Science Gene-editing experiment turns fluffy hamsters into ‘aggressive’ mutant rage monsters

Metro (Archive) - May 27, 2022
By, Jeff Parsons

1653760344637.png

A team of scientists in the US have accidentally created overly-aggressive mutant hamsters following a gene-editing experiment.

Using the controversial CRISPR technology, researchers at Northwestern University were examining a hormone called vasopressin and its receptor, Avpr1a.

They opted to try and remove the latter from a group of Syrian hamsters, with the expectation it would increase bonding and co-operation between the lovable little critters.

That’s because Avpr1a is understood to regulate things like teamwork and friendship as well as dominance and bonding.

Their expectation proved to be wrong. Very wrong.

‘We were really surprised at the results,’ said Professor H Elliot Albers, the lead researcher on the study.

‘We anticipated that if we eliminated vasopressin activity, we would reduce both aggression and social communication.

‘But the opposite happened.’

The academics found the adorable bundles of fluff turned into mutant rage monsters exhibiting ‘high levels of aggression towards other same-sex individuals’.

All hamsters, regardless of genotype or sex, exhibited aggression (including chasing, biting, and pinning) when exposed to a nonaggressive, same-sex conspecific in a neutral arena.

Professor Albert admitted the results of the experiment were a ‘startling conclusion’.

1653760368707.png
The hamsters, regardless of genotype or sex, exhibited aggression after undergoing the gene-editing experiment (Credit: PNAS)

The scientists chose to experiment with Syrian hamsters because, unlike mice, they have a social organisation that’s similar to humans.

Professor Albert explained: ‘Even though we know that vasopressin increases social behaviours by acting within a number of brain regions, it is possible that the more global effects of the Avpr1a receptor are inhibitory.

‘We don’t understand this system as well as we thought we did.’
 
They opted to try and remove the latter from a group of Syrian hamsters, with the expectation it would increase bonding and co-operation between the lovable little critters.

That’s because Avpr1a is understood to regulate things like teamwork and friendship as well as dominance and bonding.
You just defined what this receptor does, and you decide to remove it just to see what happens and then was "shocked" to discover what it does? The fuck were they expecting, antisocial hamsters sitting idly in the corner? No, they got antisocial psychotic hamsters because of the absence of having the ability to bond with other members of their kind.

Scientists can be real dumb, holy shit.
 
You just defined what this receptor does, and you decide to remove it just to see what happens and then was "shocked" to discover what it does? The fuck were they expecting, antisocial hamsters sitting idly in the corner? No, they got antisocial psychotic hamsters because of the absence of having the ability to bond with other members of their kind.

Scientists can be real dumb, holy shit.
"We took a lion embryo and removed all the DNA that has an instinctual avoidance of humans. Everyone else on the team has now been mauled to death and I don't know why."

Same energy.
 
You just defined what this receptor does, and you decide to remove it just to see what happens and then was "shocked" to discover what it does? The fuck were they expecting, antisocial hamsters sitting idly in the corner? No, they got antisocial psychotic hamsters because of the absence of having the ability to bond with other members of their kind.

Scientists can be real dumb, holy shit.
"Regulate" does not mean what you think it means here. Certain alleles of this gene are related to increased aggression whereas others are linked to increased narcissism and others still to "gentleness." So yeah, it really is kinda an open question what would happen if you removed it entirely.
 
"Regulate" does not mean what you think it means here. Certain alleles of this gene are related to increased aggression whereas others are linked to increased narcissism and others still to "gentleness." So yeah, it really is kinda an open question what would happen if you removed it entirely.
I don't know if it's an open question now. At least it was just hamsters but you know the next meeting discussed, "But what if we tried this other animal that's capable of eating people's faces?"
 
I don't know if it's an open question now. At least it was just hamsters but you know the next meeting discussed, "But what if we tried this other animal that's capable of eating people's faces?"
Well this isn't even the first time this sort of study was done. The article alludes to why they chose Syrian hamsters instead of mice. The reason that little blub was relevant was because a knockout study had already been done on mice:
The result was reduced anxiety but they lost social recognition abilities.
 
These are the same people who say that we are on the verge of replacing 'the randomness of nature' with 'intelligent design'.
 
First government used 1984 as a blue print, when it shouldn't be. Now science is using Umbrella, Black Mesa/Aperature science and Armacham Technology Corporation as blue prints. (In a dumber less reliable way) Impressive.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo