Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votos: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votos: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votos: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votos: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votos: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votos: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votos: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votos: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votos: 35 1.1%

  • Total de votantes
    3,199
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
This judge might be a technologically illiterate boomer, but he can see through bullshit, and he can boil arguments down to their base elements. And that is exactly what he is doing here. End of the day, they have the burden of proof to convince him its right, and having a guy sit there going "i don't know, I can't answer that", isn't going to convince anyone.
 
MAGNIFYING GLASS IS OUT
Capture.PNG
 
I disagree because the square pixels of the display are also artifact-producing. There is a reasonable argument to be made that displaying a blown-up video with bicubic interpolation is no more disingenuous than displaying a small image on a TV, and is certainly better than nearest-neighbor for real-life video content.
It depends what you mean by "better." Better usually means "looks nicer" but in this case it should mean "less likely to produce a misleading result."
 
Fatty had a great point when he said it's the standard forensic tool, a standard procedure and peer-reviewed (assuming they can prove that)... but the thing is: The guy they asked as an expert said he didn't know where the pixels come from and that's the smoking gun here. They blew it when they got an expert witness that didn't know how his digital tools worked.
 
what fatass isn't realizing is that even tho the software is accredited doesn't mean he's using it correctly.. furthermore who the fuck just clicks stuff and doesn't know how they're manipulating something especially if you're using it in a court of law where everything is scrutinized
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo