COVID Conspiracy Theorists and other idiots - This is not a political thunderdome or gay slapfight thread.

I literally don't care what you do. You should try it.
Nah, that seems impossible.

New posters may want to check your calendars. I know you felt really important being a pureblood alpha chad who resisted the lockdowns and would never take the clot shot, but society has long moved on and you need to find another obsession because literally nobody fucking cares.
 
RobSchneider.JPG


🎶🎶 Walking on sunshine 🎶🎶

"In a world where Covid is raging... Rob Schneider is a Covid skeptic making wild accusations on Twitter..."

*record scratch*

"... until the government comes after him for real!”

9bd6fc9c2a88254ba3984aa3c6e87634.jpg

"This summer...Rob Schneider is...the Unvaxxed...and he's going to find out, just how deep his beliefs run...in this hilarious, edge-of-your-seat comedy! Rob Schneider stars in Unvaxxed, coming to theaters soon. Rated R for Retard."
 
Ver archivo adjunto 4283015

🎶🎶 Walking on sunshine 🎶🎶

"In a world where Covid is raging... Rob Schneider is a Covid skeptic making wild accusations on Twitter..."

*record scratch*

"... until the government comes after him for real!”

Ver archivo adjunto 4283076

"This summer...Rob Schneider is...the Unvaxxed...and he's going to find out, just how deep his beliefs run...in this hilarious, edge-of-your-seat comedy! Rob Schneider stars in Unvaxxed, coming to theaters soon. Rated R for Retard."
Apparently it wasnt the bbc officially saying it, it was just a guest, and it was unexpected. And of course this guy blew it out of all proportion and declared it a massive success, typical of his ilk.
 
Apparently it wasnt the bbc officially saying it, it was just a guest, and it was unexpected. And of course this guy blew it out of all proportion and declared it a massive success, typical of his ilk.
Now we can't even trust Hollywood comedians like Rob Schneider to be reliable sources of information? Sigh...

My favorite thing is when conspiracy tards get pissy when you do the most basic fact check, like looking at what actually said or written and by whom. A real 'truth seeker' would be grateful to be corrected.
 
My favorite thing is when conspiracy tards get pissy when you do the most basic fact check, like looking at what actually said or written and by whom. A real 'truth seeker' would be grateful to be corrected.
There's something else I've thought of and that's that if they really were independent thinkers as they pride themselves on being, you'd expect they'd have much more diverse views, instead of pretty much having an orthodoxy of their own. Almost as if they actually aren't independent thinkers, had their own trusted media outlets they refer to, have their own experts they trust and so on.
 
Because unlike the antivax lobby they care about objectivity and can admit to mistakes?

But now it's just proving that they were right. What are the longterm implications of proving that they were right when they claimed that officials were intentionally over-counting COVID deaths?

Won't that further erode trust?
 
But now it's just proving that they were right. What are the longterm implications of proving that they were right when they claimed that officials were intentionally over-counting COVID deaths?

Won't that further erode trust?
Would you rather they just never reveal any fault and cover it up even harder than last time? I know what I'd prefer.
 
But now it's just proving that they were right. What are the longterm implications of proving that they were right when they claimed that officials were intentionally over-counting COVID deaths?

Won't that further erode trust?
This only applies if you are have zero understanding of science and how scientific discovery works. A better question would be why are there powers out there sowing seeds of distrust around our scientists and scientific processes? Part of discovery in science is admitting when you’re wrong and moving forward. It’s assholes who won’t do it (like the anti-vax autism Dr) who are only here to push an agenda.
 
Would you rather they just never reveal any fault and cover it up even harder than last time? I know what I'd prefer.

Well no, I would prefer that they never lied to begin with. There is a difference between making mistakes, and intentionally lying.

When you couple the lying here and the early lies about masks, alongwith the censoring of people who were calling it out...then you just end up proving the conspiracy theorists right.

This only applies if you are have zero understanding of science and how scientific discovery works. A better question would be why are there powers out there sowing seeds of distrust around our scientists and scientific processes? Part of discovery in science is admitting when you’re wrong and moving forward. It’s assholes who won’t do it (like the anti-vax autism Dr) who are only here to push an agenda.

Again, there is a difference between lying (which is the case here - and not the first time they lied to the public), and making an honest mistake.

Lying should never be part of science, and certainly never when it comes to public communication from our health experts. Once you ruin trust, it takes a long ass time to get it back.

This shouldn't be political. Everybody should be able to acknowledge how unacceptable this is.
 
Well no, I would prefer that they never lied to begin with. There is a difference between making mistakes, and intentionally lying.

When you couple the lying here and the early lies about masks, alongwith the censoring of people who were calling it out...then you just end up proving the conspiracy theorists right.



Again, there is a difference between lying (which is the case here - and not the first time they lied to the public), and making an honest mistake.

Lying should never be part of science, and certainly never when it comes to public communication from our health experts. Once you ruin trust, it takes a long ass time to get it back.

This shouldn't be political. Everybody should be able to acknowledge how unacceptable this is.
Again, would you rather they own up to lying, or cover it up harder than last time? I know what I would prefer.

And if I might add: your argument is predicated on them lying. Got any actual proof for that?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo