"Deal with him" how? Rawdogging isn't illegal.
We've reached winning to such levels it is changing the fabric of reality. Truthfully you know the Dems are fucked when even she's like "Hold on a sec guys, this is nuts."
He's not a Real Conservative™ so he will be lined up and shot when the Real Conservative™ people with delusions of grandeur become warlords and murder everyone they don't like. At least, that's how their fantasies go. They're oddly similar to communist fantasies, but don't bring that up - it makes them angry.
Just to add, the American government has also desecrated the crown (Constitution) through its abuse of power. It did so by coercing its people into taking experimental drugs, by violating and abusing the law, by imprisoning its people while letting rioters run free, by pressing the scales of justice in favor of criminals, by sending millions indirectly to itself while ignoring, or even exploiting, the needs of its constituents. So when Trump picked up the Constitution with his club, like @prolapsed_cranium said, he decided to give it a new lease on life. He's draining the swamp around it so it can live and breathe as the Founding Fathers intended.
I think the solution is to allow sugar and HFCS to compete on the free market. No tariffs, no subsidies. HFCS tastes like shit, people aren't going to gravitate towards it if sugar is allowed to compete instead of being artificially priced out.
I'm guessing it's going to be a battle between the MAGA Natcons and the Silicon Valley Technolibertarian/NRx guys, with some regular Right-Libertarians sprinkled in. I presume Vance will be the guy because he appeals to both major factions.
Yes if they are in a fair market HFCS gets blown the fuck out. Big corn is a crazy lobby that has given HFCS such an advantage in basically every way it's crazy.
They definitely need to be dealt with by something, if Congress can't do it maybe the Supreme Court can. Universal injunctions are a relatively recent development in the judiciary branch that tend to cause more harm then good.
She should have realized it was over when he signed the check and opened the trust fund.
I think we can all agree that Musk's private life is pretty weird and creepy, but at least he's paying for the kids and seems to truly care about the ones whose mothers don't freeze Musk out or give the kids "gender-affirming care". A few of these women seem to have trouble finding a long-term relationship or don't want one, so with Musk they get the baby and the paycheck that they really wanted. Nor does he seem to pick women who are inadequate or helpless by themselves. Baby-mama #13 should have known what she was getting into with Musk. She probably thought she'd be the one to change him. Sad.
IDK about orange soda, but I do know that Japs love ginger ale, and they just leave the food coloring out of it. Naturally it's a very pale, slightly cloudy yellowish-brownish color, barely distinguishable from lemon lime.
They're not even good at being corrupt. I'm fucking howling.
He's been playing the part of disaffected liberal for a while now since the left went full throat on sucking off the FBI. I'd actually love to see him interview Tulsi. Both of them have taken significant risks standing their ground against the surveillance state when they could have easily pivoted once they made their name for a much comfier life.
The best part is that the push for body cams came predominantly from libtards who wanted to catch the next Rodney King situation and incriminate police officers. Instead bodycams have helped exonerate many police officers and show the reality of how retarded and insufferable niggers are (that last point is important considering how much of the support for pro-black policies comes from ignorant white people who do not know how niggers really behave outside the bubble of Hollywood and the liberal media). I’ve known normies who have been redpilled towards blacks just based off of watching those police bodycam channels.Equally funny are the activists who claim brutality, get shown the body cam footage that disproves their claims, and then double down on their claims and criticize the officers for properly using their body cams.
I can't help thinking about the wild claims from Detroit during the Summer of (2020) Love that police shot an unarmed innocent dindu in the back. Then-Chief Craig chose to immediately to release the bodycam footage that debunked the claims and showed the perp being the aggressor and shooting at people before police intervened.
Not even indisputable video evidence will keep these folks from making, insisting, and doubling down on their lies. It's no wonder only their orbiters and beta cucks believe anything they say at face value.
Isn't this a good thing?
