mistaken belief is not a defence. Especially when the statement is material to the case.

You are correct that the judge will decide the circumstances, but this isn't getting some date or location mixed up.

If there's 4 years of logs and he was sharing it as late as last year just before the leak and he's been deleting evidence, claiming he dun forgot about the thousands of other instances he shared the links, when his lawyer advised him that his statement was made under oath under penalty of perjury, that will not cut the mustard.

In criminal court mistaken believe is 100% a valid defense, since you need to prove intent (most of the time in the form of dolus eventualis, and that implies that you need to at least have seriously considered the possibility of the act being/resulting in a crime and to be ok with that [the easy check for that being, did the perpretrator think "Even if it happens" (intent) or "It wont happen"(no intent)].) Idk about american law but i would assume that this crime steven imo most likely has commit even needs a dolus specialis.

 

[RickyLaFleur]

Why are there no clips from jstlk like “another victim of Destiny comes forward in a statement under penalty of purjury” on LSF?

I’d post it but I’m banned for insulting DGGtards, who are apparently a protected class.

Is the sub completely taken over? Seems like DGGers are only comfortable promoting him over there when he’s screeching about someone hated by other communities (idubbz/hasan/asmond).

LSF seems to be partially taken over by Dggr's. I've spoken on it in previous posts that the sub flip flops on completely shitting on him to full blown Janny sweeping. I'll show some recent examples.

https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/s/8eFgr6DXLC

This post that others have brought up about tiny commenting on ethan/content cop drama has some good comments. A mix of sweeping and hatred for the little man. I do notice some of the comments are being down voted for calling him a sexpest.... and see quite a few deleted comments hmmm.....

https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/s/GUUUZ3gIwl

This is his reaction to the ethan/hasan debate. Again there are people calling him a sexpest but there outnumbered by the Hasan/ethan fanboys and all the moral fag redditors. On a side note I love the hasan fan boys trying to justify his swastika sword LOL.

https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/s/WWy1QMRN4T

This is about him warning his chat about behavior. This one has some good lines like "Hitler warns his SS about their racism" LULW. Hoever some real good sweeping as well. Users like "xXEggrollXx" and "YologaniSwagetti" are these retarded dgg'rs trying to argue his political content is soooooo importent. God these people are genuinely so fucking dumb. Destiny hasn't made any real impact on politics except making liberalism look horrible through association. STOP FUCKING LISTENING TO STREAMERS SERIOUSLY ABOUT POLITICS YOU SUBHUMAN REDDITORS.

Anyway sorry if those clips were reposts. Just wanted to do my annual dunk on redditards.

 

[cloudy1]

the fact that any anti-destiny content is viewable on lsf is a miracle and just proves how truly unpopular destiny is. it's a total facade - brigaded by dgg europoors on all overnight posts and run by stale2000 who is active in dgg chat literally every day and has been shown to ban people for speaking out about the worm's numerous well-evidenced sex crimes (for example, non-consensually recording sex acts and distributing them to minors - which is rape two ways in the same crime).

every time you take one tiny step out of the dgg bubble you realize what a reviled faggot the worm truly is.

praying daily that the judge is so disgusted by destiny's online sperg-outs that he becomes an activist anti-fan

 

[Dylon Stevens]

LSF seems to be partially taken over by Dggr's

Mod of the sub is a DGGer. People who call Destiny a sex pest are getting permabanned. It's fully an echo chamber by now, completely editorialized to suit narratives, like the majority of "neutral" reddit subs. That's why reddit is a shit site for shitty people and cattle. Soon the dirt on Destiny will be fully erased like they've done previously multiple times.

Although this time it's different. Controlling shitty subreddits won't save DGGers from having their cult leader raped by the court. They can't gayop their way out of this.

 

[RickyLaFleur]

praying daily that the judge is so disgusted by destiny's online sperg-outs that he becomes an activist anti-fan

I genuinely hope Tiny pulls a Karl Jobst and pisses off the judge. My fav lolcow moment this year was the clip of the judge felting Karl and man what I would fucking do for a recording of this judge felting Tiny. I heard the judge is a woman or did i mishear that? Cause man his comments won't look good LUL.

 

[Jesus was a λῃστής]

In criminal court mistaken believe is 100% a valid defense, since you need to prove intent (most of the time in the form of dolus eventualis, and that implies that you need to at least have seriously considered the possibility of the act being/resulting in a crime and to be ok with that [the easy check for that being, did the perpretrator think "Even if it happens" (intent) or "It wont happen"(no intent)].) Idk about american law but i would assume that this crime steven imo most likely has commit even needs a dolus specialis.

I understand you work in European law, I'm not American either, but am familiar with perjury as it pops up now and then in my specific field where I occasionally will consult with legalese re: Gov Acts/Regs. Fun fact in my state, the max financial penalty can be around 1 million USD as well as up to 5 years. The mistake must be about a fact for mistaken belief/reasonable mistake in perjury defence, not the law as I understand it?

The main thing here is the materiality, Pxie claims he did send her vids after the statute, he claims he didn't. Stevens statement is directly related/contradictory to the material of the proceeding and the evidence is looking to falsify his statement. He has claimed he hasn't broken a law, not gotten a tangentially related fact wrong. Materiality or recantation, both can only be used as a defence if its not relevant or impacting the case. None of these apply to that deformed midget.

 

[Tismguide]

This is abbymc at Destiny's apartment in September 2023:

Zero matches on image search. Where did this come from, exactly? Your stash of pictures, Destiny?

 

[cmzng]

The google drive links could be able to establish specific intent which is one of the more damning aspects of it for the plaintiff’s argument. Since destiny has to think through giving targeted access limited to an individual (who he likely has no explicit consent to give to them anyways) or recklessly disregarding it entirely and “implying” it was meant to be public by providing anonymous links and foisting the blame for the dissemination on others.

At the very least it will be a technical point that can establish a narrative for the how but also the why destiny was actually sharing videos.

Speculating, but I would not put it past destiny to have explicit misdirection to these women he shared the anonymous links to under the guise of “oh no one will know you looked at this if you use incognito now, unless you want me to know :winky face:”

Which is gonna look fucking horrible to a normie jury trying to give any benefit of the doubt destiny wasn’t operating with the mens rea to leak things intentionally. His lawyers should be figuring out how to nitpick any and everything about the chain of custody for discovery if I had to think of any real way to mitigate harm on his side.

 

[Handsome and Cool]

A year from now it will be very funny to compile all his "A few more months until it gets dismissed" replies to his chat asking him when this will be over.

 

[Code Cave]

Speculating, but I would not put it past destiny to have explicit misdirection to these women he shared the anonymous links to under the guise of “oh no one will know you looked at this if you use incognito now, unless you want me to know :winky face:”

I don't know if this is what you were hinting at, but this reminded me of the logs Blav posted. Here is Destiny advising that someone opens up his Therapy Manifesto against Melina in a private window to avoid leaking her email address:
(These read from the bottom up)

So he is sharing this incredibly private information with so many people that he's telling her ways to avoid her email being on display to anyone else reading it.