Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
More accurate is what I mean. I don’t want to get into the theory, but I can assure you I’m correct.It depends what you mean by "better." Better usually means "looks nicer" but in this case it should mean "less likely to produce a misleading result."
OH NO NOT THE HECKIN SCIENCE!Judgebros...
Ver archivo adjunto 2708435
He did say the words "I don't know" several times. The judge reminded everybody of it, too.He doesn't even say "I don't know" flat out. Sometimes he starts trying to explain and then gives up and other times when giving a leading question he'll just say "yes". It came off as dishonest to me
shut up covid karenJudgebros...
Ver archivo adjunto 2708435
>Blue checkmarkJudgebros...
Ver archivo adjunto 2708435
Because they brought in the guy who just uses it. It's like bringing in an office worker who types on Word and asking them how the code in the software works so that the letters type on the document. Guy might use the software, but he's going to know jack shit about the details of why the code in the software does what it does.Fatty had a great point when he said it's the standard forensic tool, a standard procedure and peer-reviewed (assuming they can prove that)... but the thing is: The guy they asked as an expert said he didn't know where the pixels come from and that's the smoking gun here. They blew it when they got an expert witness that didn't know how his digital tools worked.
the jury is not there.Ver archivo adjunto 2708437
Did this guy saw the judge comming down as an excuse to dox the jury? where's the jury here?
Jury not in the roomVer archivo adjunto 2708437
Did this guy saw the judge comming down as an excuse to dox the jury? where's the jury here?
No, I know I'm just pointing out that he tries to start acting like what he's talking about before he says "I don't know" lolHe did say the words "I don't know" several times. The judge reminded everybody of it, too.
Somebody's gotta give photos from the trial to the press. Balliffs probably watch him like a hawk.Ver archivo adjunto 2708437
Did this guy saw the judge comming down as an excuse to dox the jury? where's the jury here?
I cant believe the judge literally said "I am anti-science"Judgebros...
Ver archivo adjunto 2708435
I think the idea is that Kyle pointed his gun at Ziminski, that caused Ziminski to confront Kyle and then everything pans out the way the defense is saying. So the instigator would be Kyle who aimed his rifle at Ziminski and not Ziminski and Pedobaum, who ambushed him.What does it change even if he pointed the gun on him? And also don't we have video with the Byecept putting HIS gun in kids direction? Shoudn't we have a trial on him instead?
Reddit is bottom of the fucking barrel retardsi hate reddit
Ver archivo adjunto 2706569
r/WitchesVsPatriarchy - The Rittenhouse Trial needs Justice
1,447 votes and 281 comments so far on Redditwww.reddit.com
![]()
The Rittenhouse Trial needs Justice : WitchesVsPatriarchy
archived 11 Nov 2021 04:57:07 UTCarchive.md