- Registrado
- 1 de Abr, 2019
Basically what I'm getting from this is that they're wanting to use some sketchy ass image enhancement program and the defense doesn't want them to since they have no idea how it's going to alter the photos.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
If the algorithm speculates, then my client skates.If they interpolate
You must exonerate.
It was just another job.Agent 47 just committed a murder.
I disagree because the square pixels of the display are also artifact-producing. There is a reasonable argument to be made that displaying a blown-up video with bicubic interpolation is no more disingenuous than displaying a small image on a TV, and is certainly better than nearest-neighbor for real-life video content.
Kinda feel bad for the guy. Binger dragged him in to cover his lying ass about stuff being "common knowledge".It's literally not his job. His job would be to make something bigger, and then they'd use that for leads on things like "who this might be" and "identifying possible suspects". Not "Testify about the program he uses".
Better than TeeVeeFake experts, witness intimidation, attorney misconduct? This trial has everything!
Target practice.
Yeah I'm not sure why this mattersThis is so stupid.