Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Iniciador del tema trannyfucker
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 On-and-off DDoS attacks. (July 25th: On-going connection issues.)
🧅 Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/ -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 4 de Dic, 2018
The troon in question “Angelica” Ross has spent the last week or so burning bridges in Hollywood by going after big-time tv show runner (and incredibly filthy rich guy) Ryan Murphy. The guy who gave him a job on the troon-centric show Pose.
Considering how crazy the cast and crew of Pose ended up being in real life, I’m amazed no one has killed or been killed. Yet.
Considering how crazy the cast and crew of Pose ended up being in real life, I’m amazed no one has killed or been killed. Yet.
- Registrado
- 16 de Abr, 2019
The former head of Stonewall is kvetching on Twitter that the latest British social attitudes survey has shown a marked drop in support for trannies. I wonder which organization, that has been trying to relentlessly force people to suck the girl cock over the last few years, could be to blame....
- Registrado
- 24 de Feb, 2019
Sure this has been posted but wanted to mention at first they stated she was the first now they have fixed it to say second. Those girls knew they were gonna lose to a man again.
AnOminous
IS THIS DIVINE INTELLECT? OR IS IT NIGGERLICIOUS?
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
This bitch is complaining about negative press coverage, when the press is exactly who has been pushing this shit to the point everyone is sick and tired of troons.
- Registrado
- 24 de Ago, 2014
I can say I'm not prejudiced at all against trannies. If non gender-confused people are so unreasonable and entitled as trannies are, as eager as trannies to destroy Science, language and the notion of truth itself, I'd criticize them equally. If non gender-confused people cause life-long harm to children, I wish them death too.
Muskcarpone
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 24 de Feb, 2019
Don't know where to post this, but British former musician and current day TRA Billy Bragg attacked musician Louise Distras on social media who in turn revealed how he once sexually harassed her. It will be interesting to see whether more women will come forward and Bragg will now start his Russel Brand arc or whether his TRA shield is strong enough to protect him.
Última edición:
ArthuriusMartyrius
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 3 de Ene, 2018
Emma Roberts has long had a reputation for being kind of a bitch with no filter IRL (ironically that's also like half the characters she plays) so I legitimately would not put it past her to say something based like this.
- Registrado
- 9 de Ago, 2019
Billy Bragg is a terminally leftist Bri'ish manlet who, in a just society, would be eaten alive by starving gerbils for the amusement of small children.
- Registrado
- 26 de Sep, 2020
Ok it's not strictly on topic, but this demonstrates the credibility and horror of the above far better than any words.
In original version, he was open to banging a gay (man/woman is unclear). Now changed to delete the icky binary and accommodate theyfabs.
I've had relations with girls from many nations
I''ve made passes at women of all classes
And just because you'regay a they I won't turn you away
If you stick around I'm sure that we can find some common-ground
Sexuality, strong and warm and wild and free
Sexuality, your laws do not apply to me
A nuclear submarine sinks off the coast of Sweden
Headlines give me headaches when I read them
I had an uncle who once played for Red Star Belgrade
He said some things are really best left unspoken
But I prefer it all to be out in the open
Sexuality, don't threaten me with misery
Sexuality, I demand equality
I'm sure that everybody knows how much my body hates me
It lets me down most every time and makes me rash and hasty
I feel a total jerk before your naked body of work
I'm getting weighed down with all this information
Safe sex doesn't mean no sex it just means use your imagination
Stop playing with yourselves in hard currency hotels
I look like Robert De Niro, I drive a Mitsubishi Zero
Sexuality, come eat and drink and sleep with me
Sexuality, we can be what we want to be
I''ve made passes at women of all classes
And just because you're
If you stick around I'm sure that we can find some common-ground
Sexuality, strong and warm and wild and free
Sexuality, your laws do not apply to me
A nuclear submarine sinks off the coast of Sweden
Headlines give me headaches when I read them
I had an uncle who once played for Red Star Belgrade
He said some things are really best left unspoken
But I prefer it all to be out in the open
Sexuality, don't threaten me with misery
Sexuality, I demand equality
I'm sure that everybody knows how much my body hates me
It lets me down most every time and makes me rash and hasty
I feel a total jerk before your naked body of work
I'm getting weighed down with all this information
Safe sex doesn't mean no sex it just means use your imagination
Stop playing with yourselves in hard currency hotels
I look like Robert De Niro, I drive a Mitsubishi Zero
Sexuality, come eat and drink and sleep with me
Sexuality, we can be what we want to be
Última edición:
AnOminous
IS THIS DIVINE INTELLECT? OR IS IT NIGGERLICIOUS?
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
So yet another virtue signaling SJW faggot manlet who turns out to be a sex pest. Has Billy Bragg been relevant to anything whatsoever since the year started with "19?"
- Registrado
- 22 de Abr, 2022
No. Basically the only thing he does with his life now is tweet about trannies and ban anyone he disagrees with from Left Field at Glastonbury. His ego has entirely eclipsed whatever talent he might have had at one point.
- Registrado
- 1 de Ene, 2021
My God, that's disgusting. Perverse content aside, he sings like a Fozzie Bear alarm clock with a broken volume control and an inability to properly pronounce consonants.
Also, the ugly bastard needs to find a dentist who can do adult braces.
A fucking what?
If one has to invent car models to make a rhyme, one is a terrible lyricist.
This man is clearly retarded. Why are people listening to him?
- Registrado
- 2 de Feb, 2021
It's a Second World War Japanese Fighter Plane you fucking retard.
Billy Bragg is certainly a revolting leftist soy girldick sucker but he has written some superb love songs and was actually worth listening to 35 years ago.
Just because he's now a lying woke worthless piece of fecal matter doesn't mean he didn't have talent, he was a superb lyricist at one point. Just cos your knowledge stops at the 4 times table doesn't mean he couldn't write a song.
Harsh I know but I'm pissed off tonight.
- Registrado
- 1 de Ene, 2021
You don't drive a plane, faggot.
AnOminous
IS THIS DIVINE INTELLECT? OR IS IT NIGGERLICIOUS?
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
He also did a mean Internationale.
- Registrado
- 2 de Feb, 2021
Yes you do, it's called Taxiing, turdhead!
And yes, I'm being asanine but I'm still in a bad mood!
- Registrado
- 28 de Sep, 2022
I've always liked how it is suddenly perfectly acceptable for them to make fun of minority names if that person has committed wrong-think. In every other situation it is an unforgivable hate crime that they strongly oppose.
Make a joke about M Night Shyamalamadingdong's name and they will crawl out of the woodwork to call you a nazi but if he ever slanders the trannies they're the ones that will be doing it.
- Registrado
- 1 de Jul, 2015
- Registrado
- 25 de Jul, 2020
Virginia Governor, Glenn Youngkin, continues to hold out in the face of trans activism as he enacts his new transgender policies in school districts across the state...
- Registrado
- 24 de Ago, 2014
Terf Island's Secretary of Science announces she will protect Science from biology denial and political correctness.
Which of course means genocide!!
Archive of The Guardian's op-ed. Full text below.
Philip Ball. Wed 4 Oct 2023 11.29 EDT
The science secretary, Michelle Donelan, told the Conservative party conference this week that the Tories are “depoliticising science”. Or as a Conservative party announcement later put it, in case you didn’t get the culture-war reference, they are “kicking woke ideology out of science”, thereby “safeguarding scientific research from the denial of biology and the steady creep of political correctness”.
Scientists do not seem too delighted to be defended in this manner. “As a scientist, I really don’t know what this means,” tweeted Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, professor of psychology and cognitive neuroscience at the University of Cambridge. “This is totally shocking and is something I never thought I would see in the UK,” said Buzz Baum, a molecular cell biologist for the Medical Research Council.
What exactly does Donelan think science needs protecting from? What is this woke threat? At the conference, she expanded on that. “Scientists are told by university bureaucrats that they cannot ask legitimate research questions about biological sex,” she claimed, adding that Keir Starmer thinks the “legitimate concerns of the scientific community” on these issues of sex and gender “don’t matter”. She said she will launch a review of the use of gender and sex questions in scientific research, apparently to be led by Alice Sullivan, a professor of sociology at University College London, which will be used to formulate guidance.
You would need to have been hiding under a rock not to appreciate that questions of sex and gender have become controversial, bordering on incendiary, in some areas of academia. As a recent exchange by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins and professor of humanities Jacqueline Rose in the New Statesman revealed, academics are often talking at cross-purposes: Dawkins defended the binary nature of human sexes from an evolutionary angle, Rose the socially constructed aspects of gender identity. On top of that, there are the complications of developmental and cognitive biology, which, among other things, can produce intersex individuals and conditions where, say, people with a Y chromosome can be anatomically female.
But one doesn’t need to take a strong stand about rights or wrongs in these debates to recognise that they are difficult and subtle – and to acknowledge it is proper that they be rigorously discussed. Arguably, this is an area where science can’t supply definitive answers to all the germane societal questions.
This is not a case of academic research being trammelled by an imposed ideology, but rather, of a range of differing views among academics themselves. Besides, rather than await clarification, Donelan has evidently formed her opinion already: she called guidance that data on sex should only be collected in exceptional circumstances “utter nonsense” and a “denial of biology”. What is the point of a review if you have decided already what it must say?
More to the point, why is the government getting involved in the first place? What chills Baum is the idea of “politicians telling scientists about the nature of biology”. Some scientists can’t help thinking of previous instances where governments imposed their views on the subject: the spurious “race science” of the Nazis and the anti-Darwinian denialism of Stalin’s regime. While that might sound a slightly hyperbolic response to a transparently desperate ploy to stoke culture-wars division, the principle is the same: a government deciding an approved position on science and demanding that academics toe the line.
Much as Donelan tries to position herself as a champion of the objectivity and freedom of science, this intervention supplies more evidence of the government’s distrust of academics in general and scientists in particular – it’s of a piece with Rishi Sunak’s assertion that scientists were given too much power during the pandemic. Witness the disturbing way this policy direction is framed. However contested and emotive this particular issue, it is hardly relevant to the large-scale practice of science – yet Donelan is seeking to leverage it to imply that all of science somehow stands at risk from “woke ideology”, as if the integrity of truth itself were at stake.
That is perhaps the most ominous aspect of this announcement. The creation of a fictitious, ubiquitous enemy to scare the population is indeed straight out of the fascist playbook. It was thoughtful of the Conservatives to drive this point home with the spectacle of party member Andrew Boff, chair of the London Assembly, being escorted from the conference hall by police on Tuesday when he voiced protest at Suella Braverman’s criticism of the term “gender ideology”.
The notion that science can be “depoliticised” at all, let alone by an agenda-driven political party, is understood to be nonsensical by those who study the interactions of science and society. Of course political agendas should never dictate research results. But the questions asked, priorities decided and societal implications of advances made absolutely make science inextricably tangled with the political landscape – not least in a controversial area like sex and gender. That entanglement can get messy, but no true democracy tries to control the narrative.
Philip Ball is a science writer and the author of the forthcoming book, How Life Works: A User’s Guide to the New Biology
(Positron's comment: If this Philip Ball is one I think of, he has written a fascinating book called The Self-made Tapestry about the formation of patterns in living organisms. This book was later updated and split into three handy volumes Shapes, Branches and Flow. It is sad when a truly original thinker of Science has drunk the kool-aid)
Which of course means genocide!!
Archive of The Guardian's op-ed. Full text below.
Science hasn’t gone ‘woke’ – the only people meddling with it are the Tories
Michelle Donelan’s plan to “depoliticise” science with new guidelines on sex and gender research is a chilling movePhilip Ball. Wed 4 Oct 2023 11.29 EDT
The science secretary, Michelle Donelan, told the Conservative party conference this week that the Tories are “depoliticising science”. Or as a Conservative party announcement later put it, in case you didn’t get the culture-war reference, they are “kicking woke ideology out of science”, thereby “safeguarding scientific research from the denial of biology and the steady creep of political correctness”.
Scientists do not seem too delighted to be defended in this manner. “As a scientist, I really don’t know what this means,” tweeted Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, professor of psychology and cognitive neuroscience at the University of Cambridge. “This is totally shocking and is something I never thought I would see in the UK,” said Buzz Baum, a molecular cell biologist for the Medical Research Council.
What exactly does Donelan think science needs protecting from? What is this woke threat? At the conference, she expanded on that. “Scientists are told by university bureaucrats that they cannot ask legitimate research questions about biological sex,” she claimed, adding that Keir Starmer thinks the “legitimate concerns of the scientific community” on these issues of sex and gender “don’t matter”. She said she will launch a review of the use of gender and sex questions in scientific research, apparently to be led by Alice Sullivan, a professor of sociology at University College London, which will be used to formulate guidance.
You would need to have been hiding under a rock not to appreciate that questions of sex and gender have become controversial, bordering on incendiary, in some areas of academia. As a recent exchange by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins and professor of humanities Jacqueline Rose in the New Statesman revealed, academics are often talking at cross-purposes: Dawkins defended the binary nature of human sexes from an evolutionary angle, Rose the socially constructed aspects of gender identity. On top of that, there are the complications of developmental and cognitive biology, which, among other things, can produce intersex individuals and conditions where, say, people with a Y chromosome can be anatomically female.
But one doesn’t need to take a strong stand about rights or wrongs in these debates to recognise that they are difficult and subtle – and to acknowledge it is proper that they be rigorously discussed. Arguably, this is an area where science can’t supply definitive answers to all the germane societal questions.
This is not a case of academic research being trammelled by an imposed ideology, but rather, of a range of differing views among academics themselves. Besides, rather than await clarification, Donelan has evidently formed her opinion already: she called guidance that data on sex should only be collected in exceptional circumstances “utter nonsense” and a “denial of biology”. What is the point of a review if you have decided already what it must say?
More to the point, why is the government getting involved in the first place? What chills Baum is the idea of “politicians telling scientists about the nature of biology”. Some scientists can’t help thinking of previous instances where governments imposed their views on the subject: the spurious “race science” of the Nazis and the anti-Darwinian denialism of Stalin’s regime. While that might sound a slightly hyperbolic response to a transparently desperate ploy to stoke culture-wars division, the principle is the same: a government deciding an approved position on science and demanding that academics toe the line.
Much as Donelan tries to position herself as a champion of the objectivity and freedom of science, this intervention supplies more evidence of the government’s distrust of academics in general and scientists in particular – it’s of a piece with Rishi Sunak’s assertion that scientists were given too much power during the pandemic. Witness the disturbing way this policy direction is framed. However contested and emotive this particular issue, it is hardly relevant to the large-scale practice of science – yet Donelan is seeking to leverage it to imply that all of science somehow stands at risk from “woke ideology”, as if the integrity of truth itself were at stake.
That is perhaps the most ominous aspect of this announcement. The creation of a fictitious, ubiquitous enemy to scare the population is indeed straight out of the fascist playbook. It was thoughtful of the Conservatives to drive this point home with the spectacle of party member Andrew Boff, chair of the London Assembly, being escorted from the conference hall by police on Tuesday when he voiced protest at Suella Braverman’s criticism of the term “gender ideology”.
The notion that science can be “depoliticised” at all, let alone by an agenda-driven political party, is understood to be nonsensical by those who study the interactions of science and society. Of course political agendas should never dictate research results. But the questions asked, priorities decided and societal implications of advances made absolutely make science inextricably tangled with the political landscape – not least in a controversial area like sex and gender. That entanglement can get messy, but no true democracy tries to control the narrative.
Philip Ball is a science writer and the author of the forthcoming book, How Life Works: A User’s Guide to the New Biology
(Positron's comment: If this Philip Ball is one I think of, he has written a fascinating book called The Self-made Tapestry about the formation of patterns in living organisms. This book was later updated and split into three handy volumes Shapes, Branches and Flow. It is sad when a truly original thinker of Science has drunk the kool-aid)
Última edición: