Well David, it's because if the business model isn't successful then it will most likely result in those developers and franchises you love so much getting shitcanned while Spencer, Bond etc. continue to stick around like parasites. You know, as we've literally just seen.
Imagine thinking Microsoft (or any company) even bothers to read the replies to these "social media engagement" posts, much less take to heart anything that's said. Still nice to see people lighting them up though.
Imagine thinking that Microsoft (or any company) is even making these posts themselves without using an A.I. to generate engagement.
Unless it's a remote gig, it's a nonstarter. Moving to one of the most expensive locales in the US to work for a company actively shedding workforce is a retard move.
Listen, maybe she's just using that transparent screen Ben Affleck invented in Paycheck. Or they've set up this gurl boss to "program computers" and turned the screen around so she can't do any damage (she doesn't seem to have noticed yet anyway).
Depends on comp.
the only time i'll agree with him on something
Phil says that good games aren't going to save Xbox. Do you doubt Phil?
the series s is whats holding xbox back from having any full potential. a simple series x or s mode in games would probably help things but idk if xbox allows that to be an option in the games published on the platform.
Because Microsoft are fucking retards and none of the studios know what the fuck is going on.
because those games are "finished products", to patch in another account system you'd not only have to migrate everything on the backend (easier said than done), you'd also have to update all those games - for very little gain. sometimes the original studio doesn't even exist anymore.
All the new hardware has given us is uglier games with dev times reaching 10 years+ per game.
