Would you press the Red Button or Blue Button?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Would you press the Red Button or Blue Button?

  • Blue

    Votos: 23 17.3%
  • Red

    Votos: 110 82.7%

  • Total de votantes
    133
Where can I press the button that kills everyone who asks this retarded engagement bait question? It's just a worse trolley problem.
 
Everyone is gathered at a new facility, do you:
Option A: Chimp out and wreck the place.
Option B: Not act like a nigger.


If more than 50% of people choose to chimp out, the cops decide they'd rather stay in the station and eat donuts.
If less than 50% of people chimp out, all those that did get arrested.
 
This is more interesting than OP's question where there's no downside to the red button. Is it only all of the future pain or pain you've already experienced included? Only physical or both emotional and physical?
Its actually not more interesting because 55% of virtue signalling retards on twitter are picking blue for some reason
 
Reminder that for blue to win both India and China would also need to hit blue en masse.

Red is literally the only logical answer, why would anyone not pick red? If everyone picks red then the end-result is the exact same as most people picking blue, and the only one with a downside is blue lmao
 
I had to do this as an exercise once. The "correct" answer is everyone should vote blue so everyone survives. But I still vote red.
 
When I was first introduced to this I thought it was a way of representing the American elections and what the one asking thinks the elections will result in.
Something something, blue is democrats and red is republicans and how the republicans will kill all the democrats or something.

Perhaps I'm just reading too much into it.
Overall, I dislike the question.


As for my vote, I chose blue to be a contrarian. :P
 
there seems to be something fundamentally wrong with blue voters brains
they cant comprehend everyone can just vote red
I have not read their comments, but maybe an assumption is that some of the other people will vote blue, and so they are condemned to die if red wins, so for the same reason that "everyone can vote red", then "everyone can vote blue" and avoid accidental casualties.

So they'll balance towards blue to save those others (who also voted blue without knowing or thinking much). Essentially, "you should be altruistic, because if eveyone is, then everyone is saved", if you are not, then "you are selfish and potentially condemning others".

Of course this is just in theory, if the time were to come, actions would speak louder than words.
 
Red is the objective best choice.

Worst case: you lose a friend or two. Best case: the world is cleansed from baby boomers. The rich already plans to cull the population anyway, it'll be fine.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo