Opinion Nobody Should Care About a Woman’s ‘Body Count’

Link (Archive)

Nobody Should Care About a Woman’s ‘Body Count’​

Ever since elon Musk’s lackeys began fiddling with the algorithms of X (formerly Twitter), I have noticed a distinct shift in the content that is pushed onto users. My “For you” tab is now a nest of tradwives, shoplifting videos, and that guy who has strong opinions on trouser creases. It is also home to the kind of old-fashioned misogyny that I once thought was on the decline.

And that’s because X, a small social network beloved by journalists, is now providing a window into a much bigger part of the internet—one that is simultaneously absurdly popular and almost invisible to outsiders. It is the interlinking Venn diagram of Twitch streamers; mixed-martial-arts, wrestling, and boxing fandoms; manosphere influencers; and video-game commentators. The way that these guys turn up on one another’s podcasts, X feeds, and livestreams—and their habit of physically fighting one another for money—makes them seem like a younger, more ripped version of the Intellectual Dark Web.

One of the obsessions of the worst parts of this group—call them the Influential Jerk Web—is “body count” discourse, in which women (always women) are shamed for the number of sexual partners they’ve had. The phrase has gained popularity so quickly that Jason Derulo has just released a song about it. Now, Derulo is okay with a high body count—“all that ass, must be good at math,” he observes—but others are not. “A lot of the world’s problems could be fixed if women walked around with their body count on their foreheads,” the professional kickboxer turned sexist influencer Andrew Tate said in one viral clip. A bit rich, you might think, coming from a self-confessed former “pimp” who is currently awaiting trial on human-trafficking and rape charges. But Tate is only one of many influencers who talk like ayatollahs while adhering to the beauty standards of Ryan Gosling in Barbie.

These men provide Gen Z and younger Millennials with a very old template for masculinity filtered through the new visual grammar and vocabulary of YouTube, Twitch, and TikTok. Take the mixed martial artist Dillon Danis, who is scheduled to fight the YouTuber turned pro wrestler Logan Paul in a boxing match in Manchester, England, on October 14. In the past five years, “influencer boxing” has become a lucrative content machine. Logan and his brother, Jake, who have more than 20 million YouTube followers each, have led the trend, alongside the British streamer JJ Olatunji, better known as KSI. Their venues are located across the world, in places such as Texas and Saudi Arabia, and the fights make thousands of dollars on pay-per-view. Influencer boxing is characterized by the kind of pre-match smacktalk familiar from professional wrestling but internetified. And that means, unfortunately, a torrent of sexually inflected misogyny.

Scroll down Danis’s X feed and you’ll see what I’m talking about. Over the past few weeks, he has relentlessly targeted Paul’s fiancée, Nina Agdal, posting photographs of her with her exes, digging out Instagram posts in which she is somewhat scantily dressed (she’s a model), claiming that he could put any prize money toward “HIV medication bills for Nina’s exes,” implying that she has dated everyone she has ever been photographed with, and calling her a “whore.”

This tsunami of slut-shaming nestles between other insults, such as mocking Paul’s failed NFT project, CryptoZoo. In return, Paul has taunted Danis about his dead father. Most fans will therefore see the cracks about Nina Agdal as professional-wrestling-style kayfabe—building up the hype for the fight so that Paul is trying to not just win the match but defend his honor. Pro wrestling is a highly choreographed sport; many fights are billed as “grudge matches,” and the Paul brothers’ internet-era innovation has been to bring its obsession with storylines to boxing. (In 2019, Logan Paul claimed at a press conference that KSI’s family didn’t love him. Four years on, the two men own the sports-drink company Prime together.)

But one person who apparently doesn’t find the posts funny is Agdal herself. On September 6, she filed for an injunction under New Jersey’s revenge-porn laws, accusing Danis of posting a “nonconsensual, sexually explicit photograph” of her, “displaying full frontal nudity, to millions of social media users in the course of a relentless, ongoing campaign of cyber harassment and bullying against her.” She was granted a temporary restraining order. Danis deleted that photo but falsely claimed that Agdal was trying to put him in jail. (She is seeking damages.) “This is actually wild,” he added in a post that, according to X, has been viewed 18 million times. Danis presented the lawsuit as his opponent’s camp trying to tank the October 14 fight, adding: “Logan Paul is a dead man walking.”

In feminist circles, Danis’s behavior would be classified as “DARVO”: deny, attack, reverse victim and offender. The sympathetic character in his version of the story is himself, a man threatened with jail for engaging merely in some lighthearted badinage—shh, don’t mention that it was at the expense of a woman who never asked to be involved with this circus. When Agdal understandably complained about becoming the focus of his fans’ aggression, Danis called upon 2020’s favorite misogynist trope: “Nina Agdal will be called Karen Agdal till further notice.”

I can’t be the only one who thought we had left overt, unapologetic sexism like this behind. What is most striking about Danis’s feed is how masculine his world seems—life is a competition between men, and women are just the prizes (or the liabilities). Tate, whose public comments give little indication that he enjoys spending time with women, shows the same attitude. Maybe these guys are obsessed with “body counts” because they treat life as one giant scoreboard.

whether or not Danis sees his posts as kayfabe is irrelevant. At least some portion of his audience won’t, because he is tapping into well-established anti-feminist talking points. In this worldview, the most humiliating thing that could happen to a man is failing to control his woman, an attitude that puts men into a torturous position of constant precarity. Other humans are by definition uncontrollable, no matter how much you intimidate them or patrol their behavior. But tell that to the late-Millennial and Gen Z influencers trying to shame women so that they will “behave”—and not embarrass the men who are deemed to be in charge of them.

Misogyny occupies a sweet spot in our culture—it is frowned upon enough to make young men trading off it feel edgy, but it’s typically taken less seriously than racism. Its post-#MeToo resurgence has led to members of the Influential Jerk Web coming out with phrases you might have thought died out with 19th-century laws on acceptable forms of wife beating. In 2021, the livestreamer Sneako notoriously confessed that he had watched his girlfriend have sex with another man at a party, and told the Peer to Peer podcast: “It felt like somebody was taking something from me, like someone was violating my property.” He was at pains to note that wanting to watch another man have sex in no way suggested that he was bisexual, which suggests a brittle borderline homophobia is also part of the deal.

Two other things are worth noting about the body-count discourse. The first is that some people on the edges of the Influential Jerk Web have consciously rejected its exhausting sexual monitoring of women. The left-wing streamer Destiny, for example, was raised Catholic but is now in an open relationship. His partner Melina Goransson regularly mocks Danis and other bro streamers, and recently retweeted a post by another user that read: “Quickly now! Do some push ups!! That’s how we change the world!! Now go home and call women whores for not acknowledging your existence and making their own money!!”

The second thing is that, in accordance with Rule 34 of the internet, the straight male anxiety that Danis and Tate are tapping into has been translated into pornography. One of those joining the pushback against Dillon Danis was the influencer Adam Grandmaison, better known as Adam22. He has a podcast with his wife, Lena Nersesian, or Lena the Plug, where they interview a female porn actor and then sleep with her. Last month, though, Nersesian slept with another man instead. Amid all the mockery about Lena’s body count and how Adam was a cuck, the video went viral—so viral that he bought her a $400,000 Lamborghini to celebrate its success. Tate criticized them, telling the former Fox News host Tucker Carlson that “this is what the Matrix wants from you as a man. They want the woman in charge, and the man below, with no backbone … I would argue, in nearly any household where the female is dominant, everyone is vaccinated.” Unfazed, the couple went on a podcast with Tate and invited him to take part in a threesome. (Tate declined.)

The intense interest in Grandmaison and Nersesian’s relationship makes sense: If the worst thing you can say to a man is that his partner is a “whore,” then there’s money on the table for whoever will admit to reveling in his wife’s high body count. And that’s the real lesson here. The internet has smashed all kinds of taboos, but without taboos, how can people feel the thrill of breaking them? The Influential Jerk Web has brought back sexual shame not just to control women but to extract pleasure from doing so.
 
Yeah, the prostitutes no longer die of infection or spread it around. It's great.
Yeah, and I don't want to date prostitutes.

And quite frankly prostitutes and those who use them probably deserve to die of infection.

That's called sugar babying, and it's a form of prostitution.
Yeah, and females have been propagandized into thinking that they deserve to earn more then men, while having a man that earns more than you.
 
I do not think there are many women who would say to a man they were dating "I'm sorry, but you haven't slept around enough. You haven't even fucked a hooker. Come back when you have had sex with a dozen other women."
Your rants are not only uninteresting but uninformed. Ever hear of social proof theory? See, men and women are different. It is stated that a man wants an attractive woman, but an attractive woman does not necessarily want a handsome man, rather she wants a man who is desired by other attractive women.
This article is a bit dated, but it demonstrates the principal quite nicely.

It recounds how women struggle in the college dating scene but reveals that they only go after men who are already succesful with women.

"Jayne Dallas, a senior studying advertising who was seated across the table, grumbled that the population of male undergraduates was even smaller when you looked at it as a dating pool. “Out of that 40 percent, there are maybe 20 percent that we would consider, and out of those 20, 10 have girlfriends, so all the girls are fighting over that other 10 percent,” she said."


One sorority slut talks about how her boyfriend already fucked a handful of her sorority sisters. Instead of being uneasy about it, she sees it validation.
The narrative in Charlotte Simmons also demonstrates this principal in how Charlotte Simmons reacts and ultimately selects (or does not select) three different suitors, I cannot recommend it, although the novel does have flaws. And while it may be fiction Tom Wolfe studied college life for a over a year, and examines real issues in pyschologhy and our current cultural milieu. Can't Buy Me Love is another fictional work demonstrating it. In Titanic, one of the things that stimulated her sexual attraction was looking at his sketch book and seeing that other women posed nude for him, which insinuated having sexual experience and being selected by other women. And yes these are fictional works but as good to excellent fictional works they reveal truths about human psychology, the human condition, and the world we live in.
This meme that women hate virgin men for some reason is retarded.
Yeah that's why women routinely throw out cliched insults about being an incel or not having sex.
Fh-BstmWYAAlIkA.jpeg
Otherwise see above.
 
Última edición:
she's tongued some cunt's dung pipe and I'm sorry but why the fuck is that popular with every cunt now? Am I just so old that it's a generation thing
I have an inquiring mind, and my god so many people of my generation eat ass/the opposite. I honestly hope they're just saying they do when I ask to sound hip, but lately they've been mocking me for NOT eating ass, the fuck. So I've taken to calling them faggots for getting their ass licked, put a stop to it.
I feel like it started around 2014ish, why though, I have no idea.
 
This is bullshit until and unless you can give me some concrete evidence it isn't.
Actually, it is not bullshit. I did a quick internet search, found a bunch of stuff. It is an oft discussed phenomenon. You can believe it or not, I don't care, and your reddit tier screeching for "source" has no sway with me.

bc9.png
Do you get all your information about women from a TV show that ran 15 years ago?? Have you ever heard the phrase "correlation is not causation"? Do you get that evo psych is not really applicable in modernity? (ex. A car suddenly stops ahead of me on the highway, I hit the brake hard. No accident, but 5 seconds later I can feel the adrenaline rush of fight-or-flight response. That may be an evolved response, but it's not a very helpful one in context.)
Yeah because the electric Jew known as tv was reguarly dropping red and blacks pills at any point in time. You are of course wrong when you state "correlation is not causation." Correlation is not always causation, but often times it is.
Prove it, these guys claim to all be either virgins or tomcats that fuck everything
Prove what, you dolt? I am not some christcuck bible thumper and my position has always been there needs to be a balance between purtinical prudery. I cannot speak for others here. Some are ridiculous prudes who think even an age of consent of 18 is too high and want to reinstate prohibition of alcohol, others share my view.
Unless they're whores by trade I don't think very many women have a 'body count' (disgusting phrase) of 50 or higher.
Anyone here have a "source" proving to this idiot that things have gotten much worse. There are young women who have body counts that high. A body count of even should be scandalous. I am not your research assistant, nor am I capable of opening your eyes to see what is plainly in front of everyone's face.
 
Última edición:
Have you heard of these awesome drugs called “antibiotics”? They clear up most STIs for good. There’s also a newer class of drugs called “antiretrovirals” that can prevent you from getting HIV and treat HIV if you have it.

So if your gf has access to modern medicine and uses it, then the chances she’s going to give you the clap she got from her ex bf is low. Get tested ffs. This mindset just perpetuates shame and neurosyphilis
For fuck's sake! Just because you that can treat STDs doesn't mean you have free rein to fuck willy nilly. Medicine isn't magic. It's a pain in the ass to have to be reliant on medication for the rest of your life and the risk of contracting disease from someone promiscuous is always going to be higher no matter what. Not to mention that if everyone kept fucking 24/7 then antibiotic abuse and viral evolution would render medicine ineffective.

I don't understand why you always take the kneejerk contrarian position without trying to think them through first. No wonder people here keep shitting on you.
 
Part of the push to gay marriage was propagandizing anal play as safe, healthy, and even more desirable than normal sex. These days, if the thought of putting your dick or mouth where somebody poops makes you retch, there's something wrong with you.
One of the lassie's I was going with at the time was really into anal and no pun intended it's a fucking shitty experience. It's so much prep work and what not so it brings you out of the normal initiation of sexual contact for me. The idea of going to town on an arse with your mouth gives me the boak as I said so how they convinced people this was a good idea astounds me genuinely. I've got poofter relatives so I kinda have a bit of insight into the bender world because of it and aye it's a constant barrage of anal = gud hue hue even for hetero people. The gay scene is absolutely bonkers, those cunts get up to some heinous things, so it's no wonder when gay marriage became legal the filth started spreading like a fucking virus.

I have an inquiring mind, and my god so many people of my generation eat ass/the opposite. I honestly hope they're just saying they do when I ask to sound hip, but lately they've been mocking me for NOT eating ass, the fuck. So I've taken to calling them faggots for getting their ass licked, put a stop to it.
I feel like it started around 2014ish, why though, I have no idea.
My nigga I am in exactly the same boat. So many people have just came out and admitted in rooms full of people about how much they love tongue punching shite pipes. I rip the pish out of them on a regular basis but the cunts don't care. It's at the point where they say it as openly as if they were saying "Aye I love a nice cup of tea in the morning" it's just that normalized now. It's at the stage where I get banter fired my way for saying naw I don't like tonguing chocolate starfishes. It's definitely about 2014ish because I distinctly remember it was before Trump got in. Stay strong homes we must push the brown menace back!
 
I don't understand why you always take the kneejerk contrarian position without trying to think them through first. No wonder people here keep shitting on you.
If the normative position is one of sexism, racism, and seething hatred then I am happy to be the contrarian and welcome the hats and cans.
Just because you that can treat STDs doesn't mean you have free rein to fuck willy nilly. Medicine isn't magic.
My position isn't that people should have sex willy nilly because medicine exists. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure: it is obviously better to use condoms than be on drugs for the rest of your life.

My position is that dumb evo-psych takes on why women have to be pure and virginal (and men do not, as many men here have admitted) are not very applicable in modernity. More broadly, the concept of "body count" totally neglects whether protection was used, what the context of those unions were, etc. I'd daresay a woman with a body count of 1 could be very damaged if that one person was her dad, likewise a woman who's had partners before you isn't necessarily the whore of Babylon.
 
There's weird standard with body count when it comes to terminally online brainlets. If a guy is a virgin or only fucked one or two girls, he's an incel loser. If a girl is a virgin or fucked a couple times, she's a prudish Christian weirdo. If a girl fucks 30 guys (hopefully not in one sitting), you can't say anything because that would be slut shaming. If a guy fucks 30 women nowadays, that's misogynistic behavior. So the only group that's in the right are the women sucking dick in a Wendy bathroom because slut shaming bad.

Personally I never cared about body count. The only thing that really matters to me is results of said body count. I'm not going to raise kids that aren't mine. There's probably some weird reddit mental gymnastics that translates to that being misogyny.

It all comes down to preference. If body count is a deal breaker for you, that doesn't make you a bad person, despite what some aging slut blogging on X thinks.
 
My position is that dumb evo-psych takes on why women have to be pure and virginal (and men do not, as many men here have admitted) are not very applicable in modernity. More broadly, the concept of "body count" totally neglects whether protection was used, what the context of those unions were, etc. I'd daresay a woman with a body count of 1 could be very damaged if that one person was her dad, likewise a woman who's had partners before you isn't necessarily the whore of Babylon.
You could say I'm giving too much credit to people here but I think that's something already implied. Of course nobody thinks of body count as the definitive be-all end-all indicator of a woman's quality, but the fact that exceptions exist doesn't diminish the usefulness of using body-count as a rule of thumb.
 
Actually, it is not bullshit. I did a quick internet search, found a bunch of stuff. It is an oft discussed phenomenon. You can believe it or not, I don't care, and your reddit tier screeching for "source" has no sway with me.
You know you can find people on the Internet who say the earth is flat, right? Just because you read it on pol doesn't make it true.
So yeah, I call bullshit. You read this from some community of men who are equally uninformed about women as you. It's the blind leading the blind around here.
There are young women who have body counts that high. A body count of even should be scandalous. I am not your research assistant, nor am I capable of opening your eyes to see what is plainly in front of everyone's face.
Do you walk around on the street and the women have little numbers above their heads of how many people they've fucked? If not, then this is not "plain to see". It sounds more like manosphere ranting than anything else, and it's pretty hypocritical since some of the men here assembled freely admitted they fuck around but prefer women who never do.
 
but the fact that exceptions exist doesn't diminish the usefulness of using body-count as a rule of thumb.
How would you know a woman's body count unless you ask her? Isn't she just free to tell you some made-up number? (I have fucked √5 men.) Or do you estimate?
Why are you so desperately defending getting into a committed relationship with village mattresses? Maybe a divorce attorney gotta respect the grift.
:( "village mattresses" you oughta be ashamed of yourself. When men do this they're Chads, but you hold women to a completely different standard. And there's no real excuse for it nowadays.
 
You know you can find people on the Internet who say the earth is flat, right? Just because you read it on pol doesn't make it true.
So yeah, I call bullshit. You read this from some community of men who are equally uninformed about women as you. It's the blind leading the blind around here.

Do you walk around on the street and the women have little numbers above their heads of how many people they've fucked? If not, then this is not "plain to see". It sounds more like manosphere ranting than anything else, and it's pretty hypocritical since some of the men here assembled freely admitted they fuck around but prefer women who never do.
I was going to reply to one of your earlier posts but whatever this is good enough.

To start with. This article here sums up pretty well what happens mentally to serial daters


tl'dr though, if you spend your time going from person to person, eventually you have trouble seeing other people as actual people. I imagine this is an issue whether you're a guy or a girl.

You really shouldn't need studies to understand that the more exposure to something people have, the less they see it as important or special or unique or whatever. The more partners people have the less they view each partner as someone special or unique they become just another person or relationship in their life. That doesn't mean they can't find someone to spend their life with long term or that they won't love that person or view them differently than their past relationships. But whether they want to or not they will always view that relationship through the lens of all their past partners or relationships.

There's a lot of people who can't handle that from a partner whether because it's true or just that it's just their perception. It's just not something people necessarily want weighing on them in a relationship. Whether there's any valid reason for it or not. It might seem like it's selfish or making a big deal out of something unimportant.

I can tell you straight up I've met people with partner counts over 100, who were not prostitutes, and they are definitely not people I would want to have relationships with, not even friendships really, not because of their body count, but because of who they are as people. Whether the two are related or not, I don't know, but with at least one of the people, who they are as a person is directly related to how many people they've fucked.

From what I've seen over my life, being excessively promiscuous is definitely soul killing, for anyone, it's not good for your mental health, it's risky for your physical health, it damages you emotionally and stunts your ability to form proper relationships with people, even friendships in a lot of cases. People should definitely be putting more care and thought into who they're fucking than a lot of people seem to these days.

But, what can you do? People are gonna do what they're gonna do. It's just sad a whole generation or more of people are gonna be fucked up before they learn maybe they shouldn't fuck anyone that breathes at the drop of a hat.
 
How would you know a woman's body count unless you ask her? Isn't she just free to tell you some made-up number? (I have fucked √5 men.) Or do you estimate?

:( "village mattresses" you oughta be ashamed of yourself. When men do this they're Chads, but you hold women to a completely different standard. And there's no real excuse for it nowadays.
I would hang the chads with the same rope I use for the whores. Sexual deviants deserve to be thrown in a woodchipper. Now will you cease using this trite argument?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo