Wuhan Coronavirus / COVID-19 Thread 2: Booster Shot - Resume all Corona sperging here.

Read the text ...
I was testing loads of times
Understood but how often? To know for sure testing would have to be like every week? And it’s likely that many people don’t develop any symptoms whatsoever- documented early on. Not saying you’re wrong just that it’s pretty hard to know for sure.

You'd have to be the biggest loser to stick to your guns like that on something like this, see them tear away everything from you for it, then accept them when they come back with a "sorry, we promise to not do it again" and rejoin. And if they tried to force it for folks who've drummed out with all the papers, the lawyers would feast for years off the results of those cases.

At the rate things are going, I wouldn't be surprised to see reports of units no longer being combat capable due to the gutting of their rank and file. Grunts ain't gonna go anywhere, but good luck keeping that mechanized unit mechanized when all the army trained mechanics took their discharge and fucked off to work in the civilian sector for twice the pay.

Yeah I bet. The main selling point of the military is that you can retire relatively young and get education benefits, maybe some reenlistment bonuses. Qualified people are only willing to put up with so much crap before they just say fuck it I’m out of here.

It seems Youtube is cranking up the covid related censorship to sell another winter of disease and death. Some autist made a video about the transition of Dr. Campbell and it got taken down for wrongthink after it went viral (300k view), even though there is nothing sensational in it.


tl;dw nothing new for people who've been following him, first 2 minutes may worth watching for keks though
Campbell originally thought that the vaxx was good but has slowly changed his pov because he is an honest man. Absolutely nothing sensational about him, in fact he is kind of boring tbh
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Every day

Good luck with the infection, you'll probably do fine like most people.

RE the passing out. At my work in the past month or 2, we have had 2 people, that I know of, pass out randomly and have had the EMTs come. Place had a vax mandate, so most people are vaxxed. I also had a co-worker tell me they had heart issues immediately after the first vax. The damage of this is only starting I fear. Every day I am glad I was able to get a religious exemption based on what the people here shared.

I got the bare minimum vax because I had to, to fly visit my Dad. My Sister and Father are both vaxxmaxxed and it scares the shit out of me. But they'll NEVER listen to me if I bring it up.

I've never had COVID or even a head cold this whole time, and all I do is drink and smoke.
 
Mark my words. All this stuff with graphene and nanotubes is going to end up becoming the next asbestos. They're all excited about the material properties of nanomaterials and carbon allotropes now, because of course they are. Asbestos is also an excellent material with splendid fireproofing properties. But when small particles find their way into people's bodies and the immune system goes on the attack, they're going to realize the enormity of their mistake.
 
Mark my words. All this stuff with graphene and nanotubes is going to end up becoming the next asbestos. They're all excited about the material properties of nanomaterials and carbon allotropes now, because of course they are. Asbestos is also an excellent material with splendid fireproofing properties. But when small particles find their way into people's bodies and the immune system goes on the attack, they're going to realize the enormity of their mistake.
That's already been identified as a huge risk for graphene commercialization. Problem is, graphene is just such a damn useful material for so many purposes that it would be hard not to use it in practically everything.

Do you have proof graphene damages the immune system by any chance? I'd be amazed if there isn't some risk that it's like asbestos or any sort of microparticles inhaled over time, but perhaps it's no "worse" than microplastics which aren't as obviously lethal as long-term asbestos exposure.
 
Understood but how often? To know for sure testing would have to be like every week? And it’s likely that many people don’t develop any symptoms whatsoever- documented early on. Not saying you’re wrong just that it’s pretty hard to know for sure.
Had get tested like every 2 fucking weeks. And because of that it was costing me 50 bucks a month because my cheap ass employer having issues with finding test
 
That's already been identified as a huge risk for graphene commercialization. Problem is, graphene is just such a damn useful material for so many purposes that it would be hard not to use it in practically everything.

Do you have proof graphene damages the immune system by any chance? I'd be amazed if there isn't some risk that it's like asbestos or any sort of microparticles inhaled over time, but perhaps it's no "worse" than microplastics which aren't as obviously lethal as long-term asbestos exposure.
Just from a quick google of "graphene asbetos", to see who's drawing those comparisons:






Along with the application and production of GFNs increasing, the risk of unintentional occupational or environmental exposure to GFNs is increasing [26]. And recently, there are some investigation on GFNs exposure in occupational settings and published data showed that the occupational exposure of GFNs had potential toxicity to the workers and researchers [2729]. GFNs can be delivered into bodies by intratracheal instillation [30], oral administration [31], intravenous injection [32], intraperitoneal injection [33] and subcutaneous injection [34]. GFNs can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by penetrating through the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier, and blood-placenta barrier etc. and accumulating in the lung, liver, and spleen etc. For example, some graphene nanomaterials aerosols can be inhaled and substantial deposition in the respiratory tract, and they can easily penetrate through the tracheobronchial airways and then transit down to the lower lung airways, resulting in the subsequent formation of granulomas, lung fibrosis and adverse health effects to exposed persons [2, 29]. Several reviews have outlined the unique properties [35, 36] and summarized the latest potential biological applications of GFNs for drug delivery, gene delivery, biosensors, tissue engineering, and neurosurgery [3739]; assessed the biocompatibility of GFNs in cells (bacterial, mammalian and plant) [7, 40, 41] and animals (mice and zebrafish) [42]; collected information on the influence of GFNs in the soil and water environments [43]. Although these reviews discussed the related safety profiles and nanotoxicology of GFNs, the specific conclusions and detailed mechanisms of toxicity were insufficient, and the mechanisms of toxicity were not summarized completely. The toxicological mechanisms of GFNs demonstrated in recent studies mainly contain inflammatory response, DNA damage, apoptosis, autophagy and necrosis etc., and those mechanisms can be collected to further explore the complex signalling pathways network regulating the toxicity of GFNs. It needs to point out that there are several factors which largely influence the toxicity of GFNs, such as the concentration, lateral dimension, surface structure and functionalization etc. Herein, this review presents a comprehensive summary of the available information on the mechanisms and regulating factors of GFNs toxicity in vitro and in vivo via different experimental methods, with the goals of providing suggestions for further studies of GFNs and completing the toxicology mechanisms to improve the biological safety of GFNs and facilitate their wide application.

Yeah, that's not good.
 
No Tylenol. It depletes glutathione and increases oxidative stress.
Interesting didn't know this.
1676394951106.png

"Impaired endogenous antioxidant defences"
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15878691/
 
Been waiting to use this for the entire month
FoQdZSmXwAE5LcH.jpg 1676431985121.png

So Aaron Siri made a post today where he describes how the CDC cherry-picked V-Safe evidence for the vax safety. In short, they only concerned themselves with effects that happened within the first week after getting the vaccine, rather than the entirety of the data. This data was then used to bolster their false claims that the vaccine was safe due to their reported 0.8% negative incidence rate. As we know, it may take months for vaccine side effects to show themselves, as we see with athletes (obviously in peak health) getting downed by heart attacks and strokes at unprecedented levels. Please also note that the data stops at 42 days (6 weeks) post-vaccination.

Edit: fixed link
 
Última edición:
Been waiting to use this for the entire month
Ver archivo adjunto 4535534Ver archivo adjunto 4535646

So Aaron Siri made a post today where he describes how the CDC cherry-picked V-Safe evidence for the vax safety. In short, they only concerned themselves with effects that happened within the first week after getting the vaccine, rather than the entirety of the data. This data was then used to bolster their false claims that the vaccine was safe due to their reported 0.8% negative incidence rate. As we know, it may take months for vaccine side effects to show themselves, as we see with athletes (obviously in peak health) getting downed by heart attacks and strokes at unprecedented levels. Please also note that the data stops at 42 days (6 weeks) post-vaccination.
Stops at 42 days,... I have the feeling there's more than meet the eye after 42 days.
 
Interesting didn't know this.
Ver archivo adjunto 4529929
"Impaired endogenous antioxidant defences"
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15878691/
Cells protect themselves from radicals by using enzymes to break them down. Those enzymes are the selenoproteins, such as glutathione peroxidase and thioredoxin reductase.



Those enzymes require "fuel" to work, such as glutathione.


When the substrate runs out, the enzyme stops doing its job and the radicals (in this case, hydrogen peroxide and lipid hydroperoxides) start building up. Most of the time, people don’t really need “antioxidants” in their diet because their cells already balance oxidation and reduction reactions on their own, with their own redox enzymes, provided those cells are not starved of the proper nutrients to run those enzymatic reactions. People are eating energy-rich, nutrient-poor diets that are full of carbohydrates with very little in the way of varied vitamin, mineral, and protein content. That’s a problem, and it’s really bad for people’s blood vessels. It leads to endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis.

COVID-19 occasionally triggers such severe oxidative stress (in the context of viral sepsis), the afflicted cells run out of glutathione and undergo oxidation-driven cell death, like ferroptosis. Tylenol also saps glutathione. By instructing people with mild COVID-19 to take Tylenol and go home, they were signing people’s death warrants.


There are some who actually blame Tylenol for autism, because it depletes glutathione in the brain and causes oxidative damage to developing neurons.


 


Healthy 25 year old athlete saves a goal on the field only to collapse dead a few seconds later after celebrating said save.
Perfectly normal folks!

Seems like it's happening with enough regularity that the normies are starting to worry about all those jabs they took.
It certainly feels like we're in a new chapter of this story entitled 'Fuck around and find out."

My sympathies go out to the poor kid.
 
Stops at 42 days,... I have the feeling there's more than meet the eye after 42 days.
The 6-week limit seems exceptionally arbitrary. I suppose internal pressure (V-SAFE is ran and managed by the CDC) forced or influenced the short duration of the study, especially when it the percent of people seeking medical care post-injection steadily ticks upwards as time passes. Apparently, there's check-ins at 3, 6, and 12 months after the final dose of vaccine according to the CDC on their own website. However, I do not see any data any of those months as of now. Part of me thinks the longer intervals between check ins makes it less likely for people to remember that X symptom happened on Y date and correlate it with the vaccine instead of any other recent injuries they might have had.

Also unsurprisingly, the WHO abandons plans to investigate the origin of Covid-19, as reported yesterday.
 
More from Splotchy


She looks like she has a feed bag over her mouth.
 
More from Splotchy
b.mp4
a.mp4
She looks like she has a feed bag over her mouth.
Yeah just like the horses but on the other hand, it could also be a kind of barf bag when she might puke suddenly.

Btw, as for why we don't wear masks anymore, because first, they really didn't work and secondly, look at all these dirty and contaminated masks dropped everywhere like cigarette butts! It's more polluting than climate change.
 
Última edición:
New John Campbell. Let's see how long this one stays up:


Archived version:


 
Atrás
Top Abajo