Disaster 'Harmful' classic novel taken off GCSE course - Of Niggers and Men


The classic American novel Of Mice and Men will no longer be studied at GCSE in Wales from next September due to concerns about racism and the use of racial slurs.

John Steinbeck's text, set in the 1930s, has been a mainstay of the English literature qualification for many years.

Wales' Children's Commissioner Rocio Cifuentes welcomed the move and said having to discuss the book in class had been "psychologically and emotionally" harmful for some black children.

The WJEC exam board said it had selected "a wide range" of "appropriate and inclusive texts" as part of a new English language and literature GCSE.

Ms Cifuentes said many black children had "specifically mentioned this text and the harm that it caused them" when she spoke to them as part of research on racism in secondary schools.

She said it was important to have "opportunities for positive, constructive, informed discussions on race and racism" but there were "alternative texts available, which could still offer the same opportunities but in a less directly harmful way".

"It's not censorship," she said.

"This is safeguarding the wellbeing of children who have told us how awful those discussions have made them feel in those classrooms.

"They've very often been the only black child in that classroom when discussions all around them are focusing on very derogatory, negative depictions of black people."

Marley, 16, listened to the audio book with the rest of the class when he studied Of Mice and Men.

When it came to the racial slurs, people "laughed and giggled and stared at me and it made me feel really uncomfortable".

Bowen Cole, 18, studied another classic novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, which also does not feature in the new qualification.

It is using "the words that should not be said in this day and age" in class that is problematic, not the books more generally, the former Welsh Youth Parliament member said.

"I was the only black person there in a class which was completely white," said Bowen, who found hearing the racist language in the book repeated in lessons "really awkward" and "confusing".

Steinbeck's 1937 novel is currently one of five options offered to schools as part of a unit in the WJEC's English literature GCSE.

It is set at the time of the Great Depression and follows two ranch workers in California who move from place to place looking for work.

Rhian Evans, an English teacher at Ysgol Gyfun Gymraeg Bro Myrddin in Carmarthen, said it was a popular choice for schools because it was accessible for children of all abilities and introduced important themes about "how we treat each other in general in our societies".

They did not repeat the N-word while discussing the book in their classroom, she said.

"We always discuss why we don't use it and I think it does allow for that discussion," she said.

"But I think the truth is that as a white woman I will never know what it feels like to be a child of colour in a classroom where they are forced to encounter that word as part of their GCSE education."

Though Of Mice and Men "would be missed," Ms Evans said there were other authors "who come from all sorts of backgrounds and who would perhaps also introduce the same kind of themes, but in a more relevant and a more modern way to pupils of today".

Harry, 17, felt the classroom was a safe environment to discuss the sensitive subjects raised in the novel.

"I felt it was a good place to do it in school where if you had any questions you can discuss with the teacher or any of the pupils who were learning it with you.

"As long as we associate the behaviour in the book as something that isn't OK, I don't think learning about it will be any problem".

Celyn, 16, had mixed feelings about the novel and said its depiction of women and other "old-fashioned" beliefs made her feel uncomfortable.

"I think it made us more aware maybe that some things still haven't changed," she added.

Jack, 17, said: "Before we got to a bit that was going to be uncomfortable we had a discussion as a class and we would agree on what would be OK."

The new qualification, merging English language and literature in one GCSE, is part of a wider overhaul of qualifications in Wales from next September.

The WJEC said: "This is a new qualification, and as such, our starting point for selecting texts was not the existing English literature qualification."

It employed an anti-racism consultant "to help us ensure our qualifications reflect a modern and inclusive Wales" and consulted with a broad range of organisations.

It added: "We have provided a choice of work from writers of diverse backgrounds, nationalities, genders, and communities.

"We believe this new selection will enrich the educational experience by providing a choice of texts that explore themes that will resonate with learners."

Of Mice and Men is an optional text on the GCSE English literature course in Northern Ireland.

A major exam board in England dropped the text in 2014 when the then Education Secretary Michael Gove said more British works should be studied.
 
The British are a colonised people.
I know OM&M is an American book, but we don't need to take their culture war bullshit with it.
 
"It's not censorship," she said.
It's literally the text book definition of it.
Celyn, 16, had mixed feelings about the novel and said its depiction of women and other "old-fashioned" beliefs made her feel uncomfortable.
No shit it's old fashioned it's from 1937 you fucking retarded nigger faggot cunt.

These fucks don't deserve of mice and men, continue on with your miserable unchallenging existence while the rest of us non pussies enjoy fine literature.
 
Última edición:
Marley, 16, listened to the audio book with the rest of the class when he studied Of Mice and Men.

When it came to the racial slurs, people "laughed and giggled and stared at me and it made me feel really uncomfortable".
Sounds like teenagers. I also recall laughing at the moment Slim says 'ho down' when I first read it at school. I recall many times laughing at any naughty word at school. He needs to pucker up and learn not to be a victim.

Like An Inspector Calls, there is a weird obsession with using Of Mice and Men at schools. The reasons are obvious. Both texts are short and have left wing messages. For many young people, those are the only two books they will ever bother with. While other readers have moved on from Steinbeck's and Priestley's lesser work, the schooling system refuses to let them die. Schools are so archaic nowadays and have been for years. They still think in that post-Welfare State mentality. Is it any wonder children don't read anymore when this is what they have on offer?

Of Mice and Men is a fine novel, nothing special. Steinbeck's The Pearl would make an excellent replacement. Several other novels would do better: A Clockwork Orange, Brave New World, The Power and The Glory, Darkness At Noon, Child of God, Concrete Island, The Third Policeman, The Unlimited Dream Company, Wise Blood, The Wasp Factory, Miss Lonelyhearts, The Loved One. I don't like all the novels I suggested, but they are short and would appeal to teenagers far more than what they currently offer. I may speak from bias but I think Miss Lonelyhearts would actually make children rethink reading as something other than a boring past time that only older people do.
 
Última edición:
I remember reading 1984 in school and being disappointed that the book was just 10% dystopia and 90% about the main character having an office romance with a much younger woman.
False advertising
 
The new qualification, merging English language and literature in one GCSE, is part of a wider overhaul of qualifications in Wales from next September.
Uttterly pozzed. "Literature" is infected and retarded, English (German, French, Spanish, Chinese, Russian, etc) is an objective skill. It is actually in the interests of migrants and browns, too, to separate useful skills from first-world navel-gazing sinecures for slow-in-the-mind children of onepercenters.
 
Not a popular take, but I support the set texts for syllabuses being predominantly or exclusively British authored. The syllabuses for history already focus on the history of Britain. There is not something offensive about studying your own culture and language and its cultural and historical context. There is not exactly a lack of British authored classic and modern texts for the exam authorities to choose from, and you obviously wouldn't need to drop the Shakespeare element. Let the Americans study the American classic novel; we have enough that resonate with our own culture and history.
 
Sorry, a book where the only woman in the book has no name and is just “Curley’s Wife” and is murdered is fine. But historically accurate slurs that show the attitudes of the time, and make for fantastic class discussion (I remember we had that conversation in class when I read the book for GCSE in the dim and distant past) is not.
Jesus.

(I had a fantastic teacher for A level who got us to read the wasp factory alongside handmaids tale. He was wonderful, and encouraged proper discussion. He’d be spinning in his grave if he knew about this way of thinking)
 
Screenshot_20241223-112324.png

So, a refugee child of commies who Pinochet should have given a helicopter trip to

What the fuck is this thing doing in charge of Welsh children's education

There's a definite trend of putting either childless hags or faggots in charge of government departments, quangos, commissions and ombudsmen that govern children's issues or education in the West

I'm assuming she's a childless hag because after reading a half dozen articles on her, not a single one mentions the usual brave struggles hard working moms, who work for charities on six figure income who just got a government sinecure because the family is attached at the hip to the labour party, have to deal with.
 
To kill a mocking bird be next for being anti-MEtoo incel propaganda?
It's not anti-MEtoo if it's a black man raping a White women. MeToo was only interested in slandering and libeling innocent White men, not once did they say a peep about the rampant muslim rape and sex slavery gangs. Also, that work of fiction is used to downplay the rampant rapes blacks did in the past and rewriting it as the blackies being innocent. Only reason they would remove that book is for the nigger word or something similar.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo