US AP: Semi-automatic rifle ban passes Washington state Legislature - The high-powered firearms — once banned nationwide — are now the weapon of choice among young men responsible for most of the country’s devastating mass shootings.

Semi-automatic rifle ban passes Washington state Legislature
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Lisa Baumann
2023-04-20 03:32:06GMT

wash01.jpg
Customers look at AR-15-style rifles on a mostly empty display wall at Rainier Arms Friday, April 14, 2023, in Auburn, Wash. as stock dwindles before potential legislation that would ban future sale of the weapons in the state. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)

BELLINGHAM, Wash. (AP) — A ban on dozens of semi-automatic rifles cleared the Washington state Legislature on Wednesday and the governor is expected to sign it into law.

The high-powered firearms — once banned nationwide — are now the weapon of choice among young men responsible for most of the country’s devastating mass shootings.

The ban comes after multiple failed attempts in the state’s Legislature, and amid the most mass shootings during the first 100 days of a calendar year since 2009.

The Washington law would block the sale, distribution, manufacture and importation of more than 50 gun models, including AR-15s, AK-47s and similar style rifles. These guns fire one bullet per trigger pull and automatically reload for a subsequent shot. Some exemptions are included for sales to law enforcement agencies and the military in Washington. The measure does not bar the possession of the weapons by people who already have them.

The law would go into effect immediately once it’s signed by Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee, who has long advocated for such a ban. When the bill passed the state House in March, Inslee said he’s believed it since 1994 when, as a member of the U.S. Congress, he voted to make the ban a federal law.

After the bill passed, Inslee said the state of Washington “will not accept gun violence as normal.”

Inslee said lives will be saved because of the semi-automatic rifle ban and two other measures approved by the Legislature this session: one that introduced a 10-day waiting period for gun purchases and another to hold gunmakers liable for negligent sales.

Republican state lawmakers opposed the ban, with some contending school shootings should be addressed by remodeling buildings to make them less appealing as targets and others saying it infringes on people’s rights to defend themselves.

“HB 1240 clearly violates our state and federal constitutions, which is why it will end up in court immediately,” Sen. Lynda Wilson of Vancouver said.

The U.S. Congress reinstating a ban on semi-automatic rifles appears far off. But President Joe Biden and other Democrats have become increasingly emboldened in pushing for stronger gun controls — and doing so with no clear electoral consequences.

Nine states including California, New York and Massachusetts, along with the District of Columbia, have already passed similar bans, and the laws have been upheld as constitutional by the courts, according to Washington’s Attorney General Bob Ferguson.

In Colorado, lawmakers debated on Wednesday about similar gun measures, but a sweeping ban on semi-automatic firearms faces stiffer odds.

Lawmakers in the Texas Capitol set aside a slate of proposed new gun restrictions without a vote after hours of emotional appeals from Uvalde families whose children were killed last year. The hearing didn’t end until the early morning hours Wednesday.

During debate on the Washington state bill, Democrats spoke of frequent mass shootings that have killed people in churches, nightclubs, grocery stores and schools.

Sen. Liz Lovelett of Anacortes said that kids’ concerns about school shootings need to be addressed.

“They are marching in the streets. They are asking for us to take action,” Lovelett said. “We have to be able to give our kids reasons to feel hopeful.”

Another gun-control bill that passed in Washington this session would allow people whose family members die from gun violence to sue if a manufacturer or seller “is irresponsible in how they handle, store or sell those weapons.” Under the state’s consumer-protection act, the attorney general could file a lawsuit against manufacturers or sellers for negligently allowing their guns to be sold to minors, or to people buying guns legally in order to sell them to someone who can’t lawfully have them.

A second bill would require gun buyers to show they’ve taken safety training. It would also impose a 10-day waiting period for all gun purchases — something that’s already mandatory in Washington when buying a semi-automatic rifle.

Some gun-control legislation in other states has been struck down since last year’s landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling, which set new standards for reviewing the nation’s gun laws. The ruling says the government must justify gun control laws by showing they are “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”
 
Inslee said lives will be saved because of the semi-automatic rifle ban and two other measures approved by the Legislature this session: one that introduced a 10-day waiting period for gun purchases and another to hold gunmakers liable for negligent sales.
Ask Chicago how it's stringent gun control is working out for them. I don't think there's ever been a case in which the bans have actually prevented murder since, you know, illegal gun trade still exists.
 
Wait, so they're not actually banning semi-automatic rifles as a category, just specific models? Even if you're pro-gun control what's the point of that?
It's exactly how Canada started out their gun control. They banned specific models and a few features (like "high capacity" magazines) and then just kept extending the list of models until pretty much everything was banned.
 
Wait, so they're not actually banning semi-automatic rifles as a category, just specific models? Even if you're pro-gun control what's the point of that?
See attached.

It's not just a list, it's also a feature ban tailored to get around everything California autists used to fuck with their own AWB. Also "conversion kits" are banned, which in the broadest possible interpretation basically bans all parts, but more likely will ban uppers and lowers that aren't completely stripped.
 

Archivos adjuntos

It's exactly how Canada started out their gun control. They banned specific models and a few features (like "high capacity" magazines) and then just kept extending the list of models until pretty much everything was banned.
It's all part of the plan to gradually disassemble gun rights until all parts of it are gone for good. If it was one big sweep people would be outraged but going by piece and piece over time to get the same result results in less pushback.
 
When I was checking Idaho out, a few people suggested I move to Washington (Pullman, Clarkston, etc.) to avoid a tax on my pension.

I am glad that I stayed in the right side of the river.
 
what does this even mean? the AR 15 and Ak47 are not semiautomatic and have been banned for decades...

Some exemptions are included for sales to law enforcement agencies and the military in Washington. The measure does not bar the possession of the weapons by people who already have them.
does Police in the US not use full auto weapons?
 
what does this even mean? the AR 15 and Ak47 are not semiautomatic and have been banned for decades...


does Police in the US not use full auto weapons?
SWAT or other tactical teams have full / burst but many police cars have semiautomatic patrol rifles.
 
This appears to go against the Washington State Constitution: https://leg.wa.gov/CodeReviser/Pages/WAConstitution.aspx

Article 1, Section 24
SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.
 
Oi Yank got a Licence for that?

But seriously for a second this is how it started in England, it will be a longer process in America but they will follow the same process as they did here and dilute what you can own after that to the point of irrelivance, resit this shit and prove how retarded it is.
The US situation is a bit more complicated. First the Supreme Court has already struck down less restrictive shit than this, so it's not likely to stand. Second, other places in the country are getting MORE permissive with guns. Most of the states now allow carry of a handgun without a license.
 
Its honestly amazing how dedicated the left is in trying to implement a Communist revolution on American soil. If only that energy was spent in actually fixing community issues. But that is never going to happen as that doesn't end in their profit.

Still, never fucking disarm. Britain got worse after the gun ban. Canada is currently being raked over the coals thanks to gun bans. Then Australia. And finally California. All these states have one thing in common. Increased violence thanks to gun control. While it is sad that it takes fear to get the murderous retards to stop, it is necessary.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo