Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Última edición:
Some scientists can’t help thinking of previous instances where governments imposed their views on the subject: the spurious “race science” of the Nazis and the anti-Darwinian denialism of Stalin’s regime.
Oh, I don't know. Lysenko was purging and isolating his rivals before Stalin adopted his views into the regime. All that is being announced here is an investigation into whether there is already suppression of research, an "imposition of views," by people who take government funding. And even Stalin didn't let Lysenkoism and meddling infect the nuclear division. What's plainly going on is that gender studies is encroaching into other areas without "studies" being done to support it.
 
Terf Island's Secretary of Science announces she will protect Science from biology denial and political correctness.

As much as I enjoy people talking openly about the tranny menace, before getting too excited, everyone needs to remember that:
a)the party saying this shit have been in power since 2010, and the sole party in power since 2015, meaning the a lot of this shit happened on their watch in the first place
b)this is the same party that talked a big game on immigration when that was the hot button issue, but did nothing practical to actually fucking fix it.
 
As much as I enjoy people talking openly about the tranny menace, before getting too excited, everyone needs to remember that:
a)the party saying this shit have been in power since 2010, and the sole party in power since 2015, meaning the a lot of this shit happened on their watch in the first place
b)this is the same party that talked a big game on immigration when that was the hot button issue, but did nothing practical to actually fucking fix it.
Exactly. It's not remotely the first time the party in power has talked up all of the contentious social issues of the day before an election, only to turn around and decry everything they claimed to support when they've got the election in the bag. The Tory/lib coalition was even worse in that regard, because there you had two parties pulling it at once and somehow managing to chart a course that pissed off everyone, while actively making things worse at every juncture. At the time, I had hoped it might open a few eyes to how cynical and manipulative westminster politics had become since Major's and Blair's governments, but they all just blindly voted for more of the same at every chance they got. They suckers actually believe the lies their fed. On the rare occasions when they break past reflexive defence of the system, they demand that I present a detailed alternative to the status quo, then get irrationally angry when I do, or crow when I refuse.

We should demolish westminster palace and use the stone to build bridges on the east half of the thames. At least then it would be useful.
 
The United Nation announced that heterosexual men are lesbians.
Ver archivo adjunto 5399585
Maybe this is the wrong place to make this point, but when I see stuff like this, I truly don't care. Think of what TERFs are. Most, if not all of these people were fine with demonizing men, saying men's hobbies and spaces should be diversified, women are completely equal to men, men are all potential rapists, video games are sexist, etc. - and surprise, a few men went crazy and want to be women so they don't get shat on constantly. Sorry, but too bad! Maybe you should have just been happy with what men were, because now they're gaming the system to be even closer to you.

What happened? Why can't men compete in women's sports? I thought you were equal, what happened? Now biology matters? What about biological differences in the races? Let's keep going with that line of thought!

Every TERF is a miserable man-hating hag who looks like they chose the wrong holy grail, that would still be a super-progressive liberal if it wasn't for this one issue. I hope it's not controversial here to be happy they're reaping what they sowed. Men's shit (and even gay men's shit) has been ruined for a long time now, it's finally hitting these people and boo hoo woe is me. Too bad.
 
Última edición:
NBA Welcomes First ‘Non-Binary, ‘Trans’ Referee
Videos by OutKick

A biologically female NBA referee came out as a nonbinary trans male to be the FIRST in NBA history to set this arbitrary benchmark.

NBA ref Che Flores was highlighted in a new GQ article Monday, revealing the referee’s ‘trailblazing’ identity as a queer person and having zero to do with basketball.
The Woke NBA’s First Non-Binary, Trans Ref: Che Flores

Identity does not contribute to officiating, but in the NBA, identity and platform are everything.

“One piece I was missing for myself was that no one knew how I identified,” Flores shared.
1698160272801.png1698160313694.png
Modern Sports Keep Eye Off The Ball

As is standard with progressive LGBT ideology (which this is), the message focuses solely on a person’s identity. In Flores’ case as a trans, non-binary person, her identity is both malleable AND sacred to her being; never to be denied or ‘mischaracterized’ despite a definite set of chromosomes.

Flores wanted to set the record straight ahead of the NBA’s 2023-24 season. Last season, Flores officiated 35 NBA games.

“Being misgendered as she/her always just felt like a little jab in the gut,” Flores said.

“I can go through the world and even my job a lot more comfortably,” Flores added.

While Flores hoped to usher in a new brand for the NBA, prioritizing LGBT agendas, the ref oversaw a disregard for the profession that made her recognizable. For Che Flores, her presence in the NBA isn’t about growing the sport of basketball but encouraging others, including youth, to come out of the closet.

As the NBA turns progressively more liberal, similar to most major American leagues, the message becomes less about romanticizing basketball and more about pushing agendas.
Che Flores Highlights ‘Mission’ Behind Coming Out In Comments To GQ

Flores is the latest “pioneer” in the modern landscape of sports.

Rather than push the envelope as a woman in a heavily male field, Flores aims to push radical gender ideology.

“I just think of having younger queer kids look at somebody who’s on a high-profile stage and not using it,” Flores added. “And I’m not using the league to an advantage in any way. This is just to let young kids know that we can exist, we can be successful in all different ways.”

Flores, like many before, will discover that woke leads to broke. Woke also means performing a role no longer focused on your actual merit, which Flores will soon acknowledge and play into.

The ref officiated more than 1,000 games across 14 years, making stops at the NCAA, WNBA and G League before reaching the NBA. Impressive on its own.

Flores possesses the freedom to identify as trans but the ref makes her intentions in coming out transparent for those wondering what her platform encourages.

“When I started refereeing, you had to look a certain way,” Flores says. “This is the first time I’m comfortable expressing myself through my own fashion and not having to worry about it.”

In Flores’ ideal future, more non-binary, more trans refs will officiate NBA games.

Follow Alejandro Avila on Twitter: @AlejandroAveela
Check us out on TikTok

nba

Alejandro Avila lives in Southern California and previously covered news for the LA Football Network. Jeopardy expert and grumpy sports fan that has watched every movie.
More From: SportsKirk Cousins and CreedTheory PGA Tour Players Turned Down LIV Golf Offers Because They're From Texas Is OutrageousJoe Buck implies Kevin O'Connell told T.J. Hockenson to fake an injury. (Credit: Twitter video screenshot/https://twitter.com/awfulannouncing/status/1716623918046568712)MATTRESS MACK HOUSTON ASTROS

(+)
Source : https://www.outkick.com/nba-welcomes-first-non-binary-trans-referee/

No evidence they/them are going full pooner, but hopefully that's the next step.
 
Japan’s Supreme Court Rules Against Surgery Requirement to Legally Change Gender




1698238065197.png


Save Page as PDF File
Source : https://time.com/6328269/japan-supreme-court-lgbt-gender-recognition/
Japan’s Supreme Court Rules Against Surgery Requirement to Legally Change Gender
A participant holds up a placard during the International Transgender Day of Visibility rally in Shibuya district of Tokyo on March 31, 2023.A participant holds up a placard during the International Transgender Day of Visibility rally in Shibuya district of Tokyo on March 31, 2023.Yuichi Yamazaki—AFP /Getty Images
October 25, 2023 4:15 AM EDT

TOKYO — Japan’s Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that a law requiring transgender people to have their reproductive organs removed in order to officially change their gender is unconstitutional.

The decision by the top court’s 15-judge Grand Bench was its first on the constitutionality of Japan’s 2003 law requiring the removal of reproductive organs for a state-recognized gender change, a practice long criticized by international rights and medical groups.

The case was filed by a plaintiff whose request for a gender change in her family registry — to female from her biologically assigned male — was turned down by lower courts.

The decision comes at a time of heightened awareness of issues surrounding LGBTQ+ people in Japan and is a major victory for that community.

Kyodo News said the judges unanimously ruled that the part of the law requiring the loss of reproductive functions for a gender change is unconstitutional. Other details of the decision were not immediately available.

Under the law that was struck down, transgender people who want to have their biologically assigned gender changed on family registries and other official documents must be diagnosed as having Gender Identity Disorder and undergo an operation to remove their reproductive organs.

LGBTQ+ activists in Japan have stepped up efforts to pass an anti-discrimination law since a former aide to Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said in February that he wouldn’t want to live next to LGBTQ+ people and that citizens would flee Japan if same-sex marriage were allowed.

But changes have come slowly and Japan remains the only Group of Seven member that does not allow same-sex marriage or legal protections, including an effective anti-discrimination law.

Read More: Courts in Japan Support Same-Sex Marriage, But Lawmakers Are Reluctant to Legalize It. Here’s Why

The plaintiff, who is only identified as a resident in western Japan, originally filed the request in 2000, saying the surgery requirement forces a huge burden economically and physically and that it violates the constitution's equal rights protections.

Rights groups and the LGBTQ+ community in Japan have been hopeful for a change in the law after a local family court, in an unprecedented ruling earlier this month, accepted a transgender male's request for a gender change without the compulsory surgery, saying the rule is unconstitutional.

The special law that took effect in 2004 states that people who wish to register a gender change must have their original reproductive organs, including testes or ovaries, removed and have a body that “appears to have parts that resemble the genital organs” of the new gender they want to register with.

More than 10,000 Japanese have had their genders officially changed since then, according to court documents from the Oct. 11 ruling that accepted Gen Suzuki's request for a gender change without the required surgery.

Surgery to remove reproductive organs is not required in most of some 50 European and central Asian countries that have laws allowing people to change their gender on official documents, the Shizuoka ruling said. The practice of changing one's gender in such a way has become mainstream in many places around the world, it noted.

Read More: How a New Drug Law, Old Attitudes, and Persistent Health Care System Shortcomings Threaten China’s Transgender Community

In a country of conformity where the conservative government sticks to traditional paternalistic family values and is reluctant to accept sexual and family diversity, many LGBTQ+ people still hide their sexuality due to fear of discrimination at work and schools.

Some groups opposing more inclusivity for transgender people, especially to those changing from male to female, had submitted petitions on Tuesday to the Supreme Court, asking it to keep the surgery requirement in place.

Hundreds of municipalities now issue partnership certificates for same-sex couples to ease hurdles in renting apartments and other areas, but they are not legally binding.

In 2019, the Supreme Court in another case filed by a transgender male seeking a gender registration change without the required sexual organ removal and sterilization surgery found the ongoing law constitutional.

In that ruling, the top court said the law was constitutional because it was meant to reduce confusion in families and society, though it acknowledged that it restricts freedom and could become out of step with changing social values and should be reviewed later.

So much for "based Japan." 🙄
 
So much for "based Japan." 🙄
I lived in a VERY suburban part of Tokyo. Literally all families and it's where the Ghibli Museum is. There is a tranny bar literally a 5-minute walk from the station.
Marie
1698243925588.png
Nancy (this is actually the 2nd Japanese tranny I'm aware of named Nancy)
1698243946623.png
"Based Japan" is literally just "infinitely sexually deviant Japan". But weebs don't wanna hear how normalized pedophilia is there and think it's just "Westerners moralizing".
 
Última edición:

UK children grilled 'every term' about their gender by 'activist teachers', say parents - as 11-year-old pupils given DETENTION for 'misgendering' staff (Archive)

UK children are becoming confused after being constantly quizzed by teachers over gender confusion and punishing them if they 'accidentally misgender' people, it has been claimed.

Parents and former teachers speaking at the LGB Alliance conference in central London spoke out about 'activist teachers' who are promoting gender ideology in schools.

One parent from Brighton claimed a young woman thought she was a boy at school because teachers questioned pupils at least once a term to ask if they were confused about their gender.

Another parent at the talk held by the gay and lesbian rights charity said an 11-year-old girl questioning their own gender was sent to an 'unqualified male' who helped her buy a 'penis packer' so she could try living as a boy.

The same parents also said activist teachers had written to the head teacher at a school to say they would go against the head's instructions not to use a child's preferred pronouns, The Telegraph reported.

In another example, a teacher at a Brighton school told pupils she was non-binary and didn't need to wear sanitary protection.

Instead, the teacher wears white, very tight linen clothes when she menstruates. This means the blood shows through in order to generate a 'conversation with the kids'.

Also, a parent who runs PSHE Brighton, a campaign group for families worried about sex education in schools, said Year 7s were given punishments 'two years in a row' for misgendering a teacher in the first three days at school.

She said: 'We've had Year 7s who are innocently going 'Yes miss, I'll do that'.

'Bang, they are in what's called a non-detention - like lockdown, something like that where they lock them up after school.

'Two years in a row the Year 7s have been given this punishment for misgendering this teacher in their first three days at school.'

The government has promised guidance on trans issues since 2018 and is expected to publish it by the end of the year - after missing its own deadline at the end of the summer term.

Kate Barker, chief executive of the LGB Alliance, said: 'Teachers and parents have been waiting six years for schools' trans guidance.

'This delay has been exploited by gender identity activist organisations to introduce unscientific, unevidenced, and over-sexualised teaching resources into schools.'

A government spokesman said: 'We've been repeatedly clear about the importance of biological sex and that contested views should not be taught as fact.

'Schools and colleges must uphold public trust and are expected to maintain high standards of ethics and behaviour both within and outside of school and colleges.'
 

Gender-critical books ‘treated like Mein Kampf’ by public library

Archive
Library service of Calderdale council has barred six books from being promoted in displays in order to ‘protect the public from offence’

Gender-critical books have been treated like Mein Kampf by a public library, it can be revealed.
Works by authors including Helen Joyce and Prof Kathleen Stock were hidden from view by a library service of the Labour-run Calderdale council, and are now barred from being promoted in displays in order to protect the public from offence.

The only other book similarly censored by the library service by being hidden was Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf, The Telegraph can reveal.

Authors are furious at the revelation that their gender-critical work, which critiques the belief that gender self-identification takes precedence over biological sex, has been handled in the same way as the 1925 manifesto of the future Nazi dictator.

The Telegraph previously revealed that six books discussing the dangers of puberty blockers and gender reassignment surgery were hidden from public view by Calderdale librarians.

Now council documents shown to The Telegraph indicate that staff had not previously taken such direct measures to conceal books, except on one occasion when “a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf was moved to our stores following complaints from some customers some years ago”.
Hitler’s autobiographical manifesto contains his outline for a state based on racial hierarchy which is free of the Jewish people.

Ms Joyce, the author of one of the six gender-critical books, told The Telegraph: “I was disgusted, but not surprised, to discover that the only previous example Calderdale Libraries could give of hiding away a ‘toxic’ book concerned Hitler’s manifesto, Mein Kampf.

“Its senior staff have apparently surrendered to the demands of trans ideologues to such an extent that when a crybully threw a strop about a top ten bestseller on the subject of women’s, children’s and gay people’s human rights, they agreed to treat that book as if it was Nazi propaganda.”

While Calderdale council officers have recommended that the six gender-critical books, by authors including Abigail Shrier, are reinstated on publicly visible bookshelves, they also advised that the books should not be “promoted” as part of special display.

This is in stark contrast to standard practice for many books on LGBT issues, which are typically placed in special display within public libraries during Pride month.

Calderdale council officers cited best-practice advice that the books should not be promoted, advice which comes from the group Book 28, an LGBT organisation which has pushed councils to take steps to prevent LGBT people seeing “offensive” and “transphobic” gender-critical books in their libraries .

It was understood the local chapter of the Women’s Rights Network will contest a campaign against gender-critical titles “singled out” because of concerns they could be found to be offensive.

The controversy began with an internal HR grievance lodged in January 2023 about gender-critical books on display in council libraries .

Calderdale’s library agreed to remove six gender-critical books from public view.
After The Telegraph revealed that these books had been hidden, Calderdale library staff lodged a complaint against their own employer and demanded the books be reinstated on library shelves.

Calderdale council undertook a review of its policies following the outcry against censorship, while stating it had to balance these concerns against what it termed some people’s “acute vulnerability”.

This week Ian Day, the council’s director for public service, said that while the books are likely “to cause offence to some people”, the titles do not reach “the threshold required to interfere with legal rights such as the right of freedom of expression”.

He recommended that the council decide to reinstate books, with the proviso that they are not promoted.

Books which will not be promoted by Calderdale library​

  • Material Girls by Kathleen Stock
  • Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters by Abigail Shrier
  • Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality by Helen Joyce
  • Doublethink: A Feminist Challenge to Transgenderism by Janice G Raymond
  • Trigger Warning: My Lesbian Feminist Life by Sheila Jeffreys
  • Transgender Body Politics by Heather Brunskell-Evans
 

UK: Girl Suspended From School After Refusing To Use Unisex Facilities, Calling Parents For Help

Archive
A teen girl was suspended from her school in Gosport, United Kingdom, following her refusal to use a gender neutral bathroom and contacting a parent for help. The girl, who attends the Brune Park Community School, told her father she was given the option of either using the unisex facility, or not being allowed to go to the bathroom at all.

Speaking to the News, the father of the girl, who has not been named, reported that his daughter received a 1-day suspension on October 11 in an incident that began with her refusing to use the mixed-sex lavatory.

“A male teacher at my daughter’s school refused her access to a female toilet, giving her an ultimatum to use a unisex toilet or not to go at all,” the father said, outraged. “To add to the problem, my daughter was subsequently suspended because she contacted me to tell me what was going on and refused to hand over her phone.”

The girl had reportedly told her teacher that she felt unsafe using the unisex washroom, and that she had concerns about its hygienic upkeep. While the exact age of the girl is not known, Bune Park’s student body ranges from 11 to 16 years old.

“My daughter now has a suspension on her school record for stating she wanted to use a female toilet because the unisex ones make her feel unsafe and dirty, without so much as a question asked of this teacher,” her father said, adding that while the unisex washrooms are “always open,” the single-sex options are sometimes closed off to students for unknown reasons.

The father said there had never been any issues before with his daughter using female toilets, adding: “I’ve spoken to a lot of other parents who aren’t even aware of the unisex toilets being introduced, let alone male teachers having control over what toilets their sons and daughters can use.

“If a girl wants to use a female toilet she should be able to – especially at a sensitive age when they are going through changes. The same applies for boys, some might be too shy to use a unisex toilet … There is absolutely no excuse in today’s world for a male teacher trained in safeguarding children to refuse a young girl access to a female toilet. There has been no repercussions for the teacher whatsoever, so they can do this again.”

The school declined to comment, instead sending a letter justifying the suspension to the child’s parent.

“The decision to suspend (the child) has not been taken lightly. (She) has been suspended for this fixed period because on October 11 (she) was persistently defiant,” they told the girl’s father.

Issues concerning the introduction of unisex toilets in schools have been persistent over the past year, with many reporting incidents at schools across the United Kingdom.

Earlier this year, a mother in Coventry reported that her 13-year-old daughter had been assaulted in the mixed-sex washrooms at the Caludon Castle School in Wyken.

The mother explained that a teenage boy had kicked the cubicle door open to take photographs of her daughter while she was using the toilet. He kicked the door so hard that it hit the teen in the face, leaving her with marks on her arm and a large cut on her forehead.

The girl had to be taken to hospital after being attacked while using the facilities.
 
The latest series of Big Brother in the UK has a tranny. Or rather had because he was voted out. Cue the usual accusations of transphobia. It wasn't helped when another housemate stuck a giant cock on a halloween skeleton decoration and said "let's call her Hallie. Here's said tranny,

untitled1.jpg

And here's the handmaiden who was his biggest supporter in the house
untitled2.jpg
Why are they always so fat?


Big Brother fans demand Paul is 'REMOVED from house immediately' amid claims he made 'disgusting transphobic slur' about ejected housemate Hallie on 24hr live stream

By Ciara Farmer For Mailonline

Published: 11:29, 30 October 2023 | Updated: 11:32, 30 October 2023

Big Brother fans were left raging on Sunday evening over comments allegedly made by Paul Blackburn on the ITV show's 24hr live stream.
The security officer, 23, has been accused by viewers of making a transphobic slur about ejected housemate Hallie Clarke, 18, during a new Halloween challenge.
The house has been adorned with Halloween decorations, including skeletons around the living areas and garden - one of whom was mocked up with oranges fashioned as breasts and an appendage seemingly added to resemble a penis.
A number of Twitter users claimed Paul was heard calling the skeleton Hallie - in the wake of the trans teen, who left the show on Friday, informing the house that she was planning to undergo Feminising Genital Surgery.
After viewers regaled the story on the microblogging site, fans soon swarmed with messages insisting he should be dismissed immediately if he had made the 'transphobic' comments, while others called upon Ofcom to act.

Eek: Big Brother fans were left raging on Sunday evening over comments allegedly made by Paul Blackburn on the ITV show's 24hr live stream


Eek: Big Brother fans were left raging on Sunday evening over comments allegedly made by Paul Blackburn on the ITV show's 24hr live stream

Hmm... The security officer, 23, has been accused by viewers of making a transphobic slur about ejected housemate Hallie Clarke, 18, during a new Halloween challenge


Hmm... The security officer, 23, has been accused by viewers of making a transphobic slur about ejected housemate Hallie Clarke, 18, during a new Halloween challenge

Hmm... The house has been adorned with Halloween decorations, including skeletons around the living areas and garden - one of whom was mocked up with oranges fashioned as breasts and an appendage seemingly added to resemble a penis


Hmm... The house has been adorned with Halloween decorations, including skeletons around the living areas and garden - one of whom was mocked up with oranges fashioned as breasts and an appendage seemingly added to resemble a penis

Hmm: A number of Twitter users claimed Paul was heard calling the skeleton Hallie - in the wake of the trans teen, who left the show on Friday, informing the house that she was planning to undergo Feminising Genital Surgery


Hmm: A number of Twitter users claimed Paul was heard calling the skeleton Hallie - in the wake of the trans teen, who left the show on Friday, informing the house that she was planning to undergo Feminising Genital Surgery

77171081-12688297-image-a-22_1698664925762.jpg


77171079-12688297-image-a-24_1698664936089.jpg


Not good: After viewers regaled the story on the microblogging site, fans soon swarmed with messages insisting he should be dismissed immediately if he had made the 'transphobic' comments, while others called upon Ofcom to act


Not good: After viewers regaled the story on the microblogging site, fans soon swarmed with messages insisting he should be dismissed immediately if he had made the 'transphobic' comments, while others called upon Ofcom to act
A fan account for the show wrote on Sunday evening: 'Completely flew again tonight. Well that was an interesting live stream...
'Paul showcasing how transphobic he really is with the skeleton in the garden. I'm so mad about that, still hoping that I heard that wrong but if that is true then big brother should intervene #bbukD!'
Attempting to clarify the story, a viewer asked: 'Could you enlighten me please i saw them positioning the skeleton in the house but didn't hear what they said?'
To which the user replied: 'They named this skeleton Hallie and then did this to it. There's something in between it's legs. It doesn't look good...
'Paul told Olivia that when Yinrun sees it she won't like it. And they had a joke about it basically. I'm going to try and find the stream later and watch again.'
Another Twitter account shared the claims, writing: 'On last nights Live Feed, Paul put something between a skeletons legs and said “that one’s called Hallie”. He then told Olivia that when Yinrun sees it “she’s not gonna like it”'.
Fellow viewers soon voiced their outrage over the moment, writing: 'Paul needs to be held accountable for this, Big Brother better speak up. #BBUK... This should lead to immediate removal. No excuses @itv do you condone transphobia or not?...

Eeek: 'Paul showcasing how transphobic he really is with the skeleton in the garden. I'm so mad about that, still hoping that I heard that wrong but if that is true then big brother should intervene #bbukD!'


Eeek: 'Paul showcasing how transphobic he really is with the skeleton in the garden. I'm so mad about that, still hoping that I heard that wrong but if that is true then big brother should intervene #bbukD!'
'Get this gross transphobic chaser out of there I stg I'm so sick of him... Bang out of order, if that is what they said!... can we write to ofcom?... Surely people have been removed for less than this before...
'Oh my god!! I've been defending Paul but this is UNACCEPTABLE!! My support of him ends right now!! Are you going to do something about this? #BBUK...
'I said exactly this. Housemates have been removed for less. They HAVE to do something... I liked Paul, as a housemate, but if this is true its disgusting and even more so when its done at the expense of an 18 y/o....
'Woah yeah 100%! Needs to be thrown straight out for that surely??!!'
MailOnline has contacted ITV for comment.
During her stint in the house, Hallie revealed she would spend part of the £100k prize money on 'a new vagina'. On her second day she came out as transgender to co-stars, admitting she felt she wasn't being 'authentic' not telling them.
She went on to tell pals Kerry and Jenkin that if she won the ITV show, she would spend £30k of the money on Feminising Genital Surgery.
Hallie said: 'If I win I'm going to get a vagina. Designer vagina. And I'm going to pay my mum back for all the years she paid for my treatment.
An emotional Kerry asked how much it would cost, to which Hallie replied: 'Like 30 grand. The mind doesn't match the body. That's the best way to describe being trans. I have a female mind, but the body doesn't match.'
Hallie also explained that due to not being in the correct body yet, it has stopped her from being sexually active.

Farewell: Hallie was the third person to be evicted from the house on Friday October 27


Farewell: Hallie was the third person to be evicted from the house on Friday October 27
 

Pedophiles Debate “Benefits” of Puberty-Halting Drugs On “Boy Love” Forum

Archive
Men involved in one of the longest-running homosexual pro-pedophilia forums have recently been discussing the “benefits” of drugs to halt a child’s puberty. BoyChat, which has been in operation since 1995, was founded by a self-described “boy lover” and operates as a network for men to connect and discuss their pedophilic interest in boys as well as strategies for promoting the normalization of pedophilia.

On October 14, a man using the screen name “Pharmakonposted a statement to BoyChat asserting his belief that puberty should be voluntary, and that the view was only controversial due to transphobic sentiment.

“Puberty comes on average two years sooner than it did a generation ago. Puberty blockers have been used for most of that time to delay ‘precocious puberty,’ but it’s left up to doctors and parents — not kids — to decide what that means. Puberty blockers only became controversial due to trans hate,” he wrote. “Even where giving kids puberty blockers has been made illegal for trans affirmation, it remains legal for cis kids!”

The post concludes by stating, “Puberty blockers should be available on demand so kids who want to can choose when, or if, they will experience puberty.”

Responses to the suggestion were mixed, but prompted widespread discussion on the pedophile forum regarding halting children’s puberty.

“I like the idea of generations – children and parents and grandparents and great grandparents – I like the stages of human life that have been assigned to us by evolution,” another user added, continuing with the suggestion that he found puberty to be sexually arousing.

“I don’t see puberty as a disaster in terms of boyish beauty. Indeed, very much the contrary :). And it seems to me that the developing mind and body and emotions of the adolescent boy, which require adult masculine guidance, provides a vital raison d’etre for pederasty.”

Another user, “Cherubino,” argued that “puberty blockers are reversible” while puberty is not.

“I don’t think any medical facilities or personnel would be willing to perform the surgery on a minor,” he said, referring to genital surgeries that are euphemistically labeled “gender-affirming” care.

“Puberty itself is also not reversible, so delaying it should be an option, and without significant risk or harm compared to the potential benefits,” he added.

In a follow-up discussion of the supposed “benefits” of halting puberty, “Cherubinoremarked: “How about allowing a celebrated boy soprano to extend his career? In any case, it’s a private decision, not your decision nor mine. From a medical ethics POV, it is not the ethical quandary that a surgical intervention presents.”

This is not the first time the issue has been raised within the forum. Last year, “Cherubino” told of how he believes that “all cute boys should get puberty blockers.”

The comment was in response to a discussion on a September 2022 proposed bill, since passed, by California Senator Scott Wiener which established that the state would provide “refuge” for “trans kids” from other states where doctors are prohibited from administering puberty blockers to minors.

Men involved in the BoyChat community often exchange tips on how to avoid law enforcement and advocate for sexual offending against minors. The terms “pro-contact” and “no contact” or “anti-contact” are used to differentiate between those who believe sex with minors should be legalized and those who claim to avoid acting on their urge to abuse.

BoyChat has been running for nearly three decades, and offers a messaging platform for users to speak with each other. The founder of BoyChat, who used the alias “Kasper,” had initially set up the forum as part of a pedophile network called Free Spirits, which he launched in the fall of 1995.

Archived versions of the site show that from its beginning, the forum openly advocated for homosexual pedophilia, or pederasty. The page’s background depicted a pro-pedophilia symbol, a smaller blue triangle inside of a larger triangle, which is described as representing a boy with an adult man.

According to the Free Spirits site, boy love is “a phenomenon of attraction to boys that many males exhibit, in which there are erotic, aesthetic, emotional, and spiritual aspects. Many people call it an orientation just like any other.”

“There is an ethical consensus among the BoyChat community and the keepers of the sites that all forms of non-voluntary sexual contact are to be condemned. Some participants in BoyChat voice their opinions that men should not have sexual contacts with boys when the boys seek it, because they don’t want to risk the dangers of society’s reaction. Others, especially those who sought out relationships with men as boys, say that some boys are harmed when their repeated requests for love and intimacy are rejected, and that it is a natural right that boys be able to make their personal choice,” reads the site’s FAQ page.

The mission statement, adopted July 14, 1997, claims to be “dedicated to promoting open communication among boy lovers, the most underserved and misunderstood sexual minority remaining in today’s human society. Free Spirits sponsors various means through which the international boylove movement can hold ongoing discussions, provide mutual support, and educate the rest of society about this diverse and responsible community.”

The most recent version of the website offers a live chat session called LifeLine. The service is described as “a real-time support chat for people who are attracted to children. Whether you’re a boylover or a girllover, or someone who knows one, we’re here to listen.”

In 1997, one of the founding members of the pedophile network placed an advertisement in a Usenet forum that was aimed at “boy lovers.” Usenet, created in 1980, was one of the very first computer networks and an alternative to the United States military-controlled ARPANET system. It was developed in the US and initially used largely by academics and programmers. Usenet was also the site of some of the FBI’s first computer-related child pornography busts in the mid-90’s, after a ten year-old boy suddenly disappeared and investigators discovered a “larger ring of pedophiles.”

Former president of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, Ernest E. Allen, commented during a 1997 Senate subcomittee hearing on the proliferation of child pornography on the internet: “A 1995 Carnegie Mellon University study found that over a year and a half period, 83.5 percent of digitized pictures stored on Usenet groups were pornographic in nature. The study also asserted that pedophilic, hebephelic, and paraphiliac images accounted for approximately 3 million downloaded images from an adult online bulletin board.”

He continued: “Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Security and Terrorism in 1995, Postal Inspector Paul Hartman testified that he had previously been convinced that pedophiles were members of an underground subculture with no formal lines of communication — until he discovered the prolific use of computers to exchange information and discuss their sexual desires.”

“Dear Boylovers,” the Usenet post, dated September 27, 1997, began. “Do you ever get tired of looking through newsgroups trying to find information and resources that mean something to you? Are you lonely? Do you sometimes wish you could stop being who you are?”

There is a place on the Internet you can go to find caring support, glean valuable information and make real friends. Free Spirits was founded a few months ago to give you a place to be. It is an exciting, vibrant, growing community and we’d like to invite you to take a look at it. The heart and soul of Free Spirits is BoyChat.”

In January, Reduxx revealed that the general manager of a controversial “child protection organization” which campaigns against child pornography bans and campaigns state representatives demanding child-like sex dolls be kept legal had been posting in BoyChat about his pedophilic interest in young boys.

Prescott Bayern, the general manager of Prostasia, posted to BoyChat in 2022 that he was “the definition of a ‘dirty old man.’” He continued: “I can no longer go out to find the boys who need me, so, I have set traps just outside of the front yard fence. One day, I’ll catch one.”

Bayern has been active in a variety of online forums advocating for adult-child sexual relations. In one post, he announced that he was going to masturbate to the sight of children to emphasize that pedophilic fantasies and “thought crimes” could not be policed.

In June, Reduxx was the first to report that an academic at Canada’s McGill University had been soliciting members of the pro-pedophile forum for anonymous research, while promising to protect their identities regardless of any sexual offending against minors committed by survey participants.

The survey, created by psychology PhD researcher Julia Levitan, also inquired about various options related to gender identity, including “pansexual, sexually attracted to children in general, regardless of their gender,” and “queer, sexually attracted to children in a way that does not correspond to traditional/established ideas of gender sexual orientation.”
 

Transgender police officer who branded free speech campaigner a woman beater and Nazi while targeting him for having gender views 'directly contradicting her own' is sacked

(Archive)

  • Lynsay Watson sent ex-officer Harry Miller over 1.2K messages over 18 months
  • Watson targeted Miller due to his views about gender identity, a panel was told
A trans police officer who trolled a free speech campaigner online branding him a women beater and a Nazi has been sacked.

Lynsay Watson, 56, sent former police officer Harry Miller more than 1,200 messages over an 18-month period in which she also described him as a Fascist and a bigot and labelled his campaign group Fair Cop 'domestic terrorists'.

PC Watson targeted Mr Miller because his views about gender identity were 'in direct contradiction to her own' a police misconduct panel was told on Friday.

In the messages she made 'factual assertions that Mr Miller was violent towards women'.

She also described broadcaster Sonia Poulton as Terf (trans-exclusionary radical feminist) - intended to be a derogatory term.

The panel heard she initially sent messages from an account in which she identified herself as a police officer - prompting Mr Miller to complain about her conduct to Leicestershire police.

But when she was spoken to by a senior officer - he simply advised her to post anonymously instead using a pseudonym, the panel was told.

She went on to set up at least four different accounts with fake names, including one in which she claimed to be a retired officer from another force as well as a Home Office adviser on policing and transgender issues with a masters in legal studies.

Watson, a former nurse, admitted gross misconduct but had denied breaching standards relating to honesty and integrity.

Force solicitor Liz Briggs, outlining the case against her, told the panel it was clear Watson and Mr Miller were at 'polar opposites' in their views about gender ideology.

She said Watson was 'entirely entitled to strongly disagree with Mr Miller and of course vice versa' but as a police officer, must treat the public with respect and courtesy.

She said the messages were 'derogatory and abusive' and there were other ways she could have expressed her views.

Mrs Briggs said even after she was warned about her conduct, Watson continued her activities online setting up a 'number of different accounts in an attempt to evade identification and in doing so she provided false information'.

Watson admitted the allegations and breaching standards of professional behaviour relating to standards of authority; respect and courtesy, orders and instructions and disreputable conduct.

She denied her conduct breached the standards of honesty and integrity, which relate to when she was challenged on Twitter about her identity and denied it was her and claimed to be a retired GMP officer and on another occasion said she was a woman called 'Paula' who had a masters degree in legal studies but this was found proven.

Mrs Briggs said her actions were 'intentional, deliberate targeted and planned'.

She added: 'An officer who is abusive towards individuals when their ideologies clash is undoubtedly going to cause significant harm to public confidence.'

Watson claimed she was acting on behalf of the persecuted LGBTQ community and posted anonymously to gather evidence about unknown officers who she believed were members of Fair Cop.

But panel chair Kate Meynell, Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire police, said that when considering the contents of the post it 'is not clear how they would be a way of gathering evidence'.

Ms Meynell said: 'I find that the officer's conduct does amount to gross misconduct. It was inevitable PC Watson's conduct would impact on the reputation of Leicestershire police and police generally.' She said she accepted that Watson had 'deeply held views on the subject'.

'I also accept that she has a right to set those views out and defend and debate them,' she said.

'However as a serving police officer this must be done in accordance with the standards of professional behaviour.

'In my view it is precisely when an officer is engaging in a public debate about something they care passionately about that they need to keep the standards and codes of ethics at the forefront of their mind.' She said Watson continued sending messages in the face of repeated warnings and said the content was 'not in keeping with debate: it is abusive, insulting and certainly discourteous'.

She said she also considered the frequency and number of messages and that members of the police force should 'not take any active part in politics'.

'That is the obligation the officer took on - in my view her conduct would interfere with her ability to impartially discharge her duties and certainly would give that impression to members of the public'.

Ms Meynell said her conduct 'had a significant effect on the reputation of the force,policing generally and our public trust..

'I am therefore of the view that the only proper outcome in this case is dismissal without notice and PC Watson should now be included on the bared list,' she concluded.

Watson's Police Federation representative DS Andy Spence said she had worked at two previous police force's where she had 'faced difficulties' and was not accepted but had been since joining Leicestershire police.

He said the Tweets came from 'somebody who is trying to stand up for her community to ensure they are protected and to ensure they are not subject to the same behaviour that she has faced in her past'.

Mr Miller, a former officer in Humberside who was investigated after he Tweeted a gender critical poem, said afterwards: 'PC Watson appears to me to be the product of a culture within Leicestershire Constabulary which consistently promotes the politically contested ideology of trans identity through the raising of flags, its presence on Pride marches, and its use of the Pride and trans flag symbols on riot shields. It continues to do this in spite of Home Office advice to the contrary.

'PC Watson's actions must be set against this culturally poisonous backdrop, and some leniency should be afforded as a result.'
 
However contested and emotive this particular issue, it is hardly relevant to the large-scale practice of science – yet Donelan is seeking to leverage it to imply that all of science somehow stands at risk from “woke ideology”, as if the integrity of truth itself were at stake.
That's because it in fact is. It's slimy and pathetic for these troons and ideologues to act like they haven't been aggressively censoring any empirical science that proves their claims are arrant nonsense. They certainly weren't complaining when people doing real science were being deplatformed, threatened and having their careers destroyed.
Why are they always so fat?
Because they are degenerate coomer freaks who can't keep themselves from immediately acting on any impulse or desire. That's why they're troons in the first place.
 
On Wednesday, authorities moved to shut down a screening of a documentary starring destransitioner Chloe Cole after far-left activists flooded into the venue and disrupted the event at the University of Utah.

The event, which was hosted by the University of Utah's Young Americans for Freedom chapter, was shut down by campus police after nearly 70 transgender rights activists disrupted the screening for more than 15 minutes with loud chants, according to YAF's the New Guard.

"Hey hey, ho ho, transphobia has got to go," the activists chanted as they took over the room, video shows.

Shortly after the activists flooded into the event, campus police demanded that they either stay quiet or leave the venue. They insisted upon staying and continued to cause disruption.

Lucy Atwood, chair of Utah YAF, told the New Guard: "I tried to do an introduction of the film for those who were there to learn about the horrific experiences that Chloe and others featured in the documentary have gone through, but each time I would talk, people would yell."

Atwood said that her chapter attempted to play the movie with subtitles on but campus police made the decision to shut down the screening. Instead of forcing the far-left activists to leave, police ordered everyone to vacate the venue.

According to the outlet, the chapter will be hosting Chloe Cole in person on November 30 and YAF's legal team is working to ensure that the event will proceed without it being shut down by authorities.

The Daily Caller documentary, Damaged: The Transing of America's Kids, tells the story of the lives of transgender people who wish they had never transitioned genders and the harmful effects it has had on their mental and physical health.

  • Sophie Grace Chappell part of team revising UK therapist's ethical framework
  • Some professionals have spoken of their fears over her involvement
  • The Philosophy professor made controversial comments in 2021 radio interview
A transgender academic accused of saying it ‘would not matter’ if the number of female murders increased if men were allowed to self-identify as women has been put in charge of creating guidelines for therapists, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Philosophy professor Sophie Grace Chappell is on the core team revising the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy’s (BACP) national ethical framework.

But some therapists have spoken of their fears over her involvement because of comments she made in a 2021 radio interview rejecting feminist groups’ fears that controversial SNP plans to allow men to legally self identify as female without undergoing any medical procedures could put women at risk.

Campaigners said such laws could allow men with predatory intentions automatic access to female-only spaces by identifying as women. But Prof Chappell, who was born male and began living as a woman in 2014, told the BBC’s Kaye Adams that such fears were not based on real data.

She imagined a world in which gay people faced a process to be accepted as homosexual similar to trans people needing a gender recognition certificate to be acknowledged as a different sex.

If that was challenged, she said ‘people would say there’s going to be a crime wave or dreadful homosexual murders... it’s going to be awful if you do that. I think you’d rightly dismiss that as scaremongering. And you’d say no, look... It wouldn’t matter actually if there was a slight spike in those statistics. Because this isn’t about that kind of issue. It’s about human rights.’

Critics say Prof Chappell is suggesting any small rise in murders of women under self-ID laws is insignificant compared to the importance of trans rights.

And they fear she could, in her new role, introduce BACP guidelines restricting what therapists can say to clients.

One female counsellor said: ‘Prof Chappell is completely unsuitable to be deciding what form our ethical framework should take. I fear this person will insert gender ideology into our professional guidelines.’

James Esses, who was kicked off a psychotherapy course for his gender-critical views, said: ‘It is extremely worrying that a trans activist who dismisses concerns about women’s safety is rewriting ethical guidance for therapists.’

Last night Prof Chappell, who teaches at the Open University, said: ‘I have never said that violence against anyone does not matter. For any minority, civil rights do not vary with the crime statistics for that minority.

‘To use crimes committed by a few gay people as a weapon against the whole community would be utterly cynical. Likewise for the trans community.’

BACP said those reviewing its guidelines include experts ‘with a diverse range of knowledge, perspectives and experience’.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo