US AP: Semi-automatic rifle ban passes Washington state Legislature - The high-powered firearms — once banned nationwide — are now the weapon of choice among young men responsible for most of the country’s devastating mass shootings.

Semi-automatic rifle ban passes Washington state Legislature
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Lisa Baumann
2023-04-20 03:32:06GMT

wash01.jpg
Customers look at AR-15-style rifles on a mostly empty display wall at Rainier Arms Friday, April 14, 2023, in Auburn, Wash. as stock dwindles before potential legislation that would ban future sale of the weapons in the state. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)

BELLINGHAM, Wash. (AP) — A ban on dozens of semi-automatic rifles cleared the Washington state Legislature on Wednesday and the governor is expected to sign it into law.

The high-powered firearms — once banned nationwide — are now the weapon of choice among young men responsible for most of the country’s devastating mass shootings.

The ban comes after multiple failed attempts in the state’s Legislature, and amid the most mass shootings during the first 100 days of a calendar year since 2009.

The Washington law would block the sale, distribution, manufacture and importation of more than 50 gun models, including AR-15s, AK-47s and similar style rifles. These guns fire one bullet per trigger pull and automatically reload for a subsequent shot. Some exemptions are included for sales to law enforcement agencies and the military in Washington. The measure does not bar the possession of the weapons by people who already have them.

The law would go into effect immediately once it’s signed by Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee, who has long advocated for such a ban. When the bill passed the state House in March, Inslee said he’s believed it since 1994 when, as a member of the U.S. Congress, he voted to make the ban a federal law.

After the bill passed, Inslee said the state of Washington “will not accept gun violence as normal.”

Inslee said lives will be saved because of the semi-automatic rifle ban and two other measures approved by the Legislature this session: one that introduced a 10-day waiting period for gun purchases and another to hold gunmakers liable for negligent sales.

Republican state lawmakers opposed the ban, with some contending school shootings should be addressed by remodeling buildings to make them less appealing as targets and others saying it infringes on people’s rights to defend themselves.

“HB 1240 clearly violates our state and federal constitutions, which is why it will end up in court immediately,” Sen. Lynda Wilson of Vancouver said.

The U.S. Congress reinstating a ban on semi-automatic rifles appears far off. But President Joe Biden and other Democrats have become increasingly emboldened in pushing for stronger gun controls — and doing so with no clear electoral consequences.

Nine states including California, New York and Massachusetts, along with the District of Columbia, have already passed similar bans, and the laws have been upheld as constitutional by the courts, according to Washington’s Attorney General Bob Ferguson.

In Colorado, lawmakers debated on Wednesday about similar gun measures, but a sweeping ban on semi-automatic firearms faces stiffer odds.

Lawmakers in the Texas Capitol set aside a slate of proposed new gun restrictions without a vote after hours of emotional appeals from Uvalde families whose children were killed last year. The hearing didn’t end until the early morning hours Wednesday.

During debate on the Washington state bill, Democrats spoke of frequent mass shootings that have killed people in churches, nightclubs, grocery stores and schools.

Sen. Liz Lovelett of Anacortes said that kids’ concerns about school shootings need to be addressed.

“They are marching in the streets. They are asking for us to take action,” Lovelett said. “We have to be able to give our kids reasons to feel hopeful.”

Another gun-control bill that passed in Washington this session would allow people whose family members die from gun violence to sue if a manufacturer or seller “is irresponsible in how they handle, store or sell those weapons.” Under the state’s consumer-protection act, the attorney general could file a lawsuit against manufacturers or sellers for negligently allowing their guns to be sold to minors, or to people buying guns legally in order to sell them to someone who can’t lawfully have them.

A second bill would require gun buyers to show they’ve taken safety training. It would also impose a 10-day waiting period for all gun purchases — something that’s already mandatory in Washington when buying a semi-automatic rifle.

Some gun-control legislation in other states has been struck down since last year’s landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling, which set new standards for reviewing the nation’s gun laws. The ruling says the government must justify gun control laws by showing they are “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”
 
The goal of the left is Simple. They can't ban guns nationwide, so they will work state by state to make it harder and harder for normal law abiding people to own a gun and rebel against the government.
Gun owners need to be vigilant and not give in an inch and form sanctuary counties.
 
This will be struck down by the courts sooner or later, in the meantime sanctuary county time is now. Fuck all grabboid scum right in the eye sockets.
 
Kill grabboids. Behead grabboids. Roundhouse kick a grabboid into the concrete. Slam dunk a grabboid baby into the trashcan. Crucify filthy gabboids. Defecate in a grabboid's food. Launch grabboids into the sun. Stir fry grabboids in a wok. Toss grabboids into active volcanoes. Urinate into a grabboid's gas tank. Judo throw grabboids into a wood chipper. Twist grabboids heads off. Report grabboids to the IRS. Karate chop grabboids in half. Curb stomp pregnant grabboids. Trap grabboids in quicksand. Crush grabboids in the trash compactor. Liquefy grabboids in a vat of acid. Exterminate grabboids in the gas chamber. Stomp grabboid skulls with steel toed boots. Cremate grabboids in the oven. Lobotomize grabboids. Mandatory abortions for grabboids. Grind grabboid fetuses in the garbage disposal. Vaporize grabboids with tannerite. Kick grabboids down the stairs. Feed grabboids to alligators. Slice grabboids with a katana.
 
The problem I have is how they define a mass shoting remember when none whites kill eachother its gang shootings
 
Dindu nuffins don't count as people to their TPTB masters. Spics are counted as white and so they count especially when they put the negros in their place.
 
Doesn't mean you can't fight tooth and nail and preserve the right for future generations.
Agreed
Remember kill your local fudd because he enabled this shit.
New England blue blood bug hivers started and enabled this back in the end of the 1890ies. Fudds are the current generation nonblue blood middle class useful idiots. Who're also usually too poor to be an upper class fuck you, got mine gun banner owner.
 
Allow me juxtapose this against the other A&N thread where the UK are now coming for kitchen knives.
This isn't about the weapon, its about compliance & control.
 
The Washington law would block the sale, distribution, manufacture and importation of more than 50 gun models, including AR-15s, AK-47s and similar style rifles.
Wait, so they're not actually banning semi-automatic rifles as a category, just specific models? Even if you're pro-gun control what's the point of that?
 
Some gun-control legislation in other states has been struck down since last year’s landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling, which set new standards for reviewing the nation’s gun laws. The ruling says the government must justify gun control laws by showing they are “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”
So everything listed up to this point is unconstitutional and merely awaits a court case for it to be struck down. In other words, Washington democrats wasted time and tax payer dollars to pass an unenforceable and unconstitutional bill.

There should be a federal law that means any legal expenses incurred by citizens fighting these unconstitutional laws, is payed out of the pro-law politicians salaries and benefits.
 
So everything listed up to this point is unconstitutional and merely awaits a court case for it to be struck down. In other words, Washington democrats wasted time and tax payer dollars to pass an unenforceable and unconstitutional bill.

There should be a federal law that means any legal expenses incurred by citizens fighting these unconstitutional laws, is payed out of the pro-law politicians salaries and benefits.

Sounds like a good idea to me, these politicians know this is all unconstitutional but they don't care because it isn't their money being wasted to fight about it.

Personally, I feel the penalty itself is too light, maybe removal from office would be more appropriate.
 
Look police should fear disarming Americans.
They do. Because most of them are gun enthusiasts, and even the ones who aren't know they'll have to be the people walking up to every unfamiliar house to confiscate, not knowing what or who is behind every door, not knowing if they will ever see their families again. American cops don't want to confiscate guns.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo