Congress mandates new car technology to stop drunken driving

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema ddw
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
https://apnews.com/article/coronavi...iness-health-068ee87392b0cca1444053b854a514dd (someone else archive)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Congress has created a new requirement for automakers: Find a high-tech way to keep drunken people from driving cars.

It’s one of the mandates along with a burst of new spending aimed at improving auto safety amid escalating road fatalities in the $1 trillion infrastructure package that President Joe Biden is expected to sign soon.

Under the legislation, monitoring systems to stop intoxicated drivers would roll out in all new vehicles as early as 2026, after the Transportation Department assesses the best form of technology to install in millions of vehicles and automakers are given time to comply.

In all, about $17 billion is allotted to road safety programs, the biggest increase in such funding in decades, according to the Eno Center for Transportation. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg says that could mean more protected bike paths and greener spaces built into busy roadways.

“It’s monumental,” said Alex Otte, national president of Mothers Against Drunk Driving. Otte called the package the “single most important legislation” in the group’s history that marks “the beginning of the end of drunk driving.”

“It will virtually eliminate the No. 1 killer on America’s roads,” she said.

Last month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported an estimated 20,160 people died in traffic collisions in the first half of 2021, the highest first-half total since 2006. The agency has pointed to speeding, impaired driving and not wearing seatbelts during the coronavirus pandemic as factors behind the spike.

Each year, around 10,000 people are killed due to alcohol-related crashes in the U.S., making up nearly 30% of all traffic fatalities, according to NHTSA.

Currently, some convicted drunken drivers must use breathalyzer devices attached to an ignition interlock, blowing into a tube and disabling the vehicle if their blood alcohol level is too high. The legislation doesn’t specify the technology, only that it must “passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired.”

Sam Abuelsamid, principal mobility analyst for Guidehouse Insights, said the most likely system to prevent drunken driving is infrared cameras that monitor driver behavior. That technology is already being installed by automakers such as General Motors, BMW and Nissan to track driver attentiveness while using partially automated driver-assist systems.

The cameras make sure a driver is watching the road, and they look for signs of drowsiness, loss of consciousness or impairment.

If signs are spotted, the cars will warn the driver, and if the behavior persists, the car would turn on its hazard lights, slow down and pull to the side of the road.

Abuelsamid said breathalyzers aren’t a practical solution because many people would object to being forced to blow into a tube every time they get into the car. “I don’t think it’s going to go over very well with a lot of people,” he said.

The voluminous bill also requires automakers to install rear-seat reminders to alert parents if a child is left inadvertently in the back seat, a mandate that could begin by 2025 after NHTSA completes its rulemaking on the issue. Since 1990, about 1,000 children have died from vehicular heatstroke after the highest total in a single year was 54 in 2018, according to Kidsandcars.org.

Congress, meanwhile, directed the agency to update decades-old safety standards to avert deaths from collapsing front seatbacks and issue a rule requiring automatic emergency braking and lane departure warnings in all passenger vehicles, though no date was set for compliance.

Most automakers had already agreed to make automatic emergency braking standard equipment in most of their models by September of next year, as part of a voluntary plan announced near the end of the Obama administration.

Buttigieg, promoting the legislation’s benefits Monday at a White House briefing, said he had traveled the country in recent months and seen too many roadside memorials for people who had died in preventable traffic deaths.

He pointed to a new $5 billion “Safe Streets & Roads for All” program under his department that will in part promote healthier streets for cyclists and pedestrians. The federal program, which he acknowledged may take several months to set up, would support cities’ campaigns to end traffic fatalities with a “Vision Zero” effort that could build traffic roundabouts to slow cars, carve out new bike paths and widen sidewalks and even reduce some roads to shift commuters toward public transit or other modes of transportation.

The legislation requires at least 15% of a state’s highway safety improvement program funds to address pedestrians, bicyclists and other nonmotorized road users if those groups make up 15% or more of the state’s crash fatalities.

“The best way to allow people to move in ways that are better for congestion and better for climate is to give them alternatives,” Buttigieg said. Describing much of it as a longer-term effort, he said, “this is how we do right by the next generation.”

Still, safety advocates worry that the bipartisan bill missed opportunities to address more forcefully an emerging U.S. crisis of road fatalities and urged the Transportation Department to deliver on immediate solutions.

They have called on a sometimes slow-moving NHTSA to address a backlog of traffic safety regulations ordered by Congress nearly a decade ago, such as mandatory rear seat belt reminders.

“Prompt action must be taken on comprehensive, commonsense and confirmed solutions to steer our nation toward zero crash fatalities,” said Cathy Chase, president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety. “Proven solutions are at hand; it’s time to take action.”

The department said Tuesday it will release a “safe system approach” to road safety in January that identifies safety action for drivers, roads, vehicles, speeds and post-crash medical care, stressing a need to move deliberately to ensure “sustained” improvements.

“These aren’t just numbers; these are family, friends, coworkers, neighbors and fellow Americans — and tragically and disproportionately, Black, brown and Native American,” said Deputy Transportation Secretary Polly Trottenberg. “It’s not acceptable the level of deaths that we’re seeing on American highways right now.”
 
They are to lazy to deal with the societal issues so they try and patch over them with technical solutions.

People get multiple DWI's and they never get their license taken away. Ive known people who have gotten them and they get a work permit. Then get DWI with the work permit and nothing happens. Just more fines and court dates.

They also love mandating this crap like back up cameras, stability control, etc because it drives up the prices of cars. They want the poors out of their cars and in to mass transit so the beautiful people don't have to sit in traffic.
 
I read the article and I am telling you it's a load of shit. An annoying chime is one thing but fucking cameras? Auto pilot that takes you off the road? Facial recognition to tell when you are getting tired or are too drunk? And yeah cars made before 2026 absolutely matter because how many people own a current year car? Most people go for the cheaper older models anyway.
Yes, all of those technologies already exist in one form or another.

And yeah, cars made before 2026 will still be on the road then, but by 2040 they won't be by and large.

Like it or not, the overlords have decided that this will be the future of driving in the USA. You can either buy and maintain an older vehicle, or suffer the consequences of constant in-vehicle surveillance. And to be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if the government just outright bans older cars under the guise of "not meeting current emissions standards" or some equally bullshit excuse.
 
People get multiple DWI's and they never get their license taken away.
It's supposed to be how close you get them and whether or not you've paid the fines. But
They want the poors out of their cars and in to mass transit so the beautiful people don't have to sit in traffic.
Mass transit only gets you so far and it only works if it gets you out of the city. But everyone ignores this because of environmentalism.
And to be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if the government just outright bans older cars under the guise of "not meeting current emissions standards" or some equally bullshit excuse.
It's been that way ever since they started the emission standards.
 
Allow me to tell you about the emissions test. It's an annual test where your car has to be taken to an auto shop and checked to ensure the pollutants it produces meet or are below government standards. If you don't pass an emissions test, you can't drive your car until the problem is fixed (at your expense.)
Allow me to tell you about niggers and spics.
In my state you can not renew your registration until your back car taxes are paid.
And a few years ago you they made it so you can not renew your registration unless your emissions was up to date. The bi-annual test costs money.
If you got pulled over with expired tags they would impound your car.

Guess what happened? Niggers and spics don't pay their taxes on time and don't believe in paying to get their car's emissions tested. And they where getting their cars impounded at an alarming rate. Some cities are now rolling with 20+ % of the cars with some sort of registration compliance issue. State troopers used to park at off ramps and with automatic plate readers and snag cars all day. That was very racist!
So now as long as you can show some sort of proof of insurance your good. Just another ticket they wont pay and they are sent on their way. Registration is now optional. There is no way they can tell you you "can't drive your car" until something is fixed.
 
Última edición:
I’ve been predicting for years that they will eventually mandate gps tracking limitations that will prevent your car from going over the speed limit. This is just one step closer. Total bullshit.
 
Modern cars are prime examples of nanny state bullshit. With limited exceptions, today's vehicles are feminized shapeless blobs that ping and ding at you constantly and try to preempt you from actually having to drive. If you drive a crossover, you are a giant cuck, pure and simple.

If you've got the space, older cars are increasingly great investments if you have a minimum amount of know how. Just look at what has happened with John Deere tractors - everyone wants the old shit because you can actually fix them, unlike the new ones that are all computer based and require you to take them in so you can pay out the ass.

Even if you never learned how to work on cars, it's all there on YouTube for pretty much anything can imagine. It also is not that hard to get a hang of, most Americans have had a white trash neighbor who is always adding more mods to their crusty old Mustang. If your car is a manual it is not only much easier to fix, but also mostly unstealable in 2021 which is another plus.
 
Bars and restaurants are going to shit themselves over this. Most people drink to get drunk or at least buzzed and 0.08 is not as drunk as you think it is. Nobody is going to want to go out anymore if your car isn't going to start after having a couple of drinks.

And yes, maybe instead of punishing literally everyone for the actions of a few, we could start actually punishing people for DWIs. Right now it's a joke that we let people get to their fifth DWI when they finally kill someone.
 
Última edición:
When will beveraged drivers like Ralph catch a break?
 
Not really a joke, the statistic is that the drunk will get away with it about six times before they get caught. It's hard to find though because search engine results are salted by lawyers looking for new dewey clients.

Huh, I searched it and the CDC statistic is that they'll get away with it EIGHTY FUCKING TIMES before officer friendly decides enough is enough, as of 2011.
 
I'd rather every car have a breathalyzer than this creepy intrusive shit. Neither is ideal but the former is much more reasonable than the latter and would actually stop drunk people from being able to even start the vehicle.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo