Disaster 'Harmful' classic novel taken off GCSE course - Of Niggers and Men


The classic American novel Of Mice and Men will no longer be studied at GCSE in Wales from next September due to concerns about racism and the use of racial slurs.

John Steinbeck's text, set in the 1930s, has been a mainstay of the English literature qualification for many years.

Wales' Children's Commissioner Rocio Cifuentes welcomed the move and said having to discuss the book in class had been "psychologically and emotionally" harmful for some black children.

The WJEC exam board said it had selected "a wide range" of "appropriate and inclusive texts" as part of a new English language and literature GCSE.

Ms Cifuentes said many black children had "specifically mentioned this text and the harm that it caused them" when she spoke to them as part of research on racism in secondary schools.

She said it was important to have "opportunities for positive, constructive, informed discussions on race and racism" but there were "alternative texts available, which could still offer the same opportunities but in a less directly harmful way".

"It's not censorship," she said.

"This is safeguarding the wellbeing of children who have told us how awful those discussions have made them feel in those classrooms.

"They've very often been the only black child in that classroom when discussions all around them are focusing on very derogatory, negative depictions of black people."

Marley, 16, listened to the audio book with the rest of the class when he studied Of Mice and Men.

When it came to the racial slurs, people "laughed and giggled and stared at me and it made me feel really uncomfortable".

Bowen Cole, 18, studied another classic novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, which also does not feature in the new qualification.

It is using "the words that should not be said in this day and age" in class that is problematic, not the books more generally, the former Welsh Youth Parliament member said.

"I was the only black person there in a class which was completely white," said Bowen, who found hearing the racist language in the book repeated in lessons "really awkward" and "confusing".

Steinbeck's 1937 novel is currently one of five options offered to schools as part of a unit in the WJEC's English literature GCSE.

It is set at the time of the Great Depression and follows two ranch workers in California who move from place to place looking for work.

Rhian Evans, an English teacher at Ysgol Gyfun Gymraeg Bro Myrddin in Carmarthen, said it was a popular choice for schools because it was accessible for children of all abilities and introduced important themes about "how we treat each other in general in our societies".

They did not repeat the N-word while discussing the book in their classroom, she said.

"We always discuss why we don't use it and I think it does allow for that discussion," she said.

"But I think the truth is that as a white woman I will never know what it feels like to be a child of colour in a classroom where they are forced to encounter that word as part of their GCSE education."

Though Of Mice and Men "would be missed," Ms Evans said there were other authors "who come from all sorts of backgrounds and who would perhaps also introduce the same kind of themes, but in a more relevant and a more modern way to pupils of today".

Harry, 17, felt the classroom was a safe environment to discuss the sensitive subjects raised in the novel.

"I felt it was a good place to do it in school where if you had any questions you can discuss with the teacher or any of the pupils who were learning it with you.

"As long as we associate the behaviour in the book as something that isn't OK, I don't think learning about it will be any problem".

Celyn, 16, had mixed feelings about the novel and said its depiction of women and other "old-fashioned" beliefs made her feel uncomfortable.

"I think it made us more aware maybe that some things still haven't changed," she added.

Jack, 17, said: "Before we got to a bit that was going to be uncomfortable we had a discussion as a class and we would agree on what would be OK."

The new qualification, merging English language and literature in one GCSE, is part of a wider overhaul of qualifications in Wales from next September.

The WJEC said: "This is a new qualification, and as such, our starting point for selecting texts was not the existing English literature qualification."

It employed an anti-racism consultant "to help us ensure our qualifications reflect a modern and inclusive Wales" and consulted with a broad range of organisations.

It added: "We have provided a choice of work from writers of diverse backgrounds, nationalities, genders, and communities.

"We believe this new selection will enrich the educational experience by providing a choice of texts that explore themes that will resonate with learners."

Of Mice and Men is an optional text on the GCSE English literature course in Northern Ireland.

A major exam board in England dropped the text in 2014 when the then Education Secretary Michael Gove said more British works should be studied.
 
"It's not censorship," she said.

"This is safeguarding the wellbeing of children who have told us how awful those discussions have made them feel in those classrooms.
Cool, so that same argument can be used when LGBT content is removed from schools right?

Right?

My memories of reading OM&M in school were that when we students cottoned to the fact that the "AND I'LL LOVE HIM AND SQUEEZE HIM AND CALL HIM GEORGE" character from Looney Tunes was based on Lenny, when one particular kid took his turn reading aloud, he purposefully read Lenny loudly in that character voice, which we all thought was hilarious. Since he was a redneck good ol' boy class clown type who normally didn't care for English class, the teacher allowed it because at least he was participating with more enthusiasm than normal. She may also have thought it was funny herself.
 
"This is safeguarding the wellbeing of children who have told us how awful those discussions have made them feel in those classrooms.
Seems to me that "safeguarding" is overly used to highlight a failure of common sense or to stop any criticism of a borderline insane policy.

There's going to be some really upset youngsters in the future when they realise that the real world doesn't work the way they're being taught it does.
 
Wait, so future generations of British children won't have the luxury of writing "GEORGE SHOOTS LENNY" on the first page of every copy to spoil the book for the year below? This country really is turning something unrecognisable.
Sounds like teenagers. I also recall laughing at the moment Slim says 'ho down' when I first read it at school. I recall many times laughing at any naughty word at school. He needs to pucker up and learn not to be a victim.

Like An Inspector Calls, there is a weird obsession with using Of Mice and Men at schools. The reasons are obvious. Both texts are short and have left wing messages. For many young people, those are the only two books they will ever bother with. While other readers have moved on from Steinbeck's and Priestley's lesser work, the schooling system refuses to let them die. Schools are so archaic nowadays and have been for years. They still think in that post-Welfare State mentality. Is it any wonder children don't read anymore when this is what they have on offer?

Of Mice and Men is a fine novel, nothing special. Steinbeck's The Pearl would make an excellent replacement. Several other novels would do better: A Clockwork Orange, Brave New World, The Power and The Glory, Darkness At Noon, Child of God, Concrete Island, The Third Policeman, The Unlimited Dream Company, Wise Blood, The Wasp Factory, Miss Lonelyhearts, The Loved One. I don't like all the novels I suggested, but they are short and would appeal to teenagers far more than what they currently offer. I may speak from bias but I think Miss Lonelyhearts would actually make children rethink reading as something other than a boring past time that only older people do.
I have a deep, visceral loathing of An Inspector Calls. The subtext and messaging was so overt and hamfisted that I actually felt insulted reading it. Reading it for my GCSEs when I was 15 was my first taster of the patronising attitude of the left in general I've become all too familiar with since.
 
That's even more offensive than a book with the nigger-word. How are those black kids supposed to feel included if all the texts are British?
IIRC Brick Lane by Monica Ali is already on the syllabus. There are a slew of excellent novels relating to the experience of immigrants to Britain and Britons of BAME background. All of those are drastically more relevant to the BAME kids in British classrooms, and to understanding modern British society, than any book about the American Black experience, let alone about the American Great Depression. Of Mice and Men is a magnificent piece of writing, but a British education should focus on British culture and history. That should include the immigrant experience, since that is highly relevant to current British society, but it should be focused on things that actually happened here. There is no shortage of BAME British writers to select from to put on the syllabus for options.

Off the top of my head... I think Zadie Smith's White Teeth is on the syllabus, it surely must be. Andrea Levy's Small Island. Samuel Selvon's The Lonely Londoners. Bernardine Evaristo's Girl, Woman, Other. Hanif Kureshi's The Buddha of Suburbia.
 
This was a smart move. Now the black kids have shown how much this book upset them, I'm sure none of their peers will use this to their advantage.

OT: I read this book in high school and thought it fucking sucked. The only part that really stuck out to me was one character (I think it was the black guy actually) who said 'no man is an island'. I like that phrase a lot.
 
This was a smart move. Now the black kids have shown how much this book upset them, I'm sure none of their peers will use this to their advantage.

OT: I read this book in high school and thought it fucking sucked. The only part that really stuck out to me was one character (I think it was the black guy actually) who said 'no man is an island'. I like that phrase a lot.
It's a quote from John Donne.
 
IIRC Brick Lane by Monica Ali is already on the syllabus. There are a slew of excellent novels relating to the experience of immigrants to Britain and Britons of BAME background. All of those are drastically more relevant to the BAME kids in British classrooms, and to understanding modern British society, than any book about the American Black experience, let alone about the American Great Depression. Of Mice and Men is a magnificent piece of writing, but a British education should focus on British culture and history. That should include the immigrant experience, since that is highly relevant to current British society, but it should be focused on things that actually happened here. There is no shortage of BAME British writers to select from to put on the syllabus for options.

Off the top of my head... I think Zadie Smith's White Teeth is on the syllabus, it surely must be. Andrea Levy's Small Island. Samuel Selvon's The Lonely Londoners. Bernardine Evaristo's Girl, Woman, Other. Hanif Kureshi's The Buddha of Suburbia.
As long as they don't have to read any writers from the wicked Before Times, sounds good.

(I agree that Steinbeck is really not a good choice...leave American writers to an American Lit class)
 
And here I thought this was going to be about euthanizing a retard. But I guess we already practice that bit of eugenics enmasse so it's not an issue.
 
Bowen Cole, 18, studied another classic novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, which also does not feature in the new qualification.
This is a real shame. TKAM is a wonderful book. I highly recommend everyone listen to the audiobook version narrated by Sissy Spacek. She does a wonderful job capturing the emotions of the story. I am looking forward to when my own kids are old enough to read this one with me.

Demanding that literature reflects back to us only pleasing and familiar things is childish and entitled. But if they want to deny themselves a more robust education, then that’s their business.

I agree with the comment that British literature classes should feature British literature. There is certainly a lot of it. But I bet if you asked Bowen Cole, 18, what he thought of Chaucer he’d assume it was a SoundCloud rapper or something equally retarded.
 
But I bet if you asked Bowen Cole, 18, what he thought of Chaucer he’d assume it was a SoundCloud rapper or something equally retarded.
Some children will always be "borrrrrred" no matter what you offer them. Education is for their benefit, not their enjoyment. This modern idea that absolutely everything at school should be 'engaging' and 'relevant to their interests' is fucking bullshit. There are things that everyone just has to fucking learn and How To Read is on that list. Simpletons can always make the choice to put no effort into school and experience the consequences for the rest of their lives. You can lead the horse to water etcetera. Education in the UK has gone badly wrong since simping to the lazy and retarded has become the principal aim of it.
 
OT: I read this book in high school and thought it fucking sucked. The only part that really stuck out to me was one character (I think it was the black guy actually) who said 'no man is an island'. I like that phrase a lot.
Nearly every book taught in schools sucks and a bad experience in English class is the reason why most adults don’t read.

So much time is wasted struggling to read 16th century Broadway scripts and 19th century TV shows. Math classes somehow manage to teach geometry without forcing kids to read Euclid’s Elements in Ancient Greek.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo