- Registrado
- 6 de Jul, 2021
📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Iniciador del tema Real Mayun
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 1 de Dic, 2020
The guy on the right was actually in a Vice News documentary about conversion therapy 7 years ago. He testified that he was tortured with electric shock in an attempt to make him turn straight (which obviously didn't work) and instead made him suicidal. I was actually pretty happy for him when he talked about being a nuclear advisor for the government back when I watched it.
I don't often feel bad for troons, but in a way, I feel bad for this guy. The conversion 'therapy' didn't work, but it did leave him an emotional wreck who turned to troondom to escape the pain he associates with being gay. Now he's just a sad, lost freak of a man.
Video if interested
- Registrado
- 16 de Nov, 2021
This line of reasoning, if I were to follow it, leads me to the conclusion that "woman" is too simplistic a term, coming from "basic biology", and we should therefore abandon it in favor of more complex definitions that still exclude trans people because they are categorically different from other members of the "woman" class they claim to belong to. Their own arguments still don't explain why we should accept the idea that "cis women" and "trans women" are identical for the sake of segregated spaces or sports.
- Registrado
- 30 de Jun, 2021
God damn, Bill Gates has really let himself go.
- Registrado
- 4 de Abr, 2021
Nothing says "we respect diverse voices and artistic expression" by canceling a black man because he said some bad things one time.
Nothing convinces normies that "trans rights are human rights" like hearing that your evening plans that you spent money on, hired a babysitter, paid for a nice dinner beforehand, maybe bought new clothes for, is canceled because trannies REEEEEEEEEEEED about hurt feefees.
This is surely the way to win friends and influence people. I just know that next year's survey on tranny support will be ten points higher than the highest they've ever been!
Idiots.
- Registrado
- 17 de Nov, 2021
He's an odd one, he is. On one hand, Sam Brinton has the experience and education for his Assistant Secretary job (really!), but I just can't see "Clearance Granted" without some strong-arming...
(Ed: I really need to quit being a lazy fantasy and scroll up before posting
️)Archivos adjuntos
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 26 de Ene, 2018
A wild AIDEN appears!
This is the Aiden:
This is the Aiden:
- Registrado
- 28 de Ago, 2019
Grumpy grandpa YouTuber is on a roll today:
- Registrado
- 30 de Jul, 2021
- Registrado
- 30 de Mar, 2021
Nice angling to hide the height, and top scars. Doesn't work though. Face is still too feminine, darling.
- Registrado
- 6 de Mar, 2018
ITT: People trying to force a round peg into a square hole
It's also crazy how NONE of these people answered the question. What they are implying is that "advanced biology" is literally "stuff we make up to justify ourselves".
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 18 de Ago, 2020
a post shared by a sad fat handmaiden had me rolling:
do they never click on the profiles to see WHO is making such a claim?
Is critical thinking transphobic? Who the fuck is tricked by this absolute Chad Chin?
to my total lack of surprise, another lantern-jawed, rage-filled transbian writing furious fantasies about terfs while getting a gender euphoria boner:
comes with his own Cow Crossover built in. Of course he likes Stacy Cay.
chilling AGP smirk on the lower left one here:
Edit to get this video to attach, he is SO creepy
"comedian"
like being told jokes while trapped in a basement pit!
Sammie James
twitter
instagram @sammiesamjames
do they never click on the profiles to see WHO is making such a claim?
Is critical thinking transphobic? Who the fuck is tricked by this absolute Chad Chin?
to my total lack of surprise, another lantern-jawed, rage-filled transbian writing furious fantasies about terfs while getting a gender euphoria boner:
comes with his own Cow Crossover built in. Of course he likes Stacy Cay.
chilling AGP smirk on the lower left one here:
Edit to get this video to attach, he is SO creepy
"comedian"
like being told jokes while trapped in a basement pit!
Sammie James
instagram @sammiesamjames
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 4 de Abr, 2021
"my form is male" makes me MATI. No. It isn't. There are so many ways that even women with zero curves like Keira Knightley differ from the male form.
A woman has thinner arms, thinner legs, different fat deposits on the abdomin, even incredibly small breasts are different from male chests. Their face is shaped differently and they tend to be much shorter than men. Even women one standard deviation from normal (5'7.5) are shorter than average men (5'8/5'9).
If someone were to stand a woman like Knightley naked next to a man her height and weight and blacked out the heads to avoid that type of identification you could still tell which one is the female!
Someone who is bisexual will naturally find both male and female forms attractive, but people who have a distinct sexual preference will not. Because the attraction is to the body as a whole, not just the specific genitals.
What people find attractive in another person is hard coded into our brains at a very young age, if not birth. I don't mean things like being a straight or a homo, but hair color, body shape, eye color, etc. Our "type".
All the REEEEEEEEEEEEING in the universe cannot change our unconscious sexual attraction desires.
- Registrado
- 15 de Nov, 2016
So...what is the correct definition of female from a BIOLOGICAL perspective then? Funny how they never get around to that part. Especially in the sense of what does and does not qualify as "female."
I know it is complete nonsense, but the way these people talk you'd think they were modern day Gnostics, with secret knowledge not to be dispensed to the eyes or ears of the unworthy/profane.
- Registrado
- 25 de Sep, 2021
"What could make gay men want to fuck my mangled, female body? Oh, I know, I'll just call them slurs. That'll get them thirst after me."
Do they really think they can shame men into sleeping with them? (I know they are certainly trying)
- Registrado
- 9 de Sep, 2021
They'll shut the physical clinics down but troons already changed the abortion landscape. Guttmacher no longer uses "pregnant women" or female specific language. It's all gender neutral.
It'll be interesting if they'll adopt karma points like Reddit or make it more like YouTube where no one gives a shit.
If a woman dressed like this or had a porn habit of,say, watching SFM or even reading fanfic, she'd be dragged across coals. She'd be judged for every fashion choice, every pose. But since male troons are male, they get away with it. Every fucking time.
Advanced biology is something these troons don't know much of. The guy played these people beautifully. He asked them which specific science supported their stance and all have vague answers.
advanced biology only gives more credence to the sex binary. No matter how hard Science Based Medicine argues otherwise, we're not crustaceans. We cannot change sex. And IIRC, even proteins are different at the base level in males and females.
- Registrado
- 6 de Abr, 2019
T is bad for women, no doubt about it. But the real reason why they have a chair and cane is more likely the same reason they are fake "brown"- they have severe personality disorders and need attention. They very much strike me as munchie lesbians- there are more matched sets of those around than you'd think.
Assuming this sociopath freak is telling the truth about anything is a big mistake.
Sexual Chocolate
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 7 de Ene, 2019
Shotgun Badger
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 21 de Dic, 2018
Yeah its the most ridiculous thing. The line of logic they are attempting to build here is that because biological sex can be pretty complex (re; its honestly not actually that complex, but we'll pretend like it is for this argument) then what distinguishes males from females is fundamentally arbitrary, in fact these categories are basically nonsensical social constructs which are completely fungible and up to the varying whims of whatever society, or even individual, interacts with them!
They never quite want to just say it, but the implication is obvious, Male and Female don't actually exist and don't have any reason to be distinguished on any level. Instead everyone is on a sliding scale of 'maleness' to 'femaleness', where for some reason we will doggedly ignore the actual things that matter when it comes to male vs female across basically every species on earth capable of sexual reproduction, that is to say gamete production. But they can't even properly use this reasoning to shore up their own ideology.
If I am presented with someone who displays just about every possible feature that clearly delineates them as a male (that is to say they are on the far end of the maleness spectrum, you know, a good 49.9999999% of the population) then, logically with this in mind, I can just call them a male regardless of their self identity, extraneous hormones and/or surgery, or the fact that they want to make dress go spinny, or at least overwhelmingly more male than female. But I know that this would still be completely unacceptable for these idiots even though I am still adhering to the completely retarded parameters they have attempted to ensure that this argument exists within. Truthfully, intersex conditions have vanishingly little relevance to the trans debate because the vast, vast majority of trans people are not intersex, and the existence of some wiggle room on the fuzzy edges of the boundaries between either sex does not invalidate the overwhelming applicability of the sex distinction to the obviously overwhelming majority of not just people, but every species capable of sexual reproduction bar those that are simultaneous hermaphrodites (and even then, it doesn't really explode the binary since its merely just the ability to produce both gametes co-existing in the same entity).
Let me give a little analogy of why this annoys me, its like running into somebody who really quizzes me on whether or not a donkey and a horse are different species. If I'm defending the position that they are different species there's some things that can be pointed towards that show a certain grey area that raises some questions, like Donkey's and Horses can reproduce and make Mules, and in a very slim number of cases some of those Mules themselves can be fertile, so I can recognize that there exists a little bit of overlap in reality that makes the boundaries a bit more fuzzy than the hardline definition of species (re: the largest group of organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction) would prefer. After we've talked about this ambiguity between horses and donkeys the other guy then stops me and says 'Aha, now that such an ambiguity has been established that means I am justified in identifying as a giant tube worm and not a human, how is it any different from the difference between a Donkey and a Horse!?'. Just the stupidest most ridiculous jump of reasoning based on extreme fixation on the fuzziness on the extreme edges of definitions like species or male and female that TRAs do all the time, and I'm being a generous with this analogy since the difference between the sexes is far more obvious and clearly defined than the difference between species.
Última edición: