💬 Off-Topic Louis Theroux's Forbidden America

I mean gunpowder and printing weren't first invented in europe either. Inventions can come independantly of each other. Ivermectine was invented in japan. The taste umami. Lithium ion battery. The laptop. The first microprocessor. 3 D printing. CD's were a join dutch/japanese invention. Flash memory. LCD monitors. They have a pretty decent list of inventions.
Umami is just MSG tricking your taste receptors into thinking something's there that's not. They took what other people had discovered, engineering, chemistry, architecture, and they did it really painstakingly well, but they still could hardly be said to have done any of that by their own merits alone.
 
gedmatch has multiple calculators that can basically group modern ethnicities with stone age, ancient ones. here's a greek sample
Ver archivo adjunto 2994398
lol okay, but that has nothing to do with them being mutted. No one's arguing that they just went "poof" and disappeared.
group1.jpg

It's almost like there's some weird similarity between the chart you previously posted and this map, but I just can't quite put my finger on it.
 
Umami is just MSG tricking your taste receptors into thinking something's there that's not. They took what other people had discovered, engineering, chemistry, architecture, and they did it really painstakingly well, but they still could hardly be said to have done any of that by their own merits alone.
MSG is to umami what stevia is to sweetness.

Or anyone that thinks they've tasted wasabi outside of japan (or even half of the places in japan), when it's all artifical wasabi-like flavors instead. Usually horseradish. Or thinking there's any "vanilla" in your "vanilla icecream". Just ignorance about food and flavours.
 
The last couple of pages is exactly the result of "critical thinking" as it relates to critical theory. Not to seek any understanding or truth, but to constantly criticize and make understanding impossible. This autistic debate about what exactly is white is dumb as fuck.

Aristotle also said that you have to use the right level of magnification for something. That if you're speaking about large state matters that you necessarily have to speak and think in broad strokes, but if you're trying to judge someone in court, then you need close level of magnification and get the exact facts about the person.

Saying "white" is just broad strokes and nobody is really this confused about it. Critical theorists and its often unwitting adherants will happily speak about the horrible things white people have done and nobody is confused about who they're talking about. But then when people want to speak out in defense of this unrelenting attack of "dear white people" media and academia, then suddenly you hear the smug chuckles "What is white?"

It's such a dishonest conversation. And it's there to stop discussion and terminate thought.
Only dishonest person here is you. You're going on an on about strawmen. "Asking questions on an internet forum terminates thought" ah yes because it's prevented the real conversation from happening. Let's cease asking questions and just repeat "Blacks are worse than whites because they are black" that's the only thought you're capable of having. You're not proposing broad policy. You're not showing a broad understanding of anything. Hundreds of years of history are not magnified. It's as broad as you can get while still including any fucking context at all.

And I'm not using critical theory. You people are genuinely low IQ. It's just worth it to know what you repeat amongst yourselves and why. Asking questions is worth it even to confirm you don't know why you repeat the talking points you do.

The only singular thought you have is not liking Blacks. You've not based a single reply on anything other than disliking black people. Which is fine but you faggots always act like you're not just mindlessly repeating what you hear online. Then when someone asks you why, just like they did in the documentary" your chimp brain shuts off and you start repeating the same 3 talking points perpetually
 
Only dishonest person here is you. You're going on an on about strawmen. "Asking questions on an internet forum terminates thought" ah yes because it's prevented the real conversation from happening. Let's cease asking questions and just repeat "Blacks are worse than whites because they are black" that's the only thought you're capable of having. You're not proposing broad policy. You're not showing a broad understanding of anything. Hundreds of years of history are not magnified. It's as broad as you can get while still including any fucking context at all.
What is there to say? You've said that japan got treated differently because it's an island, ignoring all off the caribean islands and madagascar, ignoring the fact that the interior of africa was much less accessible than an island. You think that IQ is a meaningless concept. Your last question to me was examples of africa being treated 1:1 the same as every asian country. What can anyone do with that question? You're not even making arguments. You're barely asking questions.

But let's get back to why I call it dishonest. What is the relevance of what exactly by a hair accuracy definition of whiteness have to do with the fact that different racial groups don't co-exist very happily? Ask the hutu's and tutsi's. Ask any other group that had their land taken by the bantu. White is just a very broad concept and it's use started for the various european melting pot that happened in the US. Everyone knows it means european people and everyone knows there's edge cases.

----

In an attempt to draw the thread back on topic, here's baked, nick and beardson talking about the documentary.

Huh? Why didn't they invite venti?
:thinking:
 
Última edición:
What is there to say? You've said that japan got treated differently because it's an island, ignoring all off the caribean islands and madagascar, ignoring the fact that the interior of africa was much less accessible than an island. You think that IQ is a meaningless concept. Your last question to me was examples of africa being treated 1:1 the same as every asian country. What can anyone do with that question? You're not even making arguments. You're barely asking questions.

But let's get back to why I call it dishonest. What is the relevance of what exactly by a hair accuracy definition of whiteness have to do with the fact that different racial groups don't co-exist very happily? Ask the hutu's and tutsi's. Ask any other group that had their land taken by the bantu. White is just a very broad concept and it's use started for the various european melting pot that happened in the US. Everyone knows it means european people and everyone knows there's edge cases.

----

In an attempt to draw the thread back on topic, here's baked, nick and beardson talking about the documentary.

Huh? Why didn't they invite venti?
:thinking:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nzkPsC_TOhE
I dropped the questions about Whiteness though? Hence strawman. The point in the comparison is that maybe "hey open up or we'll invade you" and systematically fucking over multiple native groups of people, killing and enslaving millions, might be a bit different. African nations werent warned. They were just invaded. Also might make a difference. Japan was "given" time to catch up regardless of how "short" it was. Not to mention european and american nations dealing with other shit in the meantime.
 
Half the people in this thread have never even talked to a black person I bet. I did humanitarian aid in Somalia and Nigeria. There are some, a rare minority, who can escape the crab bucket but the vast majority will always be niggers.
Sad state of affairs, but it's the way it is. I guarantee most of the people seething over the idea that white people just want a place of their own are white themselves, which just really fucking pathetic.
 
I dropped the questions about Whiteness though? Hence strawman.
You said israel was the best hope whites had of having a whites only paradise, So you're either incredibly dishonest or incredibly uninformed. Take your pick. Let's talk about the documentary and the people involved.
 
MSG is to umami what stevia is to sweetness.

Or anyone that thinks they've tasted wasabi outside of japan (or even half of the places in japan), when it's all artifical wasabi-like flavors instead. Usually horseradish. Or thinking there's any "vanilla" in your "vanilla icecream". Just ignorance about food and flavours.

I've tasted wasabi outside Japan, and just potted three plants I received in the mail an hour ago.
 
You said israel was the best hope whites had of having a whites only paradise, So you're either incredibly dishonest or incredibly uninformed. Take your pick. Let's talk about the documentary and the people involved.
That was a shitpost. I thought it was obvious because Israel is obviously for Jews only, it is unironically the best hope though, unless you count failed eastern block countries which I suppose are the second best hope. The west will continue to take in nonwhite immigrants. They will continue to breed. Unless there's a sudden ban on all immigration and the expulsion of small minority populations in countries with few of them whites will not have an ethnostate within our lifetime.
 
The Louis Theroux Thread: Come for the Nick Fuentes documentary, stay for the debate on race and white culture.
 
Arabs have polygamy and whites don't.
Sorry to jump into this conversion but I happened to stumble across it. This is factually incorrect. The Mormon religion is 99.9% white and polygamy was one of the religious tenants. In fact, there's still a sect in the southern part of my state (Utah) that actively practices polygamy to this day.

While Mormons certainly consider themselves to be the "true" children of Israel, they are not ethnically Jewish:
 
Atrás
Top Abajo