US Single woman’s ‘genius’ tactic to avoid paying for groceries for two years - Gross pan-faced whore ‘could spend my money on other things, like savings, investing or buying a Prada bag.’

With the rising cost of living, it’s no surprise people are pulling out all stops to save money.

One single woman has been hailed a “genius” after she boasted about going on “six dates every week to avoid paying for groceries” over two years.

Vivian Tu, a former Wall Street trader from New York City, explained how she got to enjoy the perks of free dinners after she managed to line up back-to-back dates with men she met on dating apps.

As time went on, the now-28-year-old ended up saving about $A22,100 in 24 months.

“Between 2016 and 2018, I didn’t buy groceries once,” Vivian confessed in an amusing TikTok video.

“Probably saved about $US150 ($A210) a week.”
whore.jpg

Vivian Tu boasted about going on six dates every week to avoid shopping for groceries over two years. Credit: yourrichbff/TikTok
Poking fun at herself, she joked: “When they say women are bad with money but you used to go on six dates a week to avoid paying for groceries.

“If you dated me between 2016 and 2018, you may be entitled to financial compensation.”

Vivian said she met most of the men on dating apps or when she was out on weekends.

“I was a young woman living in NYC,” she said.

“Did I save money on food by going on dates in my early 20s? Yes.”

“It was a lot of work. And some of those dates were super fun, but others were painful to sit through.

‘Busy investing my money’​

“When I was dating more seriously, I’d actually do sober first dates because otherwise I wouldn’t be able to tell if I actually liked them or tequila.

“I was busy investing my money since I wasn’t spending it on food.”

The controversial video was shared on social media in July 2021.
retarded.jpg

She got to enjoy the perks of free dinners after she managed to line up back-to-back dates with the men she met on dating apps. Credit: Vivian Tu
Now one-and-a-half years later, Vivian clarified she “exaggerated” about going out “six nights a week for two years”.

As she was hoping to “find love”, she noticed her weekly spendings on food quickly changed once she started going on back-to-back dates.

“To clarify once and for all, I didn’t start going on dates just for food,” she recently told Elite Daily.

“After actively dating for a while, I knew that for a certain percentage of dates I went on, I wouldn’t be paying. Sometimes we did split the check... but most of the time they would not let me pay, and I’d get to take home the leftovers. I realised that by going on dates, I was saving about $US50 ($A70) to $US100 ($A140) per week.

Saving thousands​

“Added together over time, it amounted to thousands of dollars I did not have before - discretionary income I could spend on other things, like savings, investing, and a black Prada bag to replace my tattered Longchamp tote.”

As she was dating in her early 20s, Vivian - who was working as an equity trader earning $A135,000 at the time - said her living expenses were “very high”.

When she shared the video in 2021 about going on six days a week to avoid paying groceries, many weighed in on her financial situation.
flat.jpg

She has since made a name for herself on social media after being named in the Forbes 30 Under 30 list of 2023. Credit: yourrichbff/TikTok

“My wife did this with me in college but little did she know marrying my debt would be the ultimate Uno reverse card,” one man joked.

One woman confessed: “Baby I can’t believe someone else did this too - sometimes I’d be double booked.”

‘Work smarter, not harder’​

Many described Vivian’s amusing money-saving method as “genius” and “hero”.

“Power moves, girl power,” one said.

Another suggested: “Work smarter, not harder.”

One wrote: “You might be on to something.”

While another added: “Girl. I applaud you. The amount of bulls*** you needed to sit through to get free meals.”

Meanwhile, many women confessed they are all “guilty” of going on dates in exchange for free food.

“I definitely scheduled dates before paydays,” one said, laughing.

Another revealed: “I used to do breakfast, lunch and dinner.”

‘Can’t take a joke’​

Not everyone agreed with her tactic, with one saying: “Tell me you’re cheap without telling me you’re cheap.”

However, Vivian quickly responded: “Yikes. Some of y’all really can’t take a joke.”

Vivian started her online educational platform YourRichBFF as a passion project to share her finance secrets.

She has since made a name for herself on social media after being named in the Forbes 30 Under 30 list of 2023.
Article (Archive)
It will be this pan-faced hole's last year of being 'under 30'- birthday 1994-03-20, still registered at apartment 3D 133 Mulberry St, NY 10013
 
Última edición:
lol have money, or any other object of status, it really is not hard when you have something shallow people want to get from you or see you as a means to elevate themselves with.

Why bother fucking with people below you if you have money and status rather than just living your best life? Logic dictates that if you're such a winner you'd already have a bird and not be wasting your time owning gold diggers. Your incel fantasy doesn't pass the sniff test at all.
 
I overheard from some other girls one time. "I haven't got paid yet, I'm headed to the club, the guys will buy the drinks!" Later in my life visiting my first gay bar I found out what she meant. The guys will just buy you endless drinks while talking to you. Thank god I stumbled out to the cab when he went to the can. I would've blacked out soon.
 
Either read it or don't. I don't fucking care but do not be a faggot telling other people what to do on the internet because no one in your real life listens to you, simple as.
If you're going to use words like "dysgenic" in a badly formatted rambling wall of text, it would behove you to know the difference between "affect" and "effect".
 
It confuses me how common going for dinner seems to be as a first date. Men actually do that?

I usually just meet women in bars for a date, arrive early, buy my own drink and then let them get their own when they arrive. I might get the second drink, but if they're weird about about the first part, it's usually a pretty good indication of entitlement.

Dinner is like a 4th or 5th date thing, when you know them a little better. I'm not sitting through an entire meal with somebody that might not be able to hold a conversation.
 
This is a colossally stupid waste of time, you spend 1-2 hours talking to some random stranger you will never see again just for some free food. Food isn't even that expensive, I would rather eat lentils and do literally anything else with my time.
 
If you're going to use words like "dysgenic" in a badly formatted rambling wall of text, it would behove you to know the difference between "affect" and "effect".
you choose to nitpick like some faggot because you will never be my intellectual equivalent and it makes you feel inferior. the only kind of people who correct trivial shit on the internet are pathetic individuals who cannot cope with their own intellectual inadequacy. maybe if you just accepted your own mediocrity you wouldn't feel the need to be a smug little faggot who thinks they are so smart solely because they check their shitposts like they are submitting them to teacher first. Eat a bag of dicks you giant faggot.
 
American style “dating” is weird. Here, if a lassie went out with a guy on Saturday, and then went out with five other boys the same week, the first guy would give her a black eye, not another date. How do you get from the paying-by-the-hour stage of American dating to the long-term-rental-agreement?
American style dating is more akin to a job interview than an actual effort to find a husband/wife. That's why it's so fucked.
 
you choose to nitpick like some faggot because you will never be my intellectual equivalent and it makes you feel inferior. the only kind of people who correct trivial shit on the internet are pathetic individuals who cannot cope with their own intellectual inadequacy. maybe if you just accepted your own mediocrity you wouldn't feel the need to be a smug little faggot who thinks they are so smart solely because they check their shitposts like they are submitting them to teacher first. Eat a bag of dicks you giant faggot.

You're right, you certainly sound like someone in control of their life who definitely stands up women for jokes in the totally real world.
 
You're right, you certainly sound like someone in control of their life who definitely stands up women for jokes in the totally real world.
again I either do or I don't but the only kind of person who would bother to attempt to assert that someone else's generic anecdote posted online isn't true with such continuous voracity is a giant faggot with a massive burning inferiority complex who has never received attention from the group despite craving it so desperately in their entire pathetic life. Or are you some butthurt cunt specifically shook up by the post at hand, who just cannot cope with the fact men always were and will be smarter than women in every measurable way. If you're some stupid cunt I guess the idea a man could so easily outsmart your kind by playing on the sociopathic status seeking of most modern women with an instagram fixation is something you just cannot live with accepting. tough for you. When one person has something the other wants it is exceptionally easy to lead that other person on. Andrew fucking Tate can manipulate women the fact you think other people can't is truly a measure how pathetic you are.
 
I disagree, serially accepting food in exchange for companionship wasn't a problem, because she clearly could do it on the regular. She played the damsel perfectly to her market. Chivalry was killed by feminists who would normally discourage this sort of man-farming, because it's not independent and leaning on men.
Serially accepting resources in exchange for compansionship isn't a problem when its one man and one woman because that's what marriage is.

Feminism killed chivalry not because they wanted women to be independant, but because they have no problem with treating men as disposable stools to step on. i.e. taking advantage of chivalry.

If women lack virtue there is no reason for men to be chivalrous because virtue is what chivalry is responding to.

And this one you cannot blame on men. Women chose men, men don't chose women. Men adapt their behaviour to what women like and respond to because that's how sexual selection works in humans.

If being chivalrous just gets you stepped on and taken advantage of without increasing the quality of women you get enough to be worth it why would you continue doing it?

Its like those articles we see every other day "I'm fat, I refuse to clean, I can't cook and you can forget about sex. Now where's my seven figure a year shreded prince?"

When it comes women finding men, you get what you give, and when it comes to men finding women, you give what you get.
 
again I either do or I don't but the only kind of person who would bother to attempt to assert that someone else's generic anecdote posted online isn't true with such continuous voracity is a giant faggot with a massive burning inferiority complex who has never received attention from the group despite craving it so desperately in their entire pathetic life. Or are you some butthurt cunt specifically shook up by the post at hand, who just cannot cope with the fact men always were and will be smarter than women in every measurable way. If you're some stupid cunt I guess the idea a man could so easily outsmart your kind by playing on the sociopathic status seeking of most modern women with an instagram fixation is something you just cannot live with accepting. tough for you. When one person has something the other wants it is exceptionally easy to lead that other person on. Andrew fucking Tate can manipulate women the fact you think other people can't is truly a measure how pathetic you are.
Ok now do another one
 
Serially accepting resources in exchange for compansionship isn't a problem when its one man and one woman because that's what marriage is.

Feminism killed chivalry not because they wanted women to be independant, but because they have no problem with treating men as disposable stools to step on. i.e. taking advantage of chivalry.

If women lack virtue there is no reason for men to be chivalrous because virtue is what chivalry is responding to.

And this one you cannot blame on men. Women chose men, men don't chose women. Men adapt their behaviour to what women like and respond to because that's how sexual selection works in humans.

If being chivalrous just gets you stepped on and taken advantage of without increasing the quality of women you get enough to be worth it why would you continue doing it?

Its like those articles we see every other day "I'm fat, I refuse to clean, I can't cook and you can forget about sex. Now where's my seven figure a year shreded prince?"

When it comes women finding men, you get what you give, and when it comes to men finding women, you give what you get.
quote-when-a-man-loves-a-woman-he-has-to-become-worthy-of-her-the-higher-her-virtue-the-more-f...jpg


Basically this.

Women stop spreading your legs for shitty guys or else all you will get are shitty guys
 
Ver archivo adjunto 4395352

Basically this.

Women stop spreading your legs for shitty guys or else all you will get are shitty guys
The more virtuous and devoted to goodness she is, the less post-wedding sex the husband can expect to have. This is not a secret. Still, in life you gotta compromise one way or the other.
 
What has made men become so absolutely desperate for the attention of women? I've even seen a good number of men say they truly believe having a girlfriend takes the same amount of luck as winning millions in the lottery.
Social media and dating apps.

Even the most repulsive of women are getting attention from high quality men. If you arent jumping through hoops exactly like they want theyre off to the internet to get the validation you arent giving them.

For example I recently came into contact with what id honestly describe as a 3-3.5/10 woman. Not ugly but very much overweight and had a number of shitty tats. This woman who by all accounts should be getting little male attention was absolutely basking in it, easily a dozen+ dudes orbiting her lavishing her in attention buying her shit. Of course she had an onlyfans.

If you want to see the absolute horror show this descends into, watch this series about a guy(dude is a total lolcow today, but 2-3 years ago was clearly more sane) who went and reversed catfished dudes. Posed as a incredibly disgusting, unattractive woman(morbidly obese, multiple kids, shit personality etc.) on Tinder yet still had endless seemingly high quality men simping for this woman;

Oh shit I cant even find his little video series anymore on the internet, a shame as it was quite lulzy. But basically the guy bought Tinder gold and went go to cities all over America and show how good looking dudes would trip over themselves for what should be a worthless woman.

Heres an old gem in its place;

 
Atrás
Top Abajo