US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
The Supreme Court has ruled that pardons can't be revoked. Who's the retard?
But if a white house Aide signed Biden's name on the pardon without Biden's knowledge (and Trumps somehow manages to prove it) do we keep pretending the pardon was valid?

The logical, just answer is no, of course not. Biden didn't actually issue the pardon, his Aide committed fraud.

But the likely alternative is that the Supreme Court just slaps another piece of duct tape on Biden's legitimacy like's it's been doing from the start.
 
If anyone is guilty of "going after the Constitution" it's Biden's admin, by allegedly writing and signing these documents via autopen playing pretend president by proxy.
But we all know that Biden is a drooling corpse who was never in power. The common man already knows this, as much as the Dems try to gaslight you. This isn't breaking news—the guy literally had to drop out of the race because of this. We can keep talking about it but this changes nothing. The press isn't suddenly going to admit that Biden was never in power either.

The autopen situation is fucked and I'm not claiming that Biden is a good boy, but Trump is playing with fire because he's literally going after the Constitution this time. Of course, the Founding Fathers wouldn't have known that 250 years later a crooked man and his staff would use an automatic pen to sign documents, but there's no legal framework for this. As others have pointed out, Trump can't just say that he can void official acts and carry on. There needs to be an actual interpretation of the pardon powers that I'm sure the SCOTUS, as cucked as they are, won't touch.

So again, how is this 4D chess if nothing really changes? People aren't going to suddenly revolt in the streets because Biden was illegitimate, and Dems are already forced to grin and pretend that Biden was a good president. Even the best outcome of all of this would be a retarded SCOTUS decision where they claim that everything an admin does, even if the president is braindead, is valid because they were vested in that authority.

On the other hand, if Trump continues to push this it will only be regarded as a Q Anon-tier conspiracy theory and as much you like Trump, he has cowish tendencies, so he'll look like a retard. Or are you just going to say Trump is pretending to be retarded for some long-term, fuzzy goal?
 
The word "signature" does not appear in the Constitution a single time.

The word "sign" in the context of a President signing something only appears twice in regards to legislation from Congress.

 
Keep being butt blasted Donald.
You lost 2020.
Edit: This is post is very controversial, oh well! Donald raped Ivana back in 1989.
 
Última edición:
All you guys coming in here to troll so you can brag in other threads about how you “totally owned” everyone in here are all really really cool and have parents that definitely love you.
 
You niggers arguing that an unelected theater kid with access to an auto-pen with Biden's signature is a-okay are the same fucks who'd scream constitutional crisis and end of democracy if it was a fucking Trump aide doing the same shit under the current administration.
Accepting that Trump is baselessly claiming he can void the pardons by Biden because he didn't know about them or some shit (which is also easily dismissed, as Biden repeatedly said he was considering pardoning Liz Cheney, Fauci, and co) is not the same as agreeing with those pardons. I think they're morally reprehensible and that Biden cheated the system by pardoning them, but that doesn't mean I think the solution is for Trump to go to muddy waters and challenge the constitutional powers granted to the president.

Again the problem is not who signed them, and you can't suddenly say that Biden didn't know or didn't agree with them just because you also think they should have never happened. The problem is that Biden can easily say he did sign them and that trying to go after these pardons is going after the Constitution. The situation is retarded no matter how you cut it, and there are better ways to voice your grievances against those pardons than to suddenly cross your arms and say "nuh-uh these aren't valid."

But go ahead and call me a retard, because apparently disagreeing with Trump on this means I have TDS or something.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo