Opinion How the Talmud Can Change Your Life - It’s the greatest self-help book ever written. And isn’t that what we need right now?

L | A
By Liel Leibovitz
2425616140b7bdefabe7b6a39adba732.jpg

Like so many Jews, I’ve spent the last few weeks drowning in a torrent of terrors. The reports from Israel, documenting the worst single-day massacre of Jews since Hitler’s goons were stopped, are soul-crushing. Beheaded babies, families burned alive, women brutally raped: These stories haunt me, making it difficult to go about my day. And it doesn’t help much to step out in my own city, New York, and see pro-Hamas mobs flashing swastika signs and calling for the destruction of the world’s only Jewish state.

But I’m lucky. I have the best guide ever written to getting through tough times. It’s 2,711 pages long and 1,500 years old, and it’s the greatest self-help book ever written.

It’s the Talmud.

Flip to any random page, and even if you get through the Talmud’s unique design—like an ancient precursor to the internet, it consists of intertwined links, with text and commentary presented together on the same folio—you’re not likely to walk away inspired. To the extent that it’s a book at all—my friend, the writer Jonathan Rosen, called it “a drift net for catching God”—it does much more than merely tell stories. Instead, it records arguments, often intricate ones, almost always without telling you who’s right.

Dive in, however, and you’ll find precisely the pearls of wisdom needed to make it through even the toughest of times. Here’s a taste, a tale of what you ought to do when it seems like your world has come to an end.

The Talmud tells us that when Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai—who lived in the first century CE and was widely considered his generation’s leading scholar—realized that the Romans were about to sack Jerusalem, he went to see the emperor. He didn’t ask for mercy; the holy city, he understood, was doomed. Instead, he made three seemingly strange wishes.

He asked the emperor to spare Yavneh, a town in central Israel known as a vibrant center of Torah study. He asked the emperor to protect the family of Rabban Gamliel, a communal leader and the scion of a celebrated rabbinic dynasty. And he asked the emperor to send doctors to heal a wise and righteous rabbi named Tzadok, who was so grief-stricken about the impending catastrophe that he’d stopped eating.

Pay close attention to these requests, and you’ll see principles that can still guide us all today. In times of great upheaval, Rabbi Yochanan knew, we needed to embrace three difficult but essential truths.

First, when the worst happens, we can always start again. Even when our institutions are gutted and our homes burned down, figuratively or literally, we have permission to pack up and find some other place to go, and other people who share our convictions. There’s always Yavneh, a place of refuge that may not be where we had hoped to end up but that would at least keep us safe and see to it that we survive.

But survival, Rabbi Yochanan knew, wasn’t as simple as merely setting up shop elsewhere and announcing that business continues as usual. When you lose something—or someone—you love, you often also lose hope, wondering how life could possibly go on in the face of so much devastation. This is where Rabbi Yochanan’s second request comes in: By insisting that the same rabbinic dynasty that had been in charge for decades remained in place, he tethered the Jews to tradition, giving them an ember to remind them of the great spiritual fires that once burned bright and making them believe that these same fires may burn bright once again.

The biggest piece of the puzzle, though, was still missing: Even with somewhere to live and someone to trust and something to connect them to their more storied past, people still needed concrete instruction on how to live. Enter request number three. Rather than worry about “the Jews,” a mass of people whose names and stories he didn’t and couldn’t know, Rabbi Yochanan made a point of singling out just one man, his suffering friend. By doing so, he set an example of what he wanted the society he was rebuilding to look like. In Rabbi Yochanan’s imagination, the perfect community didn’t prattle on about abstractions like virtue and justice as it stood by idly while its people suffered; it slowed down for long enough to listen to the sobs of just one elderly man, find them intolerable, and step in to help.

These principles guide us still, giving us strength even as so many feel despondent. And they’re preserved in a book—a manual for living with defeat, to quote another wise rabbi, Leonard Cohen—written for broken people in broken times. The Talmud came to be because the Temple in Jerusalem, Judaism’s beating heart for centuries, was burned down in 70 CE. The rabbis saved the old religion from extinction by capturing it in a book. They recorded their stories and their disagreements in 63 sprawling volumes; to read it today is to enter into a conversation uninterrupted by space and time, with one generation offering to the next some sound advice on how to live and asking in return not for obedience but for contemplation and then action.

So Jewish or not, heartbroken or otherwise, jump right in. More than any other book you might’ve read, the Talmud can change your life.
 
Rebekah wasn't a Canaanite. So good job lying.
after checking, she was Aramean, point standing that at that time Jews could intermarry without it being a problem

As in the book Blood Passover, there's plenty of factual basis to prove it did happen.
blood passover "proved" that some isolated jewish communities may have used dried powdered blood in rituals. Toaff himself retracted any claim of murder:


In his book "Pasque di Sangue" [Passovers of blood], Toaff discusses at length the possibility that Jews murdered Christian children to use their blood in religious rituals, and argues that confessions to such acts extracted under torture should not be dismissed.


He now wants to make it clear that the Jews of Trent did not murder Simon or any other Christian children for ritual purposes. Toaff will also make it clear that the blood of dead Christians could not possibly have been used, whether in food, beverages or for medicinal or magical purposes, because the blood traded by Jews and Christians at the time came from living donors, not corpses. His conclusion is that Jews could not possibly have murdered Christian children for their blood.


Even before he retracted the book, he denied Jews murdered anyone, only going so far as to say there was a possibility that there were acts of murder but there was no evidence:


"I tried to show that the Jewish world at that time was also violent, among other things because it had been hurt by Christian violence," the Bar-Ilan history professor said. Of course I do not claim that Judaism condones murder. But within Ashkenazi Judaism there were extremist groups that could have committed such an act and justified it," he said.
Although the use of blood is prohibited by Jewish law, Toaff says he found proof of rabbinic permission to use blood, even human blood. "The rabbis permitted it both because the blood was already dried," and because in Ashkenazi communities it was an accepted custom that took on the force of law, Toaff said. There is no proof of acts of murder, Toaff said, but there were curses and hatred of Christians, and prayers inciting to cruel vengeance against Christians. "There was always the possibility that some crazy person would do something."

He also points out the use of blood was common in medieval medicine:

Toaff said the use of blood was common in medieval medicine. "In Germany, it became a real craze. Peddlers of medicines would sell human blood, the way you have a transfusion today. The Jews were influenced by this and did the same things.

Also trying to appeal to a pope as an authority is hilarious.
>appealing to the leader of Western Christianity as an authority is wrong now
 
after checking, she was Aramean, point standing that at that time Jews could intermarry without it being a problem
Lmao you are wrong, still wrong, and can't cover up being wrong.
blood passover "proved" that some isolated jewish communities may have used dried powdered blood in rituals. Toaff himself retracted any claim of murder:
"Sure they only found a dead baby, in the courtyard well of a Jewish household, drained of blood, but see it was an accident it could have happened to anyone."

Funny how people who cross jews retract a lot of things, almost like there is a constant concerted effort to make them deny Jewish crimes. Almost like they were threatened or something.

>appealing to the leader of Western Christianity as an authority is wrong now
No he's the leader of the Catholic church, not the leader of any form of Christianity.

Also I broke down his message in an edit of my last post because I was bored, so you can read it while I fix the formatting.
 
Última edición:
Ver archivo adjunto 6100593
I do think the public need more awareness as to what the Talmud says, especially about non-jews!
I especially like whenever you search any of these up it's never the 'real' quote but DEBOOOOONKING the supposedly fake verses

that being said I'll never speak that disgusting phlegm language so who knows.
 
then give the answer, google can't match your schizoposting
You literally just lied directly. I'm laughing at your moronic ass. Remember when I told you I knew more about jews than you did, I'm still right about it
>claiming the pope was somehow working with the jews

take meds
You do know the Jesuits were all Jewish converts? Why would the pope push Jewish causes at all? Jesus himself called jews the synagogue of Satan. You can't be a Christian and accept Judaism. It's right there front and center.

I would but you need them more than I do, what with your latent health problems from all that inbreeding you've been doing.
 
Addressed why that's not a valid argument above.

Nope you didn't address it at all. You also clearly don't understand what thought experiments are. How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast today?
Maybe it's just out of context
Maybe I'm just a dumb goy
Maybe you're just like the rabbis
They never take the blame
Why do you screech like autistics?
This is what it sounds like
When yids seethe.
 
You literally just lied directly. I'm laughing at your moronic ass. Remember when I told you I knew more about jews than you did, I'm still right about it
Rebecca's father was Bethuel the Aramean, how am I wrong lmao. You can't actually answer my main point either which is that the jewish Patriarchs intermarried.

Maybe it's just out of context
Maybe I'm just a dumb goy
Maybe you're just like the rabbis
They never take the blame
Why do you screech like autistics?
This is what it sounds like
When yids seethe.
/pol/ reject doesn't refute anything and doesn't understand why legal thought experiments happen, apparently this is my fault somehow. I'm willing to take the blame when you make an actual point but when your theological stance is "jews bad except for one Jew" it's pretty hard to work with something so limited
 
doesn't understand why legal thought experiments happen
They happen when you build a whole culture around what you can get away with and sink deeper and deeper into pornographic obsession while simultaneously holding yourself up as some kind of inbred master race.

Rav Shtimuel says "hypothetically speaking, which would be worse, jerking off on a Torah scroll, or having sex with a donkey? Who is more raped, a 2 year old or a 3 year old? Is it gay if the balls don't touch?"

A vision from God stops a former member of Rav Shtimuel's cabal on the road and he comes to see:

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report, if there be any virtue and if there be any praise, think on these things.
 
You know, when the tome is madness, no-one really tries to understand it and people just make shit up involving its pages. Then I remembered that was the exact same trick the creator of Old Man Henderson used just to punish his DM.

A literal tome of madness used to justify everything Henderson did within the RPG. Didn't realize that the old religions did the same thing centuries before. Time really is a flat circle.
 
Any religious text can change your life if you decide to follow it.
 
Rebecca's father was Bethuel the Aramean, how am I wrong lmao. You can't actually answer my main point either which is that the jewish Patriarchs intermarried.
They were explicitly not canaanites you fucking idiot. Esau isn't an Isreali patriarch because he gave up his birthright.
/pol/ reject doesn't refute anything and doesn't understand why legal thought experiments happen, apparently this is my fault somehow. I'm willing to take the blame when you make an actual point but when your theological stance is "jews bad except for one Jew" it's pretty hard to work with something so limited
We literally refuted you and you just say "uhhh there's more context to this guys" and then can't show us that context that would justify two old guys talking about fucking toddlers.

It's not our problem your theological basis is so fucked up it's impossible for you to justify. That's your own cognitive dissonances.

The only reason you call us pol rejects is you can't refute any of what we say, only ignore and deflect. That's why jews are pathetic and evil.
 
They were explicitly not canaanites you fucking idiot. Esau isn't an Isreali patriarch because he gave up his birthright.
No shit but Esau gave up his birthright for the lentil soup, not to marry a Canaanite woman. The only thing wrong with Canaanite women was that Rebecca personally didn't like them.

The only reason you call us pol rejects is you can't refute any of what we say, only ignore and deflect. That's why jews are pathetic and evil.
ive been refuting you the entire time, you sit and seethe. for example the moloch statue you were crying about
 
No shit but Esau gave up his birthright for the lentil soup, not to marry a Canaanite woman. The only thing wrong with Canaanite women was that Rebecca personally didn't like them.
It came from Abraham himself you fucking idiot. Maybe reread the Bible or Torah to you kid fuckers. Also the part about lentil soup was about how flippantly he treated it, further solidifying the correct choice by divergence from Abraham and also God's authority.
ive been refuting you the entire time, you sit and seethe. for example the moloch statue you were crying about
And I showed how you didn't. Then you had no response to that but to cry about context, like you always do.
 
Última edición:
They were chosen to be the place the messiah came from, that's it. That didn't mean they weren't the most awful people on the planet.
I have long posited that the reason the Hebrews were Chosen is precisely because they were the lowest of the low. - Slaves, back biters, prone to worshipping false idols, disobedient, etc, etc. God said, "Even out of such people, I will bring Redemption."

Nope you didn't address it at all. You also clearly don't understand what thought experiments are. How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast today?

1000012347.png

You do know the Jesuits were all Jewish converts?
That explains so much. - I was going to make a comment yesterday about how Talmudists were like Jesuits in their ability to twist words to their own ends. Now I know why.
 
Also the part about lentil soup was about how flippantly he treated it, further solidifying the correct choice by divergence from Abraham and also God's authority.
you: Esau lost his birthright bc he married a canaanite woman
me: no its because he traded it for the lentil soup
you: yes it's because he traded it for the lentil soup and was flippant about it

???

btw Esau never married a Canaanite woman lol
And Esau saw that Isaac had blessed Jacob and sent him away to Padan aram, to take himself a wife from there, and that when he blessed him, he commanded him, saying, "You shall not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan."
And Jacob listened to his father and his mother, and he went to Padan aram.
And Esau saw that the daughters of Canaan were displeasing to his father Isaac.
So Esau went to Ishmael, and he took Mahalath, the daughter of Ishmael, the son of Abraham, the sister of Nebaioth, in addition to his other wives as a wife.

Genesis 28 6-9

Maybe reread the Bible or Torah
i would argue you should

Then you had no response to that but to cry about context, like you always do.
context is what separates a heart surgery from an aztec human sacrifice

"don't question what your leaders tell you, just go along like sheep"
 
you: Esau lost his birthright bc he married a canaanite woman
me: no its because he traded it for the lentil soup
you: yes it's because he traded it for the lentil soup and was flippant about it
Yeah you quoted me being right again and again, really proving my point.
would argue you should
Mahalath was, according to the Bible, the third wife of Esau, daughter of Ishmael and sister of Nebaioth. Esau took Mahalath from the house of Ishmael to be his wife, after seeing that Canaanite wives (as was the case of his first two wives, Basemath and Judith)

Huh you left that part out you total fucking lying faggot. You can't even keep a straight argument without lying through your fucking teeth.
context is what separates a heart surgery from an aztec human sacrifice
What keeps jews from humans, is it their beliefs or their genetics?
"don't question what your leaders tell you, just go along like sheep"
When will you start? Or will you just keep following the teachings of pedophiles so that you can suck baby dick of your own?
 
"don't question what your leaders tell you, just go along like sheep"
1000012349.png

"Asking questions" isn't the problem. It's when you get into stupid, theoretical debates about things that are unimportant or obvious attempts to justify sin that it becomes an issue.
But you knew that. Pilpuller.
 
Última edición:
btw Esau never married a Canaanite woman lol
You're missing the most relevant part of Genesis there buddy
When Esau was forty years old, he took Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite to be his wife, and Basemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite, and they made life bitter for Isaac and Rebekah. Genesis 26:34–35
He'd already married two Canaanite women (the Hittites were descended from Canaanites). Jacob the smarmy backstabber had listened to Isaac and not taken a Canaanite wife, so Esau the idiot impulsive brute thought marrying Mahalath would please his father and bestow a blessing, which it didn't, because he was still married to two Canaanites.
The only thing wrong with Canaanite women was that Rebecca personally didn't like them.
That's not the only thing wrong with Canaanite women, was it? Canaan or Ham brought shame upon Noah and their bloodline was accursed. The tribes of Israel were specifically told to slaughter every single Canaanite and even their cattle so they could inherit the land of Israel, and the tribes who didn't listen to that had vice brought upon them by Canaan. Basically every single group of people the Israelites hated were somehow argued to be descended from the bloodline of Canaan and therefore were all inherently accursed and deserved to die, including the infants.

Esau had offspring with the Canaanites, so the Edomites were a people to be dominated by the Maccabees, which eventually lead to King Herod making Israel a vassal state of Rome and therefore eventually lead to the destruction of the Second Temple and the expulsion of the Jews from Jerusalem, because those sneaky Edomites/Idumeans/Hasmoneans were cursed with evil Canaanite blood. Eliphaz, one of Esau's sons, had children with a Horite (descendent of Canaan) creating Amalek/Amalekites because they had even more cursed Canaanite blood in them and therefore Amalek was the great evil enemy of the Jews.

Without fail, any time the Jews run into trouble, they usually find a way of linking it back to the Curse of Ham/Canaan to justify why everyone in that tribe deserved to be completely wiped out. It's just the creation myth of the Jewish people when in fact the whole story about Abraham coming from Mesopotamia is fake, the exile in Egypt did not happen to "Israelites", there's no evidence there was ever a united nation of Judea and Israel and pretty much all the genetic and archaeological evidence indicates that the ancient Judeans were actually just Canaanites that formed a splinter religion and then made up a bunch of stories about how everyone they clashed with were evil and deserved to die because YHWH put a curse on their distant patriarch.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo