point one, Europe: Hard disagree.
Europe is still largely our ally, the only notable change in policy is two fold, first that Europe pays its fair share in our defense agreements (check NATO defense spending as % of GPD for Euro countries, they have failed their obligated contributions over the last 2 decades, if not more). Secondly, I understand the position every country, not just Europe is in, due to America's shifting desire in its position as reserve currency, contradicting its desire to have a strong manufacturing base for self sufficiency and internal growth (see 2003 articles by Warren buffet "selling out america" about this exact issue and his possible solutions). The shifting desire from America and its relationships with its trading partners is transitory; I wont argue Trump has a stable hand or is playing 4 dimensional chess, but the solution to our issues is to devalue the american dollar relative to other currencies (see warren buffet or
hudson bay capital research in more recent years), so that the American economy can internally function, at the cost of some cheaper import alternatives. In the end I believe the costs of flat screen tvs or other electronic junk is less important to the average american than stable growing wages, housing, or job security (all of which can be addressed with a stronger internal industry that isnt whored out across the globe).
point two, China: disagree, tentatively.
China largely has an export driven economy, and relies on long term planning to maintain that, exporters within china make deals years out for the supply of textiles, electronics, whatever. China is far more impacted than the US would be in the face tariffs, so if anything china is in a far worse spot than the average us citizen in this ordeal, America represents 40% of the global economy and china is a biggest trading partner, the shortfall from that is significant. Its also important to note that the EU as a whole is already saturated as a trading partner with china, as the US simply doesnt export anything really, so theres nothing that the EU is really replacing and switching to buying china (apart from Oil china doesnt sell?), so really this idea that the economy that exists now would simply continue without us is naive; it would fundamentally fold into itself and regress significantly, due to the immediate shock in demand or costs of functioning due to tariffs, and the industries would shrink.
point three, youre some based natsoc pro-white poster: questionable at best.
Everything Ive seen you post when you argue your points is never from a nationalist or socialist perspective, unless it conveniently aligns with the policy that would be in place that a neolib would cosign; youre not convincing anyone of your convictions by drumming about these points, but only when they align with the status-quo.
