Opinion Nobody Should Care About a Woman’s ‘Body Count’

Link (Archive)

Nobody Should Care About a Woman’s ‘Body Count’​

Ever since elon Musk’s lackeys began fiddling with the algorithms of X (formerly Twitter), I have noticed a distinct shift in the content that is pushed onto users. My “For you” tab is now a nest of tradwives, shoplifting videos, and that guy who has strong opinions on trouser creases. It is also home to the kind of old-fashioned misogyny that I once thought was on the decline.

And that’s because X, a small social network beloved by journalists, is now providing a window into a much bigger part of the internet—one that is simultaneously absurdly popular and almost invisible to outsiders. It is the interlinking Venn diagram of Twitch streamers; mixed-martial-arts, wrestling, and boxing fandoms; manosphere influencers; and video-game commentators. The way that these guys turn up on one another’s podcasts, X feeds, and livestreams—and their habit of physically fighting one another for money—makes them seem like a younger, more ripped version of the Intellectual Dark Web.

One of the obsessions of the worst parts of this group—call them the Influential Jerk Web—is “body count” discourse, in which women (always women) are shamed for the number of sexual partners they’ve had. The phrase has gained popularity so quickly that Jason Derulo has just released a song about it. Now, Derulo is okay with a high body count—“all that ass, must be good at math,” he observes—but others are not. “A lot of the world’s problems could be fixed if women walked around with their body count on their foreheads,” the professional kickboxer turned sexist influencer Andrew Tate said in one viral clip. A bit rich, you might think, coming from a self-confessed former “pimp” who is currently awaiting trial on human-trafficking and rape charges. But Tate is only one of many influencers who talk like ayatollahs while adhering to the beauty standards of Ryan Gosling in Barbie.

These men provide Gen Z and younger Millennials with a very old template for masculinity filtered through the new visual grammar and vocabulary of YouTube, Twitch, and TikTok. Take the mixed martial artist Dillon Danis, who is scheduled to fight the YouTuber turned pro wrestler Logan Paul in a boxing match in Manchester, England, on October 14. In the past five years, “influencer boxing” has become a lucrative content machine. Logan and his brother, Jake, who have more than 20 million YouTube followers each, have led the trend, alongside the British streamer JJ Olatunji, better known as KSI. Their venues are located across the world, in places such as Texas and Saudi Arabia, and the fights make thousands of dollars on pay-per-view. Influencer boxing is characterized by the kind of pre-match smacktalk familiar from professional wrestling but internetified. And that means, unfortunately, a torrent of sexually inflected misogyny.

Scroll down Danis’s X feed and you’ll see what I’m talking about. Over the past few weeks, he has relentlessly targeted Paul’s fiancée, Nina Agdal, posting photographs of her with her exes, digging out Instagram posts in which she is somewhat scantily dressed (she’s a model), claiming that he could put any prize money toward “HIV medication bills for Nina’s exes,” implying that she has dated everyone she has ever been photographed with, and calling her a “whore.”

This tsunami of slut-shaming nestles between other insults, such as mocking Paul’s failed NFT project, CryptoZoo. In return, Paul has taunted Danis about his dead father. Most fans will therefore see the cracks about Nina Agdal as professional-wrestling-style kayfabe—building up the hype for the fight so that Paul is trying to not just win the match but defend his honor. Pro wrestling is a highly choreographed sport; many fights are billed as “grudge matches,” and the Paul brothers’ internet-era innovation has been to bring its obsession with storylines to boxing. (In 2019, Logan Paul claimed at a press conference that KSI’s family didn’t love him. Four years on, the two men own the sports-drink company Prime together.)

But one person who apparently doesn’t find the posts funny is Agdal herself. On September 6, she filed for an injunction under New Jersey’s revenge-porn laws, accusing Danis of posting a “nonconsensual, sexually explicit photograph” of her, “displaying full frontal nudity, to millions of social media users in the course of a relentless, ongoing campaign of cyber harassment and bullying against her.” She was granted a temporary restraining order. Danis deleted that photo but falsely claimed that Agdal was trying to put him in jail. (She is seeking damages.) “This is actually wild,” he added in a post that, according to X, has been viewed 18 million times. Danis presented the lawsuit as his opponent’s camp trying to tank the October 14 fight, adding: “Logan Paul is a dead man walking.”

In feminist circles, Danis’s behavior would be classified as “DARVO”: deny, attack, reverse victim and offender. The sympathetic character in his version of the story is himself, a man threatened with jail for engaging merely in some lighthearted badinage—shh, don’t mention that it was at the expense of a woman who never asked to be involved with this circus. When Agdal understandably complained about becoming the focus of his fans’ aggression, Danis called upon 2020’s favorite misogynist trope: “Nina Agdal will be called Karen Agdal till further notice.”

I can’t be the only one who thought we had left overt, unapologetic sexism like this behind. What is most striking about Danis’s feed is how masculine his world seems—life is a competition between men, and women are just the prizes (or the liabilities). Tate, whose public comments give little indication that he enjoys spending time with women, shows the same attitude. Maybe these guys are obsessed with “body counts” because they treat life as one giant scoreboard.

whether or not Danis sees his posts as kayfabe is irrelevant. At least some portion of his audience won’t, because he is tapping into well-established anti-feminist talking points. In this worldview, the most humiliating thing that could happen to a man is failing to control his woman, an attitude that puts men into a torturous position of constant precarity. Other humans are by definition uncontrollable, no matter how much you intimidate them or patrol their behavior. But tell that to the late-Millennial and Gen Z influencers trying to shame women so that they will “behave”—and not embarrass the men who are deemed to be in charge of them.

Misogyny occupies a sweet spot in our culture—it is frowned upon enough to make young men trading off it feel edgy, but it’s typically taken less seriously than racism. Its post-#MeToo resurgence has led to members of the Influential Jerk Web coming out with phrases you might have thought died out with 19th-century laws on acceptable forms of wife beating. In 2021, the livestreamer Sneako notoriously confessed that he had watched his girlfriend have sex with another man at a party, and told the Peer to Peer podcast: “It felt like somebody was taking something from me, like someone was violating my property.” He was at pains to note that wanting to watch another man have sex in no way suggested that he was bisexual, which suggests a brittle borderline homophobia is also part of the deal.

Two other things are worth noting about the body-count discourse. The first is that some people on the edges of the Influential Jerk Web have consciously rejected its exhausting sexual monitoring of women. The left-wing streamer Destiny, for example, was raised Catholic but is now in an open relationship. His partner Melina Goransson regularly mocks Danis and other bro streamers, and recently retweeted a post by another user that read: “Quickly now! Do some push ups!! That’s how we change the world!! Now go home and call women whores for not acknowledging your existence and making their own money!!”

The second thing is that, in accordance with Rule 34 of the internet, the straight male anxiety that Danis and Tate are tapping into has been translated into pornography. One of those joining the pushback against Dillon Danis was the influencer Adam Grandmaison, better known as Adam22. He has a podcast with his wife, Lena Nersesian, or Lena the Plug, where they interview a female porn actor and then sleep with her. Last month, though, Nersesian slept with another man instead. Amid all the mockery about Lena’s body count and how Adam was a cuck, the video went viral—so viral that he bought her a $400,000 Lamborghini to celebrate its success. Tate criticized them, telling the former Fox News host Tucker Carlson that “this is what the Matrix wants from you as a man. They want the woman in charge, and the man below, with no backbone … I would argue, in nearly any household where the female is dominant, everyone is vaccinated.” Unfazed, the couple went on a podcast with Tate and invited him to take part in a threesome. (Tate declined.)

The intense interest in Grandmaison and Nersesian’s relationship makes sense: If the worst thing you can say to a man is that his partner is a “whore,” then there’s money on the table for whoever will admit to reveling in his wife’s high body count. And that’s the real lesson here. The internet has smashed all kinds of taboos, but without taboos, how can people feel the thrill of breaking them? The Influential Jerk Web has brought back sexual shame not just to control women but to extract pleasure from doing so.
 
When was the last time you went to church, big boy?
Why is the notion that churches and synagogues would preach mercy and forgiveness so alien to you? Have... have you ever been to church??
I've demonstrated my religious pedigree. And its synagogue, thanks. You're the one who has problems with your own holy book, Amos 5:15 and Romans 12:9.

And despite what you say you do hate what you consider evil, that is, sexism, for instance the expectation that a woman not open her legs for everyone who walks by. Free love is against Biblical morality. Doubtless you've thrown such things out to make it feminism friendly. You can't serve two masters, Jesus and Feminism.
 
Sociology reasearch suggests that is not true. And since I'm not a WHINER like @Norbert the Tiger (Norbert the Whiner? lol) I'll link some info to support that:

When was the last time you went to church, big boy?
Why is the notion that churches and synagogues would preach mercy and forgiveness so alien to you? Have... have you ever been to church??
I heavily question the validity of those articles. Many of them employ typical lefty buzzwords like 'fat shaming', which gives me the impression that they're written by activists, not serious scientists that would have been okay with a conclusion that didn't comport to their preconceived notions. If there's one thing you learn from a statistics class, it's that five different people can look at the same set of data and draw five radically different conclusions. But I'll leave that aside. You have still failed to give a solution other than "oh just tolerate them and let it work itself out". Which is not a solution. It is the lack of a solution. It is sticking your fingers in your ears and hoping the problems solves itself in some nonspecific way. So I'll pose the question once again: You admit that hookup culture is a problem, and if shaming the participants is unpalatable to your sensibilities, what remedy would you prescribe in its stead?
 
I've demonstrated my religious pedigree. And its synagogue, thanks. You're the one who has problems with your own holy book, Amos 5:15 and Romans 12:9.

And despite what you say you do hate what you consider evil, that is, sexism, for instance the expectation that a woman not open her legs for everyone who walks by. Free love is against Biblical morality. Doubtless you've thrown such things out to make it feminism friendly. You can't serve two masters, Jesus and Feminism.
Judge not lest ye be judged. And you haven't demonstrated your religious pedigree. This is the first I have heard of it. When was your bar mitvah, boy? Sing me some Torah.
I don't advocate for women to "open her legs for everyone who walks by". Far from it. Female Chauvinist Pigs do that in a futile effort to prove that sex is as meaningless to them as it is to the men who use them.
I have it on good authority from both my priest and my rabbi that hatred is not good, and that whinging about what other people do is not the best use of your limited time in this life.
I know the verse that ploished me out of Orthodox Judaism and back into Episcopalianism. Numbers 5:11-31. It pissed me off with how uneven it is. A woman accused of adultery must go through this whole awful trial, which is instigated by her husband. And if she's proven right, she gets a pretty baby on her next pregnancy, kinda like how you can get one haircut free after you buy eight of them. But if her husband is right, and she persists in going thru the trial anyway, she dies. Nothing at all happens to the husband in either circumstance. He doesn't even have to admit he was wrong, if indeed he was wrong.
What a shitty religion.
I heavily question the validity of those articles. Many of them employ typical lefty buzzwords like 'fat shaming', which gives me the impression that they're written by activists, not serious scientists that would have been okay with a conclusion that didn't comport to their preconceived notions. If there's one thing you learn from a statistics class, it's that five different people can look at the same set of data and draw five radically different conclusions. But I'll leave that aside. You have still failed to give a solution other than "oh just tolerate them and let it work itself out". Which is not a solution. It is the lack of a solution. It is sticking your fingers in your ears and hoping the problems solves itself in some nonspecific way. So I'll pose the question once again: You admit that hookup culture is a problem, and if shaming the participants is unpalatable to your sensibilities, what remedy would you prescribe in its stead?
look at the domain names. "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov" means its a peer-reviewed study. Sorry the facts didnt match your feelings.
If it really bugs you, go become an MRA sociologist and report to us how shaming is totally based brah
 
I don't advocate for women to "open her legs for everyone who walks by". Far from it.
But you do demand that people not count that woman's decision against her. So she can open her legs as much as she wants and we're forbidden from criticizing her.
Judge not lest ye be judged
Reminding you of the Bible's moral standard isn't judgment or condemnation. Try again.
and my rabbi that hatred is not good,
Ask your rabbi, if he indeed exists, if he hates the Holocaust or Hitler.
I know the verse that ploished me out of Orthodox Judaism and back into Episcopalianism.
WASP women love being tourists in other cultures. Good thing you went back home, goy
 
@Stan

>peer-reviewed

Great! So now all I have is assurance that instead of one tranny coming to wrongheaded conclusions from inconclusive data, it's now a team of them! Great! Wonderful! I take back everything I said and concede every point to you.

You like your heckin' science and statistics so much, why don't you go look up the replication crisis? We're beginning to see that across almost all fields of experimentation, we cannot recreate results of a given experiment 50% of the time. In soft science fields(like this would be), the rate is closer to 80%, likely because what people will tell you in a survey and what they actually do typically have as much commonality as my ass does with the dark side of Europa.

And I can't help but notice you've yet again dodged my question. If you don't have a solution of your own to this problem, how am I supposed to take anything you have to say on mine seriously? You've made a habit throughout this thread of focusing in on the most inflammatory parts of what I said while hemming around the more salient points I've made. I'm sure you're not just doing that intentionally or anything.
 
Ohh love a good ad hominem. You can't beat what I'm saying so you pivot to my thread. Let me guess, you're gonna post my photo next.
Pot calling the kettle black. Further down I quote passaged your to the screenshot I posted on your profile about you power-levilling about getting buttfucked by guys in college, which is relevant because 1) you claim to to be good Christian, work at a Church as an administrator from what I gatther 2) power-levelling is usually reacted to very negatively here.

Stan wrote: Why do you care so much about my sexual history, Norbert? Your dick is small and it doesn’t get very hard.
In actuality, you know nothing about me or my dick size or anything else about me, other than the dissident "fringe" persoective I have expressed on here. And given your pictures, you are in no position to criticize anyone's appearance of value in the sexual marketplace. Most importantly, it is a boring, wholly unoriginal comment that reveals you to exactly the sort if midwit many on here know you to be.

Fh-BstmWYAAlIkA.jpeg
I said that being obsessed about women’s body count is an evo psych urge that doesn’t serve much purpose today. Especially if there’s no way to know what anyone’s “body count” is without asking them, and frankly, most women won’t tell you because they realize any positive non zero integer would send you into orbit.
Except it does serve a purpose because humans in particular cannot shed thousands of years of evolutionary pyschology on a dime. Know way to know what someone's body count? Out of your mind, talking out your ass as usual. A person knows what a person is from company that person keeps, how that person behaves, etc. Is it possible a chaste not until marriage type belongs to a party sorority known for hard core debauchery. Possible, but highly unlikely. There are other markers as well. Stereotypes, a certain gestalt provide clues that work because they are correct so very often,
I don’t think hookup culture is good; it sucks.
Then stop insisting it is ok or it does not matter.
Men use women and toss them aside like trash the moment they get their nut. It is particularly bad in colleges.
It seems from your power levelling you would know. Beyond that, guess who puts out for the assholes. Yes, exactly. Also with this idea that slut shaming is somehow bad, women use men just as much.
The women who think they’re getting ahead this way are sadly misguided. but I don’t think deriding them as “the town bicycle” is fair or productive, especially if you yourself have had your share of trysts.
Except that it is productive. People respond to sanctions in the culture, positive or negative More on that down below
Also. Why are you obsessed with the sexual habits of college girls? I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say it’s not because you’re a hot guy in college snowed with Bumble requests. This isn’t the first time, either. As the French would say; mind your own sex life.
As usual trying to personalize things because you are a boring, not nearly as smart as you think you are privileged (in the sense of class and opportunity) white woman who resorts to boring, cliched insults we have heard a million times. The sexual habits of college girls, women of child rearing age more generally, are pertinent to this subject, you moron. That is why I and others are talking about them here. You will also note I do not talk about things in threads where they are not relevant, eg that anti-racist teacher in South Carolina. I also care because unlike you I understand that what people do, what society accepts or does not accept affects everyone.
If there’s no objective way for you to verify what she says how can you be sure your prospective is being truthful?
Very few things are absolutely, 100 percent objective or accurate. We use the best tools we have, which do have some accuracy.
Sociology reasearch suggests that is not true.
And for every ridiculous, shitty article you throw out I will throw things out like Robert Bork's excellent Slouching Towards Gomorrah. The introduction talks about concept known as defining deviancy down, and how if society does not shame, does not deal with undesirable behavior correctly, that behavior becomes normalized and mainstream, and then the next thing that was further deviant becomes borderline acceptable.
Beyond that, and I any sensible person do not require studies or articles to know that social sanctions, postiyibe or negative, influence human behavior.

Important edit:

Judge not lest ye be judged.
Do not judge, you mean how you did not make judgements about @Caroline Farrow you hypocrit, or me or pretty much everyone else you disagree with?
 
Última edición:
Lmao @ hoes being mad that men are the way they are. Cry about it.

You can behave however you want. But you can't and won't go unjudged (by men or other women), and you have no control over that. Plan accordingly.

But don't worry. There are countless dudes with fetishes who won't grimace when you walk down the aisle towards them in a pure white dress :story:
 
Última edición:
Weird how Stan refuses to address the fact that STDs are fucking life ruining. It doesn’t matter that it can be “treated”, the damage they do to the reproductive tract is permanent.

Infertility in particular is devastating to people who want to have children. I knew a lady who got chlamydia from her rapist and once she learned that was why she couldn’t have kids, she killed herself.

I knew a chap that is now infertile because his piece of shit ex-girlfriend couldn’t stop herself from riding the carousel behind his back; and this was after she lied to him about her body count.

Then there’s the fact that HIV still fucking kills people. The drugs used in treatment will only work for so long before your body become resistant, and then you have to watch yourself deteriorate within a matter of months, and there’s nothing healthcare workers can fucking do for you unless you live in Canada and can just be MAID’ed.

With shit like bug catching culture, and activists trying to normalize HIV as “normal” among gays I have nothing but contempt towards “sex positivity” culture and the lives that get ruined.

Don’t you fucking dare try to downplay it, either. I have seen it destroy people. Don’t be a fucking selfish whore, because in doing so you’re perpetuating a cycle in which you spread life ruining diseases. It may feel good in the moment, but it’s not so fun when you’re watching your organs shut down on you because you wanted to ride the carousel.

Editing to add citations:
From the CDC
Stanford Children’s Hospital
National library of medicine
World Health Organization on HIV drug resistance
National Institute of Health on HIV drug resistance
Article from everyday health on what it’s like dying from HIV once the drugs don’t work anymore

Don’t you dare try to even downplay it, Stan. These are the consequences to being promiscuous; grandma and grandpa were on to something when they said don’t ride the carousel. It’s not just for your own safety, but for the well-being of the rest of humanity.
 
Última edición:
Weird how Stan refuses to address the fact that STDs are fucking life ruining. It doesn’t matter that it can be “treated”, the damage they do to the reproductive tract is permanent.
We don't even have to go there, though. A promiscuous woman acting like she's serious relationship material is viscerally disgusting to most men like rotten meat is disgusting. You don't have to explain why you don't want to eat rotten food. You just move on and ignore the sickness.

Hoes will try to lecture you into looking past their behavior. But it will only work on desperate simps hoes don't even want. They play themselves, and that's the real reason they're mad.
 
(Article, archive)
ever since elon Musk’s lackeys began fiddling with the algorithms of X (formerly Twitter), I have noticed a distinct shift in the content that is pushed onto users. My “For you” tab is now a nest of tradwives, shoplifting videos, and that guy who has strong opinions on trouser creases. It is also home to the kind of old-fashioned misogyny that I once thought was on the decline.

And that’s because X, a small social network beloved by journalists, is now providing a window into a much bigger part of the internet—one that is simultaneously absurdly popular and almost invisible to outsiders. It is the interlinking Venn diagram of Twitch streamers; mixed-martial-arts, wrestling, and boxing fandoms; manosphere influencers; an

d video-game commentators. The way that these guys turn up on one another’s podcasts, X feeds, and livestreams—and their habit of physically fighting one another for money—makes them seem like a younger, more ripped version of the Intellectual Dark Web.

One of the obsessions of the worst parts of this group—call them the Influential Jerk Web—is “body count” discourse, in which women (always women) are shamed for the number of sexual partners they’ve had. The phrase has gained popularity so quickly that Jason Derulo has just released a song about it. Now, Derulo is okay with a high body count—“all that ass, must be good at math,” he observes—but others are not. “A lot of the world’s problems could be fixed if women walked around with their body count on their foreheads,” the professional kickboxer turned sexist influencer Andrew Tate said in one viral clip. A bit rich, you might think, coming from a self-confessed former “pimp” who is currently awaiting trial on human-trafficking and rape charges. But Tate is only one of many influencers who talk like ayatollahs while adhering to the beauty standards of Ryan Gosling in Barbie.

These men provide Gen Z and younger Millennials with a very old template for masculinity filtered through the new visual grammar and vocabulary of YouTube, Twitch, and TikTok. Take the mixed martial artist Dillon Danis, who is scheduled to fight the YouTuber turned pro wrestler Logan Paul in a boxing match in Manchester, England, on October 14. In the past five years, “influencer boxing” has become a lucrative content machine. Logan and his brother, Jake, who have more than 20 million YouTube followers each, have led the trend, alongside the British streamer JJ Olatunji, better known as KSI. Their venues are located across the world, in places such as Texas and Saudi Arabia, and the fights make thousands of dollars on pay-per-view. Influencer boxing is characterized by the kind of pre-match smacktalk familiar from professional wrestling but internetified. And that means, unfortunately, a torrent of sexually inflected misogyny.

Scroll down Danis’s X feed and you’ll see what I’m talking about. Over the past few weeks, he has relentlessly targeted Paul’s fiancée, Nina Agdal, posting photographs of her with her exes, digging out Instagram posts in which she is somewhat scantily dressed (she’s a model), claiming that he could put any prize money toward “HIV medication bills for Nina’s exes,” implying that she has dated everyone she has ever been photographed with, and calling her a “whore.”

This tsunami of slut-shaming nestles between other insults, such as mocking Paul’s failed NFT project, CryptoZoo. In return, Paul has taunted Danis about his dead father. Most fans will therefore see the cracks about Nina Agdal as professional-wrestling-style kayfabe—building up the hype for the fight so that Paul is trying to not just win the match but defend his honor. Pro wrestling is a highly choreographed sport; many fights are billed as “grudge matches,” and the Paul brothers’ internet-era innovation has been to bring its obsession with storylines to boxing. (In 2019, Logan Paul claimed at a press conference that KSI’s family didn’t love him. Four years on, the two men own the sports-drink company Prime together.)

But one person who apparently doesn’t find the posts funny is Agdal herself. On September 6, she filed for an injunction under New Jersey’s revenge-porn laws, accusing Danis of posting a “nonconsensual, sexually explicit photograph” of her, “displaying full frontal nudity, to millions of social media users in the course of a relentless, ongoing campaign of cyber harassment and bullying against her.” She was granted a temporary restraining order. Danis deleted that photo but falsely claimed that Agdal was trying to put him in jail. (She is seeking damages.) “This is actually wild,” he added in a post that, according to X, has been viewed 18 million times. Danis presented the lawsuit as his opponent’s camp trying to tank the October 14 fight, adding: “Logan Paul is a dead man walking.”

In feminist circles, Danis’s behavior would be classified as “DARVO”: deny, attack, reverse victim and offender. The sympathetic character in his version of the story is himself, a man threatened with jail for engaging merely in some lighthearted badinage—shh, don’t mention that it was at the expense of a woman who never asked to be involved with this circus. When Agdal understandably complained about becoming the focus of his fans’ aggression, Danis called upon 2020’s favorite misogynist trope: “Nina Agdal will be called Karen Agdal till further notice.”

I can’t be the only one who thought we had left overt, unapologetic sexism like this behind. What is most striking about Danis’s feed is how masculine his world seems—life is a competition between men, and women are just the prizes (or the liabilities). Tate, whose public comments give little indication that he enjoys spending time with women, shows the same attitude. Maybe these guys are obsessed with “body counts” because they treat life as one giant scoreboard.

whether or not Danis sees his posts as kayfabe is irrelevant. At least some portion of his audience won’t, because he is tapping into well-established anti-feminist talking points. In this worldview, the most humiliating thing that could happen to a man is failing to control his woman, an attitude that puts men into a torturous position of constant precarity. Other humans are by definition uncontrollable, no matter how much you intimidate them or patrol their behavior. But tell that to the late-Millennial and Gen Z influencers trying to shame women so that they will “behave”—and not embarrass the men who are deemed to be in charge of them.

Misogyny occupies a sweet spot in our culture—it is frowned upon enough to make young men trading off it feel edgy, but it’s typically taken less seriously than racism. Its post-#MeToo resurgence has led to members of the Influential Jerk Web coming out with phrases you might have thought died out with 19th-century laws on acceptable forms of wife beating. In 2021, the livestreamer Sneako notoriously confessed that he had watched his girlfriend have sex with another man at a party, and told the Peer to Peer podcast: “It felt like somebody was taking something from me, like someone was violating my property.” He was at pains to note that wanting to watch another man have sex in no way suggested that he was bisexual, which suggests a brittle borderline homophobia is also part of the deal.

Two other things are worth noting about the body-count discourse. The first is that some people on the edges of the Influential Jerk Web have consciously rejected its exhausting sexual monitoring of women. The left-wing streamer Destiny, for example, was raised Catholic but is now in an open relationship. His partner Melina Goransson regularly mocks Danis and other bro streamers, and recently retweeted a post by another user that read: “Quickly now! Do some push ups!! That’s how we change the world!! Now go home and call women whores for not acknowledging your existence and making their own money!!”

The second thing is that, in accordance with Rule 34 of the internet, the straight male anxiety that Danis and Tate are tapping into has been translated into pornography. One of those joining the pushback against Dillon Danis was the influencer Adam Grandmaison, better known as Adam22. He has a podcast with his wife, Lena Nersesian, or Lena the Plug, where they interview a female porn actor and then sleep with her. Last month, though, Nersesian slept with another man instead. Amid all the mockery about Lena’s body count and how Adam was a cuck, the video went viral—so viral that he bought her a $400,000 Lamborghini to celebrate its success. Tate criticized them, telling the former Fox News host Tucker Carlson that “this is what the Matrix wants from you as a man. They want the woman in charge, and the man below, with no backbone … I would argue, in nearly any household where the female is dominant, everyone is vaccinated.” Unfazed, the couple went on a podcast with Tate and invited him to take part in a threesome. (Tate declined.)

The intense interest in Grandmaison and Nersesian’s relationship makes sense: If the worst thing you can say to a man is that his partner is a “whore,” then there’s money on the table for whoever will admit to reveling in his wife’s high body count. And that’s the real lesson here. The internet has smashed all kinds of taboos, but without taboos, how can people feel the thrill of breaking them? The Influential Jerk Web has brought back sexual shame not just to control women but to extract pleasure from doing so.
 
Yeah, they should. It gives an insight into how they value relationships, how trustworthy they may be, and how many possible STDs you're risking infection by.
 
I'm supposed to care about what women think, but not what they do?
The way that these guys turn up on one another’s podcasts, X feeds, and livestreams—and their habit of physically fighting one another for money—makes them seem like a younger, more ripped version of the Intellectual Dark Web.
She's exposed to slightly less censorship than usual, and this is how she chooses to describe it?
 
Maybe she's right, maybe I shouldn't care about a woman's body count.

But I do.

Men shouldn't fuck everything with a pulse either, lest you become an effigy of Drexel made from whey protein and housecat teeth.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo