Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votos: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votos: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votos: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votos: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votos: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votos: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votos: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votos: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votos: 35 1.1%

  • Total de votantes
    3,199
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
He doesn't even say "I don't know" flat out. Sometimes he starts trying to explain and then gives up and other times when giving a leading question he'll just say "yes". It came off as dishonest to me
He did say the words "I don't know" several times. The judge reminded everybody of it, too.
 
1636666245188.png

Did this guy saw the judge comming down as an excuse to dox the jury? where's the jury here?
EDIT: disregard that i suck cocks the jury wasn't in
 
Fatty had a great point when he said it's the standard forensic tool, a standard procedure and peer-reviewed (assuming they can prove that)... but the thing is: The guy they asked as an expert said he didn't know where the pixels come from and that's the smoking gun here. They blew it when they got an expert witness that didn't know how his digital tools worked.
Because they brought in the guy who just uses it. It's like bringing in an office worker who types on Word and asking them how the code in the software works so that the letters type on the document. Guy might use the software, but he's going to know jack shit about the details of why the code in the software does what it does.

And the reality is, it does alter the picture, and as usual, prosecution is fighting against the evidence.
 
He's allowing it, but given the difficulty that the judge had to see it... so long as agent 47 is the one to cross, it'll be fine given its so god damned small.
 
What does it change even if he pointed the gun on him? And also don't we have video with the Byecept putting HIS gun in kids direction? Shoudn't we have a trial on him instead?
I think the idea is that Kyle pointed his gun at Ziminski, that caused Ziminski to confront Kyle and then everything pans out the way the defense is saying. So the instigator would be Kyle who aimed his rifle at Ziminski and not Ziminski and Pedobaum, who ambushed him.

Now Binger and Baldy start with some bullshit about High School enrollment, the hell is this crap?
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo